38 |
|
\begin{doublespace} |
39 |
|
|
40 |
|
\begin{abstract} |
41 |
< |
|
41 |
> |
We present a new method for introducing stable non-equilibrium |
42 |
> |
velocity and temperature distributions in molecular dynamics |
43 |
> |
simulations of heterogeneous systems. This method extends some |
44 |
> |
earlier Reverse Non-Equilibrium Molecular Dynamics (RNEMD) methods |
45 |
> |
which use momentum exchange swapping moves that can create |
46 |
> |
non-thermal velocity distributions (and which are difficult to use |
47 |
> |
for interfacial calculations). By using non-isotropic velocity |
48 |
> |
scaling (NIVS) on the molecules in specific regions of a system, it |
49 |
> |
is possible to impose momentum or thermal flux between regions of a |
50 |
> |
simulation and stable thermal and momentum gradients can then be |
51 |
> |
established. The scaling method we have developed conserves the |
52 |
> |
total linear momentum and total energy of the system. To test the |
53 |
> |
methods, we have computed the thermal conductivity of model liquid |
54 |
> |
and solid systems as well as the interfacial thermal conductivity of |
55 |
> |
a metal-water interface. We find that the NIVS-RNEMD improves the |
56 |
> |
problematic velocity distributions that develop in other RNEMD |
57 |
> |
methods. |
58 |
|
\end{abstract} |
59 |
|
|
60 |
|
\newpage |
65 |
|
% BODY OF TEXT |
66 |
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
67 |
|
|
52 |
– |
|
53 |
– |
|
68 |
|
\section{Introduction} |
69 |
|
The original formulation of Reverse Non-equilibrium Molecular Dynamics |
70 |
|
(RNEMD) obtains transport coefficients (thermal conductivity and shear |
71 |
|
viscosity) in a fluid by imposing an artificial momentum flux between |
72 |
|
two thin parallel slabs of material that are spatially separated in |
73 |
< |
the simulation cell.\cite{MullerPlathe:1997xw,Muller-Plathe:1999ek} The |
74 |
< |
artificial flux is typically created by periodically "swapping" either |
75 |
< |
the entire momentum vector $\vec{p}$ or single components of this |
76 |
< |
vector ($p_x$) between molecules in each of the two slabs. If the two |
77 |
< |
slabs are separated along the z coordinate, the imposed flux is either |
78 |
< |
directional ($J_z(p_x)$) or isotropic ($J_z$), and the response of a |
79 |
< |
simulated system to the imposed momentum flux will typically be a |
80 |
< |
velocity or thermal gradient. The transport coefficients (shear |
81 |
< |
viscosity and thermal conductivity) are easily obtained by assuming |
82 |
< |
linear response of the system, |
73 |
> |
the simulation cell.\cite{MullerPlathe:1997xw,ISI:000080382700030} The |
74 |
> |
artificial flux is typically created by periodically ``swapping'' |
75 |
> |
either the entire momentum vector $\vec{p}$ or single components of |
76 |
> |
this vector ($p_x$) between molecules in each of the two slabs. If |
77 |
> |
the two slabs are separated along the $z$ coordinate, the imposed flux |
78 |
> |
is either directional ($j_z(p_x)$) or isotropic ($J_z$), and the |
79 |
> |
response of a simulated system to the imposed momentum flux will |
80 |
> |
typically be a velocity or thermal gradient (Fig. \ref{thermalDemo}). |
81 |
> |
The shear viscosity ($\eta$) and thermal conductivity ($\lambda$) are |
82 |
> |
easily obtained by assuming linear response of the system, |
83 |
|
\begin{eqnarray} |
84 |
< |
J_z(p_x) & = & -\eta \frac{\partial v_x}{\partial z}\\ |
85 |
< |
J & = & \lambda \frac{\partial T}{\partial z} |
84 |
> |
j_z(p_x) & = & -\eta \frac{\partial v_x}{\partial z}\\ |
85 |
> |
J_z & = & \lambda \frac{\partial T}{\partial z} |
86 |
|
\end{eqnarray} |
87 |
|
RNEMD has been widely used to provide computational estimates of thermal |
88 |
|
conductivities and shear viscosities in a wide range of materials, |
89 |
|
from liquid copper to monatomic liquids to molecular fluids |
90 |
< |
(e.g. ionic liquids).\cite{ISI:000246190100032} |
90 |
> |
(e.g. ionic liquids).\cite{Bedrov:2000-1,Bedrov:2000,Muller-Plathe:2002,ISI:000184808400018,ISI:000231042800044,Maginn:2007,Muller-Plathe:2008,ISI:000258460400020,ISI:000258840700015,ISI:000261835100054} |
91 |
|
|
92 |
< |
RNEMD is preferable in many ways to the forward NEMD methods because |
93 |
< |
it imposes what is typically difficult to measure (a flux or stress) |
94 |
< |
and it is typically much easier to compute momentum gradients or |
95 |
< |
strains (the response). For similar reasons, RNEMD is also preferable |
96 |
< |
to slowly-converging equilibrium methods for measuring thermal |
97 |
< |
conductivity and shear viscosity (using Green-Kubo relations or the |
98 |
< |
Helfand moment approach of Viscardy {\it et |
92 |
> |
\begin{figure} |
93 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{thermalDemo} |
94 |
> |
\caption{RNEMD methods impose an unphysical transfer of momentum or |
95 |
> |
kinetic energy between a ``hot'' slab and a ``cold'' slab in the |
96 |
> |
simulation box. The molecular system responds to this imposed flux |
97 |
> |
by generating a momentum or temperature gradient. The slope of the |
98 |
> |
gradient can then be used to compute transport properties (e.g. |
99 |
> |
shear viscosity and thermal conductivity).} |
100 |
> |
\label{thermalDemo} |
101 |
> |
\end{figure} |
102 |
> |
|
103 |
> |
RNEMD is preferable in many ways to the forward NEMD methods |
104 |
> |
\cite{ISI:A1988Q205300014} because it imposes what is typically |
105 |
> |
difficult to measure (a flux or stress) and it is typically much |
106 |
> |
easier to compute momentum gradients or strains (the response). For |
107 |
> |
similar reasons, RNEMD is also preferable to slowly-converging |
108 |
> |
equilibrium methods for measuring thermal conductivity and shear |
109 |
> |
viscosity (using Green-Kubo relations [CITATIONS NEEDED] |
110 |
> |
or the Helfand moment approach of Viscardy {\it et |
111 |
|
al.}\cite{Viscardy:2007bh,Viscardy:2007lq}) because these rely on |
112 |
|
computing difficult to measure quantities. |
113 |
|
|
117 |
|
typically samples from the same manifold of states in the |
118 |
|
microcanonical ensemble. |
119 |
|
|
120 |
< |
Recently, Tenney and Maginn have discovered some problems with the |
121 |
< |
original RNEMD swap technique. Notably, large momentum fluxes |
122 |
< |
(equivalent to frequent momentum swaps between the slabs) can result |
123 |
< |
in "notched", "peaked" and generally non-thermal momentum |
124 |
< |
distributions in the two slabs, as well as non-linear thermal and |
125 |
< |
velocity distributions along the direction of the imposed flux ($z$). |
126 |
< |
Tenney and Maginn obtained reasonable limits on imposed flux and |
127 |
< |
self-adjusting metrics for retaining the usability of the method. |
120 |
> |
Recently, Tenney and Maginn\cite{Maginn:2010} have discovered |
121 |
> |
some problems with the original RNEMD swap technique. Notably, large |
122 |
> |
momentum fluxes (equivalent to frequent momentum swaps between the |
123 |
> |
slabs) can result in ``notched'', ``peaked'' and generally non-thermal |
124 |
> |
momentum distributions in the two slabs, as well as non-linear thermal |
125 |
> |
and velocity distributions along the direction of the imposed flux |
126 |
> |
($z$). Tenney and Maginn obtained reasonable limits on imposed flux |
127 |
> |
and self-adjusting metrics for retaining the usability of the method. |
128 |
|
|
129 |
|
In this paper, we develop and test a method for non-isotropic velocity |
130 |
|
scaling (NIVS-RNEMD) which retains the desirable features of RNEMD |
131 |
|
(conservation of linear momentum and total energy, compatibility with |
132 |
|
periodic boundary conditions) while establishing true thermal |
133 |
|
distributions in each of the two slabs. In the next section, we |
134 |
< |
develop the method for determining the scaling constraints. We then |
134 |
> |
present the method for determining the scaling constraints. We then |
135 |
|
test the method on both single component, multi-component, and |
136 |
|
non-isotropic mixtures and show that it is capable of providing |
137 |
|
reasonable estimates of the thermal conductivity and shear viscosity |
138 |
|
in these cases. |
139 |
|
|
140 |
|
\section{Methodology} |
141 |
< |
We retain the basic idea of Muller-Plathe's RNEMD method; the periodic |
142 |
< |
system is partitioned into a series of thin slabs along a particular |
141 |
> |
We retain the basic idea of M\"{u}ller-Plathe's RNEMD method; the |
142 |
> |
periodic system is partitioned into a series of thin slabs along one |
143 |
|
axis ($z$). One of the slabs at the end of the periodic box is |
144 |
|
designated the ``hot'' slab, while the slab in the center of the box |
145 |
|
is designated the ``cold'' slab. The artificial momentum flux will be |
147 |
|
hot slab. |
148 |
|
|
149 |
|
Rather than using momentum swaps, we use a series of velocity scaling |
150 |
< |
moves. For molecules $\{i\}$ located within the cold slab, |
150 |
> |
moves. For molecules $\{i\}$ located within the cold slab, |
151 |
|
\begin{equation} |
152 |
< |
\vec{v}_i \leftarrow \left( \begin{array}{c} |
153 |
< |
x \\ |
154 |
< |
y \\ |
155 |
< |
z \\ |
152 |
> |
\vec{v}_i \leftarrow \left( \begin{array}{ccc} |
153 |
> |
x & 0 & 0 \\ |
154 |
> |
0 & y & 0 \\ |
155 |
> |
0 & 0 & z \\ |
156 |
|
\end{array} \right) \cdot \vec{v}_i |
157 |
|
\end{equation} |
158 |
|
where ${x, y, z}$ are a set of 3 scaling variables for each of the |
159 |
|
three directions in the system. Likewise, the molecules $\{j\}$ |
160 |
|
located in the hot slab will see a concomitant scaling of velocities, |
161 |
|
\begin{equation} |
162 |
< |
\vec{v}_j \leftarrow \left( \begin{array}{c} |
163 |
< |
x^\prime \\ |
164 |
< |
y^\prime \\ |
165 |
< |
z^\prime \\ |
162 |
> |
\vec{v}_j \leftarrow \left( \begin{array}{ccc} |
163 |
> |
x^\prime & 0 & 0 \\ |
164 |
> |
0 & y^\prime & 0 \\ |
165 |
> |
0 & 0 & z^\prime \\ |
166 |
|
\end{array} \right) \cdot \vec{v}_j |
167 |
|
\end{equation} |
168 |
|
|
169 |
|
Conservation of linear momentum in each of the three directions |
170 |
< |
($\alpha = x,y,z$) ties the values of the hot and cold bin scaling |
170 |
> |
($\alpha = x,y,z$) ties the values of the hot and cold scaling |
171 |
|
parameters together: |
172 |
|
\begin{equation} |
173 |
|
P_h^\alpha + P_c^\alpha = \alpha^\prime P_h^\alpha + \alpha P_c^\alpha |
174 |
|
\end{equation} |
175 |
|
where |
176 |
< |
\begin{equation} |
151 |
< |
\begin{array}{rcl} |
176 |
> |
\begin{eqnarray} |
177 |
|
P_c^\alpha & = & \sum_{i = 1}^{N_c} m_i \left[\vec{v}_i\right]_\alpha \\ |
178 |
< |
P_h^\alpha & = & \sum_{j = 1}^{N_h} m_j \left[\vec{v}_j\right]_\alpha \\ |
154 |
< |
\end{array} |
178 |
> |
P_h^\alpha & = & \sum_{j = 1}^{N_h} m_j \left[\vec{v}_j\right]_\alpha |
179 |
|
\label{eq:momentumdef} |
180 |
< |
\end{equation} |
180 |
> |
\end{eqnarray} |
181 |
|
Therefore, for each of the three directions, the hot scaling |
182 |
|
parameters are a simple function of the cold scaling parameters and |
183 |
|
the instantaneous linear momentum in each of the two slabs. |
194 |
|
Conservation of total energy also places constraints on the scaling: |
195 |
|
\begin{equation} |
196 |
|
\sum_{\alpha = x,y,z} K_h^\alpha + K_c^\alpha = \sum_{\alpha = x,y,z} |
197 |
< |
\left(\alpha^\prime\right)^2 K_h^\alpha + \alpha^2 K_c^\alpha. |
197 |
> |
\left(\alpha^\prime\right)^2 K_h^\alpha + \alpha^2 K_c^\alpha |
198 |
|
\end{equation} |
199 |
< |
where the kinetic energies, $K_h^\alpha$ and $K_c^\alpha$, are computed |
200 |
< |
for each of the three directions in a similar manner to the linear momenta |
201 |
< |
(Eq. \ref{eq:momentumdef}). Substituting in the expressions for the |
202 |
< |
hot scaling parameters ($\alpha^\prime$) from Eq. (\ref{eq:hotcoldscaling}), |
203 |
< |
we obtain the {\it constraint ellipsoid equation}: |
199 |
> |
where the translational kinetic energies, $K_h^\alpha$ and |
200 |
> |
$K_c^\alpha$, are computed for each of the three directions in a |
201 |
> |
similar manner to the linear momenta (Eq. \ref{eq:momentumdef}). |
202 |
> |
Substituting in the expressions for the hot scaling parameters |
203 |
> |
($\alpha^\prime$) from Eq. (\ref{eq:hotcoldscaling}), we obtain the |
204 |
> |
{\it constraint ellipsoid}: |
205 |
|
\begin{equation} |
206 |
< |
\sum_{\alpha = x,y,z} a_\alpha \alpha^2 + b_\alpha \alpha + c_\alpha = 0, |
206 |
> |
\sum_{\alpha = x,y,z} a_\alpha \alpha^2 + b_\alpha \alpha + c_\alpha = 0 |
207 |
|
\label{eq:constraintEllipsoid} |
208 |
|
\end{equation} |
209 |
|
where the constants are obtained from the instantaneous values of the |
210 |
|
linear momenta and kinetic energies for the hot and cold slabs, |
211 |
< |
\begin{equation} |
187 |
< |
\begin{array}{rcl} |
211 |
> |
\begin{eqnarray} |
212 |
|
a_\alpha & = &\left(K_c^\alpha + K_h^\alpha |
213 |
|
\left(p_\alpha\right)^2\right) \\ |
214 |
|
b_\alpha & = & -2 K_h^\alpha p_\alpha \left( 1 + p_\alpha\right) \\ |
215 |
< |
c_\alpha & = & K_h^\alpha p_\alpha^2 + 2 K_h^\alpha p_\alpha - K_c^\alpha \\ |
192 |
< |
\end{array} |
215 |
> |
c_\alpha & = & K_h^\alpha p_\alpha^2 + 2 K_h^\alpha p_\alpha - K_c^\alpha |
216 |
|
\label{eq:constraintEllipsoidConsts} |
217 |
< |
\end{equation} |
218 |
< |
This ellipsoid equation defines the set of cold slab scaling |
219 |
< |
parameters which can be applied while preserving both linear momentum |
220 |
< |
in all three directions as well as kinetic energy. |
217 |
> |
\end{eqnarray} |
218 |
> |
This ellipsoid (Eq. \ref{eq:constraintEllipsoid}) defines the set of |
219 |
> |
cold slab scaling parameters which can be applied while preserving |
220 |
> |
both linear momentum in all three directions as well as total kinetic |
221 |
> |
energy. |
222 |
|
|
223 |
|
The goal of using velocity scaling variables is to transfer linear |
224 |
|
momentum or kinetic energy from the cold slab to the hot slab. If the |
225 |
|
hot and cold slabs are separated along the z-axis, the energy flux is |
226 |
|
given simply by the decrease in kinetic energy of the cold bin: |
227 |
|
\begin{equation} |
228 |
< |
(1-x^2) K_c^x + (1-y^2) K_c^y + (1-z^2) K_c^z = J_z |
228 |
> |
(1-x^2) K_c^x + (1-y^2) K_c^y + (1-z^2) K_c^z = J_z\Delta t |
229 |
|
\end{equation} |
230 |
|
The expression for the energy flux can be re-written as another |
231 |
|
ellipsoid centered on $(x,y,z) = 0$: |
232 |
|
\begin{equation} |
233 |
< |
x^2 K_c^x + y^2 K_c^y + z^2 K_c^z = (K_c^x + K_c^y + K_c^z - J_z) |
233 |
> |
x^2 K_c^x + y^2 K_c^y + z^2 K_c^z = K_c^x + K_c^y + K_c^z - J_z\Delta t |
234 |
|
\label{eq:fluxEllipsoid} |
235 |
|
\end{equation} |
236 |
< |
The spatial extent of the {\it flux ellipsoid equation} is governed |
237 |
< |
both by a targetted value, $J_z$ as well as the instantaneous values of the |
238 |
< |
kinetic energy components in the cold bin. |
236 |
> |
The spatial extent of the {\it thermal flux ellipsoid} is governed |
237 |
> |
both by a targetted value, $J_z$ as well as the instantaneous values |
238 |
> |
of the kinetic energy components in the cold bin. |
239 |
|
|
240 |
|
To satisfy an energetic flux as well as the conservation constraints, |
241 |
< |
it is sufficient to determine the points ${x,y,z}$ which lie on both |
242 |
< |
the constraint ellipsoid (Eq. \ref{eq:constraintEllipsoid}) and the |
243 |
< |
flux ellipsoid (Eq. \ref{eq:fluxEllipsoid}), i.e. the intersection of |
244 |
< |
the two ellipsoids in 3-dimensional space. |
241 |
> |
we must determine the points ${x,y,z}$ which lie on both the |
242 |
> |
constraint ellipsoid (Eq. \ref{eq:constraintEllipsoid}) and the flux |
243 |
> |
ellipsoid (Eq. \ref{eq:fluxEllipsoid}), i.e. the intersection of the |
244 |
> |
two ellipsoids in 3-dimensional space. |
245 |
|
|
246 |
< |
One may also define momentum flux (say along the x-direction) as: |
246 |
> |
\begin{figure} |
247 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ellipsoids} |
248 |
> |
\caption{Scaling points which maintain both constant energy and |
249 |
> |
constant linear momentum of the system lie on the surface of the |
250 |
> |
{\it constraint ellipsoid} while points which generate the target |
251 |
> |
momentum flux lie on the surface of the {\it flux ellipsoid}. The |
252 |
> |
velocity distributions in the cold bin are scaled by only those |
253 |
> |
points which lie on both ellipsoids.} |
254 |
> |
\label{ellipsoids} |
255 |
> |
\end{figure} |
256 |
> |
|
257 |
> |
One may also define {\it momentum} flux (say along the $x$-direction) as: |
258 |
|
\begin{equation} |
259 |
< |
(1-x) P_c^x = j_z(p_x) |
259 |
> |
(1-x) P_c^x = j_z(p_x)\Delta t |
260 |
> |
\label{eq:fluxPlane} |
261 |
|
\end{equation} |
262 |
+ |
The above {\it momentum flux plane} is perpendicular to the $x$-axis, |
263 |
+ |
with its position governed both by a target value, $j_z(p_x)$ as well |
264 |
+ |
as the instantaneous value of the momentum along the $x$-direction. |
265 |
|
|
266 |
+ |
In order to satisfy a momentum flux as well as the conservation |
267 |
+ |
constraints, we must determine the points ${x,y,z}$ which lie on both |
268 |
+ |
the constraint ellipsoid (Eq. \ref{eq:constraintEllipsoid}) and the |
269 |
+ |
flux plane (Eq. \ref{eq:fluxPlane}), i.e. the intersection of an |
270 |
+ |
ellipsoid and a plane in 3-dimensional space. |
271 |
|
|
272 |
+ |
In both the momentum and energy flux scenarios, valid scaling |
273 |
+ |
parameters are arrived at by solving geometric intersection problems |
274 |
+ |
in $x, y, z$ space in order to obtain cold slab scaling parameters. |
275 |
+ |
Once the scaling variables for the cold slab are known, the hot slab |
276 |
+ |
scaling has also been determined. |
277 |
|
|
278 |
|
|
279 |
+ |
The following problem will be choosing an optimal set of scaling |
280 |
+ |
variables among the possible sets. Although this method is inherently |
281 |
+ |
non-isotropic, the goal is still to maintain the system as isotropic |
282 |
+ |
as possible. Under this consideration, one would like the kinetic |
283 |
+ |
energies in different directions could become as close as each other |
284 |
+ |
after each scaling. Simultaneously, one would also like each scaling |
285 |
+ |
as gentle as possible, i.e. ${x,y,z \rightarrow 1}$, in order to avoid |
286 |
+ |
large perturbation to the system. Therefore, one approach to obtain |
287 |
+ |
the scaling variables would be constructing an criteria function, with |
288 |
+ |
constraints as above equation sets, and solving the function's minimum |
289 |
+ |
by method like Lagrange multipliers. |
290 |
|
|
291 |
+ |
In order to save computation time, we have a different approach to a |
292 |
+ |
relatively good set of scaling variables with much less calculation |
293 |
+ |
than above. Here is the detail of our simplification of the problem. |
294 |
+ |
|
295 |
+ |
In the case of kinetic energy transfer, we impose another constraint |
296 |
+ |
${x = y}$, into the equation sets. Consequently, there are two |
297 |
+ |
variables left. And now one only needs to solve a set of two {\it |
298 |
+ |
ellipses equations}. This problem would be transformed into solving |
299 |
+ |
one quartic equation for one of the two variables. There are known |
300 |
+ |
generic methods that solve real roots of quartic equations. Then one |
301 |
+ |
can determine the other variable and obtain sets of scaling |
302 |
+ |
variables. Among these sets, one can apply the above criteria to |
303 |
+ |
choose the best set, while much faster with only a few sets to choose. |
304 |
+ |
|
305 |
+ |
In the case of momentum flux transfer, we impose another constraint to |
306 |
+ |
set the kinetic energy transfer as zero. In another word, we apply |
307 |
+ |
Eq. \ref{eq:fluxEllipsoid} and let ${J_z = 0}$. After that, with one |
308 |
+ |
variable fixed by Eq. \ref{eq:fluxPlane}, one now have a similar set |
309 |
+ |
of equations on the above kinetic energy transfer problem. Therefore, |
310 |
+ |
an approach similar to the above would be sufficient for this as well. |
311 |
+ |
|
312 |
+ |
\section{Computational Details} |
313 |
+ |
\subsection{Lennard-Jones Fluid} |
314 |
+ |
Our simulation consists of a series of systems. All of these |
315 |
+ |
simulations were run with the OpenMD simulation software |
316 |
+ |
package\cite{Meineke:2005gd} integrated with RNEMD codes. |
317 |
+ |
|
318 |
+ |
A Lennard-Jones fluid system was built and tested first. In order to |
319 |
+ |
compare our method with swapping RNEMD, a series of simulations were |
320 |
+ |
performed to calculate the shear viscosity and thermal conductivity of |
321 |
+ |
argon. 2592 atoms were in a orthorhombic cell, which was ${10.06\sigma |
322 |
+ |
\times 10.06\sigma \times 30.18\sigma}$ by size. The reduced density |
323 |
+ |
${\rho^* = \rho\sigma^3}$ was thus 0.85, which enabled direct |
324 |
+ |
comparison between our results and others. These simulations used |
325 |
+ |
velocity Verlet algorithm with reduced timestep ${\tau^* = |
326 |
+ |
4.6\times10^{-4}}$. |
327 |
+ |
|
328 |
+ |
For shear viscosity calculation, the reduced temperature was ${T^* = |
329 |
+ |
k_B T/\varepsilon = 0.72}$. Simulations were first equilibrated in canonical |
330 |
+ |
ensemble (NVT), then equilibrated in microcanonical ensemble |
331 |
+ |
(NVE). Establishing and stablizing momentum gradient were followed |
332 |
+ |
also in NVE ensemble. For the swapping part, Muller-Plathe's algorithm was |
333 |
+ |
adopted.\cite{ISI:000080382700030} The simulation box was under |
334 |
+ |
periodic boundary condition, and devided into ${N = 20}$ slabs. In each swap, |
335 |
+ |
the top slab ${(n = 1)}$ exchange the most negative $x$ momentum with the |
336 |
+ |
most positive $x$ momentum in the center slab ${(n = N/2 + 1)}$. Referred |
337 |
+ |
to Tenney {\it et al.}\cite{ISI:000273472300004}, a series of swapping |
338 |
+ |
frequency were chosen. According to each result from swapping |
339 |
+ |
RNEMD, scaling RNEMD simulations were run with the target momentum |
340 |
+ |
flux set to produce a similar momentum flux, and consequently shear |
341 |
+ |
rate. Furthermore, various scaling frequencies can be tested for one |
342 |
+ |
single swapping rate. To test the temperature homogeneity in our |
343 |
+ |
system of swapping and scaling methods, temperatures of different |
344 |
+ |
dimensions in all the slabs were observed. Most of the simulations |
345 |
+ |
include $10^5$ steps of equilibration without imposing momentum flux, |
346 |
+ |
$10^5$ steps of stablization with imposing unphysical momentum |
347 |
+ |
transfer, and $10^6$ steps of data collection under RNEMD. For |
348 |
+ |
relatively high momentum flux simulations, ${5\times10^5}$ step data |
349 |
+ |
collection is sufficient. For some low momentum flux simulations, |
350 |
+ |
${2\times10^6}$ steps were necessary. |
351 |
+ |
|
352 |
+ |
After each simulation, the shear viscosity was calculated in reduced |
353 |
+ |
unit. The momentum flux was calculated with total unphysical |
354 |
+ |
transferred momentum ${P_x}$ and data collection time $t$: |
355 |
+ |
\begin{equation} |
356 |
+ |
j_z(p_x) = \frac{P_x}{2 t L_x L_y} |
357 |
+ |
\end{equation} |
358 |
+ |
where $L_x$ and $L_y$ denotes $x$ and $y$ lengths of the simulation |
359 |
+ |
box, and physical momentum transfer occurs in two ways due to our |
360 |
+ |
periodic boundary condition settings. And the velocity gradient |
361 |
+ |
${\langle \partial v_x /\partial z \rangle}$ can be obtained by a |
362 |
+ |
linear regression of the velocity profile. From the shear viscosity |
363 |
+ |
$\eta$ calculated with the above parameters, one can further convert |
364 |
+ |
it into reduced unit ${\eta^* = \eta \sigma^2 (\varepsilon m)^{-1/2}}$. |
365 |
+ |
|
366 |
+ |
For thermal conductivity calculations, simulations were first run under |
367 |
+ |
reduced temperature ${\langle T^*\rangle = 0.72}$ in NVE |
368 |
+ |
ensemble. Muller-Plathe's algorithm was adopted in the swapping |
369 |
+ |
method. Under identical simulation box parameters with our shear |
370 |
+ |
viscosity calculations, in each swap, the top slab exchanges all three |
371 |
+ |
translational momentum components of the molecule with least kinetic |
372 |
+ |
energy with the same components of the molecule in the center slab |
373 |
+ |
with most kinetic energy, unless this ``coldest'' molecule in the |
374 |
+ |
``hot'' slab is still ``hotter'' than the ``hottest'' molecule in the |
375 |
+ |
``cold'' slab. According to swapping RNEMD results, target energy flux |
376 |
+ |
for scaling RNEMD simulations can be set. Also, various scaling |
377 |
+ |
frequencies can be tested for one target energy flux. To compare the |
378 |
+ |
performance between swapping and scaling method, distributions of |
379 |
+ |
velocity and speed in different slabs were observed. |
380 |
+ |
|
381 |
+ |
For each swapping rate, thermal conductivity was calculated in reduced |
382 |
+ |
unit. The energy flux was calculated similarly to the momentum flux, |
383 |
+ |
with total unphysical transferred energy ${E_{total}}$ and data collection |
384 |
+ |
time $t$: |
385 |
+ |
\begin{equation} |
386 |
+ |
J_z = \frac{E_{total}}{2 t L_x L_y} |
387 |
+ |
\end{equation} |
388 |
+ |
And the temperature gradient ${\langle\partial T/\partial z\rangle}$ |
389 |
+ |
can be obtained by a linear regression of the temperature |
390 |
+ |
profile. From the thermal conductivity $\lambda$ calculated, one can |
391 |
+ |
further convert it into reduced unit ${\lambda^*=\lambda \sigma^2 |
392 |
+ |
m^{1/2} k_B^{-1}\varepsilon^{-1/2}}$. |
393 |
+ |
|
394 |
+ |
\subsection{ Water / Metal Thermal Conductivity} |
395 |
+ |
Another series of our simulation is the calculation of interfacial |
396 |
+ |
thermal conductivity of a Au/H$_2$O system. Respective calculations of |
397 |
+ |
liquid water (Extended Simple Point Charge model) and crystal gold |
398 |
+ |
thermal conductivity were performed and compared with current results |
399 |
+ |
to ensure the validity of NIVS-RNEMD. After that, a mixture system was |
400 |
+ |
simulated. |
401 |
+ |
|
402 |
+ |
For thermal conductivity calculation of bulk water, a simulation box |
403 |
+ |
consisting of 1000 molecules were first equilibrated under ambient |
404 |
+ |
pressure and temperature conditions using NPT ensemble, followed by |
405 |
+ |
equilibration in fixed volume (NVT). The system was then equilibrated in |
406 |
+ |
microcanonical ensemble (NVE). Also in NVE ensemble, establishing a |
407 |
+ |
stable thermal gradient was followed. The simulation box was under |
408 |
+ |
periodic boundary condition and devided into 10 slabs. Data collection |
409 |
+ |
process was similar to Lennard-Jones fluid system. |
410 |
+ |
|
411 |
+ |
Thermal conductivity calculation of bulk crystal gold used a similar |
412 |
+ |
protocol. Two types of force field parameters, Embedded Atom Method |
413 |
+ |
(EAM) and Quantum Sutten-Chen (QSC) force field were used |
414 |
+ |
respectively. The face-centered cubic crystal simulation box consists of |
415 |
+ |
2880 Au atoms. The lattice was first allowed volume change to relax |
416 |
+ |
under ambient temperature and pressure. Equilibrations in canonical and |
417 |
+ |
microcanonical ensemble were followed in order. With the simulation |
418 |
+ |
lattice devided evenly into 10 slabs, different thermal gradients were |
419 |
+ |
established by applying a set of target thermal transfer flux. Data of |
420 |
+ |
the series of thermal gradients was collected for calculation. |
421 |
+ |
|
422 |
+ |
After simulations of bulk water and crystal gold, a mixture system was |
423 |
+ |
constructed, consisting of 1188 Au atoms and 1862 H$_2$O |
424 |
+ |
molecules. Spohr potential was adopted in depicting the interaction |
425 |
+ |
between metal atom and water molecule.\cite{ISI:000167766600035} A |
426 |
+ |
similar protocol of equilibration was followed. Several thermal |
427 |
+ |
gradients was built under different target thermal flux. It was found |
428 |
+ |
out that compared to our previous simulation systems, the two phases |
429 |
+ |
could have large temperature difference even under a relatively low |
430 |
+ |
thermal flux. Therefore, under our low flux conditions, it is assumed |
431 |
+ |
that the metal and water phases have respectively homogeneous |
432 |
+ |
temperature, excluding the surface regions. In calculating the |
433 |
+ |
interfacial thermal conductivity $G$, this assumptioin was applied and |
434 |
+ |
thus our formula becomes: |
435 |
+ |
|
436 |
+ |
\begin{equation} |
437 |
+ |
G = \frac{E_{total}}{2 t L_x L_y \left( \langle T_{gold}\rangle - |
438 |
+ |
\langle T_{water}\rangle \right)} |
439 |
+ |
\label{interfaceCalc} |
440 |
+ |
\end{equation} |
441 |
+ |
where ${E_{total}}$ is the imposed unphysical kinetic energy transfer |
442 |
+ |
and ${\langle T_{gold}\rangle}$ and ${\langle T_{water}\rangle}$ are the |
443 |
+ |
average observed temperature of gold and water phases respectively. |
444 |
+ |
|
445 |
+ |
\section{Results And Discussions} |
446 |
+ |
\subsection{Thermal Conductivity} |
447 |
+ |
\subsubsection{Lennard-Jones Fluid} |
448 |
+ |
Our thermal conductivity calculations show that scaling method results |
449 |
+ |
agree with swapping method. Four different exchange intervals were |
450 |
+ |
tested (Table \ref{thermalLJRes}) using swapping method. With a fixed |
451 |
+ |
10fs exchange interval, target exchange kinetic energy was set to |
452 |
+ |
produce equivalent kinetic energy flux as in swapping method. And |
453 |
+ |
similar thermal gradients were observed with similar thermal flux in |
454 |
+ |
two simulation methods (Figure \ref{thermalGrad}). |
455 |
+ |
|
456 |
+ |
\begin{table*} |
457 |
+ |
\begin{minipage}{\linewidth} |
458 |
+ |
\begin{center} |
459 |
+ |
|
460 |
+ |
\caption{Calculation results for thermal conductivity of Lennard-Jones |
461 |
+ |
fluid at ${\langle T^* \rangle = 0.72}$ and ${\rho^* = 0.85}$, with |
462 |
+ |
swap and scale methods at various kinetic energy exchange rates. Results |
463 |
+ |
in reduced unit. Errors of calculations in parentheses.} |
464 |
+ |
|
465 |
+ |
\begin{tabular}{ccc} |
466 |
+ |
\hline |
467 |
+ |
(Equilvalent) Exchange Interval (fs) & $\lambda^*_{swap}$ & |
468 |
+ |
$\lambda^*_{scale}$\\ |
469 |
+ |
\hline |
470 |
+ |
250 & 7.03(0.34) & 7.30(0.10)\\ |
471 |
+ |
500 & 7.03(0.14) & 6.95(0.09)\\ |
472 |
+ |
1000 & 6.91(0.42) & 7.19(0.07)\\ |
473 |
+ |
2000 & 7.52(0.15) & 7.19(0.28)\\ |
474 |
+ |
\hline |
475 |
+ |
\end{tabular} |
476 |
+ |
\label{thermalLJRes} |
477 |
+ |
\end{center} |
478 |
+ |
\end{minipage} |
479 |
+ |
\end{table*} |
480 |
+ |
|
481 |
+ |
\begin{figure} |
482 |
+ |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{thermalGrad} |
483 |
+ |
\caption{NIVS-RNEMD method introduced similar temperature gradients |
484 |
+ |
compared to ``swapping'' method under various kinetic energy flux in |
485 |
+ |
thermal conductivity simulations.} |
486 |
+ |
\label{thermalGrad} |
487 |
+ |
\end{figure} |
488 |
+ |
|
489 |
+ |
During these simulations, molecule velocities were recorded in 1000 of |
490 |
+ |
all the snapshots of one single data collection process. These |
491 |
+ |
velocity data were used to produce histograms of velocity and speed |
492 |
+ |
distribution in different slabs. From these histograms, it is observed |
493 |
+ |
that under relatively high unphysical kinetic energy flux, speed and |
494 |
+ |
velocity distribution of molecules in slabs where swapping occured |
495 |
+ |
could deviate from Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution. Figure |
496 |
+ |
\ref{thermalHist} a) illustrates how these distributions deviate from an |
497 |
+ |
ideal distribution. In high temperature slab, probability density in |
498 |
+ |
low speed is confidently smaller than ideal curve fit; in low |
499 |
+ |
temperature slab, probability density in high speed is smaller than |
500 |
+ |
ideal, while larger than ideal in low speed. This phenomenon is more |
501 |
+ |
obvious in our high swapping rate simulations. And this deviation |
502 |
+ |
could also leads to deviation of distribution of velocity in various |
503 |
+ |
dimensions. One feature of these deviated distribution is that in high |
504 |
+ |
temperature slab, the ideal Gaussian peak was changed into a |
505 |
+ |
relatively flat plateau; while in low temperature slab, that peak |
506 |
+ |
appears sharper. This problem is rooted in the mechanism of the |
507 |
+ |
swapping method. Continually depleting low (high) speed particles in |
508 |
+ |
the high (low) temperature slab could not be complemented by |
509 |
+ |
diffusions of low (high) speed particles from neighbor slabs, unless |
510 |
+ |
in suffciently low swapping rate. Simutaneously, surplus low speed |
511 |
+ |
particles in the low temperature slab do not have sufficient time to |
512 |
+ |
diffuse to neighbor slabs. However, thermal exchange rate should reach |
513 |
+ |
a minimum level to produce an observable thermal gradient under noise |
514 |
+ |
interference. Consequently, swapping RNEMD has a relatively narrow |
515 |
+ |
choice of swapping rate to satisfy these above restrictions. |
516 |
+ |
|
517 |
+ |
Comparatively, NIVS-RNEMD has a speed distribution closer to the ideal |
518 |
+ |
curve fit (Figure \ref{thermalHist} b). Essentially, after scaling, a |
519 |
+ |
Gaussian distribution function would remain Gaussian. Although a |
520 |
+ |
single scaling is non-isotropic in all three dimensions, our scaling |
521 |
+ |
coefficient criteria could help maintian the scaling region as |
522 |
+ |
isotropic as possible. On the other hand, scaling coefficients are |
523 |
+ |
preferred to be as close to 1 as possible, which also helps minimize |
524 |
+ |
the difference among different dimensions. This is possible if scaling |
525 |
+ |
interval and one-time thermal transfer energy are well |
526 |
+ |
chosen. Consequently, NIVS-RNEMD is able to impose an unphysical |
527 |
+ |
thermal flux as the previous RNEMD method without large perturbation |
528 |
+ |
to the distribution of velocity and speed in the exchange regions. |
529 |
+ |
|
530 |
+ |
\begin{figure} |
531 |
+ |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{thermalHist} |
532 |
+ |
\caption{Speed distribution for thermal conductivity using a) |
533 |
+ |
``swapping'' and b) NIVS- RNEMD methods. Shown is from the |
534 |
+ |
simulations with an exchange or equilvalent exchange interval of 250 |
535 |
+ |
fs.} |
536 |
+ |
\label{thermalHist} |
537 |
+ |
\end{figure} |
538 |
+ |
|
539 |
+ |
\subsubsection{SPC/E Water} |
540 |
+ |
Our results of SPC/E water thermal conductivity are comparable to |
541 |
+ |
Bedrov {\it et al.}\cite{ISI:000090151400044}, which employed the |
542 |
+ |
previous swapping RNEMD method for their calculation. Bedrov {\it et |
543 |
+ |
al.}\cite{ISI:000090151400044} argued that exchange of the molecule |
544 |
+ |
center-of-mass velocities instead of single atom velocities in a |
545 |
+ |
molecule conserves the total kinetic energy and linear momentum. This |
546 |
+ |
principle is adopted in our simulations. Scaling is applied to the |
547 |
+ |
velocities of the rigid bodies of SPC/E model water molecules, instead |
548 |
+ |
of each hydrogen and oxygen atoms in relevant water molecules. As |
549 |
+ |
shown in Figure \ref{spceGrad}, temperature gradients were established |
550 |
+ |
similar to their system. However, the average temperature of our |
551 |
+ |
system is 300K, while theirs is 318K, which would be attributed for |
552 |
+ |
part of the difference between the final calculation results (Table |
553 |
+ |
\ref{spceThermal}). Both methods yields values in agreement with |
554 |
+ |
experiment. And this shows the applicability of our method to |
555 |
+ |
multi-atom molecular system. |
556 |
+ |
|
557 |
+ |
\begin{figure} |
558 |
+ |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{spceGrad} |
559 |
+ |
\caption{Temperature gradients for SPC/E water thermal conductivity.} |
560 |
+ |
\label{spceGrad} |
561 |
+ |
\end{figure} |
562 |
+ |
|
563 |
+ |
\begin{table*} |
564 |
+ |
\begin{minipage}{\linewidth} |
565 |
+ |
\begin{center} |
566 |
+ |
|
567 |
+ |
\caption{Calculation results for thermal conductivity of SPC/E water |
568 |
+ |
at ${\langle T\rangle}$ = 300K at various thermal exchange rates. Errors of |
569 |
+ |
calculations in parentheses. } |
570 |
+ |
|
571 |
+ |
\begin{tabular}{cccc} |
572 |
+ |
\hline |
573 |
+ |
$\langle dT/dz\rangle$(K/\AA) & & $\lambda$(W/m/K) & \\ |
574 |
+ |
& This work & Previous simulations\cite{ISI:000090151400044} & |
575 |
+ |
Experiment$^a$\\ |
576 |
+ |
\hline |
577 |
+ |
0.38 & 0.816(0.044) & & 0.64\\ |
578 |
+ |
0.81 & 0.770(0.008) & 0.784\\ |
579 |
+ |
1.54 & 0.813(0.007) & 0.730\\ |
580 |
+ |
\hline |
581 |
+ |
\end{tabular} |
582 |
+ |
\label{spceThermal} |
583 |
+ |
\end{center} |
584 |
+ |
\end{minipage} |
585 |
+ |
\end{table*} |
586 |
+ |
|
587 |
+ |
\subsubsection{Crystal Gold} |
588 |
+ |
Our results of gold thermal conductivity using two force fields are |
589 |
+ |
shown separately in Table \ref{qscThermal} and \ref{eamThermal}. In |
590 |
+ |
these calculations,the end and middle slabs were excluded in thermal |
591 |
+ |
gradient regession and only used as heat source and drain in the |
592 |
+ |
systems. Our yielded values using EAM force field are slightly larger |
593 |
+ |
than those using QSC force field. However, both series are |
594 |
+ |
significantly smaller than experimental value by an order of more than |
595 |
+ |
100. It has been verified that this difference is mainly attributed to |
596 |
+ |
the lack of electron interaction representation in these force field |
597 |
+ |
parameters. Richardson {\it et al.}\cite{Clancy:1992} used EAM |
598 |
+ |
force field parameters in their metal thermal conductivity |
599 |
+ |
calculations. The Non-Equilibrium MD method they employed in their |
600 |
+ |
simulations produced comparable results to ours. As Zhang {\it et |
601 |
+ |
al.}\cite{ISI:000231042800044} stated, thermal conductivity values |
602 |
+ |
are influenced mainly by force field. Therefore, it is confident to |
603 |
+ |
conclude that NIVS-RNEMD is applicable to metal force field system. |
604 |
+ |
|
605 |
+ |
\begin{figure} |
606 |
+ |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{AuGrad} |
607 |
+ |
\caption{Temperature gradients for thermal conductivity calculation of |
608 |
+ |
crystal gold using QSC force field.} |
609 |
+ |
\label{AuGrad} |
610 |
+ |
\end{figure} |
611 |
+ |
|
612 |
+ |
\begin{table*} |
613 |
+ |
\begin{minipage}{\linewidth} |
614 |
+ |
\begin{center} |
615 |
+ |
|
616 |
+ |
\caption{Calculation results for thermal conductivity of crystal gold |
617 |
+ |
using QSC force field at ${\langle T\rangle}$ = 300K at various |
618 |
+ |
thermal exchange rates. Errors of calculations in parentheses. } |
619 |
+ |
|
620 |
+ |
\begin{tabular}{cc} |
621 |
+ |
\hline |
622 |
+ |
$\langle dT/dz\rangle$(K/\AA) & $\lambda$(W/m/K)\\ |
623 |
+ |
\hline |
624 |
+ |
1.44 & 1.10(0.01)\\ |
625 |
+ |
2.86 & 1.08(0.02)\\ |
626 |
+ |
5.14 & 1.15(0.01)\\ |
627 |
+ |
\hline |
628 |
+ |
\end{tabular} |
629 |
+ |
\label{qscThermal} |
630 |
+ |
\end{center} |
631 |
+ |
\end{minipage} |
632 |
+ |
\end{table*} |
633 |
+ |
|
634 |
+ |
\begin{figure} |
635 |
+ |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{eamGrad} |
636 |
+ |
\caption{Temperature gradients for thermal conductivity calculation of |
637 |
+ |
crystal gold using EAM force field.} |
638 |
+ |
\label{eamGrad} |
639 |
+ |
\end{figure} |
640 |
+ |
|
641 |
+ |
\begin{table*} |
642 |
+ |
\begin{minipage}{\linewidth} |
643 |
+ |
\begin{center} |
644 |
+ |
|
645 |
+ |
\caption{Calculation results for thermal conductivity of crystal gold |
646 |
+ |
using EAM force field at ${\langle T\rangle}$ = 300K at various |
647 |
+ |
thermal exchange rates. Errors of calculations in parentheses. } |
648 |
+ |
|
649 |
+ |
\begin{tabular}{cc} |
650 |
+ |
\hline |
651 |
+ |
$\langle dT/dz\rangle$(K/\AA) & $\lambda$(W/m/K)\\ |
652 |
+ |
\hline |
653 |
+ |
1.24 & 1.24(0.06)\\ |
654 |
+ |
2.06 & 1.37(0.04)\\ |
655 |
+ |
2.55 & 1.41(0.03)\\ |
656 |
+ |
\hline |
657 |
+ |
\end{tabular} |
658 |
+ |
\label{eamThermal} |
659 |
+ |
\end{center} |
660 |
+ |
\end{minipage} |
661 |
+ |
\end{table*} |
662 |
+ |
|
663 |
+ |
|
664 |
+ |
\subsection{Interfaciel Thermal Conductivity} |
665 |
+ |
After simulations of homogeneous water and gold systems using |
666 |
+ |
NIVS-RNEMD method were proved valid, calculation of gold/water |
667 |
+ |
interfacial thermal conductivity was followed. It is found out that |
668 |
+ |
the low interfacial conductance is probably due to the hydrophobic |
669 |
+ |
surface in our system. Figure \ref{interfaceDensity} demonstrates mass |
670 |
+ |
density change along $z$-axis, which is perpendicular to the |
671 |
+ |
gold/water interface. It is observed that water density significantly |
672 |
+ |
decreases when approaching the surface. Under this low thermal |
673 |
+ |
conductance, both gold and water phase have sufficient time to |
674 |
+ |
eliminate temperature difference inside respectively (Figure |
675 |
+ |
\ref{interfaceGrad}). With indistinguishable temperature difference |
676 |
+ |
within respective phase, it is valid to assume that the temperature |
677 |
+ |
difference between gold and water on surface would be approximately |
678 |
+ |
the same as the difference between the gold and water phase. This |
679 |
+ |
assumption enables convenient calculation of $G$ using |
680 |
+ |
Eq. \ref{interfaceCalc} instead of measuring temperatures of thin |
681 |
+ |
layer of water and gold close enough to surface, which would have |
682 |
+ |
greater fluctuation and lower accuracy. Reported results (Table |
683 |
+ |
\ref{interfaceRes}) are of two orders of magnitude smaller than our |
684 |
+ |
calculations on homogeneous systems, and thus have larger relative |
685 |
+ |
errors than our calculation results on homogeneous systems. |
686 |
+ |
|
687 |
+ |
\begin{figure} |
688 |
+ |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{interfaceDensity} |
689 |
+ |
\caption{Density profile for interfacial thermal conductivity |
690 |
+ |
simulation box. Significant water density decrease is observed on |
691 |
+ |
gold surface.} |
692 |
+ |
\label{interfaceDensity} |
693 |
+ |
\end{figure} |
694 |
+ |
|
695 |
+ |
\begin{figure} |
696 |
+ |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{interfaceGrad} |
697 |
+ |
\caption{Temperature profiles for interfacial thermal conductivity |
698 |
+ |
simulation box. Temperatures of different slabs in the same phase |
699 |
+ |
show no significant difference.} |
700 |
+ |
\label{interfaceGrad} |
701 |
+ |
\end{figure} |
702 |
+ |
|
703 |
+ |
\begin{table*} |
704 |
+ |
\begin{minipage}{\linewidth} |
705 |
+ |
\begin{center} |
706 |
+ |
|
707 |
+ |
\caption{Calculation results for interfacial thermal conductivity |
708 |
+ |
at ${\langle T\rangle \sim}$ 300K at various thermal exchange |
709 |
+ |
rates. Errors of calculations in parentheses. } |
710 |
+ |
|
711 |
+ |
\begin{tabular}{cccc} |
712 |
+ |
\hline |
713 |
+ |
$J_z$(MW/m$^2$) & $T_{gold}$ & $T_{water}$ & $G$(MW/m$^2$/K)\\ |
714 |
+ |
\hline |
715 |
+ |
98.0 & 355.2 & 295.8 & 1.65(0.21) \\ |
716 |
+ |
78.8 & 343.8 & 298.0 & 1.72(0.32) \\ |
717 |
+ |
73.6 & 344.3 & 298.0 & 1.59(0.24) \\ |
718 |
+ |
49.2 & 330.1 & 300.4 & 1.65(0.35) \\ |
719 |
+ |
\hline |
720 |
+ |
\end{tabular} |
721 |
+ |
\label{interfaceRes} |
722 |
+ |
\end{center} |
723 |
+ |
\end{minipage} |
724 |
+ |
\end{table*} |
725 |
+ |
|
726 |
+ |
\subsection{Shear Viscosity} |
727 |
+ |
Our calculations (Table \ref{shearRate}) shows that scale RNEMD method |
728 |
+ |
produced comparable shear viscosity to swap RNEMD method. In Table |
729 |
+ |
\ref{shearRate}, the names of the calculated samples are devided into |
730 |
+ |
two parts. The first number refers to total slabs in one simulation |
731 |
+ |
box. The second number refers to the swapping interval in swap method, or |
732 |
+ |
in scale method the equilvalent swapping interval that the same |
733 |
+ |
momentum flux would theoretically result in swap method. All the scale |
734 |
+ |
method results were from simulations that had a scaling interval of 10 |
735 |
+ |
time steps. The average molecular momentum gradients of these samples |
736 |
+ |
are shown in Figure \ref{shearGrad}. |
737 |
+ |
|
738 |
+ |
\begin{table*} |
739 |
+ |
\begin{minipage}{\linewidth} |
740 |
+ |
\begin{center} |
741 |
+ |
|
742 |
+ |
\caption{Calculation results for shear viscosity of Lennard-Jones |
743 |
+ |
fluid at ${T^* = 0.72}$ and ${\rho^* = 0.85}$, with swap and scale |
744 |
+ |
methods at various momentum exchange rates. Results in reduced |
745 |
+ |
unit. Errors of calculations in parentheses. } |
746 |
+ |
|
747 |
+ |
\begin{tabular}{ccc} |
748 |
+ |
\hline |
749 |
+ |
Series & $\eta^*_{swap}$ & $\eta^*_{scale}$\\ |
750 |
+ |
\hline |
751 |
+ |
20-500 & 3.64(0.05) & 3.76(0.09)\\ |
752 |
+ |
20-1000 & 3.52(0.16) & 3.66(0.06)\\ |
753 |
+ |
20-2000 & 3.72(0.05) & 3.32(0.18)\\ |
754 |
+ |
20-2500 & 3.42(0.06) & 3.43(0.08)\\ |
755 |
+ |
\hline |
756 |
+ |
\end{tabular} |
757 |
+ |
\label{shearRate} |
758 |
+ |
\end{center} |
759 |
+ |
\end{minipage} |
760 |
+ |
\end{table*} |
761 |
+ |
|
762 |
+ |
\begin{figure} |
763 |
+ |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{shearGrad} |
764 |
+ |
\caption{Average momentum gradients of shear viscosity simulations} |
765 |
+ |
\label{shearGrad} |
766 |
+ |
\end{figure} |
767 |
+ |
|
768 |
+ |
\begin{figure} |
769 |
+ |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{shearTempScale} |
770 |
+ |
\caption{Temperature profile for scaling RNEMD simulation.} |
771 |
+ |
\label{shearTempScale} |
772 |
+ |
\end{figure} |
773 |
+ |
However, observations of temperatures along three dimensions show that |
774 |
+ |
inhomogeneity occurs in scaling RNEMD simulations, particularly in the |
775 |
+ |
two slabs which were scaled. Figure \ref{shearTempScale} indicate that with |
776 |
+ |
relatively large imposed momentum flux, the temperature difference among $x$ |
777 |
+ |
and the other two dimensions was significant. This would result from the |
778 |
+ |
algorithm of scaling method. From Eq. \ref{eq:fluxPlane}, after |
779 |
+ |
momentum gradient is set up, $P_c^x$ would be roughly stable |
780 |
+ |
($<0$). Consequently, scaling factor $x$ would most probably larger |
781 |
+ |
than 1. Therefore, the kinetic energy in $x$-dimension $K_c^x$ would |
782 |
+ |
keep increase after most scaling steps. And if there is not enough time |
783 |
+ |
for the kinetic energy to exchange among different dimensions and |
784 |
+ |
different slabs, the system would finally build up temperature |
785 |
+ |
(kinetic energy) difference among the three dimensions. Also, between |
786 |
+ |
$y$ and $z$ dimensions in the scaled slabs, temperatures of $z$-axis |
787 |
+ |
are closer to neighbor slabs. This is due to momentum transfer along |
788 |
+ |
$z$ dimension between slabs. |
789 |
+ |
|
790 |
+ |
Although results between scaling and swapping methods are comparable, |
791 |
+ |
the inherent temperature inhomogeneity even in relatively low imposed |
792 |
+ |
exchange momentum flux simulations makes scaling RNEMD method less |
793 |
+ |
attractive than swapping RNEMD in shear viscosity calculation. |
794 |
+ |
|
795 |
+ |
\section{Conclusions} |
796 |
+ |
NIVS-RNEMD simulation method is developed and tested on various |
797 |
+ |
systems. Simulation results demonstrate its validity in thermal |
798 |
+ |
conductivity calculations, from Lennard-Jones fluid to multi-atom |
799 |
+ |
molecule like water and metal crystals. NIVS-RNEMD improves |
800 |
+ |
non-Boltzmann-Maxwell distributions, which exist in previous RNEMD |
801 |
+ |
methods. Furthermore, it develops a valid means for unphysical thermal |
802 |
+ |
transfer between different species of molecules, and thus extends its |
803 |
+ |
applicability to interfacial systems. Our calculation of gold/water |
804 |
+ |
interfacial thermal conductivity demonstrates this advantage over |
805 |
+ |
previous RNEMD methods. NIVS-RNEMD has also limited application on |
806 |
+ |
shear viscosity calculations, but could cause temperature difference |
807 |
+ |
among different dimensions under high momentum flux. Modification is |
808 |
+ |
necessary to extend the applicability of NIVS-RNEMD in shear viscosity |
809 |
+ |
calculations. |
810 |
+ |
|
811 |
|
\section{Acknowledgments} |
812 |
|
Support for this project was provided by the National Science |
813 |
|
Foundation under grant CHE-0848243. Computational time was provided by |
814 |
|
the Center for Research Computing (CRC) at the University of Notre |
815 |
|
Dame. \newpage |
816 |
|
|
817 |
< |
\bibliographystyle{jcp2} |
817 |
> |
\bibliographystyle{aip} |
818 |
|
\bibliography{nivsRnemd} |
819 |
+ |
|
820 |
|
\end{doublespace} |
821 |
|
\end{document} |
822 |
|
|