ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/nivsRnemd/nivsRnemd.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/nivsRnemd/nivsRnemd.tex (file contents):
Revision 3570 by skuang, Wed Mar 10 02:00:06 2010 UTC vs.
Revision 3574 by skuang, Fri Mar 12 21:36:16 2010 UTC

# Line 75 | Line 75 | RNEMD is preferable in many ways to the forward NEMD m
75   from liquid copper to monatomic liquids to molecular fluids
76   (e.g. ionic liquids).\cite{ISI:000246190100032}
77  
78 + \begin{figure}
79 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{thermalDemo}
80 + \caption{Demostration of thermal gradient estalished by RNEMD method.}
81 + \label{thermalDemo}
82 + \end{figure}
83 +
84   RNEMD is preferable in many ways to the forward NEMD methods because
85   it imposes what is typically difficult to measure (a flux or stress)
86   and it is typically much easier to compute momentum gradients or
# Line 356 | Line 362 | thermal conductivity of a Au/H${_2}$O system. Respecti
362    m^{1/2} k_B^{-1}\varepsilon^{-1/2}}$.
363  
364   Another series of our simulation is to calculate the interfacial
365 < thermal conductivity of a Au/H${_2}$O system. Respective calculations of
365 > thermal conductivity of a Au/H$_2$O system. Respective calculations of
366   water (SPC/E) and gold (QSC) thermal conductivity were performed and
367   compared with current results to ensure the validity of
368 < NIVS-RNEMD. After that, the mixture system was simulated.
368 > NIVS-RNEMD. After that, a mixture system was simulated.
369 >
370 > For thermal conductivity calculation of bulk water, a simulation box
371 > consisting of 1000 molecules were first equilibrated under ambient
372 > pressure and temperature conditions (NPT), followed by equilibration
373 > in fixed volume (NVT). The system was then equilibrated in
374 > microcanonical ensemble (NVE). Also in NVE ensemble, establishing
375 > stable thermal gradient was followed. The simulation box was under
376 > periodic boundary condition and devided into 10 slabs. Data collection
377 > process was similar to Lennard-Jones fluid system. Thermal
378 > conductivity calculation of bulk crystal gold used a similar
379 > protocol. And the face centered cubic crystal simulation box consists
380 > of 2880 Au atoms.
381 >
382 > After simulations of bulk water and crystal gold, a mixture system was
383 > constructed, consisting of 1188 Au atoms and 1862 H$_2$O
384 > molecules. Spohr potential was adopted in depicting the interaction
385 > between metal atom and water molecule.\cite{ISI:000167766600035} A
386 > similar protocol of equilibration was followed. A thermal gradient was
387 > built. It was found out that compared to homogeneous systems, the two
388 > phases could have large temperature difference under a relatively low
389 > thermal flux. Therefore, under our low flux condition, it is assumed
390 > that the metal and water phases have respectively homogeneous
391 > temperature. In calculating the interfacial thermal conductivity $G$,
392 > this assumptioin was applied and thus our formula becomes:
393 >
394 > \begin{equation}
395 > G = \frac{E_{total}}{2 t L_x L_y \left( \langle T_{gold}\rangle -
396 >    \langle T_{water}\rangle \right)}
397 > \label{interfaceCalc}
398 > \end{equation}
399 > where ${E_{total}}$ is the imposed unphysical kinetic energy transfer
400 > and ${\langle T_{gold}\rangle}$ and ${\langle T_{water}\rangle}$ are the
401 > average observed temperature of gold and water phases respectively.
402  
403   \section{Results And Discussion}
404   \subsection{Shear Viscosity}
# Line 432 | Line 471 | attractive than swapping RNEMD in shear viscosity calc
471   attractive than swapping RNEMD in shear viscosity calculation.
472  
473   \subsection{Thermal Conductivity}
474 <
474 > \subsubsection{Lennard-Jones Fluid}
475   Our thermal conductivity calculations also show that scaling method results
476   agree with swapping method. Table \ref{thermal} lists our simulation
477   results with similar manner we used in shear viscosity
# Line 501 | Line 540 | plateau; while in low temperature slab, that peak appe
540   \label{histScale}
541   \end{figure}
542  
543 < \subsection{Interfaciel Thermal Conductivity}
543 > \subsubsection{SPC/E Water}
544 > Our results of SPC/E water thermal conductivity are comparable to
545 > Bedrov {\it et al.}\cite{ISI:000090151400044}, which employed the
546 > previous swapping RNEMD method for their calculation. Our simulations
547 > were able to produce a similar temperature gradient to their
548 > system. However, the average temperature of our system is 300K, while
549 > theirs is 318K, which would be attributed for part of the difference
550 > between the two series of results. Both methods yields values in
551 > agreement with experiment. And this shows the applicability of our
552 > method to multi-atom molecular system.
553  
554   \begin{figure}
555   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{spceGrad}
# Line 520 | Line 568 | $\langle dT/dz\rangle$(K/\AA) & & $\lambda$(W/m/K) & \
568   \begin{tabular}{cccc}
569   \hline
570   $\langle dT/dz\rangle$(K/\AA) & & $\lambda$(W/m/K) & \\
571 < & This work & Previous simulations$^a$ & Experiment$^b$\\
571 > & This work & Previous simulations\cite{ISI:000090151400044} &
572 > Experiment$^a$\\
573   \hline
574 < 0.3 & 0.82()  & 0.784 & 0.64\\
575 < 0.8 & 0.770() & 0.730\\
576 < 1.5 & 0.813() & \\
574 > 0.38 & 0.816(0.044) & & 0.64\\
575 > 0.81 & 0.770(0.008) & 0.784\\
576 > 1.54 & 0.813(0.007) & 0.730\\
577   \hline
578   \end{tabular}
579   \label{spceThermal}
# Line 532 | Line 581 | $\langle dT/dz\rangle$(K/\AA) & & $\lambda$(W/m/K) & \
581   \end{minipage}
582   \end{table*}
583  
584 + \subsubsection{Crystal Gold}
585 + Our results of gold thermal conductivity used QSC force field are
586 + shown in Table \ref{AuThermal}. Although our calculation is smaller
587 + than experimental value by an order of more than 100, this difference
588 + is mainly attributed to the lack of electron interaction
589 + representation in our force field parameters. Richardson {\it et
590 +  al.}\cite{ISI:A1992HX37800010} used similar force field parameters
591 + in their metal thermal conductivity calculations. The EMD method they
592 + employed in their simulations produced comparable results to
593 + ours. Therefore, it is confident to conclude that NIVS-RNEMD is
594 + applicable to metal force field system.
595  
596   \begin{figure}
597   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{AuGrad}
# Line 550 | Line 610 | $\langle dT/dz\rangle$(K/\AA) & $\lambda$(W/m/K)\\
610   \begin{tabular}{ccc}
611   \hline
612   $\langle dT/dz\rangle$(K/\AA) & $\lambda$(W/m/K)\\
613 < & This work & Previous simulations$^a$ \\
613 > & This work & Previous simulations\cite{ISI:A1992HX37800010} \\
614   \hline
615 < 1.4 & 1.10() & \\
616 < 2.8 & 1.08() & \\
617 < 5.1 & 1.15() & \\
615 > 1.44 & 1.10(0.01) & \\
616 > 2.86 & 1.08(0.02) & \\
617 > 5.14 & 1.15(0.01) & \\
618   \hline
619   \end{tabular}
620   \label{AuThermal}
# Line 562 | Line 622 | $\langle dT/dz\rangle$(K/\AA) & $\lambda$(W/m/K)\\
622   \end{minipage}
623   \end{table*}
624  
625 + \subsection{Interfaciel Thermal Conductivity}
626 + After valid simulations of homogeneous water and gold systems using
627 + NIVS-RNEMD method, calculation of gold/water interfacial thermal
628 + conductivity was followed. It is found out that the interfacial
629 + conductance is low due to a hydrophobic surface in our system. Figure
630 + \ref{interfaceDensity} demonstrates this observance. Consequently, our
631 + reported results (Table \ref{interfaceRes}) are of two orders of
632 + magnitude smaller than our calculations on homogeneous systems.
633  
634 + \begin{figure}
635 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{interfaceDensity}
636 + \caption{Density profile for interfacial thermal conductivity
637 +  simulation box.}
638 + \label{interfaceDensity}
639 + \end{figure}
640 +
641 + \begin{figure}
642 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{interfaceGrad}
643 + \caption{Temperature profiles for interfacial thermal conductivity
644 +  simulation box.}
645 + \label{interfaceGrad}
646 + \end{figure}
647 +
648 + \begin{table*}
649 + \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
650 + \begin{center}
651 +
652 + \caption{Calculation results for interfacial thermal conductivity
653 +  at ${\langle T\rangle \sim}$ 300K at various thermal exchange
654 +  rates. Errors of calculations in parentheses. }
655 +
656 + \begin{tabular}{cccc}
657 + \hline
658 + $J_z$(MW/m$^2$) & $T_{gold}$ & $T_{water}$ & $G$(MW/m$^2$/K)\\
659 + \hline
660 + 98.0 & 355.2 & 295.8 & 1.65(0.21) \\
661 + 78.8 & 343.8 & 298.0 & 1.72(0.32) \\
662 + 73.6 & 344.3 & 298.0 & 1.59(0.24) \\
663 + 49.2 & 330.1 & 300.4 & 1.65(0.35) \\
664 + \hline
665 + \end{tabular}
666 + \label{interfaceRes}
667 + \end{center}
668 + \end{minipage}
669 + \end{table*}
670 +
671 + \section{Conclusions}
672 + NIVS-RNEMD simulation method is developed and tested on various
673 + systems. Simulation results demonstrate its validity of thermal
674 + conductivity calculations. NIVS-RNEMD improves non-Boltzmann-Maxwell
675 + distributions existing in previous RNEMD methods, and extends its
676 + applicability to interfacial systems. NIVS-RNEMD has also limited
677 + application on shear viscosity calculations, but under high momentum
678 + flux, it  could cause temperature difference among different
679 + dimensions. Modification is necessary to extend the applicability of
680 + NIVS-RNEMD in shear viscosity calculations.
681 +
682   \section{Acknowledgments}
683   Support for this project was provided by the National Science
684   Foundation under grant CHE-0848243. Computational time was provided by

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines