101 |
|
\end{figure} |
102 |
|
|
103 |
|
RNEMD is preferable in many ways to the forward NEMD |
104 |
< |
methods\cite{ISI:A1988Q205300014,hess:209,backer:154503} because it |
105 |
< |
imposes what is typically difficult to measure (a flux or stress) and |
106 |
< |
it is typically much easier to compute momentum gradients or strains |
107 |
< |
(the response). For similar reasons, RNEMD is also preferable to |
108 |
< |
slowly-converging equilibrium methods for measuring thermal |
109 |
< |
conductivity and shear viscosity (using Green-Kubo |
104 |
> |
methods\cite{ISI:A1988Q205300014,hess:209,Vasquez:2004fk,backer:154503,ISI:000266247600008} |
105 |
> |
because it imposes what is typically difficult to measure (a flux or |
106 |
> |
stress) and it is typically much easier to compute momentum gradients |
107 |
> |
or strains (the response). For similar reasons, RNEMD is also |
108 |
> |
preferable to slowly-converging equilibrium methods for measuring |
109 |
> |
thermal conductivity and shear viscosity (using Green-Kubo |
110 |
|
relations\cite{daivis:541,mondello:9327} or the Helfand moment |
111 |
|
approach of Viscardy {\it et |
112 |
|
al.}\cite{Viscardy:2007bh,Viscardy:2007lq}) because these rely on |