ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/nivsRnemd/nivsRnemd.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/nivsRnemd/nivsRnemd.tex (file contents):
Revision 3577 by skuang, Thu Mar 18 00:53:20 2010 UTC vs.
Revision 3614 by skuang, Sun Jul 18 03:20:57 2010 UTC

# Line 6 | Line 6
6   \usepackage{caption}
7   %\usepackage{tabularx}
8   \usepackage{graphicx}
9 + \usepackage{multirow}
10   %\usepackage{booktabs}
11   %\usepackage{bibentry}
12   %\usepackage{mathrsfs}
# Line 38 | Line 39 | Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
39   \begin{doublespace}
40  
41   \begin{abstract}
42 <
42 >  We present a new method for introducing stable non-equilibrium
43 >  velocity and temperature distributions in molecular dynamics
44 >  simulations of heterogeneous systems.  This method extends earlier
45 >  Reverse Non-Equilibrium Molecular Dynamics (RNEMD) methods which use
46 >  momentum exchange swapping moves that can create non-thermal
47 >  velocity distributions and are difficult to use for interfacial
48 >  calculations.  By using non-isotropic velocity scaling (NIVS) on the
49 >  molecules in specific regions of a system, it is possible to impose
50 >  momentum or thermal flux between regions of a simulation and stable
51 >  thermal and momentum gradients can then be established.  The scaling
52 >  method we have developed conserves the total linear momentum and
53 >  total energy of the system.  To test the methods, we have computed
54 >  the thermal conductivity of model liquid and solid systems as well
55 >  as the interfacial thermal conductivity of a metal-water interface.
56 >  We find that the NIVS-RNEMD improves the problematic velocity
57 >  distributions that develop in other RNEMD methods.
58   \end{abstract}
59  
60   \newpage
# Line 49 | Line 65 | Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
65   %                          BODY OF TEXT
66   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
67  
52
53
68   \section{Introduction}
69   The original formulation of Reverse Non-equilibrium Molecular Dynamics
70   (RNEMD) obtains transport coefficients (thermal conductivity and shear
71   viscosity) in a fluid by imposing an artificial momentum flux between
72   two thin parallel slabs of material that are spatially separated in
73   the simulation cell.\cite{MullerPlathe:1997xw,ISI:000080382700030} The
74 < artificial flux is typically created by periodically ``swapping'' either
75 < the entire momentum vector $\vec{p}$ or single components of this
76 < vector ($p_x$) between molecules in each of the two slabs.  If the two
77 < slabs are separated along the $z$ coordinate, the imposed flux is either
78 < directional ($j_z(p_x)$) or isotropic ($J_z$), and the response of a
79 < simulated system to the imposed momentum flux will typically be a
80 < velocity or thermal gradient (Fig. \ref{thermalDemo}).  The transport
81 < coefficients (shear viscosity and thermal conductivity) are easily
82 < obtained by assuming linear response of the system,
74 > artificial flux is typically created by periodically ``swapping''
75 > either the entire momentum vector $\vec{p}$ or single components of
76 > this vector ($p_x$) between molecules in each of the two slabs.  If
77 > the two slabs are separated along the $z$ coordinate, the imposed flux
78 > is either directional ($j_z(p_x)$) or isotropic ($J_z$), and the
79 > response of a simulated system to the imposed momentum flux will
80 > typically be a velocity or thermal gradient (Fig. \ref{thermalDemo}).
81 > The shear viscosity ($\eta$) and thermal conductivity ($\lambda$) are
82 > easily obtained by assuming linear response of the system,
83   \begin{eqnarray}
84   j_z(p_x) & = & -\eta \frac{\partial v_x}{\partial z}\\
85   J_z & = & \lambda \frac{\partial T}{\partial z}
86   \end{eqnarray}
87 < RNEMD has been widely used to provide computational estimates of thermal
88 < conductivities and shear viscosities in a wide range of materials,
89 < from liquid copper to monatomic liquids to molecular fluids
90 < (e.g. ionic liquids).\cite{ISI:000246190100032}
87 > RNEMD has been widely used to provide computational estimates of
88 > thermal conductivities and shear viscosities in a wide range of
89 > materials, from liquid copper to both monatomic and molecular fluids
90 > (e.g.  ionic
91 > liquids).\cite{Bedrov:2000-1,Bedrov:2000,Muller-Plathe:2002,ISI:000184808400018,ISI:000231042800044,Maginn:2007,Muller-Plathe:2008,ISI:000258460400020,ISI:000258840700015,ISI:000261835100054}
92  
93   \begin{figure}
94   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{thermalDemo}
95 < \caption{Demostration of thermal gradient estalished by RNEMD
96 <  method. Physical thermal flow directs from high temperature region
97 <  to low temperature region. Unphysical thermal transfer counteracts
98 <  it and maintains a steady thermal gradient.}
95 > \caption{RNEMD methods impose an unphysical transfer of momentum or
96 >  kinetic energy between a ``hot'' slab and a ``cold'' slab in the
97 >  simulation box.  The molecular system responds to this imposed flux
98 >  by generating a momentum or temperature gradient.  The slope of the
99 >  gradient can then be used to compute transport properties (e.g.
100 >  shear viscosity and thermal conductivity).}
101   \label{thermalDemo}
102   \end{figure}
103  
104 < RNEMD is preferable in many ways to the forward NEMD methods because
105 < it imposes what is typically difficult to measure (a flux or stress)
106 < and it is typically much easier to compute momentum gradients or
107 < strains (the response).  For similar reasons, RNEMD is also preferable
108 < to slowly-converging equilibrium methods for measuring thermal
109 < conductivity and shear viscosity (using Green-Kubo relations or the
110 < Helfand moment approach of Viscardy {\it et
104 > RNEMD is preferable in many ways to the forward NEMD
105 > methods\cite{ISI:A1988Q205300014,hess:209,Vasquez:2004fk,backer:154503,ISI:000266247600008}
106 > because it imposes what is typically difficult to measure (a flux or
107 > stress) and it is typically much easier to compute the response
108 > (momentum gradients or strains).  For similar reasons, RNEMD is also
109 > preferable to slowly-converging equilibrium methods for measuring
110 > thermal conductivity and shear viscosity (using Green-Kubo
111 > relations\cite{daivis:541,mondello:9327} or the Helfand moment
112 > approach of Viscardy {\it et
113    al.}\cite{Viscardy:2007bh,Viscardy:2007lq}) because these rely on
114   computing difficult to measure quantities.
115  
# Line 100 | Line 119 | Recently, Tenney and Maginn\cite{ISI:000273472300004}
119   typically samples from the same manifold of states in the
120   microcanonical ensemble.
121  
122 < Recently, Tenney and Maginn\cite{ISI:000273472300004} have discovered
122 > Recently, Tenney and Maginn\cite{Maginn:2010} have discovered
123   some problems with the original RNEMD swap technique.  Notably, large
124   momentum fluxes (equivalent to frequent momentum swaps between the
125   slabs) can result in ``notched'', ``peaked'' and generally non-thermal
# Line 110 | Line 129 | scaling (NIVS-RNEMD) which retains the desirable featu
129   and self-adjusting metrics for retaining the usability of the method.
130  
131   In this paper, we develop and test a method for non-isotropic velocity
132 < scaling (NIVS-RNEMD) which retains the desirable features of RNEMD
132 > scaling (NIVS) which retains the desirable features of RNEMD
133   (conservation of linear momentum and total energy, compatibility with
134   periodic boundary conditions) while establishing true thermal
135 < distributions in each of the two slabs.  In the next section, we
136 < develop the method for determining the scaling constraints.  We then
137 < test the method on both single component, multi-component, and
138 < non-isotropic mixtures and show that it is capable of providing
135 > distributions in each of the two slabs. In the next section, we
136 > present the method for determining the scaling constraints.  We then
137 > test the method on both liquids and solids as well as a non-isotropic
138 > liquid-solid interface and show that it is capable of providing
139   reasonable estimates of the thermal conductivity and shear viscosity
140 < in these cases.
140 > in all of these cases.
141  
142   \section{Methodology}
143 < We retain the basic idea of Muller-Plathe's RNEMD method; the periodic
144 < system is partitioned into a series of thin slabs along a particular
143 > We retain the basic idea of M\"{u}ller-Plathe's RNEMD method; the
144 > periodic system is partitioned into a series of thin slabs along one
145   axis ($z$).  One of the slabs at the end of the periodic box is
146   designated the ``hot'' slab, while the slab in the center of the box
147   is designated the ``cold'' slab.  The artificial momentum flux will be
# Line 130 | Line 149 | moves.  For molecules $\{i\}$ located within the cold
149   hot slab.
150  
151   Rather than using momentum swaps, we use a series of velocity scaling
152 < moves.  For molecules $\{i\}$ located within the cold slab,
152 > moves.  For molecules $\{i\}$  located within the cold slab,
153   \begin{equation}
154   \vec{v}_i \leftarrow \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
155   x & 0 & 0 \\
# Line 138 | Line 157 | where ${x, y, z}$ are a set of 3 scaling variables for
157   0 & 0 & z \\
158   \end{array} \right) \cdot \vec{v}_i
159   \end{equation}
160 < where ${x, y, z}$ are a set of 3 scaling variables for each of the
161 < three directions in the system.  Likewise, the molecules $\{j\}$
162 < located in the hot slab will see a concomitant scaling of velocities,
160 > where ${x, y, z}$ are a set of 3 velocity-scaling variables for each
161 > of the three directions in the system.  Likewise, the molecules
162 > $\{j\}$ located in the hot slab will see a concomitant scaling of
163 > velocities,
164   \begin{equation}
165   \vec{v}_j \leftarrow \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
166   x^\prime & 0 & 0 \\
# Line 150 | Line 170 | Conservation of linear momentum in each of the three d
170   \end{equation}
171  
172   Conservation of linear momentum in each of the three directions
173 < ($\alpha = x,y,z$) ties the values of the hot and cold bin scaling
173 > ($\alpha = x,y,z$) ties the values of the hot and cold scaling
174   parameters together:
175   \begin{equation}
176   P_h^\alpha + P_c^\alpha = \alpha^\prime P_h^\alpha + \alpha P_c^\alpha
# Line 184 | Line 204 | Substituting in the expressions for the hot scaling pa
204   similar manner to the linear momenta (Eq. \ref{eq:momentumdef}).
205   Substituting in the expressions for the hot scaling parameters
206   ($\alpha^\prime$) from Eq. (\ref{eq:hotcoldscaling}), we obtain the
207 < {\it constraint ellipsoid equation}:
207 > {\it constraint ellipsoid}:
208   \begin{equation}
209 < \sum_{\alpha = x,y,z} a_\alpha \alpha^2 + b_\alpha \alpha + c_\alpha = 0
209 > \sum_{\alpha = x,y,z} \left( a_\alpha \alpha^2 + b_\alpha \alpha +
210 >  c_\alpha \right) = 0
211   \label{eq:constraintEllipsoid}
212   \end{equation}
213   where the constants are obtained from the instantaneous values of the
# Line 198 | Line 219 | This ellipsoid equation defines the set of cold slab s
219   c_\alpha & = & K_h^\alpha p_\alpha^2 + 2 K_h^\alpha p_\alpha - K_c^\alpha
220   \label{eq:constraintEllipsoidConsts}
221   \end{eqnarray}
222 < This ellipsoid equation defines the set of cold slab scaling
223 < parameters which can be applied while preserving both linear momentum
224 < in all three directions as well as kinetic energy.
222 > This ellipsoid (Eq. \ref{eq:constraintEllipsoid}) defines the set of
223 > cold slab scaling parameters which, when applied, preserve the linear
224 > momentum of the system in all three directions as well as total
225 > kinetic energy.
226  
227 < The goal of using velocity scaling variables is to transfer linear
228 < momentum or kinetic energy from the cold slab to the hot slab.  If the
229 < hot and cold slabs are separated along the z-axis, the energy flux is
230 < given simply by the decrease in kinetic energy of the cold bin:
227 > The goal of using these velocity scaling variables is to transfer
228 > kinetic energy from the cold slab to the hot slab.  If the hot and
229 > cold slabs are separated along the z-axis, the energy flux is given
230 > simply by the decrease in kinetic energy of the cold bin:
231   \begin{equation}
232   (1-x^2) K_c^x  + (1-y^2) K_c^y + (1-z^2) K_c^z = J_z\Delta t
233   \end{equation}
234   The expression for the energy flux can be re-written as another
235   ellipsoid centered on $(x,y,z) = 0$:
236   \begin{equation}
237 < x^2 K_c^x + y^2 K_c^y + z^2 K_c^z = K_c^x + K_c^y + K_c^z - J_z\Delta t
237 > \sum_{\alpha = x,y,z} K_c^\alpha \alpha^2 = \sum_{\alpha = x,y,z}
238 > K_c^\alpha -J_z \Delta t
239   \label{eq:fluxEllipsoid}
240   \end{equation}
241 < The spatial extent of the {\it thermal flux ellipsoid equation} is
242 < governed both by a targetted value, $J_z$ as well as the instantaneous
243 < values of the kinetic energy components in the cold bin.
241 > The spatial extent of the {\it thermal flux ellipsoid} is governed
242 > both by the target flux, $J_z$ as well as the instantaneous values of
243 > the kinetic energy components in the cold bin.
244  
245   To satisfy an energetic flux as well as the conservation constraints,
246 < it is sufficient to determine the points ${x,y,z}$ which lie on both
247 < the constraint ellipsoid (Eq. \ref{eq:constraintEllipsoid}) and the
248 < flux ellipsoid (Eq. \ref{eq:fluxEllipsoid}), i.e. the intersection of
249 < the two ellipsoids in 3-dimensional space.
246 > we must determine the points ${x,y,z}$ that lie on both the constraint
247 > ellipsoid (Eq. \ref{eq:constraintEllipsoid}) and the flux ellipsoid
248 > (Eq. \ref{eq:fluxEllipsoid}), i.e. the intersection of the two
249 > ellipsoids in 3-dimensional space.
250  
251   \begin{figure}
252   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ellipsoids}
253 < \caption{Scaling points which maintain both constant energy and
254 <  constant linear momentum of the system lie on the surface of the
255 <  {\it constraint ellipsoid} while points which generate the target
256 <  momentum flux lie on the surface of the {\it flux ellipsoid}.  The
257 <  velocity distributions in the cold bin are scaled by only those
253 > \caption{Velocity scaling coefficients which maintain both constant
254 >  energy and constant linear momentum of the system lie on the surface
255 >  of the {\it constraint ellipsoid} while points which generate the
256 >  target momentum flux lie on the surface of the {\it flux ellipsoid}.
257 >  The velocity distributions in the cold bin are scaled by only those
258    points which lie on both ellipsoids.}
259   \label{ellipsoids}
260   \end{figure}
261  
262 < One may also define momentum flux (say along the $x$-direction) as:
262 > Since ellipsoids can be expressed as polynomials up to second order in
263 > each of the three coordinates, finding the the intersection points of
264 > two ellipsoids is isomorphic to finding the roots a polynomial of
265 > degree 16.  There are a number of polynomial root-finding methods in
266 > the literature,\cite{Hoffman:2001sf,384119} but numerically finding
267 > the roots of high-degree polynomials is generally an ill-conditioned
268 > problem.\cite{Hoffman:2001sf}[P157] One simplification is to maintain velocity
269 > scalings that are {\it as isotropic as possible}.  To do this, we
270 > impose $x=y$, and to treat both the constraint and flux ellipsoids as
271 > 2-dimensional ellipses.  In reduced dimensionality, the
272 > intersecting-ellipse problem reduces to finding the roots of
273 > polynomials of degree 4.
274 >
275 > Depending on the target flux and current velocity distributions, the
276 > ellipsoids can have between 0 and 4 intersection points.  If there are
277 > no intersection points, it is not possible to satisfy the constraints
278 > while performing a non-equilibrium scaling move, and no change is made
279 > to the dynamics.  
280 >
281 > With multiple intersection points, any of the scaling points will
282 > conserve the linear momentum and kinetic energy of the system and will
283 > generate the correct target flux.  Although this method is inherently
284 > non-isotropic, the goal is still to maintain the system as close to an
285 > isotropic fluid as possible.  With this in mind, we would like the
286 > kinetic energies in the three different directions could become as
287 > close as each other as possible after each scaling.  Simultaneously,
288 > one would also like each scaling as gentle as possible, i.e. ${x,y,z
289 >  \rightarrow 1}$, in order to avoid large perturbation to the system.
290 > To do this, we pick the intersection point which maintains the three
291 > scaling variables ${x, y, z}$ as well as the ratio of kinetic energies
292 > ${K_c^z/K_c^x, K_c^z/K_c^y}$ as close as possible to 1.
293 >
294 > After the valid scaling parameters are arrived at by solving geometric
295 > intersection problems in $x, y, z$ space in order to obtain cold slab
296 > scaling parameters, Eq. (\ref{eq:hotcoldscaling}) is used to
297 > determine the conjugate hot slab scaling variables.
298 >
299 > \subsection{Introducing shear stress via velocity scaling}
300 > It is also possible to use this method to magnify the random
301 > fluctuations of the average momentum in each of the bins to induce a
302 > momentum flux.  Doing this repeatedly will create a shear stress on
303 > the system which will respond with an easily-measured strain.  The
304 > momentum flux (say along the $x$-direction) may be defined as:
305   \begin{equation}
306   (1-x) P_c^x = j_z(p_x)\Delta t
307   \label{eq:fluxPlane}
308   \end{equation}
309 < The above {\it momentum flux equation} is essentially a plane which is
310 < perpendicular to the $x$-axis, with its position governed both by a
311 < target value, $j_z(p_x)$ as well as the instantaneous value of the
247 < momentum along the $x$-direction.
309 > This {\it momentum flux plane} is perpendicular to the $x$-axis, with
310 > its position governed both by a target value, $j_z(p_x)$ as well as
311 > the instantaneous value of the momentum along the $x$-direction.
312  
313 < Similarly, to satisfy a momentum flux as well as the conservation
314 < constraints, it is sufficient to determine the points ${x,y,z}$ which
315 < lie on both the constraint ellipsoid (Eq. \ref{eq:constraintEllipsoid})
316 < and the flux plane (Eq. \ref{eq:fluxPlane}), i.e. the intersection of
317 < an ellipsoid and a plane in 3-dimensional space.
313 > In order to satisfy a momentum flux as well as the conservation
314 > constraints, we must determine the points ${x,y,z}$ which lie on both
315 > the constraint ellipsoid (Eq. \ref{eq:constraintEllipsoid}) and the
316 > flux plane (Eq. \ref{eq:fluxPlane}), i.e. the intersection of an
317 > ellipsoid and a plane in 3-dimensional space.
318  
319 < To summarize, by solving respective equation sets, one can determine
320 < possible sets of scaling variables for cold slab. And corresponding
321 < sets of scaling variables for hot slab can be determine as well.
319 > In the case of momentum flux transfer, we also impose another
320 > constraint to set the kinetic energy transfer as zero. In other
321 > words, we apply Eq. \ref{eq:fluxEllipsoid} and let ${J_z = 0}$.  With
322 > one variable fixed by Eq. \ref{eq:fluxPlane}, one now have a similar
323 > set of quartic equations to the above kinetic energy transfer problem.
324  
325 < The following problem will be choosing an optimal set of scaling
260 < variables among the possible sets. Although this method is inherently
261 < non-isotropic, the goal is still to maintain the system as isotropic
262 < as possible. Under this consideration, one would like the kinetic
263 < energies in different directions could become as close as each other
264 < after each scaling. Simultaneously, one would also like each scaling
265 < as gentle as possible, i.e. ${x,y,z \rightarrow 1}$, in order to avoid
266 < large perturbation to the system. Therefore, one approach to obtain the
267 < scaling variables would be constructing an criteria function, with
268 < constraints as above equation sets, and solving the function's minimum
269 < by method like Lagrange multipliers.
325 > \section{Computational Details}
326  
327 < In order to save computation time, we have a different approach to a
328 < relatively good set of scaling variables with much less calculation
329 < than above. Here is the detail of our simplification of the problem.
327 > We have implemented this methodology in our molecular dynamics code,
328 > OpenMD,\cite{Meineke:2005gd,openmd} performing the NIVS scaling moves
329 > after an MD step with a variable frequency.  We have tested the method
330 > in a variety of different systems, including homogeneous fluids
331 > (Lennard-Jones and SPC/E water), crystalline solids ({\sc
332 >  eam}~\cite{PhysRevB.33.7983} and quantum Sutton-Chen ({\sc
333 >  q-sc})~\cite{PhysRevB.59.3527} models for Gold), and heterogeneous
334 > interfaces (QSC gold - SPC/E water). The last of these systems would
335 > have been difficult to study using previous RNEMD methods, but using
336 > velocity scaling moves, we can even obtain estimates of the
337 > interfacial thermal conductivities ($G$).
338  
339 < In the case of kinetic energy transfer, we impose another constraint
276 < ${x = y}$, into the equation sets. Consequently, there are two
277 < variables left. And now one only needs to solve a set of two {\it
278 <  ellipses equations}. This problem would be transformed into solving
279 < one quartic equation for one of the two variables. There are known
280 < generic methods that solve real roots of quartic equations. Then one
281 < can determine the other variable and obtain sets of scaling
282 < variables. Among these sets, one can apply the above criteria to
283 < choose the best set, while much faster with only a few sets to choose.
339 > \subsection{Simulation Cells}
340  
341 < In the case of momentum flux transfer, we impose another constraint to
342 < set the kinetic energy transfer as zero. In another word, we apply
343 < Eq. \ref{eq:fluxEllipsoid} and let ${J_z = 0}$. After that, with one
344 < variable fixed by Eq. \ref{eq:fluxPlane}, one now have a similar set
345 < of equations on the above kinetic energy transfer problem. Therefore,
346 < an approach similar to the above would be sufficient for this as well.
347 <
348 < \section{Computational Details}
349 < \subsection{Lennard-Jones Fluid}
350 < Our simulation consists of a series of systems. All of these
295 < simulations were run with the OpenMD simulation software
296 < package\cite{Meineke:2005gd} integrated with RNEMD codes.
341 > In each of the systems studied, the dynamics was carried out in a
342 > rectangular simulation cell using periodic boundary conditions in all
343 > three dimensions.  The cells were longer along the $z$ axis and the
344 > space was divided into $N$ slabs along this axis (typically $N=20$).
345 > The top slab ($n=1$) was designated the ``hot'' slab, while the
346 > central slab ($n= N/2 + 1$) was designated the ``cold'' slab. In all
347 > cases, simulations were first thermalized in canonical ensemble (NVT)
348 > using a Nos\'{e}-Hoover thermostat.\cite{Hoover85} then equilibrated in
349 > microcanonical ensemble (NVE) before introducing any non-equilibrium
350 > method.
351  
352 < A Lennard-Jones fluid system was built and tested first. In order to
299 < compare our method with swapping RNEMD, a series of simulations were
300 < performed to calculate the shear viscosity and thermal conductivity of
301 < argon. 2592 atoms were in a orthorhombic cell, which was ${10.06\sigma
302 <  \times 10.06\sigma \times 30.18\sigma}$ by size. The reduced density
303 < ${\rho^* = \rho\sigma^3}$ was thus 0.85, which enabled direct
304 < comparison between our results and others. These simulations used
305 < velocity Verlet algorithm with reduced timestep ${\tau^* =
306 <  4.6\times10^{-4}}$.
352 > \subsection{RNEMD with M\"{u}ller-Plathe swaps}
353  
354 < For shear viscosity calculation, the reduced temperature was ${T^* =
355 <  k_B T/\varepsilon = 0.72}$. Simulations were first equilibrated in canonical
356 < ensemble (NVT), then equilibrated in microcanonical ensemble
311 < (NVE). Establishing and stablizing momentum gradient were followed
312 < also in NVE ensemble. For the swapping part, Muller-Plathe's algorithm was
313 < adopted.\cite{ISI:000080382700030} The simulation box was under
314 < periodic boundary condition, and devided into ${N = 20}$ slabs. In each swap,
315 < the top slab ${(n = 1)}$ exchange the most negative $x$ momentum with the
316 < most positive $x$ momentum in the center slab ${(n = N/2 + 1)}$. Referred
317 < to Tenney {\it et al.}\cite{ISI:000273472300004}, a series of swapping
318 < frequency were chosen. According to each result from swapping
319 < RNEMD, scaling RNEMD simulations were run with the target momentum
320 < flux set to produce a similar momentum flux, and consequently shear
321 < rate. Furthermore, various scaling frequencies can be tested for one
322 < single swapping rate. To test the temperature homogeneity in our
323 < system of swapping and scaling methods, temperatures of different
324 < dimensions in all the slabs were observed. Most of the simulations
325 < include $10^5$ steps of equilibration without imposing momentum flux,
326 < $10^5$ steps of stablization with imposing unphysical momentum
327 < transfer, and $10^6$ steps of data collection under RNEMD. For
328 < relatively high momentum flux simulations, ${5\times10^5}$ step data
329 < collection is sufficient. For some low momentum flux simulations,
330 < ${2\times10^6}$ steps were necessary.
354 > In order to compare our new methodology with the original
355 > M\"{u}ller-Plathe swapping algorithm,\cite{ISI:000080382700030} we
356 > first performed simulations using the original technique.
357  
358 < After each simulation, the shear viscosity was calculated in reduced
359 < unit. The momentum flux was calculated with total unphysical
360 < transferred momentum ${P_x}$ and data collection time $t$:
358 > \subsection{RNEMD with NIVS scaling}
359 >
360 > For each simulation utilizing the swapping method, a corresponding
361 > NIVS-RNEMD simulation was carried out using a target momentum flux set
362 > to produce a the same momentum or energy flux exhibited in the
363 > swapping simulation.
364 >
365 > To test the temperature homogeneity (and to compute transport
366 > coefficients), directional momentum and temperature distributions were
367 > accumulated for molecules in each of the slabs.
368 >
369 > \subsection{Shear viscosities}
370 >
371 > The momentum flux was calculated using the total non-physical momentum
372 > transferred (${P_x}$) and the data collection time ($t$):
373   \begin{equation}
374   j_z(p_x) = \frac{P_x}{2 t L_x L_y}
375   \end{equation}
376 < where $L_x$ and $L_y$ denotes $x$ and $y$ lengths of the simulation
377 < box, and physical momentum transfer occurs in two ways due to our
378 < periodic boundary condition settings. And the velocity gradient
379 < ${\langle \partial v_x /\partial z \rangle}$ can be obtained by a
380 < linear regression of the velocity profile. From the shear viscosity
381 < $\eta$ calculated with the above parameters, one can further convert
382 < it into reduced unit ${\eta^* = \eta \sigma^2 (\varepsilon m)^{-1/2}}$.
376 > where $L_x$ and $L_y$ denote the $x$ and $y$ lengths of the simulation
377 > box.  The factor of two in the denominator is present because physical
378 > momentum transfer occurs in two directions due to our periodic
379 > boundary conditions.  The velocity gradient ${\langle \partial v_x
380 >  /\partial z \rangle}$ was obtained using linear regression of the
381 > velocity profiles in the bins.  For Lennard-Jones simulations, shear
382 > viscosities are reporte in reduced units (${\eta^* = \eta \sigma^2
383 >  (\varepsilon m)^{-1/2}}$).
384  
385 < For thermal conductivity calculations, simulations were first run under
347 < reduced temperature ${\langle T^*\rangle = 0.72}$ in NVE
348 < ensemble. Muller-Plathe's algorithm was adopted in the swapping
349 < method. Under identical simulation box parameters with our shear
350 < viscosity calculations, in each swap, the top slab exchanges all three
351 < translational momentum components of the molecule with least kinetic
352 < energy with the same components of the molecule in the center slab
353 < with most kinetic energy, unless this ``coldest'' molecule in the
354 < ``hot'' slab is still ``hotter'' than the ``hottest'' molecule in the
355 < ``cold'' slab. According to swapping RNEMD results, target energy flux
356 < for scaling RNEMD simulations can be set. Also, various scaling
357 < frequencies can be tested for one target energy flux. To compare the
358 < performance between swapping and scaling method, distributions of
359 < velocity and speed in different slabs were observed.
385 > \subsection{Thermal Conductivities}
386  
387 < For each swapping rate, thermal conductivity was calculated in reduced
388 < unit. The energy flux was calculated similarly to the momentum flux,
389 < with total unphysical transferred energy ${E_{total}}$ and data collection
364 < time $t$:
387 > The energy flux was calculated similarly to the momentum flux, using
388 > the total non-physical energy transferred (${E_{total}}$) and the data
389 > collection time $t$:
390   \begin{equation}
391   J_z = \frac{E_{total}}{2 t L_x L_y}
392   \end{equation}
393 < And the temperature gradient ${\langle\partial T/\partial z\rangle}$
394 < can be obtained by a linear regression of the temperature
395 < profile. From the thermal conductivity $\lambda$ calculated, one can
396 < further convert it into reduced unit ${\lambda^*=\lambda \sigma^2
397 <  m^{1/2} k_B^{-1}\varepsilon^{-1/2}}$.
393 > The temperature gradient ${\langle\partial T/\partial z\rangle}$ was
394 > obtained by a linear regression of the temperature profile. For
395 > Lennard-Jones simulations, thermal conductivities are reported in
396 > reduced units (${\lambda^*=\lambda \sigma^2 m^{1/2}
397 >  k_B^{-1}\varepsilon^{-1/2}}$).
398  
399 < \subsection{ Water / Metal Thermal Conductivity}
375 < Another series of our simulation is the calculation of interfacial
376 < thermal conductivity of a Au/H$_2$O system. Respective calculations of
377 < liquid water (SPC/E) and crystal gold (QSC) thermal conductivity were
378 < performed and compared with current results to ensure the validity of
379 < NIVS-RNEMD. After that, a mixture system was simulated.
399 > \subsection{Interfacial Thermal Conductivities}
400  
401 < For thermal conductivity calculation of bulk water, a simulation box
402 < consisting of 1000 molecules were first equilibrated under ambient
403 < pressure and temperature conditions using NPT ensemble, followed by
404 < equilibration in fixed volume (NVT). The system was then equilibrated in
405 < microcanonical ensemble (NVE). Also in NVE ensemble, establishing a
406 < stable thermal gradient was followed. The simulation box was under
387 < periodic boundary condition and devided into 10 slabs. Data collection
388 < process was similar to Lennard-Jones fluid system.
401 > For materials with a relatively low interfacial conductance, and in
402 > cases where the flux between the materials is small, the bulk regions
403 > on either side of an interface rapidly come to a state in which the
404 > two phases have relatively homogeneous (but distinct) temperatures.
405 > In calculating the interfacial thermal conductivity $G$, this
406 > assumption was made, and the conductance can be approximated as:
407  
390 Thermal conductivity calculation of bulk crystal gold used a similar
391 protocol. The face centered cubic crystal simulation box consists of
392 2880 Au atoms. The lattice was first allowed volume change to relax
393 under ambient temperature and pressure. Equilibrations in canonical and
394 microcanonical ensemble were followed in order. With the simulation
395 lattice devided evenly into 10 slabs, different thermal gradients were
396 established by applying a set of target thermal transfer flux. Data of
397 the series of thermal gradients was collected for calculation.
398
399 After simulations of bulk water and crystal gold, a mixture system was
400 constructed, consisting of 1188 Au atoms and 1862 H$_2$O
401 molecules. Spohr potential was adopted in depicting the interaction
402 between metal atom and water molecule.\cite{ISI:000167766600035} A
403 similar protocol of equilibration was followed. Several thermal
404 gradients was built under different target thermal flux. It was found
405 out that compared to our previous simulation systems, the two phases
406 could have large temperature difference even under a relatively low
407 thermal flux. Therefore, under our low flux conditions, it is assumed
408 that the metal and water phases have respectively homogeneous
409 temperature, excluding the surface regions. In calculating the
410 interfacial thermal conductivity $G$, this assumptioin was applied and
411 thus our formula becomes:
412
408   \begin{equation}
409   G = \frac{E_{total}}{2 t L_x L_y \left( \langle T_{gold}\rangle -
410      \langle T_{water}\rangle \right)}
411   \label{interfaceCalc}
412   \end{equation}
413 < where ${E_{total}}$ is the imposed unphysical kinetic energy transfer
414 < and ${\langle T_{gold}\rangle}$ and ${\langle T_{water}\rangle}$ are the
415 < average observed temperature of gold and water phases respectively.
413 > where ${E_{total}}$ is the imposed non-physical kinetic energy
414 > transfer and ${\langle T_{gold}\rangle}$ and ${\langle
415 >  T_{water}\rangle}$ are the average observed temperature of gold and
416 > water phases respectively.
417  
418 < \section{Results And Discussions}
423 < \subsection{Thermal Conductivity}
424 < \subsubsection{Lennard-Jones Fluid}
425 < Our thermal conductivity calculations show that scaling method results
426 < agree with swapping method. Four different exchange intervals were
427 < tested (Table \ref{thermalLJRes}) using swapping method. With a fixed
428 < 10fs exchange interval, target exchange kinetic energy was set to
429 < produce equivalent kinetic energy flux as in swapping method. And
430 < similar thermal gradients were observed with similar thermal flux in
431 < two simulation methods (Figure \ref{thermalGrad}).
418 > \section{Results}
419  
420 < \begin{table*}
421 < \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
422 < \begin{center}
420 > \subsection{Lennard-Jones Fluid}
421 > 2592 Lennard-Jones atoms were placed in an orthorhombic cell
422 > ${10.06\sigma \times 10.06\sigma \times 30.18\sigma}$ on a side.  The
423 > reduced density ${\rho^* = \rho\sigma^3}$ was thus 0.85, which enabled
424 > direct comparison between our results and previous methods.  These
425 > simulations were carried out with a reduced timestep ${\tau^* =
426 >  4.6\times10^{-4}}$.  For the shear viscosity calculations, the mean
427 > temperature was ${T^* = k_B T/\varepsilon = 0.72}$.  For thermal
428 > conductivity calculations, simulations were first run under reduced
429 > temperature ${\langle T^*\rangle = 0.72}$ in the microcanonical
430 > ensemble, but other temperatures ([XXX, YYY, and ZZZ]) were also
431 > sampled.  The simulations included $10^5$ steps of equilibration
432 > without any momentum flux, $10^5$ steps of stablization with an
433 > imposed momentum transfer to create a gradient, and $10^6$ steps of
434 > data collection under RNEMD.
435  
436 < \caption{Calculation results for thermal conductivity of Lennard-Jones
438 <  fluid at ${\langle T^* \rangle = 0.72}$ and ${\rho^* = 0.85}$, with
439 <  swap and scale methods at various kinetic energy exchange rates. Results
440 <  in reduced unit. Errors of calculations in parentheses.}
436 > \subsubsection*{Thermal Conductivity}
437  
438 < \begin{tabular}{ccc}
439 < \hline
440 < (Equilvalent) Exchange Interval (fs) & $\lambda^*_{swap}$ &
441 < $\lambda^*_{scale}$\\
442 < \hline
443 < 250  & 7.03(0.34) & 7.30(0.10)\\
444 < 500  & 7.03(0.14) & 6.95(0.09)\\
449 < 1000 & 6.91(0.42) & 7.19(0.07)\\
450 < 2000 & 7.52(0.15) & 7.19(0.28)\\
451 < \hline
452 < \end{tabular}
453 < \label{thermalLJRes}
454 < \end{center}
455 < \end{minipage}
456 < \end{table*}
438 > Our thermal conductivity calculations show that the NIVS method agrees
439 > well with the swapping method. Four different swap intervals were
440 > tested (Table \ref{LJ}). With a fixed scaling interval of 10 time steps,
441 > the target exchange kinetic energy produced equivalent kinetic energy
442 > flux as in the swapping method. Similar thermal gradients were
443 > observed with similar thermal flux under the two different methods
444 > (Figure \ref{thermalGrad}).
445  
446 < \begin{figure}
447 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{thermalGrad}
448 < \caption{Temperature gradients under various kinetic energy flux of
461 <  thermal conductivity simulations}
462 < \label{thermalGrad}
463 < \end{figure}
446 > \begin{table*}
447 >  \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
448 >    \begin{center}
449  
450 < During these simulations, molecule velocities were recorded in 1000 of
451 < all the snapshots. These velocity data were used to produce histograms
452 < of velocity and speed distribution in different slabs. From these
453 < histograms, it is observed that with increasing unphysical kinetic
454 < energy flux, speed and velocity distribution of molecules in slabs
455 < where swapping occured could deviate from Maxwell-Boltzmann
456 < distribution. Figure \ref{histSwap} indicates how these distributions
457 < deviate from ideal condition. In high temperature slabs, probability
458 < density in low speed is confidently smaller than ideal distribution;
459 < in low temperature slabs, probability density in high speed is smaller
460 < than ideal. This phenomenon is observable even in our relatively low
461 < swapping rate simulations. And this deviation could also leads to
462 < deviation of distribution of velocity in various dimensions. One
463 < feature of these deviated distribution is that in high temperature
479 < slab, the ideal Gaussian peak was changed into a relatively flat
480 < plateau; while in low temperature slab, that peak appears sharper.
481 <
482 < \begin{figure}
483 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{histSwap}
484 < \caption{Speed distribution for thermal conductivity using swapping RNEMD.}
485 < \label{histSwap}
486 < \end{figure}
487 <
488 < \begin{figure}
489 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{histScale}
490 < \caption{Speed distribution for thermal conductivity using scaling RNEMD.}
491 < \label{histScale}
492 < \end{figure}
493 <
494 < \subsubsection{SPC/E Water}
495 < Our results of SPC/E water thermal conductivity are comparable to
496 < Bedrov {\it et al.}\cite{ISI:000090151400044}, which employed the
497 < previous swapping RNEMD method for their calculation. Our simulations
498 < were able to produce a similar temperature gradient to their
499 < system. However, the average temperature of our system is 300K, while
500 < theirs is 318K, which would be attributed for part of the difference
501 < between the two series of results. Both methods yields values in
502 < agreement with experiment. And this shows the applicability of our
503 < method to multi-atom molecular system.
450 >      \caption{Thermal conductivity ($\lambda^*$) and shear viscosity
451 >        ($\eta^*$) (in reduced units) of a Lennard-Jones fluid at
452 >        ${\langle T^* \rangle = 0.72}$ and ${\rho^* = 0.85}$ computed
453 >        at various momentum fluxes.  The original swapping method and
454 >        the velocity scaling method give similar results.
455 >        Uncertainties are indicated in parentheses.}
456 >      
457 >      \begin{tabular}{|cc|cc|cc|}
458 >        \hline
459 >        \multicolumn{2}{|c}{Momentum Exchange} &
460 >        \multicolumn{2}{|c}{Swapping RNEMD} &
461 >        \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{NIVS-RNEMD} \\
462 >        \hline
463 >        \multirow{2}{*}{Swap Interval (fs)} & Equivalent $J_z^*$ or &
464  
465 < \begin{figure}
466 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{spceGrad}
467 < \caption{Temperature gradients for SPC/E water thermal conductivity.}
468 < \label{spceGrad}
469 < \end{figure}
470 <
471 < \begin{table*}
472 < \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
473 < \begin{center}
474 <
475 < \caption{Calculation results for thermal conductivity of SPC/E water
476 <  at ${\langle T\rangle}$ = 300K at various thermal exchange rates. Errors of
477 <  calculations in parentheses. }
478 <
479 < \begin{tabular}{cccc}
480 < \hline
521 < $\langle dT/dz\rangle$(K/\AA) & & $\lambda$(W/m/K) & \\
522 < & This work & Previous simulations\cite{ISI:000090151400044} &
523 < Experiment$^a$\\
524 < \hline
525 < 0.38 & 0.816(0.044) & & 0.64\\
526 < 0.81 & 0.770(0.008) & 0.784\\
527 < 1.54 & 0.813(0.007) & 0.730\\
528 < \hline
529 < \end{tabular}
530 < \label{spceThermal}
531 < \end{center}
532 < \end{minipage}
465 >        \multirow{2}{*}{$\lambda^*_{swap}$} &
466 >        \multirow{2}{*}{$\eta^*_{swap}$}  &
467 >        \multirow{2}{*}{$\lambda^*_{scale}$} &
468 >        \multirow{2}{*}{$\eta^*_{scale}$} \\
469 >        & $j_p^*(v_x)$ (reduced units) & & & & \\
470 >        \hline
471 >        250  & 0.16  & 7.03(0.34) &            & 7.30(0.10) & \\
472 >        500  & 0.09  & 7.03(0.14) & 3.64(0.05) & 6.95(0.09) & 3.76(0.09)\\
473 >        1000 & 0.047 & 6.91(0.42) & 3.52(0.16) & 7.19(0.07) & 3.66(0.06)\\
474 >        2000 & 0.024 & 7.52(0.15) & 3.72(0.05) & 7.19(0.28) & 3.32(0.18)\\
475 >        2500 & 0.019 &            & 3.42(0.06) &            & 3.43(0.08)\\
476 >        \hline
477 >      \end{tabular}
478 >      \label{LJ}
479 >    \end{center}
480 >  \end{minipage}
481   \end{table*}
482  
535 \subsubsection{Crystal Gold}
536 Our results of gold thermal conductivity used QSC force field are
537 shown in Table \ref{AuThermal}. Although our calculation is smaller
538 than experimental value by an order of more than 100, this difference
539 is mainly attributed to the lack of electron interaction
540 representation in our force field parameters. Richardson {\it et
541  al.}\cite{ISI:A1992HX37800010} used similar force field parameters
542 in their metal thermal conductivity calculations. The EMD method they
543 employed in their simulations produced comparable results to
544 ours. Therefore, it is confident to conclude that NIVS-RNEMD is
545 applicable to metal force field system.
546
483   \begin{figure}
484 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{AuGrad}
485 < \caption{Temperature gradients for crystal gold thermal conductivity.}
486 < \label{AuGrad}
484 >  \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{thermalGrad}
485 >  \caption{NIVS-RNEMD method creates similar temperature gradients
486 >    compared with the swapping method under a variety of imposed kinetic
487 >    energy flux values.}
488 >  \label{thermalGrad}
489   \end{figure}
490  
491 < \begin{table*}
554 < \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
555 < \begin{center}
491 > \subsubsection*{Velocity Distributions}
492  
493 < \caption{Calculation results for thermal conductivity of crystal gold
494 <  at ${\langle T\rangle}$ = 300K at various thermal exchange rates. Errors of
495 <  calculations in parentheses. }
493 > During these simulations, velocities were recorded every 1000 steps
494 > and was used to produce distributions of both velocity and speed in
495 > each of the slabs. From these distributions, we observed that under
496 > relatively high non-physical kinetic energy flux, the speed of
497 > molecules in slabs where swapping occured could deviate from the
498 > Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution. This behavior was also noted by Tenney
499 > and Maginn.\cite{Maginn:2010} Figure \ref{thermalHist} shows how these
500 > distributions deviate from an ideal distribution. In the ``hot'' slab,
501 > the probability density is notched at low speeds and has a substantial
502 > shoulder at higher speeds relative to the ideal MB distribution.  In
503 > the cold slab, the opposite notching and shouldering occurs.  This
504 > phenomenon is more obvious at higher swapping rates.  
505  
506 < \begin{tabular}{ccc}
507 < \hline
508 < $\langle dT/dz\rangle$(K/\AA) & $\lambda$(W/m/K)\\
509 < & This work & Previous simulations\cite{ISI:A1992HX37800010} \\
510 < \hline
511 < 1.44 & 1.10(0.01) & \\
512 < 2.86 & 1.08(0.02) & \\
513 < 5.14 & 1.15(0.01) & \\
514 < \hline
515 < \end{tabular}
516 < \label{AuThermal}
517 < \end{center}
573 < \end{minipage}
574 < \end{table*}
506 > In the velocity distributions, the ideal Gaussian peak is
507 > substantially flattened in the hot slab, and is overly sharp (with
508 > truncated wings) in the cold slab. This problem is rooted in the
509 > mechanism of the swapping method. Continually depleting low (high)
510 > speed particles in the high (low) temperature slab is not complemented
511 > by diffusions of low (high) speed particles from neighboring slabs,
512 > unless the swapping rate is sufficiently small. Simutaneously, surplus
513 > low speed particles in the low temperature slab do not have sufficient
514 > time to diffuse to neighboring slabs.  Since the thermal exchange rate
515 > must reach a minimum level to produce an observable thermal gradient,
516 > the swapping-method RNEMD has a relatively narrow choice of exchange
517 > times that can be utilized.
518  
519 < \subsection{Interfaciel Thermal Conductivity}
520 < After valid simulations of homogeneous water and gold systems using
521 < NIVS-RNEMD method, calculation of gold/water interfacial thermal
522 < conductivity was followed. It is found out that the interfacial
523 < conductance is low due to a hydrophobic surface in our system. Figure
524 < \ref{interfaceDensity} demonstrates this observance. Consequently, our
525 < reported results (Table \ref{interfaceRes}) are of two orders of
526 < magnitude smaller than our calculations on homogeneous systems.
519 > For comparison, NIVS-RNEMD produces a speed distribution closer to the
520 > Maxwell-Boltzmann curve (Figure \ref{thermalHist}).  The reason for
521 > this is simple; upon velocity scaling, a Gaussian distribution remains
522 > Gaussian.  Although a single scaling move is non-isotropic in three
523 > dimensions, our criteria for choosing a set of scaling coefficients
524 > helps maintain the distributions as close to isotropic as possible.
525 > Consequently, NIVS-RNEMD is able to impose an unphysical thermal flux
526 > as the previous RNEMD methods but without large perturbations to the
527 > velocity distributions in the two slabs.
528  
529   \begin{figure}
530 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{interfaceDensity}
531 < \caption{Density profile for interfacial thermal conductivity
532 <  simulation box.}
533 < \label{interfaceDensity}
530 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{thermalHist}
531 > \caption{Speed distribution for thermal conductivity using a)
532 >  ``swapping'' and b) NIVS- RNEMD methods. Shown is from the
533 >  simulations with an exchange or equilvalent exchange interval of 250
534 >  fs. In circled areas, distributions from ``swapping'' RNEMD
535 >  simulation have deviation from ideal Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution
536 >  (curves fit for each distribution).}
537 > \label{thermalHist}
538   \end{figure}
539  
592 \begin{figure}
593 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{interfaceGrad}
594 \caption{Temperature profiles for interfacial thermal conductivity
595  simulation box.}
596 \label{interfaceGrad}
597 \end{figure}
540  
541 < \begin{table*}
542 < \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
543 < \begin{center}
541 > \subsubsection*{Shear Viscosity}
542 > Our calculations (Table \ref{LJ}) show that velocity-scaling
543 > RNEMD predicted comparable shear viscosities to swap RNEMD method.  All
544 > the scale method results were from simulations that had a scaling
545 > interval of 10 time steps. The average molecular momentum gradients of
546 > these samples are shown in Figure \ref{shear} (a) and (b).
547  
603 \caption{Calculation results for interfacial thermal conductivity
604  at ${\langle T\rangle \sim}$ 300K at various thermal exchange
605  rates. Errors of calculations in parentheses. }
606
607 \begin{tabular}{cccc}
608 \hline
609 $J_z$(MW/m$^2$) & $T_{gold}$ & $T_{water}$ & $G$(MW/m$^2$/K)\\
610 \hline
611 98.0 & 355.2 & 295.8 & 1.65(0.21) \\
612 78.8 & 343.8 & 298.0 & 1.72(0.32) \\
613 73.6 & 344.3 & 298.0 & 1.59(0.24) \\
614 49.2 & 330.1 & 300.4 & 1.65(0.35) \\
615 \hline
616 \end{tabular}
617 \label{interfaceRes}
618 \end{center}
619 \end{minipage}
620 \end{table*}
621
622 \subsection{Shear Viscosity}
623 Our calculations (Table \ref{shearRate}) shows that scale RNEMD method
624 produced comparable shear viscosity to swap RNEMD method. In Table
625 \ref{shearRate}, the names of the calculated samples are devided into
626 two parts. The first number refers to total slabs in one simulation
627 box. The second number refers to the swapping interval in swap method, or
628 in scale method the equilvalent swapping interval that the same
629 momentum flux would theoretically result in swap method. All the scale
630 method results were from simulations that had a scaling interval of 10
631 time steps. The average molecular momentum gradients of these samples
632 are shown in Figure \ref{shearGrad}.
633
634 \begin{table*}
635 \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
636 \begin{center}
637
638 \caption{Calculation results for shear viscosity of Lennard-Jones
639  fluid at ${T^* = 0.72}$ and ${\rho^* = 0.85}$, with swap and scale
640  methods at various momentum exchange rates. Results in reduced
641  unit. Errors of calculations in parentheses. }
642
643 \begin{tabular}{ccc}
644 \hline
645 Series & $\eta^*_{swap}$ & $\eta^*_{scale}$\\
646 \hline
647 20-500 & 3.64(0.05) & 3.76(0.09)\\
648 20-1000 & 3.52(0.16) & 3.66(0.06)\\
649 20-2000 & 3.72(0.05) & 3.32(0.18)\\
650 20-2500 & 3.42(0.06) & 3.43(0.08)\\
651 \hline
652 \end{tabular}
653 \label{shearRate}
654 \end{center}
655 \end{minipage}
656 \end{table*}
657
548   \begin{figure}
549 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{shearGrad}
550 < \caption{Average momentum gradients of shear viscosity simulations}
551 < \label{shearGrad}
549 >  \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{shear}
550 >  \caption{Average momentum gradients in shear viscosity simulations,
551 >    using (a) ``swapping'' method and (b) NIVS-RNEMD method
552 >    respectively. (c) Temperature difference among x and y, z dimensions
553 >    observed when using NIVS-RNEMD with equivalent exchange interval of
554 >    500 fs.}
555 >  \label{shear}
556   \end{figure}
557  
664 \begin{figure}
665 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{shearTempScale}
666 \caption{Temperature profile for scaling RNEMD simulation.}
667 \label{shearTempScale}
668 \end{figure}
558   However, observations of temperatures along three dimensions show that
559   inhomogeneity occurs in scaling RNEMD simulations, particularly in the
560 < two slabs which were scaled. Figure \ref{shearTempScale} indicate that with
560 > two slabs which were scaled. Figure \ref{shear} (c) indicate that with
561   relatively large imposed momentum flux, the temperature difference among $x$
562   and the other two dimensions was significant. This would result from the
563   algorithm of scaling method. From Eq. \ref{eq:fluxPlane}, after
# Line 688 | Line 577 | attractive than swapping RNEMD in shear viscosity calc
577   exchange momentum flux simulations makes scaling RNEMD method less
578   attractive than swapping RNEMD in shear viscosity calculation.
579  
580 +
581 + \subsection{Bulk SPC/E water}
582 +
583 + We compared the thermal conductivity of SPC/E water using NIVS-RNEMD
584 + to the work of Bedrov {\it et al.}\cite{Bedrov:2000}, which employed
585 + the original swapping RNEMD method.  Bedrov {\it et
586 +  al.}\cite{Bedrov:2000} argued that exchange of the molecule
587 + center-of-mass velocities instead of single atom velocities in a
588 + molecule conserves the total kinetic energy and linear momentum.  This
589 + principle is also adopted in our simulations. Scaling was applied to
590 + the center-of-mass velocities of the rigid bodies of SPC/E model water
591 + molecules.
592 +
593 + To construct the simulations, a simulation box consisting of 1000
594 + molecules were first equilibrated under ambient pressure and
595 + temperature conditions using the isobaric-isothermal (NPT)
596 + ensemble.\cite{melchionna93} A fixed volume was chosen to match the
597 + average volume observed in the NPT simulations, and this was followed
598 + by equilibration, first in the canonical (NVT) ensemble, followed by a
599 + 100ps period under constant-NVE conditions without any momentum
600 + flux. 100ps was allowed to stabilize the system with an imposed
601 + momentum transfer to create a gradient, and 1ns was alotted for
602 + data collection under RNEMD.
603 +
604 + As shown in Figure \ref{spceGrad}, temperature gradients were
605 + established similar to the previous work.  However, the average
606 + temperature of our system is 300K, while that in Bedrov {\it et al.}
607 + is 318K, which would be attributed for part of the difference between
608 + the final calculation results (Table \ref{spceThermal}). [WHY DIDN'T
609 + WE DO 318 K?]  Both methods yield values in reasonable agreement with
610 + experiment [DONE AT WHAT TEMPERATURE?]
611 +
612 + \begin{figure}
613 +  \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{spceGrad}
614 +  \caption{Temperature gradients in SPC/E water thermal conductivity
615 +    simulations.}
616 +  \label{spceGrad}
617 + \end{figure}
618 +
619 + \begin{table*}
620 +  \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
621 +    \begin{center}
622 +      
623 +      \caption{Thermal conductivity of SPC/E water under various
624 +        imposed thermal gradients. Uncertainties are indicated in
625 +        parentheses.}
626 +      
627 +      \begin{tabular}{|c|ccc|}
628 +        \hline
629 +        \multirow{2}{*}{$\langle dT/dz\rangle$(K/\AA)} & \multicolumn{3}{|c|}{$\lambda
630 +          (\mathrm{W m}^{-1} \mathrm{K}^{-1})$} \\
631 +        & This work (300K) & Previous simulations (318K)\cite{Bedrov:2000} &
632 +        Experiment\cite{WagnerKruse}\\
633 +        \hline
634 +        0.38 & 0.816(0.044) & & 0.64\\
635 +        0.81 & 0.770(0.008) & 0.784 & \\
636 +        1.54 & 0.813(0.007) & 0.730 & \\
637 +        \hline
638 +      \end{tabular}
639 +      \label{spceThermal}
640 +    \end{center}
641 +  \end{minipage}
642 + \end{table*}
643 +
644 + \subsection{Crystalline Gold}
645 +
646 + To see how the method performed in a solid, we calculated thermal
647 + conductivities using two atomistic models for gold.  Several different
648 + potential models have been developed that reasonably describe
649 + interactions in transition metals. In particular, the Embedded Atom
650 + Model ({\sc eam})~\cite{PhysRevB.33.7983} and Sutton-Chen ({\sc
651 +  sc})~\cite{Chen90} potential have been used to study a wide range of
652 + phenomena in both bulk materials and
653 + nanoparticles.\cite{ISI:000207079300006,Clancy:1992,Vardeman:2008fk,Vardeman-II:2001jn,ShibataT._ja026764r,Sankaranarayanan:2005lr,Chui:2003fk,Wang:2005qy,Medasani:2007uq}
654 + Both potentials are based on a model of a metal which treats the
655 + nuclei and core electrons as pseudo-atoms embedded in the electron
656 + density due to the valence electrons on all of the other atoms in the
657 + system. The {\sc sc} potential has a simple form that closely
658 + resembles the Lennard Jones potential,
659 + \begin{equation}
660 + \label{eq:SCP1}
661 + U_{tot}=\sum _{i}\left[ \frac{1}{2}\sum _{j\neq i}D_{ij}V^{pair}_{ij}(r_{ij})-c_{i}D_{ii}\sqrt{\rho_{i}}\right] ,
662 + \end{equation}
663 + where $V^{pair}_{ij}$ and $\rho_{i}$ are given by
664 + \begin{equation}
665 + \label{eq:SCP2}
666 + V^{pair}_{ij}(r)=\left( \frac{\alpha_{ij}}{r_{ij}}\right)^{n_{ij}}, \rho_{i}=\sum_{j\neq i}\left( \frac{\alpha_{ij}}{r_{ij}}\right) ^{m_{ij}}.
667 + \end{equation}
668 + $V^{pair}_{ij}$ is a repulsive pairwise potential that accounts for
669 + interactions between the pseudoatom cores. The $\sqrt{\rho_i}$ term in
670 + Eq. (\ref{eq:SCP1}) is an attractive many-body potential that models
671 + the interactions between the valence electrons and the cores of the
672 + pseudo-atoms. $D_{ij}$, $D_{ii}$ set the appropriate overall energy
673 + scale, $c_i$ scales the attractive portion of the potential relative
674 + to the repulsive interaction and $\alpha_{ij}$ is a length parameter
675 + that assures a dimensionless form for $\rho$. These parameters are
676 + tuned to various experimental properties such as the density, cohesive
677 + energy, and elastic moduli for FCC transition metals. The quantum
678 + Sutton-Chen ({\sc q-sc}) formulation matches these properties while
679 + including zero-point quantum corrections for different transition
680 + metals.\cite{PhysRevB.59.3527}  The {\sc eam} functional forms differ
681 + slightly from {\sc sc} but the overall method is very similar.
682 +
683 + In this work, we have utilized both the {\sc eam} and the {\sc q-sc}
684 + potentials to test the behavior of scaling RNEMD.
685 +
686 + A face-centered-cubic (FCC) lattice was prepared containing 2880 Au
687 + atoms (i.e. ${6\times 6\times 20}$ unit cells). Simulations were run
688 + both with and without isobaric-isothermal (NPT)~\cite{melchionna93}
689 + pre-equilibration at a target pressure of 1 atm. When equilibrated
690 + under NPT conditions, our simulation box expanded by approximately 1\%
691 + in volume. Following adjustment of the box volume, equilibrations in
692 + both the canonical and microcanonical ensembles were carried out. With
693 + the simulation cell divided evenly into 10 slabs, different thermal
694 + gradients were established by applying a set of target thermal
695 + transfer fluxes.
696 +
697 + The results for the thermal conductivity of gold are shown in Table
698 + \ref{AuThermal}.  In these calculations, the end and middle slabs were
699 + excluded in thermal gradient linear regession. {\sc eam} predicts
700 + slightly larger thermal conductivities than {\sc q-sc}.  However, both
701 + values are smaller than experimental value by a factor of more than
702 + 200. This behavior has been observed previously by Richardson and
703 + Clancy, and has been attributed to the lack of electronic effects in
704 + these force fields.\cite{Clancy:1992} The non-equilibrium MD method
705 + employed in their simulations gave an thermal conductance estimation
706 + of [FORCE FIELD] gold as [RESULT IN REF], which is comparable to ours. It
707 + should be noted that the density of the metal being simulated also
708 + greatly affects the thermal conductivity.  With an expanded lattice,
709 + lower thermal conductance is expected (and observed). We also observed
710 + a decrease in thermal conductance at higher temperatures, a trend that
711 + agrees with experimental measurements [PAGE
712 + NUMBERS?].\cite{AshcroftMermin}
713 +
714 + \begin{table*}
715 +  \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
716 +    \begin{center}
717 +      
718 +      \caption{Calculated thermal conductivity of crystalline gold
719 +        using two related force fields. Calculations were done at both
720 +        experimental and equilibrated densities and at a range of
721 +        temperatures and thermal flux rates.  Uncertainties are
722 +        indicated in parentheses. [SWAPPING COMPARISON?]}
723 +      
724 +      \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|cc|}
725 +        \hline
726 +        Force Field & $\rho$ (g/cm$^3$) & ${\langle T\rangle}$ (K) &
727 +        $\langle dT/dz\rangle$ (K/\AA) & $\lambda (\mathrm{W m}^{-1} \mathrm{K}^{-1})$\\
728 +        \hline
729 +        \multirow{7}{*}{\sc q-sc} & \multirow{3}{*}{19.188} & \multirow{3}{*}{300} & 1.44 & 1.10(0.06)\\
730 +        &        &     & 2.86 & 1.08(0.05)\\
731 +        &        &     & 5.14 & 1.15(0.07)\\\cline{2-5}
732 +        & \multirow{4}{*}{19.263} & \multirow{2}{*}{300} & 2.31 & 1.25(0.06)\\
733 +        &        &     & 3.02 & 1.26(0.05)\\\cline{3-5}
734 +        &        & \multirow{2}{*}{575} & 3.02 & 1.02(0.07)\\
735 +        &        &     & 4.84 & 0.92(0.05)\\
736 +        \hline
737 +        \multirow{8}{*}{\sc eam} & \multirow{3}{*}{19.045} & \multirow{3}{*}{300} & 1.24 & 1.24(0.16)\\
738 +        &        &     & 2.06 & 1.37(0.04)\\
739 +        &        &     & 2.55 & 1.41(0.07)\\\cline{2-5}
740 +        & \multirow{5}{*}{19.263} & \multirow{3}{*}{300} & 1.06 & 1.45(0.13)\\
741 +        &        &     & 2.04 & 1.41(0.07)\\
742 +        &        &     & 2.41 & 1.53(0.10)\\\cline{3-5}
743 +        &        & \multirow{2}{*}{575} & 2.82 & 1.08(0.03)\\
744 +        &        &     & 4.14 & 1.08(0.05)\\
745 +        \hline
746 +      \end{tabular}
747 +      \label{AuThermal}
748 +    \end{center}
749 +  \end{minipage}
750 + \end{table*}
751 +
752 + \subsection{Thermal Conductance at the Au/H$_2$O interface}
753 + The most attractive aspect of the scaling approach for RNEMD is the
754 + ability to use the method in non-homogeneous systems, where molecules
755 + of different identities are segregated in different slabs.  To test
756 + this application, we simulated a Gold (111) / water interface.  To
757 + construct the interface, a box containing a lattice of 1188 Au atoms
758 + (with the 111 surface in the +z and -z directions) was allowed to
759 + relax under ambient temperature and pressure.  A separate (but
760 + identically sized) box of SPC/E water was also equilibrated at ambient
761 + conditions.  The two boxes were combined by removing all water
762 + molecules within 3 \AA radius of any gold atom.  The final
763 + configuration contained 1862 SPC/E water molecules.
764 +
765 + After simulations of bulk water and crystal gold, a mixture system was
766 + constructed, consisting of 1188 Au atoms and 1862 H$_2$O
767 + molecules. Spohr potential was adopted in depicting the interaction
768 + between metal atom and water molecule.\cite{ISI:000167766600035} A
769 + similar protocol of equilibration was followed. Several thermal
770 + gradients was built under different target thermal flux. It was found
771 + out that compared to our previous simulation systems, the two phases
772 + could have large temperature difference even under a relatively low
773 + thermal flux.
774 +
775 +
776 + After simulations of homogeneous water and gold systems using
777 + NIVS-RNEMD method were proved valid, calculation of gold/water
778 + interfacial thermal conductivity was followed. It is found out that
779 + the low interfacial conductance is probably due to the hydrophobic
780 + surface in our system. Figure \ref{interface} (a) demonstrates mass
781 + density change along $z$-axis, which is perpendicular to the
782 + gold/water interface. It is observed that water density significantly
783 + decreases when approaching the surface. Under this low thermal
784 + conductance, both gold and water phase have sufficient time to
785 + eliminate temperature difference inside respectively (Figure
786 + \ref{interface} b). With indistinguishable temperature difference
787 + within respective phase, it is valid to assume that the temperature
788 + difference between gold and water on surface would be approximately
789 + the same as the difference between the gold and water phase. This
790 + assumption enables convenient calculation of $G$ using
791 + Eq. \ref{interfaceCalc} instead of measuring temperatures of thin
792 + layer of water and gold close enough to surface, which would have
793 + greater fluctuation and lower accuracy. Reported results (Table
794 + \ref{interfaceRes}) are of two orders of magnitude smaller than our
795 + calculations on homogeneous systems, and thus have larger relative
796 + errors than our calculation results on homogeneous systems.
797 +
798 + \begin{figure}
799 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{interface}
800 + \caption{Simulation results for Gold/Water interfacial thermal
801 +  conductivity: (a) Significant water density decrease is observed on
802 +  crystalline gold surface, which indicates low surface contact and
803 +  leads to low thermal conductance. (b) Temperature profiles for a
804 +  series of simulations. Temperatures of different slabs in the same
805 +  phase show no significant differences.}
806 + \label{interface}
807 + \end{figure}
808 +
809 + \begin{table*}
810 +  \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
811 +    \begin{center}
812 +      
813 +      \caption{Computed interfacial thermal conductivity ($G$) values
814 +        for the Au(111) / water interface at ${\langle T\rangle \sim}$
815 +        300K using a range of energy fluxes. Uncertainties are
816 +        indicated in parentheses. }
817 +      
818 +      \begin{tabular}{|cccc|}
819 +        \hline
820 +        $J_z$ (MW/m$^2$) & $\langle T_{gold} \rangle$ (K) & $\langle
821 +        T_{water} \rangle$ (K) & $G$
822 +        (MW/m$^2$/K)\\
823 +        \hline
824 +        98.0 & 355.2 & 295.8 & 1.65(0.21) \\
825 +        78.8 & 343.8 & 298.0 & 1.72(0.32) \\
826 +        73.6 & 344.3 & 298.0 & 1.59(0.24) \\
827 +        49.2 & 330.1 & 300.4 & 1.65(0.35) \\
828 +        \hline
829 +      \end{tabular}
830 +      \label{interfaceRes}
831 +    \end{center}
832 +  \end{minipage}
833 + \end{table*}
834 +
835 +
836   \section{Conclusions}
837   NIVS-RNEMD simulation method is developed and tested on various
838 < systems. Simulation results demonstrate its validity of thermal
839 < conductivity calculations. NIVS-RNEMD improves non-Boltzmann-Maxwell
840 < distributions existing in previous RNEMD methods, and extends its
841 < applicability to interfacial systems. NIVS-RNEMD has also limited
842 < application on shear viscosity calculations, but under high momentum
843 < flux, it  could cause temperature difference among different
844 < dimensions. Modification is necessary to extend the applicability of
845 < NIVS-RNEMD in shear viscosity calculations.
838 > systems. Simulation results demonstrate its validity in thermal
839 > conductivity calculations, from Lennard-Jones fluid to multi-atom
840 > molecule like water and metal crystals. NIVS-RNEMD improves
841 > non-Boltzmann-Maxwell distributions, which exist in previous RNEMD
842 > methods. Furthermore, it develops a valid means for unphysical thermal
843 > transfer between different species of molecules, and thus extends its
844 > applicability to interfacial systems. Our calculation of gold/water
845 > interfacial thermal conductivity demonstrates this advantage over
846 > previous RNEMD methods. NIVS-RNEMD has also limited application on
847 > shear viscosity calculations, but could cause temperature difference
848 > among different dimensions under high momentum flux. Modification is
849 > necessary to extend the applicability of NIVS-RNEMD in shear viscosity
850 > calculations.
851  
852   \section{Acknowledgments}
853   Support for this project was provided by the National Science
# Line 705 | Line 855 | Dame.  \newpage
855   the Center for Research Computing (CRC) at the University of Notre
856   Dame.  \newpage
857  
858 < \bibliographystyle{jcp2}
858 > \bibliographystyle{aip}
859   \bibliography{nivsRnemd}
860 +
861   \end{doublespace}
862   \end{document}
863  

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines