ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/nivsRnemd/nivsRnemd.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/nivsRnemd/nivsRnemd.tex (file contents):
Revision 3614 by skuang, Sun Jul 18 03:20:57 2010 UTC vs.
Revision 3615 by skuang, Mon Jul 19 19:59:11 2010 UTC

# Line 329 | Line 329 | in a variety of different systems, including homogeneo
329   after an MD step with a variable frequency.  We have tested the method
330   in a variety of different systems, including homogeneous fluids
331   (Lennard-Jones and SPC/E water), crystalline solids ({\sc
332 <  eam}~\cite{PhysRevB.33.7983} and quantum Sutton-Chen ({\sc
332 >  eam})~\cite{PhysRevB.33.7983} and quantum Sutton-Chen ({\sc
333    q-sc})~\cite{PhysRevB.59.3527} models for Gold), and heterogeneous
334 < interfaces (QSC gold - SPC/E water). The last of these systems would
334 > interfaces ({\sc q-sc} gold - SPC/E water). The last of these systems would
335   have been difficult to study using previous RNEMD methods, but using
336   velocity scaling moves, we can even obtain estimates of the
337   interfacial thermal conductivities ($G$).
# Line 602 | Line 602 | established similar to the previous work.  However, th
602   data collection under RNEMD.
603  
604   As shown in Figure \ref{spceGrad}, temperature gradients were
605 < established similar to the previous work.  However, the average
606 < temperature of our system is 300K, while that in Bedrov {\it et al.}
607 < is 318K, which would be attributed for part of the difference between
608 < the final calculation results (Table \ref{spceThermal}). [WHY DIDN'T
609 < WE DO 318 K?]  Both methods yield values in reasonable agreement with
610 < experiment [DONE AT WHAT TEMPERATURE?]
605 > established similar to the previous work. Our simulation results under
606 > 318K are in well agreement with those from Bedrov {\it et al.} (Table
607 > \ref{spceThermal}). And both methods yield values in reasonable
608 > agreement with experimental value. A larger difference between
609 > simulation result and experiment is found under 300K. This could
610 > result from the force field that is used in simulation.
611  
612   \begin{figure}
613    \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{spceGrad}
# Line 624 | Line 624 | experiment [DONE AT WHAT TEMPERATURE?]
624          imposed thermal gradients. Uncertainties are indicated in
625          parentheses.}
626        
627 <      \begin{tabular}{|c|ccc|}
627 >      \begin{tabular}{|c|c|ccc|}
628          \hline
629 <        \multirow{2}{*}{$\langle dT/dz\rangle$(K/\AA)} & \multicolumn{3}{|c|}{$\lambda
630 <          (\mathrm{W m}^{-1} \mathrm{K}^{-1})$} \\
631 <        & This work (300K) & Previous simulations (318K)\cite{Bedrov:2000} &
629 >        \multirow{2}{*}{$\langle T\rangle$(K)} &
630 >        \multirow{2}{*}{$\langle dT/dz\rangle$(K/\AA)} &
631 >        \multicolumn{3}{|c|}{$\lambda (\mathrm{W m}^{-1}
632 >          \mathrm{K}^{-1})$} \\
633 >        & & This work & Previous simulations\cite{Bedrov:2000} &
634          Experiment\cite{WagnerKruse}\\
635          \hline
636 <        0.38 & 0.816(0.044) & & 0.64\\
637 <        0.81 & 0.770(0.008) & 0.784 & \\
638 <        1.54 & 0.813(0.007) & 0.730 & \\
636 >        \multirow{3}{*}{300} & 0.38 & 0.816(0.044) & &
637 >        \multirow{3}{*}{0.61}\\
638 >        & 0.81 & 0.770(0.008) & & \\
639 >        & 1.54 & 0.813(0.007) & & \\
640          \hline
641 +        \multirow{2}{*}{318} & 0.75 & 0.750(0.032) & 0.784 &
642 +        \multirow{2}{*}{0.64}\\
643 +        & 1.59 & 0.778(0.019) & 0.730 & \\
644 +        \hline
645        \end{tabular}
646        \label{spceThermal}
647      \end{center}
# Line 700 | Line 707 | Clancy, and has been attributed to the lack of electro
707   slightly larger thermal conductivities than {\sc q-sc}.  However, both
708   values are smaller than experimental value by a factor of more than
709   200. This behavior has been observed previously by Richardson and
710 < Clancy, and has been attributed to the lack of electronic effects in
711 < these force fields.\cite{Clancy:1992} The non-equilibrium MD method
710 > Clancy, and has been attributed to the lack of electronic contribution
711 > in these force fields.\cite{Clancy:1992} The non-equilibrium MD method
712   employed in their simulations gave an thermal conductance estimation
713 < of [FORCE FIELD] gold as [RESULT IN REF], which is comparable to ours. It
714 < should be noted that the density of the metal being simulated also
715 < greatly affects the thermal conductivity.  With an expanded lattice,
716 < lower thermal conductance is expected (and observed). We also observed
717 < a decrease in thermal conductance at higher temperatures, a trend that
718 < agrees with experimental measurements [PAGE
719 < NUMBERS?].\cite{AshcroftMermin}
713 > of {\sc eam} gold as 1.74$\mathrm{W m}^{-1}\mathrm{K}^{-1}$. As stated
714 > in their work, this was a rough estimation in the temperature range
715 > 300K-800K. Therefore, our results could be more accurate. It should be
716 > noted that the density of the metal being simulated also affects the
717 > thermal conductivity significantly. With an expanded lattice, lower
718 > thermal conductance is expected (and observed). We also observed a
719 > decrease in thermal conductance at higher temperatures, a trend that
720 > agrees with experimental measurements [PAGE NUMBERS?].\cite{AshcroftMermin}
721  
722   \begin{table*}
723    \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines