ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/nivsRnemd/nivsRnemd.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/nivsRnemd/nivsRnemd.tex (file contents):
Revision 3536 by skuang, Tue Oct 13 15:18:01 2009 UTC vs.
Revision 3538 by skuang, Sat Oct 17 03:38:44 2009 UTC

# Line 301 | Line 301 | were observed.
301   rate. Furthermore, various scaling frequencies can be tested for one
302   single swapping rate. To compare the performance between swapping and
303   scaling method, temperatures of different dimensions in all the slabs
304 < were observed.
304 > were observed. Most of the simulations include $10^5$ steps of
305 > equilibration without imposing momentum flux, $10^5$ steps of
306 > stablization with imposing momentum transfer, and $10^6$ steps of data
307 > collection under RNEMD. For relatively high momentum flux simulations,
308 > ${5\times10^5}$ step data collection is sufficient. For some low momentum
309 > flux simulations, ${2\times10^6}$ steps were necessary.
310  
311   After each simulation, the shear viscosity was calculated in reduced
312   unit. The momentum flux was calculated with total unphysical
# Line 343 | Line 348 | further convert it into reduced unit ${\lambda^*=\lamb
348  
349   \section{Results And Discussion}
350   \subsection{Shear Viscosity}
351 + Our calculations (Table \ref{shearRate}) shows that scale RNEMD method
352 + produced comparable shear viscosity to swap RNEMD method. In Table
353 + \ref{shearRate}, the names of the calculated samples are devided into
354 + two parts. The first number refers to total slabs in one simulation
355 + box. The second number refers to the swapping interval in swap method, or
356 + in scale method the equilvalent swapping interval that the same
357 + momentum flux would theoretically result in swap method. All the scale
358 + method results were from simulations that had 10 time steps of scaling
359 + interval. The average molecular momentum gradients of these samples
360 + are shown in Figures \ref{shearGradSwap} and \ref{shearGradScale}
361 + respectively.
362 +
363 + \begin{table*}
364 + \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
365 + \begin{center}
366 +
367 + \caption{Calculation results for shear viscosity of Lennard-Jones
368 +  fluid at ${T^* = 0.72}$ and ${\rho^* = 0.85}$, with swap and scale
369 +  methods at various momentum exchange rates. Results in reduced
370 +  unit. Errors of calculations in parentheses. }
371 +
372 + \begin{tabular}
373 + \hline
374 + Name & $\eta^*_{swap}$ & $\eta^*_{scale}$\\
375 + \hline
376 + 20-500 & 3.64(0.05) & 3.76(0.09)\\
377 + 20-1000 & 3.52(0.16) & -\\
378 + 20-2000 & - & 3.32(0.18)\\
379 + 20-2500 & - & 3.43(0.08)\\
380 + \end{tabular}
381 + \label{shearRate}
382 + \end{center}
383 + \end{minipage}
384 + \end{table*}
385 +
386 + \begin{figure}
387 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{shearGradSwap.eps}
388 + \caption{Average momentum gradients of simulations using swap method.}
389 + \label{shearGradSwap}
390 + \end{figure}
391  
392 + \begin{figure}
393 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{shearGradScale.eps}
394 + \caption{Average momentum gradients of simulations using scale
395 +  method.}
396 + \label{shearGradScale}
397 + \end{figure}
398 +
399 + \begin{figure}
400 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{shearTempScale.eps}
401 + \caption{Temperature profile for scaling RNEMD simulation.}
402 + \label{shearTempScale}
403 + \end{figure}
404 + However, observations of temperatures along three dimensions show that
405 + inhomogeneity occurs in scaling RNEMD simulations, particularly in the
406 + two slabs which were scaled. Figure \ref{shearTempScale} indicate that with
407 + increased imposed momentum flux, the temperature difference among $x$
408 + and the other two dimensions were larger. This would result from the
409 + scaling method. From Eq. \ref{eq:fluxPlane}, after momentum gradient
410 + is set up, $P_c^x$ would be roughly stable ($<0$). Consequently, scaling
411 + factor $x$ would most probably larger than 1. Therefore, the kinetic
412 + energy in $x$-dimension $K_c^x$ would keep increase after most scaling
413 + step. And if there is not enough time for the kinetic energy to
414 + exchange among different dimensions and different slabs, the system would finally build up temperature (kinetic energy) difference among the three dimensions.
415 + Also, between $y$ and $z$ dimensions in the scaled slabs, temperatures of
416 + $z$-axis are closer to neighbor slabs. This is due to momentum
417 + transfer along $z$ dimension between slabs.
418 +
419 + Although results between scaling and swapping methods are comparable,
420 + the inherent temperature inhomogeneity makes scaling RNEMD method less
421 + attractive than swapping RNEMD in shear viscosity calculation.
422 +
423 + \subsection{Thermal Conductivity}
424 +
425 +
426 +
427   \section{Acknowledgments}
428   Support for this project was provided by the National Science
429   Foundation under grant CHE-0848243. Computational time was provided by

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines