ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/nonperiodicVSS/nonperiodicVSS.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/nonperiodicVSS/nonperiodicVSS.tex (file contents):
Revision 3932 by kstocke1, Tue Aug 6 21:44:34 2013 UTC vs.
Revision 4063 by gezelter, Thu Mar 13 15:44:27 2014 UTC

# Line 2 | Line 2
2   \setkeys{acs}{usetitle = true}
3  
4   \usepackage{caption}
5 \usepackage{float}
5   \usepackage{geometry}
6   \usepackage{natbib}
7   \usepackage{setspace}
# Line 12 | Line 11
11   \usepackage{amssymb}
12   \usepackage{times}
13   \usepackage{mathptm}
15 \usepackage{setspace}
16 \usepackage{endfloat}
14   \usepackage{caption}
15   \usepackage{tabularx}
16   \usepackage{longtable}
17   \usepackage{graphicx}
21 \usepackage{multirow}
22 \usepackage{multicol}
18   \usepackage{achemso}
19   \usepackage[version=3]{mhchem}  % this is a great package for formatting chemical reactions
25 % \usepackage[square, comma, sort&compress]{natbib}
20   \usepackage{url}
27 \pagestyle{plain} \pagenumbering{arabic} \oddsidemargin 0.0cm
28 \evensidemargin 0.0cm \topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt \textheight
29 9.0in \textwidth 6.5in \brokenpenalty=10000
21  
22 < % double space list of tables and figures
23 < % \AtBeginDelayedFloats{\renewcomand{\baselinestretch}{1.66}}
33 < \setlength{\abovecaptionskip}{20 pt}
34 < \setlength{\belowcaptionskip}{30 pt}
22 > \title{A method for creating thermal and angular momentum fluxes in
23 >  non-periodic simulations}
24  
36 % \bibpunct{}{}{,}{s}{}{;}
37
38 % \citestyle{nature}
39 % \bibliographystyle{achemso}
40
41 \title{A Method for Creating Thermal and Angular Momentum Fluxes in Non-Periodic Systems}
42
25   \author{Kelsey M. Stocker}
26   \author{J. Daniel Gezelter}
27   \email{gezelter@nd.edu}
# Line 47 | Line 29
29  
30   \begin{document}
31  
32 + \begin{tocentry}
33 +
34 + Some journals require a graphical entry for the Table of Contents.
35 + This should be laid out ``print ready'' so that the sizing of the
36 + text is correct.
37 +
38 + Inside the \texttt{tocentry} environment, the font used is Helvetica
39 + 8\,pt, as required by \emph{Journal of the American Chemical
40 + Society}.
41 +
42 + The surrounding frame is 9\,cm by 3.5\,cm, which is the maximum
43 + permitted for  \emph{Journal of the American Chemical Society}
44 + graphical table of content entries. The box will not resize if the
45 + content is too big: instead it will overflow the edge of the box.
46 +
47 + This box and the associated title will always be printed on a
48 + separate page at the end of the document.
49 +
50 + \includegraphics{toc-entry-graphic} Some text to explain the graphic.
51 +
52 + \end{tocentry}
53 +
54 +
55   \newcolumntype{A}{p{1.5in}}
56   \newcolumntype{B}{p{0.75in}}
57  
# Line 58 | Line 63
63   %       University of Notre Dame\\
64   %       Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
65  
66 < \date{\today}
66 > %\date{\today}
67  
68 < \maketitle
68 > %\maketitle
69  
70 < \begin{doublespace}
70 > %\begin{doublespace}
71  
72   \begin{abstract}
73  
74 < We have adapted the Velocity Shearing and Scaling Reverse Non-Equilibium Molecular Dynamics (VSS-RNEMD) method for use with aperiodic system geometries. This new method is capable of creating stable temperature and angular velocity gradients in heterogeneous non-periodic systems while conserving total energy and angular momentum. To demonstrate the method, we have computed the thermal conductivities of a gold nanoparticle and water cluster, the shear viscosity of a water cluster, the interfacial thermal conductivity of a solvated gold nanoparticle and the interfacial friction of solvated gold nanostructures.
74 >  We present a new reverse non-equilibrium molecular dynamics (RNEMD)
75 >  method that can be used with non-periodic simulation cells. This
76 >  method applies thermal and/or angular momentum fluxes between two
77 >  arbitrary regions of the simulation, and is capable of creating
78 >  stable temperature and angular velocity gradients while conserving
79 >  total energy and angular momentum.  One particularly useful
80 >  application is the exchange of kinetic energy between two concentric
81 >  spherical regions, which can be used to generate thermal transport
82 >  between nanoparticles and the solvent that surrounds them.  The
83 >  rotational couple to the solvent (a measure of interfacial friction)
84 >  is also available via this method.  As demonstrations and tests of
85 >  the new method, we have computed the thermal conductivities of gold
86 >  nanoparticles and water clusters, the shear viscosity of a water
87 >  cluster, the interfacial thermal conductivity ($G$) of a solvated
88 >  gold nanoparticle and the interfacial friction of a variety of
89 >  solvated gold nanostructures.
90  
91   \end{abstract}
92  
# Line 79 | Line 99 | We have adapted the Velocity Shearing and Scaling Reve
99   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
100   \section{Introduction}
101  
102 + Non-equilibrium molecular dynamics (NEMD) methods impose a temperature
103 + or velocity {\it gradient} on a
104 + system,\cite{Ashurst:1975eu,Evans:1982oq,Erpenbeck:1984qe,Evans:1986nx,Vogelsang:1988qv,Maginn:1993kl,Hess:2002nr,Schelling:2002dp,Berthier:2002ai,Evans:2002tg,Vasquez:2004ty,Backer:2005sf,Jiang:2008hc,Picalek:2009rz}
105 + and use linear response theory to connect the resulting thermal or
106 + momentum {\it flux} to transport coefficients of bulk materials,
107 + \begin{equation}
108 + j_z(p_x) = -\eta \frac{\partial v_x}{\partial z},  \hspace{0.5in}
109 + J_z = \lambda \frac{\partial T}{\partial z}.
110 + \end{equation}
111 + Here, $\frac{\partial T}{\partial z}$ and $\frac{\partial
112 +  v_x}{\partial z}$ are the imposed thermal and momentum gradients,
113 + and as long as the imposed gradients are relatively small, the
114 + corresponding fluxes, $J_z$ and $j_z(p_x)$, have a linear relationship
115 + to the gradients.  The coefficients that provide this relationship
116 + correspond to physical properties of the bulk material, either the
117 + shear viscosity $(\eta)$ or thermal conductivity $(\lambda)$.  For
118 + systems which include phase boundaries or interfaces, it is often
119 + unclear what gradient (or discontinuity) should be imposed at the
120 + boundary between materials.
121  
122 + In contrast, reverse Non-Equilibrium Molecular Dynamics (RNEMD)
123 + methods impose an unphysical {\it flux} between different regions or
124 + ``slabs'' of the simulation
125 + box.\cite{Muller-Plathe:1997wq,Muller-Plathe:1999ao,Patel:2005zm,Shenogina:2009ix,Tenney:2010rp,Kuang:2010if,Kuang:2011ef,Kuang:2012fe,Stocker:2013cl}
126 + The system responds by developing a temperature or velocity {\it
127 +  gradient} between the two regions. The gradients which develop in
128 + response to the applied flux have the same linear response
129 + relationships to the transport coefficient of interest. Since the
130 + amount of the applied flux is known exactly, and measurement of a
131 + gradient is generally less complicated, imposed-flux methods typically
132 + take shorter simulation times to obtain converged results. At
133 + interfaces, the observed gradients often exhibit near-discontinuities
134 + at the boundaries between dissimilar materials. RNEMD methods do not
135 + need many trajectories to provide information about transport
136 + properties, and they have become widely used to compute thermal and
137 + mechanical transport in both homogeneous liquids and
138 + solids~\cite{Muller-Plathe:1997wq,Muller-Plathe:1999ao,Tenney:2010rp}
139 + as well as heterogeneous
140 + interfaces.\cite{Patel:2005zm,Shenogina:2009ix,Kuang:2010if,Kuang:2011ef,Kuang:2012fe,Stocker:2013cl}
141 +
142 + The strengths of specific algorithms for imposing the flux between two
143 + different slabs of the simulation cell has been the subject of some
144 + renewed interest.  The original RNEMD approach used kinetic energy or
145 + momentum exchange between particles in the two slabs, either through
146 + direct swapping of momentum vectors or via virtual elastic collisions
147 + between atoms in the two regions.  There have been recent
148 + methodological advances which involve scaling all particle velocities
149 + in both slabs.\cite{Kuang:2010if,Kuang:2012fe} Constraint equations
150 + are simultaneously imposed to require the simulation to conserve both
151 + total energy and total linear momentum.  The most recent and simplest
152 + of the velocity scaling approaches allows for simultaneous shearing
153 + (to provide viscosity estimates) as well as scaling (to provide
154 + information about thermal conductivity).\cite{Kuang:2012fe}
155 +
156 + To date, however, the RNEMD methods have only been used in periodic
157 + simulation cells where the exchange regions are physically separated
158 + along one of the axes of the simulation cell. This limits the
159 + applicability to infinite planar interfaces which are perpendicular to
160 + the applied flux.  In order to model steady-state non-equilibrium
161 + distributions for curved surfaces (e.g. hot nanoparticles in contact
162 + with colder solvent), or for regions that are not planar slabs, the
163 + method requires some generalization for non-parallel exchange regions.
164 + In the following sections, we present a new velocity shearing and
165 + scaling (VSS) RNEMD algorithm which has been explicitly designed for
166 + non-periodic simulations, and use the method to compute some thermal
167 + transport and solid-liquid friction at the surfaces of spherical and
168 + ellipsoidal nanoparticles.  
169 +
170   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
171   % **METHODOLOGY**
172   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
173 < \section{Methodology}
173 > \section{Velocity shearing and scaling (VSS) for non-periodic systems}
174  
175 < %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
176 < % FORCE FIELD PARAMETERS
177 < %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
178 < \subsection{Force field parameters}
175 > The original periodic VSS-RNEMD approach uses a series of simultaneous
176 > velocity shearing and scaling exchanges between the two
177 > slabs.\cite{Kuang:2012fe} This method imposes energy and linear
178 > momentum conservation constraints while simultaneously creating a
179 > desired flux between the two slabs. These constraints ensure that all
180 > configurations are sampled from the same microcanonical (NVE)
181 > ensemble.
182  
183 < We have chosen the SPC/E water model for these simulations. There are many values for physical properties from previous simulations available for direct comparison.
183 > \begin{figure}
184 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{figures/npVSS}
185 > \caption{Schematics of periodic (left) and non-periodic (right)
186 >  Velocity Shearing and Scaling RNEMD. A kinetic energy or momentum
187 >  flux is applied from region B to region A. Thermal gradients are
188 >  depicted by a color gradient. Linear or angular velocity gradients
189 >  are shown as arrows.}
190 > \label{fig:VSS}
191 > \end{figure}
192  
193 < Gold-gold interactions are described by the quantum Sutton-Chen (QSC) model. The QSC parameters are tuned to experimental properties such as density, cohesive energy, and elastic moduli and include zero-point quantum corrections.
193 > We have extended the VSS method for use in {\it non-periodic}
194 > simulations, in which the ``slabs'' have been generalized to two
195 > separated regions of space. These regions could be defined as
196 > concentric spheres (as in figure \ref{fig:VSS}), or one of the regions
197 > can be defined in terms of a dynamically changing ``hull'' comprising
198 > the surface atoms of the cluster. This latter definition is identical
199 > to the hull used in the Langevin Hull algorithm.\cite{Vardeman2011}
200 > For the non-periodic variant, the constraints fix both the total
201 > energy and total {\it angular} momentum of the system while
202 > simultaneously imposing a thermal and angular momentum flux between
203 > the two regions.
204  
205 < Hexane molecules are described by the TraPPE united atom model. This model provides good computational efficiency and reasonable accuracy for bulk thermal conductivity values.
206 <
207 < Metal-nonmetal interactions are governed by parameters derived from Luedtke and Landman.
208 <
209 <
210 < %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
211 < % NON-PERIODIC DYNAMICS
212 < %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
213 < \subsection{Dynamics for non-periodic systems}
214 <
215 < We have run all tests using the Langevin Hull nonperiodic simulation methodology. The Langevin Hull uses a Delaunay tesselation to create a dynamic convex hull composed of triangular facets with vertices at atomic sites. Atomic sites included in the hull are coupled to an external bath defined by a temperature, pressure and viscosity. Atoms not included in the hull are subject to standard Newtonian dynamics. Thermal coupling to the bath was turned off to avoid interference with any imposed kinetic flux. Systems containing liquids were run under moderate pressure ($\sim$ 5 atm) to avoid the formation of a substantial vapor phase, which would have a hull created out of a relatively small number of molecules.
108 <
109 < %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
110 < % NON-PERIODIC RNEMD
111 < %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
112 < \subsection{VSS-RNEMD for non-periodic systems}
113 <
114 < The adaptation of VSS-RNEMD for non-periodic systems is relatively
115 < straightforward. The major modifications to the method are the addition of a rotational shearing term and the use of more versatile hot / cold regions instead
116 < of rectangular slabs. A temperature profile along the $r$ coordinate is created by recording the average temperature of concentric spherical shells.
205 > After a time interval of $\Delta t$, the particle velocities
206 > ($\mathbf{v}_i$ and $\mathbf{v}_j$) in the two shells ($A$ and $B$)
207 > are modified by a velocity scaling coefficient ($a$ and $b$) and by a
208 > rotational shearing term ($\mathbf{c}_a$ and $\mathbf{c}_b$).  The
209 > scalars $a$ and $b$ collectively provide a thermal exchange between
210 > the two regions.  One of the values is larger than 1, and the other
211 > smaller. To conserve total energy and angular momentum, the values of
212 > these two scalars are coupled.  The vectors ($\mathbf{c}_a$ and
213 > $\mathbf{c}_b$) provide a relative rotational shear to the velocities
214 > of the particles within the two regions, and these vectors must also
215 > be coupled to constrain the total angular momentum.
216  
217 < At each time interval, the particle velocities ($\mathbf{v}_i$ and
218 < $\mathbf{v}_j$) in the cold and hot shells ($C$ and $H$) are modified by a
120 < velocity scaling coefficient ($c$ and $h$), an additive linear velocity shearing
121 < term ($\mathbf{a}_c$ and $\mathbf{a}_h$), and an additive angular velocity
122 < shearing term ($\mathbf{b}_c$ and $\mathbf{b}_h$). Here, $\langle
123 < \mathbf{v}_{i,j} \rangle$ and $\langle \mathbf{\omega}_{i,j} \rangle$ are the
124 < average linear and angular velocities for each shell.
125 <
217 > Once the values of the scaling and shearing factors are known, the
218 > velocity changes are applied,
219   \begin{displaymath}
220   \begin{array}{rclcl}
221 < & \underline{~~~~~~~~~~\mathrm{scaling}~~~~~~~~~~} & &
222 < \underline{\mathrm{rotational \; shearing}} \\  \\
221 > & \underline{~~~~~~~~\mathrm{scaling}~~~~~~~~} & &
222 > \underline{\mathrm{rotational~shearing}} \\  \\
223   \mathbf{v}_i $~~~$\leftarrow &
224 <  c \, \left(\mathbf{v}_i - \langle \omega_c
225 <  \rangle \times r_i\right) & + & \mathbf{b}_c \times r_i \\
224 >  a \left(\mathbf{v}_i - \langle \omega_a
225 >  \rangle \times \mathbf{r}_i\right) & + & \mathbf{c}_a \times \mathbf{r}_i \\
226   \mathbf{v}_j $~~~$\leftarrow &
227 <  h \, \left(\mathbf{v}_j - \langle \omega_h
228 <  \rangle \times r_j\right) & + & \mathbf{b}_h \times r_j
227 >  b  \left(\mathbf{v}_j - \langle \omega_b
228 >  \rangle \times \mathbf{r}_j\right) & + & \mathbf{c}_b \times \mathbf{r}_j
229   \end{array}
230   \end{displaymath}
231 <
231 > Here $\langle\mathbf{\omega}_a\rangle$ and $\langle\mathbf{\omega}_b\rangle$ are the instantaneous angular
232 > velocities of each shell, and $\mathbf{r}_i$ is the position of particle $i$ relative to a fixed point in space
233 > (usually the center of mass of the cluster). Particles in the shells also receive an additive ``angular shear''
234 > to their velocities. The amount of shear is governed by the imposed angular momentum flux,
235 > $\mathbf{j}_r(\mathbf{L})$,
236   \begin{eqnarray}
237 < \mathbf{b}_c & = & - \mathbf{j}_r(\mathbf{L}) \; \Delta \, t \; I_c^{-1} + \langle \omega_c \rangle \label{eq:bc}\\
238 < \mathbf{b}_h & = & + \mathbf{j}_r(\mathbf{L}) \; \Delta \, t \; I_h^{-1} + \langle \omega_h \rangle \label{eq:bh}
237 > \mathbf{c}_a & = & - \mathbf{j}_r(\mathbf{L}) \cdot
238 > \overleftrightarrow{I_a}^{-1} \Delta t   + \langle \omega_a \rangle \label{eq:bc}\\
239 > \mathbf{c}_b & = & + \mathbf{j}_r(\mathbf{L}) \cdot
240 > \overleftrightarrow{I_b}^{-1}  \Delta t  + \langle \omega_b \rangle \label{eq:bh}
241   \end{eqnarray}
242 + where $\overleftrightarrow{I}_{\{a,b\}}$ is the moment of inertia
243 + tensor for each of the two shells.
244  
245 < The total energy is constrained via two quadratic formulae,
246 <
245 > To simultaneously impose a thermal flux ($J_r$) between the shells we
246 > use energy conservation constraints,
247   \begin{eqnarray}
248 < K_c - J_r \; \Delta \, t & = & c^2 \, (K_c - \frac{1}{2}\langle \omega_c \rangle \cdot I_c\langle \omega_c \rangle) + \frac{1}{2} \mathbf{b}_c \cdot I_c \, \mathbf{b}_c \label{eq:Kc}\\
249 < K_h + J_r \; \Delta \, t & = & h^2 \, (K_h - \frac{1}{2}\langle \omega_h \rangle \cdot I_h\langle \omega_h \rangle) + \frac{1}{2} \mathbf{b}_h \cdot I_h \, \mathbf{b}_h \label{eq:Kh}
248 > K_a - J_r \Delta t & = & a^2 \left(K_a - \frac{1}{2}\langle
249 > \omega_a \rangle \cdot \overleftrightarrow{I_a} \cdot \langle \omega_a
250 > \rangle \right) + \frac{1}{2} \mathbf{c}_a \cdot \overleftrightarrow{I_a}
251 > \cdot \mathbf{c}_a \label{eq:Kc}\\
252 > K_b + J_r \Delta t & = & b^2 \left(K_b - \frac{1}{2}\langle
253 > \omega_b \rangle \cdot \overleftrightarrow{I_b} \cdot \langle \omega_b
254 > \rangle \right) + \frac{1}{2} \mathbf{c}_b \cdot \overleftrightarrow{I_b} \cdot \mathbf{c}_b \label{eq:Kh}
255   \end{eqnarray}
256 + Simultaneous solution of these quadratic formulae for the scaling coefficients, $a$ and $b$, will ensure that
257 + the simulation samples from the original microcanonical (NVE) ensemble. Here $K_{\{a,b\}}$ is the instantaneous
258 + translational kinetic energy of each shell. At each time interval, we solve for $a$, $b$, $\mathbf{c}_a$, and
259 + $\mathbf{c}_b$, subject to the imposed angular momentum flux, $j_r(\mathbf{L})$, and thermal flux, $J_r$,
260 + values. The new particle velocities are computed, and the simulation continues. System configurations after the
261 + transformations have exactly the same energy ({\it and} angular momentum) as before the moves.
262  
263 < the simultaneous
264 < solution of which provide the velocity scaling coefficients $c$ and $h$. Given an
265 < imposed angular momentum flux, $\mathbf{j}_{r} \left( \mathbf{L} \right)$, and/or
266 < thermal flux, $J_r$, equations \ref{eq:bc} - \ref{eq:Kh} are sufficient to obtain
267 < the velocity scaling ($c$ and $h$) and shearing ($\mathbf{b}_c,\,$ and $\mathbf{b}_h$) at each time interval.
263 > As the simulation progresses, the velocity transformations can be
264 > performed on a regular basis, and the system will develop a
265 > temperature and/or angular velocity gradient in response to the
266 > applied flux. Using the slope of the radial temperature or velocity
267 > gradients, it is straightforward to obtain both the thermal
268 > conductivity ($\lambda$), interfacial thermal conductance ($G$), or
269 > rotational friction coefficients ($\Xi^{rr}$) of any non-periodic
270 > system.
271  
272   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
273 < % **TESTS AND APPLICATIONS**
273 > % **COMPUTATIONAL DETAILS**
274   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
275 < \section{Tests and Applications}
275 > \section{Computational Details}
276  
277 + The new VSS-RNEMD methodology for non-periodic system geometries has
278 + been implemented in our group molecular dynamics code,
279 + OpenMD.\cite{Meineke:2005gd,openmd} We have tested the new method to
280 + calculate the thermal conductance of a gold nanoparticle and SPC/E
281 + water cluster, and compared the results with previous bulk RNEMD
282 + values, as well as experiment. We have also investigated the
283 + interfacial thermal conductance and interfacial rotational friction
284 + for gold nanostructures solvated in hexane as a function of
285 + nanoparticle size and shape.
286 +
287   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
288 < % THERMAL CONDUCTIVITIES
288 > % FORCE FIELD PARAMETERS
289   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
290 < \subsection{Thermal conductivities}
290 > \subsection{Force field}
291  
292 < Calculated values for the thermal conductivity of a 40 \AA$~$ radius gold nanoparticle (15707 atoms) at different kinetic energy flux values are shown in Table \ref{table:goldconductivity}. For these calculations, the hot and cold slabs were excluded from the linear regression of the thermal gradient. The measured linear slope $\langle dT / dr \rangle$ is linearly dependent on the applied kinetic energy flux $J_r$. Calculated thermal conductivity values compare well with previous bulk QSC values of 1.08 - 1.26 W m$^{-1}$ K$^{-1}$ [cite NIVS paper], though still significantly lower than the experimental value of 320 W m$^{-1}$ K$^{-1}$, as the QSC force field neglects significant electronic contributions to heat conduction. The small increase relative to previous simulated bulk values is due to a slight increase in gold density -- as expected, an increase in density results in higher thermal conductivity values. The increased density is a result of nanoparticle curvature relative to an infinite bulk slab, which introduces surface tension that increases ambient density.
292 > Gold -- gold interactions are described by the quantum Sutton-Chen
293 > (QSC) model.\cite{PhysRevB.59.3527} The QSC parameters are tuned to
294 > experimental properties such as density, cohesive energy, and elastic
295 > moduli and include zero-point quantum corrections.
296  
297 < \begin{longtable}{p{2.7cm} p{2.5cm} p{2.5cm}}
298 <        \caption{Calculated thermal conductivity of a crystalline gold nanoparticle of radius 40 \AA. Calculations were performed at 300 K and ambient density. Gold-gold interactions are described by the Quantum Sutton-Chen potential.}
299 <        \\ \hline \hline
300 <                \centering {$J_r$} & \centering\arraybackslash {$\langle dT / dr \rangle$} & \centering\arraybackslash {$\boldsymbol \lambda$}\\
301 <        \centering {\small(kcal fs$^{-1}$ \AA$^{-2}$)} & \centering\arraybackslash {\small(K \AA$^{-1}$)} & \centering\arraybackslash {\small(W m$^{-1}$ K$^{-1}$)}\\ \hline
302 < \endhead
175 < \hline
176 < % \endfoot
177 < \centering3.25$\times 10^{-6}$ & \centering\arraybackslash 0.11435 & \centering\arraybackslash 1.9753 \\
178 < \centering6.50$\times 10^{-6}$ & \centering\arraybackslash 0.2324 & \centering\arraybackslash 1.9438 \\
179 < \centering1.30$\times 10^{-5}$ & \centering\arraybackslash 0.44922 & \centering\arraybackslash 2.0113 \\
180 < \centering3.25$\times 10^{-5}$ & \centering\arraybackslash 1.1802 & \centering\arraybackslash 1.9139 \\
181 < \centering6.50$\times 10^{-5}$ & \centering\arraybackslash 2.339 & \centering\arraybackslash 1.9314
182 < \\ \hline \hline
183 < \label{table:goldconductivity}
184 < \end{longtable}
185 <        
186 < SPC/E Water Cluster:
297 > The SPC/E water model~\cite{Berendsen87} is particularly useful for
298 > validation of conductivities and shear viscosities.  This model has
299 > been used to previously test other RNEMD and NEMD approaches, and
300 > there are reported values for thermal conductivies and shear
301 > viscosities at a wide range of thermodynamic conditions that are
302 > available for direct comparison.\cite{Bedrov:2000,Kuang:2010if}
303  
304 < \begin{longtable}{p{2.7cm} p{2.5cm} p{2.5cm}}
305 <        \caption{Calculated thermal conductivity of a cluster of 6912 SPC/E water molecules. Calculations were performed at 300 K and ambient density.}
306 <        \\ \hline \hline
307 <                \centering {$J_r$} & \centering\arraybackslash {$\langle dT / dr \rangle$} & \centering\arraybackslash {$\boldsymbol \lambda$}\\
308 <        \centering {\small(kcal fs$^{-1}$ \AA$^{-2}$)} & \centering\arraybackslash {\small(K \AA$^{-1}$)} & \centering\arraybackslash {\small(W m$^{-1}$ K$^{-1}$)}\\ \hline
309 < \endhead
310 < \hline
311 < % \endfoot
304 > Hexane molecules are described by the TraPPE united atom
305 > model,\cite{TraPPE-UA.alkanes} which provides good computational
306 > efficiency and reasonable accuracy for bulk thermal conductivity
307 > values. In this model, sites are located at the carbon centers for
308 > alkyl groups. Bonding interactions, including bond stretches and bends
309 > and torsions, were used for intra-molecular sites closer than 3
310 > bonds. For non-bonded interactions, Lennard-Jones potentials were
311 > used. We have previously utilized both united atom (UA) and all-atom
312 > (AA) force fields for thermal
313 > conductivity,\cite{Kuang:2011ef,Kuang:2012fe,Stocker:2013cl} and since
314 > the united atom force fields cannot populate the high-frequency modes
315 > that are present in AA force fields, they appear to work better for
316 > modeling thermal conductance at metal/ligand interfaces.
317  
318 < \\ \hline \hline
319 < \label{table:waterconductivity}
320 < \end{longtable}
318 > Gold -- hexane nonbonded interactions are governed by pairwise
319 > Lennard-Jones parameters derived from Vlugt \emph{et
320 >  al}.\cite{vlugt:cpc2007154} They fitted parameters for the
321 > interaction between Au and CH$_{\emph x}$ pseudo-atoms based on the
322 > effective potential of Hautman and Klein for the Au(111)
323 > surface.\cite{hautman:4994}
324  
325   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
326 < % SHEAR VISCOSITY
326 > % NON-PERIODIC DYNAMICS
327   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
328 < \subsection{Shear viscosity}
328 > % \subsection{Dynamics for non-periodic systems}
329 > %
330 > % We have run all tests using the Langevin Hull non-periodic simulation methodology.\cite{Vardeman2011} The
331 > % Langevin Hull is especially useful for simulating heterogeneous mixtures of materials with different
332 > % compressibilities, which are typically problematic for traditional affine transform methods. We have had
333 > % success applying this method to several different systems including bare metal nanoparticles, liquid water
334 > % clusters, and explicitly solvated nanoparticles. Calculated physical properties such as the isothermal
335 > % compressibility of water and the bulk modulus of gold nanoparticles are in good agreement with previous
336 > % theoretical and experimental results. The Langevin Hull uses a Delaunay tesselation to create a dynamic convex
337 > % hull composed of triangular facets with vertices at atomic sites. Atomic sites included in the hull are coupled
338 > % to an external bath defined by a temperature, pressure and viscosity. Atoms not included in the hull are
339 > % subject to standard Newtonian dynamics.
340  
341 < SPC/E Water Cluster:
341 > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
342 > % SIMULATION PROTOCOL
343 > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
344 > \subsection{Simulation protocol}
345  
346 + In all cases, systems were equilibrated under non-periodic
347 + isobaric-isothermal (NPT) conditions -- using the Langevin Hull
348 + methodology\cite{Vardeman2011} -- before any non-equilibrium methods
349 + were introduced. For heterogeneous systems, the gold nanoparticles and
350 + ellipsoids were created from a bulk fcc lattice and were thermally
351 + equilibrated before being solvated in hexane.  Packmol\cite{packmol}
352 + was used to solvate previously equilibrated gold nanostructures within
353 + a spherical droplet of hexane.
354 +
355 + Once equilibrated, thermal or angular momentum fluxes were applied for
356 + 1 - 2 ns, until stable temperature or angular velocity gradients had
357 + developed. Systems containing liquids were run under moderate pressure
358 + (5 atm) and temperatures (230 K) to avoid the formation of a vapor
359 + layer at the boundary of the cluster.  Pressure was applied to the
360 + system via the non-periodic Langevin Hull.\cite{Vardeman2011} However,
361 + thermal coupling to the external temperature and pressure bath was
362 + removed to avoid interference with the imposed RNEMD flux.
363 +
364 + Because the method conserves \emph{total} angular momentum, systems
365 + which contain a metal nanoparticle embedded in a significant volume of
366 + solvent will still experience nanoparticle diffusion inside the
367 + solvent droplet.  To aid in computing the rotational friction in these
368 + systems, a single gold atom at the origin of the coordinate system was
369 + assigned a mass $10,000 \times$ its original mass. The bonded and
370 + nonbonded interactions for this atom remain unchanged and the heavy
371 + atom is excluded from the RNEMD exchanges.  The only effect of this
372 + gold atom is to effectively pin the nanoparticle at the origin of the
373 + coordinate system, while still allowing for rotation. For rotation of
374 + the gold ellipsoids we added two of these heavy atoms along the axis
375 + of rotation, separated by an equal distance from the origin of the
376 + coordinate system.  These heavy atoms prevent off-axis tumbling of the
377 + nanoparticle and allow for measurement of rotational friction relative
378 + to a particular axis of the ellipsoid.
379 +
380 + Angular velocity data was collected for the heterogeneous systems
381 + after a brief period of imposed flux to initialize rotation of the
382 + solvated nanostructure. Doing so ensures that we overcome the initial
383 + static friction and calculate only the \emph{dynamic} interfacial
384 + rotational friction.
385 +
386   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
387 + % THERMAL CONDUCTIVITIES
388 + %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
389 + \subsection{Thermal conductivities}
390 +
391 + To compute the thermal conductivities of bulk materials, Fourier's Law
392 + of heat conduction in radial coordinates yields an expression for the
393 + heat flow between the concentric spherical shells:
394 + \begin{equation}
395 +        q_r = - \frac{4 \pi \lambda (T_b - T_a)}{\frac{1}{r_a} - \frac{1}{r_b}}
396 + \label{eq:Q}
397 + \end{equation}
398 + where $\lambda$ is the thermal conductivity, and $T_{a,b}$ and
399 + $r_{a,b}$ are the temperatures and radii of the two RNEMD regions,
400 + respectively.
401 +
402 + A thermal flux is created using VSS-RNEMD moves, and the temperature
403 + in each of the radial shells is recorded.  The resulting temperature
404 + profiles are analyzed to yield information about the interfacial
405 + thermal conductance.  As the simulation progresses, the VSS moves are
406 + performed on a regular basis, and the system develops a thermal or
407 + velocity gradient in response to the applied flux. Once a stable
408 + thermal gradient has been established between the two regions, the
409 + thermal conductivity, $\lambda$, can be calculated using a linear
410 + regression of the thermal gradient, $\langle \frac{dT}{dr} \rangle$:
411 +
412 + \begin{equation}
413 +        \lambda = \frac{r_a}{r_b} \frac{q_r}{4 \pi \langle \frac{dT}{dr} \rangle}
414 + \label{eq:lambda}
415 + \end{equation}
416 +
417 + The rate of heat transfer between the two RNEMD regions is the amount of transferred kinetic energy over the
418 + length of the simulation, t
419 +
420 + \begin{equation}
421 +        q_r = \frac{KE}{t}
422 + \label{eq:heat}
423 + \end{equation}
424 +
425 + %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
426   % INTERFACIAL THERMAL CONDUCTANCE
427   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
428   \subsection{Interfacial thermal conductance}
429  
430 < Gold Nanoparticle in Hexane:
430 > \begin{figure}
431 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{figures/NP20}
432 > \caption{A gold nanoparticle with a radius of 20 \AA$\,$ solvated in TraPPE-UA hexane. A thermal flux is applied        between the nanoparticle and an outer shell of solvent.}
433 > \label{fig:NP20}
434 > \end{figure}
435  
436 + For heterogeneous systems such as a solvated nanoparticle, shown in Figure \ref{fig:NP20}, the interfacial
437 + thermal conductance at the surface of the nanoparticle can be determined using an applied kinetic energy flux.
438 + We can treat the temperature in each radial shell as discrete, making the thermal conductance, $G$, of each
439 + shell the inverse of its Kapitza resistance, $R_K$. To model the thermal conductance across an interface (or
440 + multiple interfaces) it is useful to consider the shells as resistors wired in series. The resistance of the
441 + shells is then additive, and the interfacial thermal conductance is the inverse of the total Kapitza
442 + resistance. The thermal resistance of each shell is
443 +
444 + \begin{equation}
445 +        R_K = \frac{1}{q_r} \Delta T 4 \pi r^2
446 + \label{eq:RK}
447 + \end{equation}
448 +
449 + making the total resistance of two neighboring shells
450 +
451 + \begin{equation}
452 +        R_{total} = \frac{1}{q_r} \left [ (T_2 - T_1) 4 \pi r^2_1 + (T_3 - T_2) 4 \pi r^2_2 \right ] = \frac{1}{G}
453 + \label{eq:Rtotal}
454 + \end{equation}
455 +
456 + This series can be expanded for any number of adjacent shells, allowing for the calculation of the interfacial
457 + thermal conductance for interfaces of considerable thickness, such as self-assembled ligand monolayers on a
458 + metal surface.
459 +
460   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
461 < % INTERFACIAL FRICTION
461 > % INTERFACIAL ROTATIONAL FRICTION
462   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
463 < \subsection{Interfacial friction}
463 > \subsection{Interfacial rotational friction}
464  
465 < Table \ref{table:interfacialfriction} gives the calculated interfacial friction coefficients $\kappa$ for a spherical gold nanoparticle and prolate ellipsoidal gold nanorod in TraPPE-UA hexane. An angular momentum flux was applied between the A and B regions defined as the gold structure and hexane molecules included in the convex hull, respectively. The resulting angular velocity gradient resulted in the gold structure rotating about the prescribed axis within the solvent.
465 > The interfacial rotational friction, $\Xi^{rr}$, can be calculated for heterogeneous nanostructure/solvent
466 > systems by applying an angular momentum flux between the solvated nanostructure and a spherical shell of
467 > solvent at the boundary of the cluster. An angular velocity gradient develops in response to the applied flux,
468 > causing the nanostructure and solvent shell to rotate in opposite directions about a given axis.
469  
470 < Analytical solutions for the rotational friction coefficients for a solvated spherical body of radius $r$ under ``stick'' boundary conditions can be estimated using Stokes' law
470 > \begin{figure}
471 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{figures/E25-75}
472 > \caption{A gold prolate ellipsoid of length 65 \AA$\,$ and width 25 \AA$\,$ solvated by TraPPE-UA hexane. An angular momentum flux is applied between the ellipsoid and an outer shell of solvent.}
473 > \label{fig:E25-75}
474 > \end{figure}
475  
476 + Analytical solutions for the rotational friction coefficients for a solvated spherical body of radius $r$ under ideal ``stick'' boundary conditions can be estimated using Stokes' law
477 +
478   \begin{equation}
479 <        f_r = 8 \pi \eta r^3 \label{eq:fr}.
479 >        \Xi^{rr}_{stick} = 8 \pi \eta r^3
480 > \label{eq:Xisphere}.
481   \end{equation}
482  
483 < For general ellipsoids with semiaxes $a$, $b$, and $c$, Perrin's extension of Stokes' law provides exact solutions for prolate $(a \geq b = c)$ and oblate $(a < b = c)$ ellipsoids. For a prolate ellipsoidal rod, demonstrated here,
483 > where $\eta$ is the dynamic viscosity of the surrounding solvent. An $\eta$ value for TraPPE-UA hexane under
484 > these particular temperature and pressure conditions was determined by applying a traditional VSS-RNEMD linear
485 > momentum flux to a periodic box of solvent.
486  
487 < \begin{eqnarray}
488 <        f_a = \label{eq:fa}\\
489 <        f_b = f_c = \label{eq:fb}
233 < \end{eqnarray}
487 > For general ellipsoids with semiaxes $a$, $b$, and $c$, Perrin's extension of Stokes' law provides exact
488 > solutions for symmetric prolate $(a \geq b = c)$ and oblate $(a < b = c)$ ellipsoids under ideal ``stick'' conditions. For simplicity, we define
489 > a Perrin Factor, $S$,
490  
491 < The dynamic viscosity of the solvent, $\eta$, was calculated by applying a linear momentum flux to a periodic box of TraPPE-UA hexane.
491 > \begin{equation}
492 >        S = \frac{2}{\sqrt{a^2 - b^2}} ln \left[ \frac{a + \sqrt{a^2 - b^2}}{b} \right].
493 > \label{eq:S}
494 > \end{equation}
495  
496 < \begin{longtable}{p{3.8cm} p{3cm} p{2.8cm} p{2.5cm} p{2.5cm}}
497 <        \caption{Calculated interfacial friction coefficients ($\kappa$) and slip length ($\delta$) of gold nanostructures solvated in TraPPE-UA hexane. The ellipsoid is oriented with the long axis along the $z$ direction.}
498 <        \\ \hline \hline
499 <                {Structure} & \centering{Axis of rotation} & \centering\arraybackslash {$\kappa$} & \centering\arraybackslash {$\delta$} & \centering\arraybackslash Stokes' Law $F$\\
500 <        \centering {} & {} & \centering\arraybackslash {\small($10^4$ Pa s m$^{-1}$)} & \centering\arraybackslash {\small(nm)} & \centering\arraybackslash{\small()}\\ \hline
501 < \endhead
496 > For a prolate ellipsoidal rod, demonstrated here, the rotational resistance tensor $\Xi$ is a $3 \times 3$ diagonal matrix with elements
497 > \begin{equation}
498 >        \Xi^{rr}_a = \frac{32 \pi}{2} \eta \frac{ \left( a^2 - b^2 \right) b^2}{2a - b^2 S}
499 > \label{eq:Xia}
500 > \end{equation}\vspace{-0.45in}\\
501 > \begin{equation}
502 >        \Xi^{rr}_{b,c} = \frac{32 \pi}{2} \eta \frac{ \left( a^4 - b^4 \right)}{ \left( 2a^2 - b^2 \right)S - 2a}.
503 > \label{eq:Xibc}
504 > \end{equation}
505 >
506 > corresponding to rotation about the long axis ($a$), and each of the equivalent short axes ($b$ and $c$), respectively.
507 >
508 > Previous VSS-RNEMD simulations of the interfacial friction of the planar Au(111) / hexane interface have shown
509 > that the interface exists within ``slip'' boundary conditions.\cite{Kuang:2012fe} Hu and Zwanzig\cite{Zwanzig}
510 > investigated the rotational friction coefficients for spheroids under slip boundary conditions and obtained
511 > numerial results for a scaling factor to be applied to $\Xi^{rr}_{\mathit{stick}}$ as a function of $\tau$, the
512 > ratio of the shorter semiaxes and the longer semiaxis of the spheroid. For the sphere and prolate ellipsoid
513 > shown here, the values of $\tau$ are $1$ and $0.3939$, respectively. Under ``slip'' conditions,
514 > $\Xi^{rr}_{\mathit{slip}}$ for any sphere and rotation of the prolate ellipsoid about its long axis approaches
515 > $0$, as no solvent is displaced by either of these rotations. $\Xi^{rr}_{\mathit{slip}}$ for rotation of the
516 > prolate ellipsoid about its short axis is $35.9\%$ of the analytical $\Xi^{rr}_{\mathit{stick}}$ result,
517 > accounting for the reduced interfacial friction under ``slip'' boundary conditions.
518 >
519 > The effective rotational friction coefficient, $\Xi^{rr}_{\mathit{eff}}$ at the interface can be extracted from non-periodic VSS-RNEMD simulations quite easily using the applied torque ($\tau$) and the observed angular velocity of the gold structure ($\omega_{Au}$)
520 >
521 > \begin{equation}
522 >        \Xi^{rr}_{\mathit{eff}} = \frac{\tau}{\omega_{Au}}
523 > \label{eq:Xieff}
524 > \end{equation}
525 >
526 > The applied torque required to overcome the interfacial friction and maintain constant rotation of the gold is
527 >
528 > \begin{equation}
529 >        \tau = \frac{L}{2 t}
530 > \label{eq:tau}  
531 > \end{equation}
532 >
533 > where $L$ is the total angular momentum exchanged between the two RNEMD regions and $t$ is the length of the simulation.
534 >
535 > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
536 > % **TESTS AND APPLICATIONS**
537 > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
538 > \section{Tests and Applications}
539 >
540 > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
541 > % THERMAL CONDUCTIVITIES
542 > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
543 > \subsection{Thermal conductivities}
544 >
545 > Calculated values for the thermal conductivity of a 40 \AA$~$ radius gold nanoparticle (15707 atoms) at
546 > different kinetic energy flux values are shown in Table \ref{table:goldTC}. For these calculations, the hot and
547 > cold slabs were excluded from the linear regression of the thermal gradient.
548 >
549 > \begin{longtable}{ccc}
550 > \caption{Calculated thermal conductivity of a crystalline gold nanoparticle of radius 40 \AA. Calculations were performed at 300 K and ambient density. Gold-gold interactions are described by the Quantum Sutton-Chen potential.}
551 > \\ \hline \hline
552 > {$J_r$} & {$\langle \frac{dT}{dr} \rangle$} & {$\boldsymbol \lambda$}\\
553 > {\footnotesize(kcal / fs $\cdot$ \AA$^{2}$)} & {\footnotesize(K / \AA)} & {\footnotesize(W / m $\cdot$ K)}\\ \hline
554 > 3.25$\times 10^{-6}$ & 0.11435 & 1.0143 \\
555 > 6.50$\times 10^{-6}$ & 0.2324 & 0.9982 \\
556 > 1.30$\times 10^{-5}$ & 0.44922 & 1.0328 \\
557 > 3.25$\times 10^{-5}$ & 1.1802 & 0.9828 \\
558 > 6.50$\times 10^{-5}$ & 2.339 & 0.9918 \\
559   \hline
560 < % \endfoot
245 < Nanoparticle & \centering$x = y = z$ & & & \\
246 < Prolate Ellipsoidal rod & \centering$x = y$ & & & \\
247 < Prolate Ellipsoidal rod & \centering$z$ & & &
560 > This work & & 1.0040
561   \\ \hline \hline
562 < \label{table:interfacialfriction}
562 > \label{table:goldTC}
563   \end{longtable}
564  
565 + The measured linear slope $\langle \frac{dT}{dr} \rangle$ is linearly dependent on the applied kinetic energy
566 + flux $J_r$. Calculated thermal conductivity values compare well with previous bulk QSC values of 1.08 -- 1.26 W / m $\cdot$ K\cite{Kuang:2010if}, though still significantly lower than the experimental value
567 + of 320 W / m $\cdot$ K, as the QSC force field neglects significant electronic contributions to
568 + heat conduction.
569  
570 + Calculated values for the thermal conductivity of a cluster of 6912 SPC/E water molecules are shown in Table
571 + \ref{table:waterTC}. As with the gold nanoparticle thermal conductivity calculations, the RNEMD regions were
572 + excluded from the $\langle \frac{dT}{dr} \rangle$ fit.
573 +
574 + \begin{longtable}{ccc}
575 + \caption{Calculated thermal conductivity of a cluster of 6912 SPC/E water molecules. Calculations were performed at 300 K and 5 atm.}
576 + \\ \hline \hline
577 + {$J_r$} & {$\langle \frac{dT}{dr} \rangle$} & {$\boldsymbol \lambda$}\\
578 + {\footnotesize(kcal / fs $\cdot$ \AA$^{2}$)} & {\footnotesize(K / \AA)} & {\footnotesize(W / m $\cdot$ K)}\\ \hline
579 + 1$\times 10^{-5}$ & 0.38683 & 0.8698 \\
580 + 3$\times 10^{-5}$ & 1.1643 & 0.9098 \\
581 + 6$\times 10^{-5}$ & 2.2262 & 0.8727 \\
582 + \hline
583 + This work & & 0.8841 \\
584 + Zhang, et al\cite{Zhang2005} & & 0.81 \\
585 + R$\ddot{\mathrm{o}}$mer, et al\cite{Romer2012} & & 0.87 \\
586 + Experiment\cite{WagnerKruse} & & 0.61
587 + \\ \hline \hline
588 + \label{table:waterTC}
589 + \end{longtable}
590 +
591 + Again, the measured slope is linearly dependent on the applied kinetic energy flux $J_r$. The average
592 + calculated thermal conductivity from this work, $0.8841$ W / m $\cdot$ K, compares very well to
593 + previous non-equilibrium molecular dynamics results\cite{Romer2012, Zhang2005} and experimental
594 + values.\cite{WagnerKruse}
595 +
596 + %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
597 + % INTERFACIAL THERMAL CONDUCTANCE
598 + %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
599 + \subsection{Interfacial thermal conductance}
600 +
601 + Calculated interfacial thermal conductance ($G$) values for three sizes of gold nanoparticles and Au(111)
602 + surface solvated in TraPPE-UA hexane are shown in Table \ref{table:G}.
603 +
604 + \begin{longtable}{ccc}
605 + \caption{Calculated interfacial thermal conductance ($G$) values for gold nanoparticles of varying radii solvated in TraPPE-UA hexane. The nanoparticle $G$ values are compared to previous simulation results for a Au(111) interface in TraPPE-UA hexane.}
606 + \\ \hline \hline
607 + {Nanoparticle Radius} & {$G$}\\
608 + {\footnotesize(\AA)} & {\footnotesize(MW / m$^{2}$ $\cdot$ K)}\\ \hline
609 + 20 & {47.1} \\
610 + 30 & {45.4} \\
611 + 40 & {46.5} \\
612 + \hline
613 + Au(111) & {30.2}
614 + \\ \hline \hline
615 + \label{table:G}
616 + \end{longtable}
617 +
618 + The introduction of surface curvature increases the interfacial thermal conductance by a factor of
619 + approximately $1.5$ relative to the flat interface. There are no significant differences in the $G$ values for
620 + the varying nanoparticle sizes. It seems likely that for the range of nanoparticle sizes represented here, any
621 + particle size effects are not evident. The simulation of larger nanoparticles may demonstrate an approach to the $G$ value of a flat Au(111) slab but would require prohibitively costly numbers of atoms.
622 +
623 + %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
624 + % INTERFACIAL FRICTION
625 + %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
626 + \subsection{Interfacial friction}
627 +
628 + Table \ref{table:couple} shows the calculated rotational friction coefficients $\Xi^{rr}$ for spherical gold
629 + nanoparticles and a prolate ellipsoidal gold nanorod in TraPPE-UA hexane. An angular momentum flux was applied
630 + between the A and B regions defined as the gold structure and hexane molecules beyond a certain radius,
631 + respectively.
632 +
633 + \begin{longtable}{lccccc}
634 + \caption{Comparison of rotational friction coefficients under ideal ``slip'' ($\Xi^{rr}_{\mathit{slip}}$) and ``stick'' ($\Xi^{rr}_{\mathit{stick}}$) conditions and effective ($\Xi^{rr}_{\mathit{eff}}$) rotational friction coefficients of gold nanostructures solvated in TraPPE-UA hexane at 230 K. The ellipsoid is oriented with the long axis along the $z$ direction.}
635 + \\ \hline \hline
636 + {Structure} & {Axis of Rotation} & {$\Xi^{rr}_{\mathit{slip}}$} & {$\Xi^{rr}_{\mathit{eff}}$} & {$\Xi^{rr}_{\mathit{stick}}$} & {$\Xi^{rr}_{\mathit{eff}}$ / $\Xi^{rr}_{\mathit{stick}}$}\\
637 + {} & {} & {\footnotesize(amu A$^2$ / fs)} & {\footnotesize(amu A$^2$ / fs)} & {\footnotesize(amu A$^2$ / fs)} & \\  \hline
638 + Sphere (r = 20 \AA) & {$x = y = z$} & 0 & {2386} & {3314} & {0.720}\\
639 + Sphere (r = 30 \AA) & {$x = y = z$} & 0 & {8415} & {11749} & {0.716}\\
640 + Sphere (r = 40 \AA) & {$x = y = z$} & 0 & {47544} & {34464} & {1.380}\\
641 + Prolate Ellipsoid & {$x = y$} & {1792} & {3128} & {4991} & {0.627}\\
642 + Prolate Ellipsoid & {$z$} & 0 & {1590} & {1993} & {0.798}
643 + \\ \hline \hline
644 + \label{table:couple}
645 + \end{longtable}
646 +
647 + The results for $\Xi^{rr}_{\mathit{eff}}$ show that, contrary to the flat Au(111) / hexane interface, gold
648 + structures solvated by hexane do not exist in the ``slip'' boundary condition. At this length scale, the
649 + nanostructures are not perfect spheroids due to atomic `roughening' of the surface and therefore experience
650 + increased interfacial friction which deviates from the ideal ``slip'' case. The 20 and 30 \AA$\,$ radius
651 + nanoparticles experience approximately 70\% of the ideal ``stick'' boundary interfacial friction. Rotation of
652 + the ellipsoid about its long axis more closely approaches the ``stick'' limit than rotation about the short
653 + axis, which at first seems counterintuitive. However, the `propellor' motion caused by rotation about the
654 + short axis may exclude solvent from the rotation cavity or move a sufficient amount of solvent along with the
655 + gold that a smaller interfacial friction is actually experienced. The largest nanoparticle (40 \AA$\,$ radius)
656 + appears to experience more than the ``stick'' limit of interfacial friction, which may be a consequence of
657 + surface features or anomalous solvent behaviors that are not fully understood at this time.
658 +
659   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
660   % **DISCUSSION**
661   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
662   \section{Discussion}
663  
664 + We have demonstrated a novel adaptation of the VSS-RNEMD methodology for the application of thermal and angular momentum fluxes in explicitly non-periodic system geometries. Non-periodic VSS-RNEMD preserves the virtues of traditional VSS-RNEMD, namely Boltzmann thermal velocity distributions and minimal thermal anisotropy, while extending the constraints to conserve total energy and total \emph{angular} momentum. We also still have the ability to impose the thermal and angular momentum fluxes simultaneously or individually.
665  
666 + Most strikingly, this method enables calculation of thermal conductivity in homogeneous non-periodic geometries, as well as interfacial thermal conductance and interfacial rotational friction in heterogeneous clusters. The ability to interrogate explicitly non-periodic effects -- such as surface curvature -- on interfacial transport properties is an exciting prospect that will be explored in the future.
667 +
668   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
669   % **ACKNOWLEDGMENTS**
670   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
671 < \section*{Acknowledgments}
671 > \begin{acknowledgement}
672 >  The authors thank Dr. Shenyu Kuang for helpful discussions. Support
673 >  for this project was provided by the National Science Foundation
674 >  under grant CHE-0848243. Computational time was provided by the
675 >  Center for Research Computing (CRC) at the University of Notre Dame.
676 > \end{acknowledgement}
677  
264 We gratefully acknowledge conversations with Dr. Shenyu Kuang. Support for
265 this project was provided by the National Science Foundation under grant
266 CHE-0848243. Computational time was provided by the Center for Research
267 Computing (CRC) at the University of Notre Dame.
678  
679   \newpage
680  
681   \bibliography{nonperiodicVSS}
682  
683 < \end{doublespace}
684 < \end{document}
683 > %\end{doublespace}
684 > \end{document}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines