ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/nonperiodicVSS/nonperiodicVSS.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/nonperiodicVSS/nonperiodicVSS.tex (file contents):
Revision 3947 by kstocke1, Fri Sep 6 13:09:47 2013 UTC vs.
Revision 3978 by kstocke1, Tue Nov 26 20:33:01 2013 UTC

# Line 79 | Line 79 | We have adapted the Velocity Shearing and Scaling Reve
79   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
80   \section{Introduction}
81  
82 + Non-equilibrium Molecular Dynamics (NEMD) methods impose a temperature
83 + or velocity {\it gradient} on a
84 + system,\cite{ASHURST:1975tg,Evans:1982zk,ERPENBECK:1984sp,MAGINN:1993hc,Berthier:2002ij,Evans:2002ai,Schelling:2002dp,PhysRevA.34.1449,JiangHao_jp802942v}
85 + and use linear response theory to connect the resulting thermal or
86 + momentum flux to transport coefficients of bulk materials.  However,
87 + for heterogeneous systems, such as phase boundaries or interfaces, it
88 + is often unclear what shape of gradient should be imposed at the
89 + boundary between materials.
90  
91 + \begin{figure}
92 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{figures/VSS}
93 + \caption{Schematics of periodic (left) and non-periodic (right)
94 +  Velocity Shearing and Scaling RNEMD. A kinetic energy or momentum
95 +  flux is applied from region B to region A. Thermal gradients are
96 +  depicted by a color gradient. Linear or angular velocity gradients
97 +  are shown as arrows.}
98 + \label{fig:VSS}
99 + \end{figure}
100 +
101 + Reverse Non-Equilibrium Molecular Dynamics (RNEMD) methods impose an
102 + unphysical {\it flux} between different regions or ``slabs'' of the
103 + simulation
104 + box.\cite{MullerPlathe:1997xw,ISI:000080382700030,Kuang:2010uq} The
105 + system responds by developing a temperature or velocity {\it gradient}
106 + between the two regions.  The gradients which develop in response to
107 + the applied flux are then related (via linear response theory) to the
108 + transport coefficient of interest. Since the amount of the applied
109 + flux is known exactly, and measurement of a gradient is generally less
110 + complicated, imposed-flux methods typically take shorter simulation
111 + times to obtain converged results. At interfaces, the observed
112 + gradients often exhibit near-discontinuities at the boundaries between
113 + dissimilar materials.  RNEMD methods do not need many trajectories to
114 + provide information about transport properties, and they have become
115 + widely used to compute thermal and mechanical transport in both
116 + homogeneous liquids and
117 + solids~\cite{MullerPlathe:1997xw,ISI:000080382700030,Maginn:2010} as
118 + well as heterogeneous
119 + interfaces.\cite{garde:nl2005,garde:PhysRevLett2009,kuang:AuThl}
120 +
121 +
122   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
123   % **METHODOLOGY**
124   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
125 < \section{Methodology}
125 > \section{Velocity Shearing and Scaling (VSS) for non-periodic systems}
126 > The VSS-RNEMD approach uses a series of simultaneous velocity shearing
127 > and scaling exchanges between the two slabs.\cite{2012MolPh.110..691K}
128 > This method imposes energy and momentum conservation constraints while
129 > simultaneously creating a desired flux between the two slabs.  These
130 > constraints ensure that all configurations are sampled from the same
131 > microcanonical (NVE) ensemble.
132 >
133 > We have extended the VSS method for use in {\it non-periodic}
134 > simulations, in which the ``slabs'' have been generalized to two
135 > separated regions of space.  These regions could be defined as
136 > concentric spheres (as in figure \ref{fig:VSS}), or one of the regions
137 > can be defined in terms of a dynamically changing ``hull'' comprising
138 > the surface atoms of the cluster.  This latter definition is identical
139 > to the hull used in the Langevin Hull algorithm.
140 >
141 > We present here a new set of constraints that are more general than
142 > the VSS constraints.  For the non-periodic variant, the constraints
143 > fix both the total energy and total {\it angular} momentum of the
144 > system while simultaneously imposing a thermal and angular momentum
145 > flux between the two regions.
146 >
147 > After each $\Delta t$ time interval, the particle velocities
148 > ($\mathbf{v}_i$ and $\mathbf{v}_j$) in the two shells ($A$ and $B$)
149 > are modified by a velocity scaling coefficient ($a$ and $b$) and by a
150 > rotational shearing term ($\mathbf{c}_a$ and $\mathbf{c}_b$).
151 > \begin{displaymath}
152 > \begin{array}{rclcl}
153 > & \underline{~~~~~~~~\mathrm{scaling}~~~~~~~~} & &
154 > \underline{\mathrm{rotational~shearing}} \\  \\
155 > \mathbf{v}_i $~~~$\leftarrow &
156 >  a \left(\mathbf{v}_i - \langle \omega_a
157 >  \rangle \times \mathbf{r}_i\right) & + & \mathbf{c}_a \times \mathbf{r}_i \\
158 > \mathbf{v}_j $~~~$\leftarrow &
159 >  b  \left(\mathbf{v}_j - \langle \omega_b
160 >  \rangle \times \mathbf{r}_j\right) & + & \mathbf{c}_b \times \mathbf{r}_j
161 > \end{array}
162 > \end{displaymath}
163 > Here $\langle\mathbf{\omega}_a\rangle$ and
164 > $\langle\mathbf{\omega}_b\rangle$ are the instantaneous angular
165 > velocities of each shell, and $\mathbf{r}_i$ is the position of
166 > particle $i$ relative to a fixed point in space (usually the center of
167 > mass of the cluster).  Particles in the shells also receive an
168 > additive ``angular shear'' to their velocities.  The amount of shear
169 > is governed by the imposed angular momentum flux,
170 > $\mathbf{j}_r(\mathbf{L})$,
171 > \begin{eqnarray}
172 > \mathbf{c}_a & = & - \mathbf{j}_r(\mathbf{L}) \cdot
173 > \overleftrightarrow{I_a}^{-1} \Delta t   + \langle \omega_a \rangle \label{eq:bc}\\
174 > \mathbf{c}_b & = & + \mathbf{j}_r(\mathbf{L}) \cdot
175 > \overleftrightarrow{I_b}^{-1}  \Delta t  + \langle \omega_b \rangle \label{eq:bh}
176 > \end{eqnarray}
177 > where $\overleftrightarrow{I}_{\{a,b\}}$ is the moment of inertia tensor for
178 > each of the two shells.
179  
180 + To simultaneously impose a thermal flux ($J_r$) between the shells we
181 + use energy conservation constraints,
182 + \begin{eqnarray}
183 + K_a - J_r \Delta t & = & a^2 \left(K_a - \frac{1}{2}\langle
184 + \omega_a \rangle \cdot \overleftrightarrow{I_a} \cdot \langle \omega_a
185 + \rangle \right) + \frac{1}{2} \mathbf{c}_a \cdot \overleftrightarrow{I_a}
186 + \cdot \mathbf{c}_a \label{eq:Kc}\\
187 + K_b + J_r \Delta t & = & b^2 \left(K_b - \frac{1}{2}\langle
188 + \omega_b \rangle \cdot \overleftrightarrow{I_b} \cdot \langle \omega_b
189 + \rangle \right) + \frac{1}{2} \mathbf{c}_b \cdot \overleftrightarrow{I_b} \cdot \mathbf{c}_b \label{eq:Kh}
190 + \end{eqnarray}
191 + Simultaneous solution of these quadratic formulae for the scaling
192 + coefficients, $a$ and $b$, will ensure that the simulation samples
193 + from the original microcanonical (NVE) ensemble.  Here $K_{\{a,b\}}$
194 + is the instantaneous translational kinetic energy of each shell.  At
195 + each time interval, we solve for $a$, $b$, $\mathbf{c}_a$, and
196 + $\mathbf{c}_b$, subject to the imposed angular momentum flux,
197 + $j_r(\mathbf{L})$, and thermal flux, $J_r$ values.  The new particle
198 + velocities are computed, and the simulation continues. System
199 + configurations after the transformations have exactly the same energy
200 + ({\it and} angular momentum) as before the moves.
201 +
202 + As the simulation progresses, the velocity transformations can be
203 + performed on a regular basis, and the system will develop a
204 + temperature and/or angular velocity gradient in response to the
205 + applied flux.  Using the slope of the radial temperature or velocity
206 + gradients, it is quite simple to obtain both the thermal conductivity
207 + ($\lambda$) and shear viscosity ($\eta$),
208 + \begin{equation}
209 +  J_r = -\lambda \frac{\partial T}{\partial
210 +    r} \hspace{2in} j_r(\mathbf{L}_z) = -\eta \frac{\partial
211 +    \omega_z}{\partial r}
212 + \end{equation}
213 + of a liquid cluster.
214 +
215   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
216   % NON-PERIODIC DYNAMICS
217   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
# Line 110 | Line 237 | of rectangular slabs. A temperature profile along the
237   of rectangular slabs. A temperature profile along the $r$ coordinate is created by recording the average temperature of concentric spherical shells.
238  
239   \begin{figure}
240 <        \center{\includegraphics[width=7in]{figures/VSS}}
240 >        \center{\includegraphics[width=7in]{figures/npVSS2}}
241          \caption{Schematics of periodic (left) and nonperiodic (right) Velocity Shearing and Scaling RNEMD. A kinetic energy or momentum flux is applied from region B to region A. Thermal gradients are depicted by a color gradient. Linear or angular velocity gradients are shown as arrows.}
242          \label{fig:VSS}
243   \end{figure}
# Line 285 | Line 412 | Calculated values for the thermal conductivity of a cl
412   \\ \hline \hline
413   {$J_r$} & {$\langle dT / dr \rangle$} & {$\boldsymbol \lambda$}\\
414   {\small(kcal fs$^{-1}$ \AA$^{-2}$)} & {\small(K \AA$^{-1}$)} & {\small(W m$^{-1}$ K$^{-1}$)}\\ \hline
415 < \\ \hline \hline
415 > 1.00$\times 10^{-5}$ & 0.38683 & 1.79665486\\
416 > 3.00$\times 10^{-5}$ & 1.1643 & 1.79077557\\
417 > 6.00$\times 10^{-5}$ & 2.2262 & 1.87314707\\
418 > \hline \hline
419   \label{table:waterconductivity}
420   \end{longtable}
421  
# Line 294 | Line 424 | Calculated values for the thermal conductivity of a cl
424   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
425   \subsection{Interfacial thermal conductance}
426  
427 + \begin{longtable}{ccc}
428 + \caption{Caption.}
429 + \\ \hline \hline
430 + {Nanoparticle Radius} & $J_r$ & {G}\\
431 + {\small(\AA)} & {\small(kcal fs$^{-1}$ \AA$^{-2}$)}  & {\small(W m$^{-2}$ K$^{-1}$)}\\ \hline
432 + 20 & & 59.66 \\
433 + 30 & & 57.88 \\
434 + 40 & & 37.48 \\
435 + $\infty$ & & 30.2 \\
436 + \hline \hline
437 + \label{table:interfacialconductance}
438 + \end{longtable}
439 +
440   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
441   % INTERFACIAL FRICTION
442   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
443   \subsection{Interfacial friction}
444  
445 < Table \ref{table:interfacialfrictionstick} shows the calculated interfacial friction coefficients $\kappa$ for a spherical gold nanoparticle and prolate ellipsoidal gold nanorod in TraPPE-UA hexane. An angular momentum flux was applied between the A and B regions defined as the gold structure and hexane molecules beyond a certain radius, respectively. The resulting angular velocity gradient resulted in the gold structure rotating about the prescribed axis within the solvent.
445 > Table \ref{table:interfacialfrictionstick} shows the calculated interfacial friction coefficients $\kappa$ for spherical gold nanoparticles and a prolate ellipsoidal gold nanorod in TraPPE-UA hexane. An angular momentum flux was applied between the A and B regions defined as the gold structure and hexane molecules beyond a certain radius, respectively. The resulting angular velocity gradient resulted in the gold structure rotating about the prescribed axis within the solvent.
446          
447   \begin{longtable}{lccccc}
448 < \caption{Calculated ``stick'' interfacial friction coefficients ($\kappa$) and friction factors ($f$) of gold nanostructures solvated in TraPPE-UA hexane. The ellipsoid is oriented with the long axis along the $z$ direction.}
448 > \caption{Calculated ``stick'' interfacial friction coefficients ($\kappa$) and friction factors ($f$) of gold nanostructures solvated in TraPPE-UA hexane at 230 K. The ellipsoid is oriented with the long axis along the $z$ direction.}
449   \\ \hline \hline
450 < {Structure} & {Axis of rotation} & {$\kappa_{VSS}$} & {$\kappa_{calc}$} & {$f_{VSS}$} & {$f_{calc}$}\\
450 > {Structure} & {Axis of Rotation} & {$\kappa_{VSS}$} & {$\kappa_{calc}$} & {$f_{VSS}$} & {$f_{calc}$}\\
451   {} & {} & {\small($10^{-29}$ Pa s m$^{3}$)} & {\small($10^{-29}$ Pa s m$^{3}$)} & {} & {}\\  \hline
452 < {Sphere} & {$x = y = z$} & {} & {5.37237} & {1} & {1}\\
453 < {Prolate Ellipsoid} & {$x = y$} & {} & {3.59881} & {} & {0.768726}\\
454 < {Prolate Ellipsoid} & {$z$} & {} & {9.01084} & {} & {1.92477}\\  \hline \hline
452 > {Sphere (r = 20 \AA)} & {$x = y = z$} & {} & {6.13239} & {1} & {1}\\
453 > {Sphere (r = 30 \AA)} & {$x = y = z$} & {} & {20.6968} & {1} & {1}\\
454 > {Sphere (r = 40 \AA)} & {$x = y = z$} & {} & {49.0591} & {1} & {1}\\
455 > {Prolate Ellipsoid} & {$x = y$} & {} & {8.22846} & {} & {1.92477}\\
456 > {Prolate Ellipsoid} & {$z$} & {} & {3.28634} & {} & {0.768726}\\
457 >  \hline \hline
458   \label{table:interfacialfrictionstick}
459   \end{longtable}
460  

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines