1 |
|
2 |
\section{\label{sec:DUFF}The DUFF Force Field} |
3 |
|
4 |
The DUFF (\underline{D}ipolar \underline{U}nified-atom |
5 |
\underline{F}orce \underline{F}ield) force field was developed to |
6 |
simulate lipid bilayer formation and equilibrium dynamics. We needed a |
7 |
model capable of forming bilayers, while still being sufficiently |
8 |
computationally efficient allowing simulations of large systems |
9 |
(\~100's of phospholipids, \~1000's of waters) for long times (\~10's |
10 |
of nanoseconds). |
11 |
|
12 |
With this goal in mind, we decided to eliminate all charged |
13 |
interactions within the force field. Charge distributions were |
14 |
replaced with dipolar entities, and charge neutral distributions were |
15 |
reduced to Lennard-Jones interaction sites. This simplification cuts |
16 |
the length scale of long range interactions from $\frac{1}{r}$ to |
17 |
$\frac{1}{r^3}$ (Eq.~\ref{eq:dipole} vs.~ Eq.~\ref{eq:coloumb}), |
18 |
allowing us to avoid the computationally expensive Ewald-Sum. Instead, |
19 |
we can use neighbor-lists and cutoff radii for the dipolar |
20 |
interactions. |
21 |
|
22 |
\begin{align} |
23 |
V^{\text{dipole}}_{ij}(\mathbf{r}_{ij},\boldsymbol{\Omega}_{i}, |
24 |
\boldsymbol{\Omega}_{j}) &= |
25 |
\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}} \biggl[ |
26 |
\frac{\boldsymbol{\mu}_{i} \cdot \boldsymbol{\mu}_{j}}{r^{3}_{ij}} |
27 |
- |
28 |
\frac{3(\boldsymbol{\mu}_i \cdot \mathbf{r}_{ij}) % |
29 |
(\boldsymbol{\mu}_j \cdot \mathbf{r}_{ij}) } |
30 |
{r^{5}_{ij}} \biggr]\label{eq:dipole} \\ |
31 |
V^{\text{ch}}_{ij}(\mathbf{r}_{ij}) &= \frac{q_{i}q_{j}}% |
32 |
{4\pi\epsilon_{0} r_{ij}} \label{eq:coloumb} |
33 |
\end{align} |
34 |
|
35 |
Applying this standard to the lipid model, we decided to represent the |
36 |
lipid model as a point dipole interaction site. Lipid head groups are |
37 |
typically zwitterionic in nature, with sometimes full integer charges |
38 |
separated by only 5 to 6~$\mbox{\AA}$. By placing a dipole of |
39 |
20.6~Debye at the head groups center of mass, our model mimics the |
40 |
dipole of DMPC.\cite{Cevc87} Then, to account for the steric hindrance |
41 |
of the head group, a Lennard-Jones interaction site is also located at |
42 |
the pseudoatom's center of mass. The model is illustrated in |
43 |
Fig.~\ref{fig:lipidModel}. |
44 |
|
45 |
\begin{figure} |
46 |
\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=\linewidth]{lipidModel.epsi} |
47 |
\caption{A representation of the lipid model. $\phi$ is the torsion angle, $\theta$ % |
48 |
is the bend angle, $\mu$ is the dipole moment of the head group, and n is the chain length.} |
49 |
\label{fig:lipidModel} |
50 |
\end{figure} |
51 |
|
52 |
Turning to the tail chains of the phospholipids, we needed a set of |
53 |
scalable parameters to model the alkyl groups as Lennard-Jones |
54 |
interaction sites. For this, we used the TraPPE force field of |
55 |
Siepmann \emph{et al}.\cite{Siepmann1998} The force field is a |
56 |
unified-atom representation of n-alkanes. It is parametrized against |
57 |
phase equilibria using Gibbs Monte Carlo simulation techniques. One of |
58 |
the advantages of TraPPE is that is generalizes the types of atoms in |
59 |
an alkyl chain to keep the number of pseudoatoms to a minimum; the |
60 |
$\mbox{CH}_2$ in propane is the same as the central and offset |
61 |
$\mbox{CH}_2$'s in pentane, meaning the pseudoatom type does not |
62 |
change according to the atom's environment. |
63 |
|
64 |
Another advantage of using TraPPE is the constraining of all bonds to |
65 |
be of fixed length. Typically, bond vibrations are the motions in a |
66 |
molecular dynamic simulation. This necessitates a small time step |
67 |
between force evaluations be used to ensure adequate sampling of the |
68 |
bond potential. Failure to do so will result in loss of energy |
69 |
conservation within the microcanonical ensemble. By constraining this |
70 |
degree of freedom, time steps larger than were previously allowable |
71 |
are able to be used when integrating the equations of motion. |
72 |
|
73 |
After developing the model for the phospholipids, we needed a model |
74 |
for water that would complement our lipid. For this we turned to the |
75 |
soft sticky dipole (SSD) model of Ichiye \emph{et |
76 |
al.}\cite{liu96:new_model} This model is discussed in greater detail |
77 |
in Sec.~\ref{sec:SSD}. The basic idea of the model is to reduce water |
78 |
to a single Lennard-Jones interaction site. The site also contains a |
79 |
dipole to mimic the partial charges on the hydrogens and the |
80 |
oxygen. However, what makes the SSD model unique is the inclusion of a |
81 |
tetrahedral short range potential to recover the hydrogen bonding of |
82 |
water, an important factor when modeling bilayers, as it has been |
83 |
shown that hydrogen bond network formation is a leading contribution |
84 |
to the entropic driving force towards lipid bilayer |
85 |
formation.\cite{Cevc87} |
86 |
|
87 |
BREAK |
88 |
|
89 |
END OF CURRENT REVISIONS |
90 |
|
91 |
BREAK |
92 |
|
93 |
|
94 |
|
95 |
|
96 |
|
97 |
The main energy function in OOPSE is DUFF (the Dipolar Unified-atom |
98 |
Force Field). DUFF is a collection of parameters taken from Seipmann |
99 |
and The total energy of interaction is given by |
100 |
Eq.~\ref{eq:totalPotential}: |
101 |
\begin{equation} |
102 |
V_{\text{Total}} = |
103 |
\overbrace{V_{\theta} + V_{\phi}}^{\text{bonded}} + |
104 |
\underbrace{V_{\text{LJ}} + V_{\text{Dp}} + % |
105 |
V_{\text{SSD}}}_{\text{non-bonded}} \label{eq:totalPotential} |
106 |
\end{equation} |
107 |
|
108 |
\subsection{Bonded Interactions} |
109 |
\label{subSec:bondedInteractions} |
110 |
|
111 |
The bonded interactions in the DUFF functional set are limited to the |
112 |
bend potential and the torsional potential. Bond potentials are not |
113 |
calculated, instead all bond lengths are fixed to allow for large time |
114 |
steps to be taken between force evaluations. |
115 |
|
116 |
The bend functional is of the form: |
117 |
\begin{equation} |
118 |
V_{\theta} = \sum k_{\theta}( \theta - \theta_0 )^2 \label{eq:bendPot} |
119 |
\end{equation} |
120 |
$k_{\theta}$, the force constant, and $\theta_0$, the equilibrium bend |
121 |
angle, were taken from the TraPPE forcefield of Siepmann. |
122 |
|
123 |
The torsion functional has the form: |
124 |
\begin{equation} |
125 |
V_{\phi} = \sum ( k_3 \cos^3 \phi + k_2 \cos^2 \phi + k_1 \cos \phi + k_0) |
126 |
\label{eq:torsionPot} |
127 |
\end{equation} |
128 |
Here, the authors decided to use a potential in terms of a power |
129 |
expansion in $\cos \phi$ rather than the typical expansion in |
130 |
$\phi$. This prevents the need for repeated trigonometric |
131 |
evaluations. Again, all $k_n$ constants were based on those in TraPPE. |
132 |
|
133 |
\subsection{Non-Bonded Interactions} |
134 |
\label{subSec:nonBondedInteractions} |
135 |
|
136 |
\begin{equation} |
137 |
V_{\text{LJ}} = \text{internal + external} |
138 |
\end{equation} |
139 |
|
140 |
|