ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/oopsePaper/EmpericalEnergy.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/oopsePaper/EmpericalEnergy.tex (file contents):
Revision 930 by mmeineke, Tue Jan 13 19:24:07 2004 UTC vs.
Revision 933 by chuckv, Tue Jan 13 20:03:21 2004 UTC

# Line 358 | Line 358 | Several molecular dynamics codes\cite{dynamo86} exist
358  
359   \subsection{\label{sec:eam}Embedded Atom Method}
360  
361 < Several molecular dynamics codes\cite{dynamo86} exist which have the
361 > Several other molecular dynamics packages\cite{dynamo86} exist which have the
362   capacity to simulate metallic systems, including some that have
363   parallel computational abilities\cite{plimpton93}. Potentials that
364   describe bonding transition metal
365   systems\cite{Finnis84,Ercolessi88,Chen90,Qi99,Ercolessi02} have a
366 < attractive interaction which models the stabilization of ``Embedding''
367 < a positively charged metal ion in an electron density created by the
366 > attractive interaction which models  ``Embedding''
367 > a positively charged metal ion in the electron density due to the
368   free valance ``sea'' of electrons created by the surrounding atoms in
369   the system. A mostly repulsive pairwise part of the potential
370   describes the interaction of the positively charged metal core ions
371   with one another. A particular potential description called the
372 < Embedded Atom Method\cite{Daw84,FBD86,johnson89,Lu97}(EAM) that has
372 > Embedded Atom Method\cite{Daw84,FBD86,johnson89,Lu97}({\sc eam}) that has
373   particularly wide adoption has been selected for inclusion in OOPSE. A
374 < good review of EAM and other metallic potential formulations was done
374 > good review of {\sc eam} and other metallic potential formulations was done
375   by Voter.\cite{voter}
376  
377   The {\sc eam} potential has the form:
# Line 379 | Line 379 | V & = & \sum_{i} F_{i}\left[\rho_{i}\right] + \sum_{i}
379   V & = & \sum_{i} F_{i}\left[\rho_{i}\right] + \sum_{i} \sum_{j \neq i}
380   \phi_{ij}({\bf r}_{ij})  \\
381   \rho_{i}  & = & \sum_{j \neq i} f_{j}({\bf r}_{ij})
382 < \end{eqnarray}
382 > \end{eqnarray}S
383  
384 < where $\phi_{ij}$ is a primarily repulsive pairwise interaction
385 < between atoms $i$ and $j$.In the origional formulation of
386 < EAM\cite{Daw84}, $\phi_{ij}$ was an entirely repulsive term, however
387 < in later refinements to EAM have shown that nonuniqueness between $F$
388 < and $\phi$ allow for more general forms for $\phi$.\cite{Daw89} The
389 < embedding function $F_{i}$ is the energy required to embedded an
390 < positively-charged core ion $i$ into a linear supeposition of
384 > where $F_{i} $ is the embedding function that equates the energy required to embed a
385 > positively-charged core ion $i$ into a linear superposition of
386   sperically averaged atomic electron densities given by
387 < $\rho_{i}$. There is a cutoff distance, $r_{cut}$, which limits the
387 > $\rho_{i}$.  $\phi_{ij}$ is a primarily repulsive pairwise interaction
388 > between atoms $i$ and $j$. In the original formulation of
389 > {\sc eam} cite{Daw84}, $\phi_{ij}$ was an entirely repulsive term, however
390 > in later refinements to EAM have shown that non-uniqueness between $F$
391 > and $\phi$ allow for more general forms for $\phi$.\cite{Daw89}
392 > There is a cutoff distance, $r_{cut}$, which limits the
393   summations in the {\sc eam} equation to the few dozen atoms
394   surrounding atom $i$ for both the density $\rho$ and pairwise $\phi$
395 < interactions.
395 > interactions. Foiles et al. fit EAM potentials for fcc metals Cu, Ag, Au, Ni, Pd, Pt and alloys of these metals\cite{FDB86}. These potential fits are in the DYNAMO 86 format and are included with {\sc oopse}.
396  
397 +
398   \subsection{\label{Sec:pbc}Periodic Boundary Conditions}
399  
400   \textit{Periodic boundary conditions} are widely used to simulate truly

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines