ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/ripple2/ripple.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/ripple2/ripple.tex (file contents):
Revision 3091 by xsun, Tue Dec 26 21:50:50 2006 UTC vs.
Revision 3097 by xsun, Wed Dec 27 22:13:09 2006 UTC

# Line 22 | Line 22 | hexagonal or distorted-hexagonal lattices.  The transl
22   translational freedom along one coordinate (out of the plane of the
23   membrane).  There is an additional harmonic surface tension which
24   binds each of the dipoles to the six nearest neighbors on either
25 < hexagonal or distorted-hexagonal lattices.  The translational freedom
26 < of the dipoles allows hexagonal lattices to find states that break out
25 > triangular or distorted lattices.  The translational freedom
26 > of the dipoles allows triangular lattices to find states that break out
27   of the normal orientational disorder of frustrated configurations and
28   which are stabilized by long-range antiferroelectric ordering.  In
29   order to break out of the frustrated states, the dipolar membranes
30   form corrugated or ``rippled'' phases that make the lattices
31 < effectively non-hexagonal.  We observe three common features of the
31 > effectively non-triangular.  We observe three common features of the
32   corrugated dipolar membranes: 1) the corrugated phases develop easily
33 < when hosted on hexagonal lattices, 2) the wave vectors for the surface
33 > when hosted on triangular lattices, 2) the wave vectors for the surface
34   ripples are always found to be perpendicular to the dipole director
35 < axis, and 3) on hexagonal lattices, the dipole director axis is found
35 > axis, and 3) on triangular lattices, the dipole director axis is found
36   to be parallel to any of the three equivalent lattice directions.
37   \end{abstract}
38  
# Line 87 | Line 87 | hexagonal packing lattice of the lipid molecules withi
87   et al.} used atomic force microscopy (AFM) to observe ripple phase
88   morphology in bilayers supported on mica.~\cite{Kaasgaard03} The
89   experimental results provide strong support for a 2-dimensional
90 < hexagonal packing lattice of the lipid molecules within the ripple
90 > triangular packing lattice of the lipid molecules within the ripple
91   phase.  This is a notable change from the observed lipid packing
92   within the gel phase.~\cite{Cevc87}
93  
# Line 131 | Line 131 | lamellar stacks of hexagonal lattices to show that lar
131   Kubica has suggested that a lattice model of polar head groups could
132   be valuable in trying to understand bilayer phase
133   formation.~\cite{Kubica02} Bannerjee used Monte Carlo simulations of
134 < lamellar stacks of hexagonal lattices to show that large headgroups
134 > lamellar stacks of triangular lattices to show that large headgroups
135   and molecular tilt with respect to the membrane normal vector can
136   cause bulk rippling.~\cite{Bannerjee02}
137  
# Line 166 | Line 166 | in dipolar systems with non-hexagonal packings.  Howev
166   At the other extreme in density from the traditional simulations of
167   dipolar fluids is the behavior of dipoles locked on regular lattices.
168   Ferroelectric states (with long-range dipolar order) can be observed
169 < in dipolar systems with non-hexagonal packings.  However, {\em
170 < hexagonally}-packed 2-D dipolar systems are inherently frustrated and
169 > in dipolar systems with non-triangular packings.  However, {\em
170 > triangularly}-packed 2-D dipolar systems are inherently frustrated and
171   one would expect a dipolar-disordered phase to be the lowest free
172   energy configuration.  Therefore, it would seem unlikely that a
173   frustrated lattice in a dipolar-disordered state could exhibit the
# Line 193 | Line 193 | hexagonal (lattice constants $a/b = \sqrt{3}$) or non-
193   of a two-dimensional dipolar medium.  Since molecules in the ripple
194   phase have limited translational freedom, we have chosen a lattice to
195   support the dipoles in the x-y plane.  The lattice may be either
196 < hexagonal (lattice constants $a/b = \sqrt{3}$) or non-hexagonal.
196 > triangular (lattice constants $a/b = \sqrt{3}$) or distorted.
197   However, each dipole has 3 degrees of freedom.  They may move freely
198   {\em out} of the x-y plane (along the $z$ axis), and they have
199   complete orientational freedom ($0 <= \theta <= \pi$, $0 <= \phi < 2
# Line 231 | Line 231 | $\sigma$ on a side) patches of membrane hosted on both
231  
232   To investigate the phase behavior of this model, we have performed a
233   series of Metropolis Monte Carlo simulations of moderately-sized (34.3
234 < $\sigma$ on a side) patches of membrane hosted on both hexagonal
235 < ($\gamma = a/b = \sqrt{3}$) and non-hexagonal ($\gamma \neq \sqrt{3}$)
234 > $\sigma$ on a side) patches of membrane hosted on both triangular
235 > ($\gamma = a/b = \sqrt{3}$) and distorted ($\gamma \neq \sqrt{3}$)
236   lattices.  The linear extent of one edge of the monolayer was $20 a$
237   and the system was kept roughly square. The average distance that
238   coplanar dipoles were positioned from their six nearest neighbors was
239 < 1 $\sigma$ (on both hexagonal and non-hexagonal lattices).  Typical
240 < system sizes were 1360 dipoles for the hexagonal lattices and 840-2800
241 < dipoles for the non-hexagonal lattices.  Periodic boundary conditions
242 < were used, and the cutoff for the dipole-dipole interaction was set to
243 < 4.3 $\sigma$.  All parameters ($T^{*}$, $\mu^{*}$, and $\gamma$) were
244 < varied systematically to study the effects of these parameters on the
245 < formation of ripple-like phases.
239 > 1 $\sigma$ (on both triangular and distorted lattices).  Typical
240 > system sizes were 1360 dipoles for the triangular lattices and
241 > 840-2800 dipoles for the distorted lattices.  Two-dimensional periodic
242 > boundary conditions were used, and the cutoff for the dipole-dipole
243 > interaction was set to 4.3 $\sigma$. Since dipole-dipole interactions
244 > decay rapidly with distance, and since the intrinsic three-dimensional
245 > periodicity of the Ewald sum can give artifacts in 2-d systems, we
246 > have chosen not to use it in these calculations.  Although the Ewald
247 > sum has been reformulated to handle 2-D
248 > systems,\cite{Parry75,Parry76,Heyes77,deLeeuw79,Rhee89} these methods
249 > are computationally expensive,\cite{Spohr97,Yeh99} and are not
250 > necessary in this case.  All parameters ($T^{*}$, $\mu^{*}$, and
251 > $\gamma$) were varied systematically to study the effects of these
252 > parameters on the formation of ripple-like phases.
253  
254   \section{Results and Analysis}
255   \label{sec:results}
# Line 271 | Line 278 | hexagonal ($\gamma = 1.732$) and non-hexagonal ($\gamm
278   the director axis, which can be used to determine a privileged dipolar
279   axis for dipole-ordered systems.  The top panel in Fig. \ref{phase}
280   shows the values of $P_2$ as a function of temperature for both
281 < hexagonal ($\gamma = 1.732$) and non-hexagonal ($\gamma=1.875$)
281 > triangular ($\gamma = 1.732$) and distorted ($\gamma=1.875$)
282   lattices.
283  
284   \begin{figure}[ht]
285   \centering
286   \caption{Top panel: The $P_2$ dipolar order parameter as a function of
287 < temperature for both hexagonal ($\gamma = 1.732$) and non-hexagonal
287 > temperature for both triangular ($\gamma = 1.732$) and distorted
288   ($\gamma = 1.875$) lattices.  Bottom Panel: The phase diagram for the
289   dipolar membrane model.  The line denotes the division between the
290   dipolar ordered (antiferroelectric) and disordered phases.  An
291 < enlarged view near the hexagonal lattice is shown inset.}
291 > enlarged view near the triangular lattice is shown inset.}
292   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{phase.pdf}
293   \label{phase}
294   \end{figure}
295  
296   There is a clear order-disorder transition in evidence from this data.
297 < Both the hexagonal and non-hexagonal lattices have dipolar-ordered
297 > Both the triangular and distorted lattices have dipolar-ordered
298   low-temperature phases, and orientationally-disordered high
299 < temperature phases.  The coexistence temperature for the hexagonal
300 < lattice is significantly lower than for the non-hexagonal lattices,
301 < and the bulk polarization is approximately $0$ for both dipolar
302 < ordered and disordered phases.  This gives strong evidence that the
303 < dipolar ordered phase is antiferroelectric.  We have repeated the
304 < Monte Carlo simulations over a wide range of lattice ratios ($\gamma$)
305 < to generate a dipolar order/disorder phase diagram.  The bottom panel
306 < in Fig. \ref{phase} shows that the hexagonal lattice is a
307 < low-temperature cusp in the $T^{*}-\gamma$ phase diagram.
299 > temperature phases.  The coexistence temperature for the triangular
300 > lattice is significantly lower than for the distorted lattices, and
301 > the bulk polarization is approximately $0$ for both dipolar ordered
302 > and disordered phases.  This gives strong evidence that the dipolar
303 > ordered phase is antiferroelectric.  We have verified that this
304 > dipolar ordering transition is not a function of system size by
305 > performing identical calculations with systems twice as large.  The
306 > transition is equally smooth at all system sizes that were studied.
307 > Additionally, we have repeated the Monte Carlo simulations over a wide
308 > range of lattice ratios ($\gamma$) to generate a dipolar
309 > order/disorder phase diagram.  The bottom panel in Fig. \ref{phase}
310 > shows that the triangular lattice is a low-temperature cusp in the
311 > $T^{*}-\gamma$ phase diagram.
312  
313   This phase diagram is remarkable in that it shows an antiferroelectric
314   phase near $\gamma=1.732$ where one would expect lattice frustration
# Line 305 | Line 316 | of the equivalent directions on the hexagonal lattice,
316   the configurations in this phase show clearly that the system has
317   accomplished dipolar orderering by forming large ripple-like
318   structures.  We have observed antiferroelectric ordering in all three
319 < of the equivalent directions on the hexagonal lattice, and the dipoles
319 > of the equivalent directions on the triangular lattice, and the dipoles
320   have been observed to organize perpendicular to the membrane normal
321   (in the plane of the membrane).  It is particularly interesting to
322   note that the ripple-like structures have also been observed to
# Line 317 | Line 328 | dipolar ordered phase supported on the hexagonal latti
328   \begin{figure}[ht]
329   \centering
330   \caption{Top and Side views of a representative configuration for the
331 < dipolar ordered phase supported on the hexagonal lattice. Note the
331 > dipolar ordered phase supported on the triangular lattice. Note the
332   antiferroelectric ordering and the long wavelength buckling of the
333   membrane.  Dipolar ordering has been observed in all three equivalent
334 < directions on the hexagonal lattice, and the ripple direction is
334 > directions on the triangular lattice, and the ripple direction is
335   always perpendicular to the director axis for the dipoles.}
336   \includegraphics[width=5.5in]{snapshot.pdf}
337   \label{fig:snapshot}
338   \end{figure}
339  
340 + Although the snapshot in Fig. \ref{fig:snapshot} gives the appearance
341 + of three-row stair-like structures, these appear to be transient.  On
342 + average, the corrugation of the membrane is a relatively smooth,
343 + long-wavelength phenomenon, with occasional steep drops between
344 + adjacent lines of anti-aligned dipoles.
345 +
346 + The height-dipole correlation function ($C(r, \cos \theta)$) makes the
347 + connection between dipolar ordering and the wave vector of the ripple
348 + even more explicit.  $C(r, \cos \theta)$ is an angle-dependent pair
349 + distribution function. The angle ($\theta$) is defined by the
350 + intermolecular vector $\vec{r}_{ij}$ and dipolar-axis of atom $i$,
351 + \begin{equation}
352 + C(r, \cos \theta) = \langle \sum_{i}
353 + \sum_{j} h_i \cdot h_j \delta(r - r_{ij}) \delta(\cos \theta_{ij} - \cos \theta)\rangle / \langle h^2 \rangle
354 + \end{equation}
355 + where $\cos \theta_{ij} = \hat{\mu}_{i} \cdot \hat{r}_{ij}$ and
356 + $\hat{r}_{ij} = \vec{r}_{ij} / r_{ij}$.   Fig. \ref{fig:CrossCorrelation}
357 + shows contours of this correlation function for both anti-ferroelectric, rippled
358 + membranes as well as for the dipole-disordered portion of the phase diagram.  
359 +
360 + \begin{figure}[ht]
361 + \centering
362 + \caption{Contours of the height-dipole correlation function as a function
363 + of the dot product between the dipole ($\hat{\mu}$) and inter-dipole
364 + separation vector ($\hat{r}$) and the distance ($r$) between the dipoles.
365 + Perfect height correlation (contours approaching 1) are present in the
366 + ordered phase when the two dipoles are in the same head-to-tail line.
367 + Anti-correlation (contours below 0) is only seen when the inter-dipole
368 + vector is perpendicular to the dipoles.  In the dipole-disordered portion
369 + of the phase diagram, there is only weak correlation in the dipole direction
370 + and this correlation decays rapidly to zero for intermolecular vectors that are
371 + not dipole-aligned.}
372 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{height-dipole-correlation.pdf}
373 + \label{fig:CrossCorrelation}
374 + \end{figure}
375 +
376   \subsection{Discriminating Ripples from Thermal Undulations}
377  
378   In order to be sure that the structures we have observed are actually
# Line 336 | Line 383 | where $h(\vec{r})$ is the height of the membrane at lo
383   h(\vec{r}) e^{-i \vec{q}\cdot\vec{r}}
384   \end{equation}
385   where $h(\vec{r})$ is the height of the membrane at location $\vec{r}
386 < = (x,y)$.~\cite{Safran94} In simple (and more complicated) elastic
387 < continuum models, Brannigan {\it et al.} have shown that in the $NVT$
388 < ensemble, the absolute value of the undulation spectrum can be
342 < written,
386 > = (x,y)$.~\cite{Safran94,Seifert97} In simple (and more complicated)
387 > elastic continuum models, it can shown that in the $NVT$ ensemble, the
388 > absolute value of the undulation spectrum can be written,
389   \begin{equation}
390   \langle | h(q)|^2 \rangle_{NVT} = \frac{k_B T}{k_c |\vec{q}|^4 +
391   \tilde{\gamma}|\vec{q}|^2},
392   \label{eq:fit}
393   \end{equation}
394   where $k_c$ is the bending modulus for the membrane, and
395 < $\tilde{\gamma}$ is the mechanical surface
396 < tension.~\cite{Brannigan04b}
395 > $\tilde{\gamma}$ is the mechanical surface tension.~\cite{Safran94}
396 > The systems studied in this paper have essentially zero bending moduli
397 > ($k_c$) and relatively large mechanical surface tensions
398 > ($\tilde{\gamma}$), so a much simpler form can be written,
399 > \begin{equation}
400 > \langle | h(q)|^2 \rangle_{NVT} = \frac{k_B T}{\tilde{\gamma}|\vec{q}|^2},
401 > \label{eq:fit2}
402 > \end{equation}
403  
404   The undulation spectrum is computed by superimposing a rectangular
405   grid on top of the membrane, and by assigning height ($h(\vec{r})$)
# Line 355 | Line 407 | h(q)|^2 \rangle$.
407   given $\vec{r}+d\vec{r}$ grid area.  Empty grid pixels are assigned
408   height values by interpolation from the nearest neighbor pixels.  A
409   standard 2-d Fourier transform is then used to obtain $\langle |
410 < h(q)|^2 \rangle$.
410 > h(q)|^2 \rangle$.  Alternatively, since the dipoles sit on a Bravais
411 > lattice, one could use the heights of the lattice points themselves as
412 > the grid for the Fourier transform (without interpolating to a square
413 > grid).  However, if lateral translational freedom is added to this
414 > model, an interpolated method for computing undulation spectra will be
415 > required.
416  
417 < The systems studied in this paper have relatively small bending moduli
418 < ($k_c$) and relatively large mechanical surface tensions
362 < ($\tilde{\gamma}$).  In practice, the best fits to our undulation
363 < spectra are obtained by approximating the value of $k_c$ to 0.  In
417 > As mentioned above, the best fits to our undulation spectra are
418 > obtained by approximating the value of $k_c$ to 0.  In
419   Fig. \ref{fig:fit} we show typical undulation spectra for two
420   different regions of the phase diagram along with their fits from the
421 < Landau free energy approach (Eq. \ref{eq:fit}).  In the
421 > Landau free energy approach (Eq. \ref{eq:fit2}).  In the
422   high-temperature disordered phase, the Landau fits can be nearly
423 < perfect, and from these fits we can estimate the bending modulus and
424 < the mechanical surface tension.
423 > perfect, and from these fits we can estimate the tension in the
424 > surface.
425  
426 < For the dipolar-ordered hexagonal lattice near the coexistence
426 > For the dipolar-ordered triangular lattice near the coexistence
427   temperature, however, we observe long wavelength undulations that are
428   far outliers to the fits.  That is, the Landau free energy fits are
429 < well within error bars for all other points, but can be off by {\em
430 < orders of magnitude} for a few low frequency components.
429 > well within error bars for most of the other points, but can be off by
430 > {\em orders of magnitude} for a few low frequency components.
431  
432   We interpret these outliers as evidence that these low frequency modes
433   are {\em non-thermal undulations}.  We take this as evidence that we
# Line 386 | Line 441 | thermal undulations fit Eq. \ref{eq:fit} remarkably we
441   \rangle$). Rippled samples show low-wavelength peaks that are
442   outliers on the Landau free energy fits.  Samples exhibiting only
443   thermal undulations fit Eq. \ref{eq:fit} remarkably well.}
444 < \includegraphics[width=5.5in]{fit.pdf}
444 > \includegraphics[width=5.5in]{logFit.pdf}
445   \label{fig:fit}
446   \end{figure}
447  
# Line 420 | Line 475 | $h(q_{\mathrm{rip}})$ itself.
475   estimated by measuring peak-to-trough distances in
476   $h(q_{\mathrm{rip}})$ itself.
477  
423 \begin{figure}[ht]
424 \centering
425 \caption{Contours of the height-dipole correlation function as a function
426 of the dot product between the dipole ($\hat{\mu}$) and inter-dipole
427 separation vector ($\hat{r}$) and the distance ($r$) between the dipoles.
428 Perfect height correlation (contours approaching 1) are present in the
429 ordered phase when the two dipoles are in the same head-to-tail line.
430 Anti-correlation (contours below 0) is only seen when the inter-dipole
431 vector is perpendicular to the dipoles. }
432 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{height-dipole-correlation.pdf}
433 \label{fig:CrossCorrelation}
434 \end{figure}
435
478   A second, more accurate, and simpler method for estimating ripple
479   shape is to extract the wavelength and height information directly
480   from the largest non-thermal peak in the undulation spectrum.  For
481   large-amplitude ripples, the two methods give similar results.  The
482   one-dimensional projection method is more prone to noise (particularly
483 < in the amplitude estimates for the non-hexagonal lattices).  We report
483 > in the amplitude estimates for the distorted lattices).  We report
484   amplitudes and wavelengths taken directly from the undulation spectrum
485   below.
486  
487 < In the hexagonal lattice ($\gamma = \sqrt{3}$), the rippling is
487 > In the triangular lattice ($\gamma = \sqrt{3}$), the rippling is
488   observed for temperatures ($T^{*}$) from $61-122$.  The wavelength of
489   the ripples is remarkably stable at 21.4~$\sigma$ for all but the
490   temperatures closest to the order-disorder transition.  At $T^{*} =
# Line 460 | Line 502 | hexagonal lattice. b) The amplitude $A^{*}$ of the rip
502   \begin{figure}[ht]
503   \centering
504   \caption{a) The amplitude $A^{*}$ of the ripples vs. temperature for a
505 < hexagonal lattice. b) The amplitude $A^{*}$ of the ripples vs. dipole
506 < strength ($\mu^{*}$) for both the hexagonal lattice (circles) and
507 < non-hexagonal lattice (squares).  The reduced temperatures were kept
508 < fixed at $T^{*} = 94$ for the hexagonal lattice and $T^{*} = 106$ for
509 < the non-hexagonal lattice (approximately 2/3 of the order-disorder
505 > triangular lattice. b) The amplitude $A^{*}$ of the ripples vs. dipole
506 > strength ($\mu^{*}$) for both the triangular lattice (circles) and
507 > distorted lattice (squares).  The reduced temperatures were kept
508 > fixed at $T^{*} = 94$ for the triangular lattice and $T^{*} = 106$ for
509 > the distorted lattice (approximately 2/3 of the order-disorder
510   transition temperature for each lattice).}
511   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{properties_sq.pdf}
512   \label{fig:Amplitude}
# Line 481 | Line 523 | Fig. \ref{fig:Amplitude}.
523   of ripple amplitude on the dipolar strength in
524   Fig. \ref{fig:Amplitude}.
525  
526 < \subsection{Non-hexagonal lattices}
526 > \subsection{Distorted lattices}
527  
528   We have also investigated the effect of the lattice geometry by
529   changing the ratio of lattice constants ($\gamma$) while keeping the
530   average nearest-neighbor spacing constant. The antiferroelectric state
531   is accessible for all $\gamma$ values we have used, although the
532 < distorted hexagonal lattices prefer a particular director axis due to
532 > distorted triangular lattices prefer a particular director axis due to
533   the anisotropy of the lattice.
534  
535 < Our observation of rippling behavior was not limited to the hexagonal
536 < lattices.  In non-hexagonal lattices the antiferroelectric phase can
535 > Our observation of rippling behavior was not limited to the triangular
536 > lattices.  In distorted lattices the antiferroelectric phase can
537   develop nearly instantaneously in the Monte Carlo simulations, and
538   these dipolar-ordered phases tend to be remarkably flat.  Whenever
539 < rippling has been observed in these non-hexagonal lattices
539 > rippling has been observed in these distorted lattices
540   (e.g. $\gamma = 1.875$), we see relatively short ripple wavelengths
541   (14 $\sigma$) and amplitudes of 2.4~$\sigma$.  These ripples are
542   weakly dependent on dipolar strength (see Fig. \ref{fig:Amplitude}),
# Line 506 | Line 548 | rippling is a symmetry-breaking phenomenon for hexagon
548   \gamma < 1.875$.  Outside this range, the order-disorder transition in
549   the dipoles remains, but the ordered dipolar phase has only thermal
550   undulations.  This is one of our strongest pieces of evidence that
551 < rippling is a symmetry-breaking phenomenon for hexagonal and
552 < nearly-hexagonal lattices.
551 > rippling is a symmetry-breaking phenomenon for triangular and
552 > nearly-triangular lattices.
553  
554   \subsection{Effects of System Size}
555   To evaluate the effect of finite system size, we have performed a
556 < series of simulations on the hexagonal lattice at a reduced
556 > series of simulations on the triangular lattice at a reduced
557   temperature of 122, which is just below the order-disorder transition
558   temperature ($T^{*} = 139$).  These conditions are in the
559   dipole-ordered and rippled portion of the phase diagram.  These are
# Line 521 | Line 563 | function of system size for a hexagonal lattice ($\gam
563   \begin{figure}[ht]
564   \centering
565   \caption{The ripple wavelength (top) and amplitude (bottom) as a
566 < function of system size for a hexagonal lattice ($\gamma=1.732$) at $T^{*} =
566 > function of system size for a triangular lattice ($\gamma=1.732$) at $T^{*} =
567   122$.}
568   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{SystemSize.pdf}
569   \label{fig:systemsize}
# Line 554 | Line 596 | symmetry of the hexagonal lattice and allow the energe
596   stable long-wavelength non-thermal surface corrugations.  The best
597   explanation for this behavior is that the ability of the dipoles to
598   translate out of the plane of the membrane is enough to break the
599 < symmetry of the hexagonal lattice and allow the energetic benefit from
599 > symmetry of the triangular lattice and allow the energetic benefit from
600   the formation of a bulk antiferroelectric phase.  Were the weak
601   surface tension absent from our model, it would be possible for the
602   entire lattice to ``tilt'' using $z$-translation.  Tilting the lattice
603 < in this way would yield an effectively non-hexagonal lattice which
603 > in this way would yield an effectively non-triangular lattice which
604   would avoid dipolar frustration altogether.  With the surface tension
605   in place, bulk tilt causes a large strain, and the simplest way to
606   release this strain is along line defects.  Line defects will result
# Line 574 | Line 616 | The packing of the dipoles into a nearly-hexagonal lat
616   relative to the surface tension can cause the corrugated phase to
617   disappear.
618  
619 < The packing of the dipoles into a nearly-hexagonal lattice is clearly
619 > The packing of the dipoles into a nearly-triangular lattice is clearly
620   an important piece of the puzzle.  The dipolar head groups of lipid
621   molecules are sterically (as well as electrostatically) anisotropic,
622 < and would not be able to pack hexagonally without the steric
623 < interference of adjacent molecular bodies.  Since we only see rippled
624 < phases in the neighborhood of $\gamma=\sqrt{3}$, this implies that
625 < there is a role played by the lipid chains in the organization of the
626 < hexagonally ordered phases which support ripples in realistic lipid
627 < bilayers.
622 > and would not be able to pack in triangular arrangements without the
623 > steric interference of adjacent molecular bodies.  Since we only see
624 > rippled phases in the neighborhood of $\gamma=\sqrt{3}$, this implies
625 > that there is a role played by the lipid chains in the organization of
626 > the triangularly ordered phases which support ripples in realistic
627 > lipid bilayers.
628  
629   The most important prediction we can make using the results from this
630   simple model is that if dipolar ordering is driving the surface
# Line 595 | Line 637 | the three equivalent lattice vectors in the hexagonal
637  
638   Our other observation about the ripple and dipolar directionality is
639   that the dipole director axis can be found to be parallel to any of
640 < the three equivalent lattice vectors in the hexagonal lattice.
640 > the three equivalent lattice vectors in the triangular lattice.
641   Defects in the ordering of the dipoles can cause the dipole director
642   (and consequently the surface corrugation) of small regions to be
643   rotated relative to each other by 120$^{\circ}$.  This is a similar

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines