ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/ripplePaper/ripple.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/ripplePaper/ripple.tex (file contents):
Revision 2142 by gezelter, Mon Mar 28 20:54:31 2005 UTC vs.
Revision 2254 by xsun, Tue May 31 20:43:32 2005 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1 < \documentclass[11pt]{article}
2 < \usepackage{amsmath}
3 < \usepackage{amssymb}
1 > \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2   \usepackage{endfloat}
3 + \usepackage{amsmath}
4   \usepackage{epsf}
5 < \usepackage{berkeley}
5 > \usepackage{times}
6 > \usepackage{setspace}
7 > \usepackage{tabularx}
8   \usepackage{graphicx}
9   \usepackage[ref]{overcite}
9 \usepackage{tabularx}
10   \pagestyle{plain}
11   \pagenumbering{arabic}
12   \oddsidemargin 0.0cm \evensidemargin 0.0cm
# Line 18 | Line 18
18  
19   \begin{document}
20  
21 < \title{Ripple Phase of the Lipid Bilayers: A Monte Carlo Simulation}
21 > \title{Symmetry breaking and the Ripple phase}
22   \author{Xiuquan Sun and J. Daniel Gezelter\footnote{Corresponding author. Email: gezelter@nd.edu} \\
23   Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry \\
24   University of Notre Dame \\
25   Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
26  
27 + \date{\today}
28 +
29   \maketitle
30  
31   \begin{abstract}
32 < The molecular explanation for the origin and properties of the ripple
33 < phase is addressed in this paper. A model which contains the surface
34 < tension and dipole-dipole interactions is used to describe the
35 < potential for a monolayer of simple point dipoles. The simulations are
36 < carried out using Monte Carlo method. It is shown asymmetry of the
37 < translational freedom of the dipoles breaks the symmetry of the
38 < hexagonal lattice and allow antiferroelectric ordering of the
39 < dipoles. The existence of the ripples only depends on the dipolar
40 < property of the system. The structure of the ripples is affected by
41 < surface tension. Only close to the hexagonal lattice, can the ripple
42 < phase be reached. Surface has the lowest transition temperature on
43 < hexagonal lattice elucidates the reason of the existence of the ripple
44 < phase in organism. A mechanism for the phase transition of the lipid
45 < bilayer is proposed.
32 > The ripple phase in phosphatidylcholine (PC) bilayers has never been
33 > explained. Our group has developed some simple (XYZ) spin-lattice
34 > models that allow spins to vary their elevation as well as their
35 > orientation. The extra degree of freedom allows hexagonal lattices of
36 > spins to find states that break out of the normally frustrated
37 > randomized states and are stabilized by long-range anti-ferroelectric
38 > ordering. To break out of the frustrated states, the spins must form
39 > ``rippled'' phases that make the lattices effectively non-hexagonal. Our
40 > XYZ models contain surface tension and dipole-dipole interactions to
41 > describe the interaction potential for monolayers and bilayers of
42 > model lipid molecules. The existence of the ripples depends primarily
43 > on the strength and lattice spacing of the dipoles, while the shape
44 > (wavelength and amplitude) of the ripples is only weakly sensitive to
45 > the applied surface tension. Additionally, the wave vector for the
46 > ripple is always perpendicular to the director axis for the
47 > dipoles. Non-hexagonal lattices of dipoles are not inherently
48 > frustrated, and are therefore less likely to form ripple phases
49 > because they can easily form low-energy anti-ferroelectric states.
50 > Indeed, we see that the dipolar order-disorder transition is
51 > substantially lower for hexagonal lattices and the ordered phase for
52 > this lattice is clearly rippled.
53   \end{abstract}
54  
55   \section{Introduction}
56   \label{Int}
57 < \indent
57 >
58   Fully hydrated lipids will aggregate spontaneously to form bilayers
59   which exhibit a variety of phases according to temperature and
60   composition. Among these phases, a periodic rippled
# Line 79 | Line 88 | The model used in our simulations is shown in Fig. \re
88   \section{Model and calculation method}
89   \label{Mod}
90  
91 < The model used in our simulations is shown in Fig. \ref{fmod1} and Fig. \ref{fmod2}.
91 > The model used in our simulations is shown in Fig. \ref{fmod1} and
92 > Fig. \ref{fmod2}.  
93 >
94   \begin{figure}
95   \centering
96   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{picture/lattice.eps}
# Line 89 | Line 100 | potentials.}
100   potentials.}
101   \label{fmod1}
102   \end{figure}
103 +
104   \begin{figure}
105 + \centering
106   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{picture/xyz.eps}
107   \caption{The 6 coordinates describing the state of a 2-dipole system in our extended X-Y-Z model. $z_i$ is the height of dipole $i$ from
108   the initial x-y plane, $\theta_i$ is the angle that the dipole is away
# Line 97 | Line 110 | The lipids are represented by the simple point-dipole.
110   the dipole on x-y plane with the x axis.}
111   \label{fmod2}
112   \end{figure}
113 +
114   The lipids are represented by the simple point-dipole. During the
115   simulations, dipoles are locked (in the x-y plane) to lattice points
116   of hexagonal (or distorted) lattice. Each dipole can move freely out
# Line 220 | Line 234 | We use the last configuration of this simulation as th
234   %\end{figure}
235   From the results of the simulation at $T = 300$ for hexagonal lattice, the system is in an antiferroelectric state. Every $3$ or $4$ arrows of the dipoles form a strip whose direction is opposite to its neighbors. $P_2$ is about $0.7$. The ripple is formed clearly. The simulation results shows the ripple has equal opportunity to be formed along different directions, this is due to the isotropic property of the hexagonal lattice.
236   We use the last configuration of this simulation as the initial condition to increase the system to $T = 400$ every $10\ kelvin$, at the same time decrease the temperature to $T = 100$ every $10\ kelvin$. The trend that the order parameter varies with temperature is plotted in Fig. \ref{t-op}.
237 +
238   \begin{figure}
239 < \begin{center}
239 > \centering
240   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{picture/hexorderpara.eps}
241 < \caption{ The orderparameter $P_2$ vs temperature T at hexagonal lattice.\label{t-op}}
242 < \end{center}
241 > \caption{ The orderparameter $P_2$ vs temperature T at hexagonal
242 > lattice.}
243 > \label{t-op}
244   \end{figure}
245 +
246   The $P_2 \approx 0.9$ for $T = 100$ implies that the system is in a
247   highly ordered state. As the temperature increases, the order
248   parameter is decreasing gradually before $T = 300$, from $T = 310$ the
# Line 248 | Line 265 | Fig. \ref{kr-a-hf}.
265   the further insight into this problem.  At first, we fixed the value
266   of $s = 7$, and vary $k_r$, the results are shown in
267   Fig. \ref{kr-a-hf}.
268 +
269   \begin{figure}
270 < \begin{center}
270 > \centering
271   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{picture/kr_amplitude.eps}
272 < \caption{ The amplitude $A$ of the ripples at $T = 300$ vs $k_r$ for hexagonal lattice. The height fluctuation $h_f$ vs $k_r$ is shown inset for the same situation.\label{kr-a-hf}}
273 < \end{center}
272 > \caption{ The amplitude $A$ of the ripples at $T = 300$ vs $k_r$ for
273 > hexagonal lattice. The height fluctuation $h_f$ vs $k_r$ is shown
274 > inset for the same situation.}
275 > \label{kr-a-hf}
276   \end{figure}
277 +
278   When $k_r < 0.1$, due to the small surface tension part, the dipoles
279   can go far away from their neighbors, lots of noise make the ripples
280   undiscernable. So, we start from $k_r = 0.1$. However, even when $k_r
# Line 299 | Line 320 | system is shown in Fig. \ref{phase}.
320   lattice, the distorted hexagonal lattices prefer a particular director
321   axis due to their anisotropic property. The phase diagram for this
322   system is shown in Fig. \ref{phase}.
323 +
324   \begin{figure}
325 < \begin{center}
325 > \centering
326   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{picture/phase.eps}
327 < \caption{ The phase diagram with temperature $T$ and lattice variable $\gamma$. The enlarged view near the hexagonal lattice is shown inset.\label{phase}}
328 < \end{center}
327 > \caption{ The phase diagram with temperature $T$ and lattice variable
328 > $\gamma$. The enlarged view near the hexagonal lattice is shown
329 > inset.}
330 > \label{phase}
331   \end{figure}
332 +
333   $T_c$ is the transition temperature. The hexagonal lattice has the
334   lowest $T_c$, and $T_c$ goes up with lattice being more
335   distorted. There is only two phases in our diagram. When we do
# Line 349 | Line 374 | fairly stable. The results are shown in Fig. \ref{samp
374   $\gamma = 1.875$, $k_r = 0.1$, $T = 260$. Under this situation, the
375   system reaches the equilibrium very quickly, and the ripples are
376   fairly stable. The results are shown in Fig. \ref{samplitude}.
377 +
378   \begin{figure}
379 < \begin{center}
379 > \centering
380   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{picture/samplitude.eps}
381 < \caption{ The amplitude of ripples $A$ at $T = 260$ vs strength of dipole $s$ for $\gamma = 1.875$. The orderparameter $P_2$ vs $s$ is shown inset at the same situation.\label{samplitude}}
382 < \end{center}
381 > \caption{ The amplitude of ripples $A$ at $T = 260$ vs strength of
382 > dipole $s$ for $\gamma = 1.875$. The orderparameter $P_2$ vs $s$ is
383 > shown inset at the same situation.}  
384 > \label{samplitude}
385   \end{figure}
386 +
387   For small $s$, there is no long range ordering in the system, so, we
388   start from $s = 7$, and we use the rippled state as the initial
389   configuration for all the simulations to reduce the noise. There is no

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines