ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/ripplePaper/ripple.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/ripplePaper/ripple.tex (file contents):
Revision 2142 by gezelter, Mon Mar 28 20:54:31 2005 UTC vs.
Revision 2143 by gezelter, Mon Mar 28 21:36:59 2005 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1 < \documentclass[11pt]{article}
2 < \usepackage{amsmath}
3 < \usepackage{amssymb}
1 > \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2   \usepackage{endfloat}
3 + \usepackage{amsmath}
4   \usepackage{epsf}
5 < \usepackage{berkeley}
5 > \usepackage{times}
6 > \usepackage{setspace}
7 > \usepackage{tabularx}
8   \usepackage{graphicx}
9   \usepackage[ref]{overcite}
9 \usepackage{tabularx}
10   \pagestyle{plain}
11   \pagenumbering{arabic}
12   \oddsidemargin 0.0cm \evensidemargin 0.0cm
# Line 24 | Line 24 | Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
24   University of Notre Dame \\
25   Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
26  
27 + \date{\today}
28 +
29   \maketitle
30  
31   \begin{abstract}
# Line 45 | Line 47 | bilayer is proposed.
47  
48   \section{Introduction}
49   \label{Int}
50 < \indent
50 >
51   Fully hydrated lipids will aggregate spontaneously to form bilayers
52   which exhibit a variety of phases according to temperature and
53   composition. Among these phases, a periodic rippled
# Line 79 | Line 81 | for a dipolar monolayer using Monte Carlo (MC) simulat
81   \section{Model and calculation method}
82   \label{Mod}
83  
84 < The model used in our simulations is shown in Fig. \ref{fmod1} and Fig. \ref{fmod2}.
84 > The model used in our simulations is shown in Fig. \ref{fmod1} and
85 > Fig. \ref{fmod2}.  
86 >
87   \begin{figure}
88   \centering
89   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{picture/lattice.eps}
# Line 89 | Line 93 | potentials.}
93   potentials.}
94   \label{fmod1}
95   \end{figure}
96 +
97   \begin{figure}
98 + \centering
99   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{picture/xyz.eps}
100   \caption{The 6 coordinates describing the state of a 2-dipole system in our extended X-Y-Z model. $z_i$ is the height of dipole $i$ from
101   the initial x-y plane, $\theta_i$ is the angle that the dipole is away
# Line 97 | Line 103 | the dipole on x-y plane with the x axis.}
103   the dipole on x-y plane with the x axis.}
104   \label{fmod2}
105   \end{figure}
106 +
107   The lipids are represented by the simple point-dipole. During the
108   simulations, dipoles are locked (in the x-y plane) to lattice points
109   of hexagonal (or distorted) lattice. Each dipole can move freely out
# Line 220 | Line 227 | We use the last configuration of this simulation as th
227   %\end{figure}
228   From the results of the simulation at $T = 300$ for hexagonal lattice, the system is in an antiferroelectric state. Every $3$ or $4$ arrows of the dipoles form a strip whose direction is opposite to its neighbors. $P_2$ is about $0.7$. The ripple is formed clearly. The simulation results shows the ripple has equal opportunity to be formed along different directions, this is due to the isotropic property of the hexagonal lattice.
229   We use the last configuration of this simulation as the initial condition to increase the system to $T = 400$ every $10\ kelvin$, at the same time decrease the temperature to $T = 100$ every $10\ kelvin$. The trend that the order parameter varies with temperature is plotted in Fig. \ref{t-op}.
230 +
231   \begin{figure}
232 < \begin{center}
232 > \centering
233   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{picture/hexorderpara.eps}
234 < \caption{ The orderparameter $P_2$ vs temperature T at hexagonal lattice.\label{t-op}}
235 < \end{center}
234 > \caption{ The orderparameter $P_2$ vs temperature T at hexagonal
235 > lattice.}
236 > \label{t-op}
237   \end{figure}
238 +
239   The $P_2 \approx 0.9$ for $T = 100$ implies that the system is in a
240   highly ordered state. As the temperature increases, the order
241   parameter is decreasing gradually before $T = 300$, from $T = 310$ the
# Line 248 | Line 258 | Fig. \ref{kr-a-hf}.
258   the further insight into this problem.  At first, we fixed the value
259   of $s = 7$, and vary $k_r$, the results are shown in
260   Fig. \ref{kr-a-hf}.
261 +
262   \begin{figure}
263 < \begin{center}
264 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{picture/kr_amplitude.eps}
265 < \caption{ The amplitude $A$ of the ripples at $T = 300$ vs $k_r$ for hexagonal lattice. The height fluctuation $h_f$ vs $k_r$ is shown inset for the same situation.\label{kr-a-hf}}
266 < \end{center}
263 > \centering
264 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{picture/kr_amplitude.eps}
265 > \caption{ The amplitude $A$ of the ripples at $T = 300$ vs $k_r$ for
266 > hexagonal lattice. The height fluctuation $h_f$ vs $k_r$ is shown
267 > inset for the same situation.}
268 > \label{kr-a-hf}
269   \end{figure}
270 +
271   When $k_r < 0.1$, due to the small surface tension part, the dipoles
272   can go far away from their neighbors, lots of noise make the ripples
273   undiscernable. So, we start from $k_r = 0.1$. However, even when $k_r
# Line 299 | Line 313 | system is shown in Fig. \ref{phase}.
313   lattice, the distorted hexagonal lattices prefer a particular director
314   axis due to their anisotropic property. The phase diagram for this
315   system is shown in Fig. \ref{phase}.
316 +
317   \begin{figure}
318 < \begin{center}
318 > \centering
319   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{picture/phase.eps}
320 < \caption{ The phase diagram with temperature $T$ and lattice variable $\gamma$. The enlarged view near the hexagonal lattice is shown inset.\label{phase}}
321 < \end{center}
320 > \caption{ The phase diagram with temperature $T$ and lattice variable
321 > $\gamma$. The enlarged view near the hexagonal lattice is shown
322 > inset.}
323 > \label{phase}
324   \end{figure}
325 +
326   $T_c$ is the transition temperature. The hexagonal lattice has the
327   lowest $T_c$, and $T_c$ goes up with lattice being more
328   distorted. There is only two phases in our diagram. When we do
# Line 349 | Line 367 | fairly stable. The results are shown in Fig. \ref{samp
367   $\gamma = 1.875$, $k_r = 0.1$, $T = 260$. Under this situation, the
368   system reaches the equilibrium very quickly, and the ripples are
369   fairly stable. The results are shown in Fig. \ref{samplitude}.
370 +
371   \begin{figure}
372 < \begin{center}
372 > \centering
373   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{picture/samplitude.eps}
374 < \caption{ The amplitude of ripples $A$ at $T = 260$ vs strength of dipole $s$ for $\gamma = 1.875$. The orderparameter $P_2$ vs $s$ is shown inset at the same situation.\label{samplitude}}
375 < \end{center}
374 > \caption{ The amplitude of ripples $A$ at $T = 260$ vs strength of
375 > dipole $s$ for $\gamma = 1.875$. The orderparameter $P_2$ vs $s$ is
376 > shown inset at the same situation.}  
377 > \label{samplitude}
378   \end{figure}
379 +
380   For small $s$, there is no long range ordering in the system, so, we
381   start from $s = 7$, and we use the rippled state as the initial
382   configuration for all the simulations to reduce the noise. There is no

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines