ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/scienceIcei/iceiPaper.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/scienceIcei/iceiPaper.tex (file contents):
Revision 1872 by chrisfen, Thu Dec 9 20:23:48 2004 UTC vs.
Revision 1888 by chrisfen, Wed Dec 15 18:47:55 2004 UTC

# Line 34 | Line 34 | a variety of common water models.  A recently discover
34   The absolute free energies of several ice polymorphs which are stable
35   at low pressures were calculated using thermodynamic integration with
36   a variety of common water models.  A recently discovered ice polymorph
37 < that has yet only been observed in computer simulations (Ice-{\it i}),
38 < was determined to be the stable crystalline state for {\it all} the
39 < water models investigated.  Phase diagrams were generated, and phase
40 < coexistence lines were determined for all of the known low-pressure
41 < ice structures.  Additionally, potential truncation was show to play a
42 < role in the resulting shape of the free energy landscape.
37 > that has as yet only been observed in computer simulations (Ice-{\it
38 > i}), was determined to be the stable crystalline state for {\it all}
39 > the water models investigated.  Phase diagrams were generated, and
40 > phase coexistence lines were determined for all of the known
41 > low-pressure ice structures.  Additionally, potential truncation was
42 > shown to play a role in the resulting shape of the free energy
43 > landscape.
44   \end{abstract}
45  
46   %\narrowtext
# Line 59 | Line 60 | under interesting thermodynamic conditions in an attem
60   hydrophobic effect.\cite{Yamada02,Marrink94,Gallagher03} With the
61   choice of models available, it is only natural to compare the models
62   under interesting thermodynamic conditions in an attempt to clarify
63 < the limitations of each of the
64 < models.\cite{Jorgensen83,Jorgensen98b,Clancy94,Mahoney01} Two
65 < important properties to quantify are the Gibbs and Helmholtz free
66 < energies, particularly for the solid forms of water.  Difficulties in
67 < studies addressing these thermodynamic quantities typically arise from
68 < the assortment of possible crystalline polymorphs that water adopts
69 < over a wide range of pressures and temperatures.  It is a challenging
70 < task to investigate the entire free energy landscape\cite{Sanz04};
71 < and ideally, research is focused on the phases having the lowest free
63 > the limitations of
64 > each.\cite{Jorgensen83,Jorgensen98b,Clancy94,Mahoney01} Two important
65 > properties to quantify are the Gibbs and Helmholtz free energies,
66 > particularly for the solid forms of water.  Difficulties in studies
67 > addressing these thermodynamic quantities typically arise from the
68 > assortment of possible crystalline polymorphs that water adopts over a
69 > wide range of pressures and temperatures.  It is a challenging task to
70 > investigate the entire free energy landscape\cite{Sanz04}; and
71 > ideally, research is focused on the phases having the lowest free
72   energy at a given state point, because these phases will dictate the
73   relevant transition temperatures and pressures for the model.
74  
# Line 117 | Line 118 | have calculated the absolute free energy of this cryst
118   considered energetic stabilization and neglected entropic
119   contributions to the overall free energy.  To address this issue, we
120   have calculated the absolute free energy of this crystal using
121 < thermodynamic integration and compared to the free energies of cubic
122 < and hexagonal ice $I$ (the experimental low density ice polymorphs)
123 < and ice B (a higher density, but very stable crystal structure
124 < observed by B\`{a}ez and Clancy in free energy studies of
125 < SPC/E).\cite{Baez95b} This work includes results for the water model
126 < from which Ice-{\it i} was crystallized (SSD/E) in addition to several
127 < common water models (TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P, and SPC/E) and a reaction
128 < field parametrized single point dipole water model (SSD/RF).  The
129 < extruded variant, Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$, was used in calculations
130 < involving SPC/E, TIP4P, and TIP5P.  These models exhibit enhanced
131 < stability with Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ because of their more
132 < tetrahedrally arranged internal charge distributions.  Additionally,
133 < there is often a small distortion of proton ordered Ice-{\it
134 < i}$^\prime$ that converts the normally square tetramer into a rhombus
135 < with alternating approximately 85 and 95 degree angles.  The degree of
136 < this distortion is model dependent and significant enough to split the
137 < tetramer diagonal location peak in the radial distribution function.
121 > thermodynamic integration and compared it to the free energies of ice
122 > $I_c$ and ice $I_h$ (the experimental low density ice polymorphs) and
123 > ice B (a higher density, but very stable crystal structure observed by
124 > B\`{a}ez and Clancy in free energy studies of SPC/E).\cite{Baez95b}
125 > This work includes results for the water model from which Ice-{\it i}
126 > was crystallized (SSD/E) in addition to several common water models
127 > (TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P, and SPC/E) and a reaction field parametrized
128 > single point dipole water model (SSD/RF).  The extruded variant,
129 > Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$, was used in calculations involving SPC/E, TIP4P,
130 > and TIP5P.  These models exhibit enhanced stability with Ice-{\it
131 > i}$^\prime$ because of their more tetrahedrally arranged internal
132 > charge distributions.  Additionally, there is often a small distortion
133 > of proton ordered Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ that converts the normally
134 > square tetramer into a rhombus with alternating approximately 85 and
135 > 95 degree angles.  The degree of this distortion is model dependent
136 > and significant enough to split the tetramer diagonal location peak in
137 > the radial distribution function.
138  
139   Thermodynamic integration was utilized to calculate the free energies
140   of the listed water models at various state points using a modified
# Line 155 | Line 156 | materials.\cite{Frenkel84,Hermens88,Meijer90,Baez95a,V
156   in the calculation of free energies for condensed phases of
157   materials.\cite{Frenkel84,Hermens88,Meijer90,Baez95a,Vlot99}.
158  
159 < The calculated free energies of proton-ordered varients of three low
159 > The calculated free energies of proton-ordered variants of three low
160   density polymorphs ($I_h$, $I_c$, and Ice-{\it i} or Ice-{\it
161   i}$^\prime$) and the stable higher density ice B are listed in Table
162 < \ref{freeEnergy}.  The reason for inclusion of ice B was that it was
162 > \ref{freeEnergy}.  Ice B was included because it has been
163   shown to be a minimum free energy structure for SPC/E at ambient
164   conditions.\cite{Baez95b} In addition to the free energies, the
165 < relavent transition temperatures at standard pressure are also
165 > relevant transition temperatures at standard pressure are also
166   displayed in Table \ref{freeEnergy}.  These free energy values
167   indicate that Ice-{\it i} is the most stable state for all of the
168   investigated water models.  With the free energy at these state
169   points, the Gibbs-Helmholtz equation was used to project to other
170 < state points and to build phase diagrams, and figure \ref{tp3PhaseDia}
171 < is an example diagram built from the results for the TIP3P water
172 < model.  All other models have similar structure, although the crossing
173 < points between the phases move to different temperatures and pressures
174 < as indicated from the transition temperatures in Table
175 < \ref{freeEnergy}.  It is interesting to note that ice $I$ does not
176 < exist in either cubic or hexagonal form in any of the phase diagrams
177 < for any of the models.  For purposes of this study, ice B is
178 < representative of the dense ice polymorphs.  A recent study by Sanz
179 < {\it et al.} goes into detail on the phase diagrams for SPC/E and
180 < TIP4P at higher pressures than those studied here.\cite{Sanz04}
170 > state points and to build phase diagrams.  Figure \ref{tp3PhaseDia} is
171 > an example diagram built from the results for the TIP3P water model.
172 > All other models have similar structure, although the crossing points
173 > between the phases move to different temperatures and pressures as
174 > indicated from the transition temperatures in Table \ref{freeEnergy}.
175 > It is interesting to note that ice $I_h$ (and ice $I_c$ for that
176 > matter) do not appear in any of the phase diagrams for any of the
177 > models.  For purposes of this study, ice B is representative of the
178 > dense ice polymorphs.  A recent study by Sanz {\it et al.} provides
179 > details on the phase diagrams for SPC/E and TIP4P at higher pressures
180 > than those studied here.\cite{Sanz04}
181  
182   \begin{table*}
183   \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
# Line 286 | Line 287 | So what is the preferred solid polymorph for simulated
287   influence the chosen polymorph upon crystallization.  
288  
289   So what is the preferred solid polymorph for simulated water?  The
290 < answer appears to be dependent both on conditions and which model is
290 > answer appears to be dependent both on the conditions and the model
291   used.  In the case of short cutoffs without a long-range interaction
292   correction, Ice-{\it i} and Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ have the lowest free
293   energy of the studied polymorphs with all the models.  Ideally,
# Line 303 | Line 304 | experimental investigation of water in the low pressur
304   simulation conditions, the question arises as to possible experimental
305   observation of this polymorph.  The rather extensive past and current
306   experimental investigation of water in the low pressure regime makes
307 < us hesitant to ascribe any relevance of this work outside of the
307 > us hesitant to ascribe any relevance to this work outside of the
308   simulation community.  It is for this reason that we chose a name for
309   this polymorph which involves an imaginary quantity.  That said, there
310   are certain experimental conditions that would provide the most ideal

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines