ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/scienceIcei/iceiPaper.tex
Revision: 1896
Committed: Thu Dec 16 22:38:02 2004 UTC (19 years, 6 months ago) by gezelter
Content type: application/x-tex
File size: 17941 byte(s)
Log Message:
revisions

File Contents

# Content
1 %\documentclass[prb,aps,twocolumn,tabularx]{revtex4}
2 \documentclass[11pt]{article}
3 \usepackage{endfloat}
4 \usepackage{amsmath}
5 \usepackage{epsf}
6 \usepackage{berkeley}
7 \usepackage{setspace}
8 \usepackage{tabularx}
9 \usepackage{graphicx}
10 \usepackage[ref]{overcite}
11 \pagestyle{plain}
12 \pagenumbering{arabic}
13 \oddsidemargin 0.0cm \evensidemargin 0.0cm
14 \topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt
15 \textheight 9.0in \textwidth 6.5in
16 \brokenpenalty=10000
17 \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.2}
18 \renewcommand\citemid{\ } % no comma in optional reference note
19
20 \begin{document}
21
22 \title{Computational free energy studies of a new ice polymorph which
23 exhibits greater stability than Ice $I_h$}
24
25 \author{Christopher J. Fennell and J. Daniel Gezelter \\
26 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\
27 University of Notre Dame\\
28 Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
29
30 \date{\today}
31
32 \maketitle
33 %\doublespacing
34
35 \begin{abstract}
36 The absolute free energies of several ice polymorphs were calculated
37 using thermodynamic integration. These polymorphs are predicted by
38 computer simulations using a variety of common water models to be
39 stable at low pressures. A recently discovered ice polymorph that has
40 as yet {\it only} been observed in computer simulations (Ice-{\it i}),
41 was determined to be the stable crystalline state for {\it all} the
42 water models investigated. Phase diagrams were generated, and phase
43 coexistence lines were determined for all of the known low-pressure
44 ice structures. Additionally, potential truncation was shown to play
45 a role in the resulting shape of the free energy landscape.
46 \end{abstract}
47
48 %\narrowtext
49
50 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
51 % BODY OF TEXT
52 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
53
54 \section{Introduction}
55
56 Water has proven to be a challenging substance to depict in
57 simulations, and a variety of models have been developed to describe
58 its behavior under varying simulation
59 conditions.\cite{Stillinger74,Rahman75,Berendsen81,Jorgensen83,Bratko85,Berendsen87,Caldwell95,Liu96,Berendsen98,Dill00,Mahoney00,Fennell04}
60 These models have been used to investigate important physical
61 phenomena like phase transitions, transport properties, and the
62 hydrophobic effect.\cite{Yamada02,Marrink94,Gallagher03} With the
63 choice of models available, it is only natural to compare the models
64 under interesting thermodynamic conditions in an attempt to clarify
65 the limitations of
66 each.\cite{Jorgensen83,Jorgensen98b,Clancy94,Mahoney01} Two important
67 properties to quantify are the Gibbs and Helmholtz free energies,
68 particularly for the solid forms of water as these predict the
69 thermodynamic stability of the various phases. Water has a
70 particularly rich phase diagram and takes on a number of different and
71 stable crystalline structures as the temperature and pressure are
72 varied. It is a challenging task to investigate the entire free
73 energy landscape\cite{Sanz04}; and ideally, research is focused on the
74 phases having the lowest free energy at a given state point, because
75 these phases will dictate the relevant transition temperatures and
76 pressures for the model.
77
78 The high-pressure phases of water (ice II - ice X as well as ice XII)
79 have been studied extensively both experimentally and
80 computationally. In this paper, standard reference state methods were
81 applied in the {\it low} pressure regime to evaluate the free energies
82 for a few known crystalline water polymorphs that might be stable at
83 these pressures. This work is unique in that one of the crystal
84 lattices was arrived at through crystallization of a computationally
85 efficient water model under constant pressure and temperature
86 conditions. Crystallization events are interesting in and of
87 themselves\cite{Matsumoto02,Yamada02}; however, the crystal structure
88 obtained in this case is different from any previously observed ice
89 polymorphs in experiment or simulation.\cite{Fennell04} We have named
90 this structure Ice-{\it i} to indicate its origin in computational
91 simulation. The unit cell of Ice-{\it i} and an axially-elongated
92 variant named Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ both consist of eight water
93 molecules that stack in rows of interlocking water tetramers as
94 illustrated in figures
95 \ref{iCrystal}A and
96 \ref{iCrystal}B. These tetramers form a crystal structure similar
97 in appearance to a recent two-dimensional surface tessellation
98 simulated on silica.\cite{Yang04} As expected in an ice crystal
99 constructed of water tetramers, the hydrogen bonds are not as linear
100 as those observed in ice $I_h$, however the interlocking of these
101 subunits appears to provide significant stabilization to the overall
102 crystal. The arrangement of these tetramers results in surrounding
103 open octagonal cavities that are typically greater than 6.3 \AA\ in
104 diameter (Fig. \ref{iCrystal}C). This open structure leads to
105 crystals that are typically 0.07 g/cm$^3$ less dense than ice $I_h$.
106
107 \begin{figure}
108 \centering
109 \includegraphics[width=4in]{iCrystal.eps}
110 \caption{(A) Unit cell for Ice-{\it i}, (B) Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$,
111 and (C) a rendering of a proton ordered crystal of Ice-{\it i} looking
112 down the (001) crystal face. In the unit cells, the spheres represent
113 the center-of-mass locations of the water molecules. The $a$ to $c$
114 ratios for Ice-{\it i} and Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ are given by 2.1214
115 and 1.785 respectively. The presence of large octagonal pores in
116 both crystal forms lead to a polymorph that is less dense than ice
117 $I_h$.}
118 \label{iCrystal}
119 \end{figure}
120
121 Results from our previous study indicated that Ice-{\it i} is the
122 minimum energy crystal structure for the single point water models
123 investigated (for discussions on these single point dipole models, see
124 our previous work and related
125 articles).\cite{Fennell04,Liu96,Bratko85} Our earlier results
126 considered only energetic stabilization and neglected entropic
127 contributions to the overall free energy. To address this issue, we
128 have calculated the absolute free energy of this crystal using
129 thermodynamic integration and compared it to the free energies of ice
130 $I_c$ and ice $I_h$ (the common low density ice polymorphs) and ice B
131 (a higher density, but very stable crystal structure observed by
132 B\`{a}ez and Clancy in free energy studies of SPC/E).\cite{Baez95b}
133 This work includes results for the water model from which Ice-{\it i}
134 was crystallized (SSD/E) in addition to several common water models
135 (TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P, and SPC/E) and a reaction field parametrized
136 single point dipole water model (SSD/RF). The axially-elongated
137 variant, Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$, was used in calculations involving
138 SPC/E, TIP4P, and TIP5P. The square tetramers in Ice-{\it i} distort
139 in Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ to form a rhombus with alternating 85 and 95
140 degree angles. Under SPC/E, TIP4P, and TIP5P, this geometry is better
141 at forming favorable hydrogen bonds. The degree of rhomboid
142 distortion depends on the water model used, but is significant enough
143 to split a peak in the radial distribution function which corresponds
144 to diagonal sites in the tetramers.
145
146 Thermodynamic integration was utilized to calculate the Helmholtz free
147 energies ($A$) of the listed water models at various state points
148 using the OOPSE molecular dynamics program.\cite{Meineke05} This
149 method uses a sequence of simulations during which the system of
150 interest is converted into a reference system for which the free
151 energy is known analytically ($A_0$). The difference in potential
152 energy between the reference system and the system of interest
153 ($\Delta V$) is then integrated in order to determine the free energy
154 difference between the two states:
155 \begin{equation}
156 A = A_0 + \int_0^1 \left\langle \Delta V \right\rangle_\lambda d\lambda.
157 \end{equation}
158 Here, $\lambda$ is the parameter that governs the transformation
159 between the reference system and the system of interest. For
160 crystalline phases, an harmonically-restrained (Einsten) crystal is
161 chosen as the reference state, while for liquid phases, the ideal gas
162 is taken as the reference state. There is some subtlety in the path
163 taken as $\lambda$ goes from $0$ to $1$. However, thermodynamic
164 integration is an established technique that has been used extensively
165 in the calculation of free energies for condensed phases of
166 materials.\cite{Frenkel84,Hermens88,Meijer90,Baez95a,Vlot99}.
167
168 The calculated free energies of proton-ordered variants of three low
169 density polymorphs ($I_h$, $I_c$, and Ice-{\it i} or Ice-{\it
170 i}$^\prime$) and the stable higher density ice B are listed in Table
171 \ref{freeEnergy}. Ice B was included because it has been
172 shown to be a minimum free energy structure for SPC/E at ambient
173 conditions.\cite{Baez95b} In addition to the free energies, the
174 relevant transition temperatures at standard pressure are also
175 displayed in Table \ref{freeEnergy}. These free energy values
176 indicate that Ice-{\it i} is the most stable state for all of the
177 investigated water models. With the free energy at these state
178 points, the Gibbs-Helmholtz equation was used to project to other
179 state points and to build phase diagrams. Figure \ref{tp3PhaseDia} is
180 an example diagram built from the results for the TIP3P water model.
181 All other models have similar structure, although the crossing points
182 between the phases move to different temperatures and pressures as
183 indicated from the transition temperatures in Table \ref{freeEnergy}.
184 It is interesting to note that ice $I_h$ (and ice $I_c$ for that
185 matter) do not appear in any of the phase diagrams for any of the
186 models. For purposes of this study, ice B is representative of the
187 dense ice polymorphs. A recent study by Sanz {\it et al.} provides
188 details on the phase diagrams for SPC/E and TIP4P at higher pressures
189 than those studied here.\cite{Sanz04}
190
191 \begin{table*}
192 \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
193 \begin{center}
194 \caption{Calculated free energies for several ice polymorphs along
195 with the calculated melting (or sublimation) and boiling points for
196 the investigated water models. All free energy calculations used a
197 cutoff radius of 9.0 \AA\ and were performed at 200 K and $\sim$1 atm.
198 Units of free energy are kcal/mol, while transition temperature are in
199 Kelvin. Calculated error of the final digits is in parentheses.}
200 \begin{tabular}{lccccccc}
201 \hline
202 Water Model & $I_h$ & $I_c$ & B & Ice-{\it i} & Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ & $T_m$ (*$T_s$) & $T_b$\\
203 \hline
204 TIP3P & -11.41(2) & -11.23(3) & -11.82(3) & -12.30(3) & - & 269(4) & 357(2)\\
205 TIP4P & -11.84(3) & -12.04(2) & -12.08(3) & - & -12.33(3) & 266(5) & 354(2)\\
206 TIP5P & -11.85(3) & -11.86(2) & -11.96(2) & - & -12.29(2) & 271(4) & 337(2)\\
207 SPC/E & -12.87(2) & -13.05(2) & -13.26(3) & - & -13.55(2) & 296(3) & 396(2)\\
208 SSD/E & -11.27(2) & -11.19(4) & -12.09(2) & -12.54(2) & - & *355(2) & -\\
209 SSD/RF & -11.51(2) & -11.47(2) & -12.08(3) & -12.29(2) & - & 278(4) & 349(2)\\
210 \end{tabular}
211 \label{freeEnergy}
212 \end{center}
213 \end{minipage}
214 \end{table*}
215
216 \begin{figure}
217 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{tp3PhaseDia.eps}
218 \caption{Phase diagram for the TIP3P water model in the low pressure
219 regime. The displayed $T_m$ and $T_b$ values are good predictions of
220 the experimental values; however, the solid phases shown are not the
221 experimentally observed forms. Both cubic and hexagonal ice $I$ are
222 higher in energy and don't appear in the phase diagram.}
223 \label{tp3PhaseDia}
224 \end{figure}
225
226 Most of the water models have melting points that compare quite
227 favorably with the experimental value of 273 K. The unfortunate
228 aspect of this result is that this phase change occurs between
229 Ice-{\it i} and the liquid state rather than ice $I_h$ and the liquid
230 state. These results do not contradict other studies. Studies of ice
231 $I_h$ using TIP4P predict a $T_m$ ranging from 214 to 238 K
232 (differences being attributed to choice of interaction truncation and
233 different ordered and disordered molecular
234 arrangements).\cite{Vlot99,Gao00,Sanz04} If the presence of ice B and
235 Ice-{\it i} were omitted, a $T_m$ value around 210 K would be
236 predicted from this work. However, the $T_m$ from Ice-{\it i} is
237 calculated to be 265 K, indicating that these simulation based
238 structures ought to be included in studies probing phase transitions
239 with this model. Also of interest in these results is that SSD/E does
240 not exhibit a melting point at 1 atm but does sublime at 355 K. This
241 is due to the significant stability of Ice-{\it i} over all other
242 polymorphs for this particular model under these conditions. While
243 troubling, this behavior resulted in the spontaneous crystallization
244 of Ice-{\it i} which led us to investigate this structure. These
245 observations provide a warning that simulations of SSD/E as a
246 ``liquid'' near 300 K are actually metastable and run the risk of
247 spontaneous crystallization. However, when a longer cutoff radius is
248 used, SSD/E prefers the liquid state under standard temperature and
249 pressure.
250
251 \begin{figure}
252 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{cutoffChange.eps}
253 \caption{Free energy as a function of cutoff radius for SSD/E, TIP3P,
254 SPC/E, SSD/RF with a reaction field, and the TIP3P and SPC/E models
255 with an added Ewald correction term. Error for the larger cutoff
256 points is equivalent to that observed at 9.0\AA\ (see Table
257 \ref{freeEnergy}). Data for ice I$_c$ with TIP3P using both 12 and
258 13.5 \AA\ cutoffs were omitted because the crystal was prone to
259 distortion and melting at 200 K. Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ is the form of
260 Ice-{\it i} used in the SPC/E simulations.}
261 \label{incCutoff}
262 \end{figure}
263
264 For the more computationally efficient water models, we have also
265 investigated the effect of potential trunctaion on the computed free
266 energies as a function of the cutoff radius. As seen in
267 Fig. \ref{incCutoff}, the free energies of the ice polymorphs with
268 water models lacking a long-range correction show significant cutoff
269 dependence. In general, there is a narrowing of the free energy
270 differences while moving to greater cutoff radii. As the free
271 energies for the polymorphs converge, the stability advantage that
272 Ice-{\it i} exhibits is reduced. Adjacent to each of these plots are
273 results for systems with applied or estimated long-range corrections.
274 SSD/RF was parametrized for use with a reaction field, and the benefit
275 provided by this computationally inexpensive correction is apparent.
276 The free energies are largely independent of the size of the reaction
277 field cavity in this model, so small cutoff radii mimic bulk
278 calculations quite well under SSD/RF.
279
280 Although TIP3P was paramaterized for use without the Ewald summation,
281 we have estimated the effect of this method for computing long-range
282 electrostatics for both TIP3P and SPC/E. This was accomplished by
283 calculating the potential energy of identical crystals both with and
284 without particle mesh Ewald (PME). Similar behavior to that observed
285 with reaction field is seen for both of these models. The free
286 energies show reduced dependence on cutoff radius and span a narrower
287 range for the various polymorphs. Like the dipolar water models,
288 TIP3P displays a relatively constant preference for the Ice-{\it i}
289 polymorph. Crystal preference is much more difficult to determine for
290 SPC/E. Without a long-range correction, each of the polymorphs
291 studied assumes the role of the preferred polymorph under different
292 cutoff radii. The inclusion of the Ewald correction flattens and
293 narrows the gap in free energies such that the polymorphs are
294 isoenergetic within statistical uncertainty. This suggests that other
295 conditions, such as the density in fixed-volume simulations, can
296 influence the polymorph expressed upon crystallization.
297
298 So what is the preferred solid polymorph for simulated water? The
299 answer appears to be dependent both on the conditions and the model
300 used. In the case of short cutoffs without a long-range interaction
301 correction, Ice-{\it i} and Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ have the lowest free
302 energy of the studied polymorphs with all the models. Ideally,
303 crystallization of each model under constant pressure conditions, as
304 was done with SSD/E, would aid in the identification of their
305 respective preferred structures. This work, however, helps illustrate
306 how studies involving one specific model can lead to insight about
307 important behavior of others. In general, the above results support
308 the finding that the Ice-{\it i} polymorph is a stable crystal
309 structure that should be considered when studying the phase behavior
310 of water models.
311
312 We also note that none of the water models used in this study are
313 polarizable or flexible models. It is entirely possible that the
314 polarizability of real water makes Ice-{\it i} substantially less
315 stable than ice $I_h$. However, the calculations presented above seem
316 interesting enough to communicate before the role of polarizability
317 (or flexibility) has been thoroughly investigated.
318
319 Finally, due to the stability of Ice-{\it i} in the investigated
320 simulation conditions, the question arises as to possible experimental
321 observation of this polymorph. The rather extensive past and current
322 experimental investigation of water in the low pressure regime makes
323 us hesitant to ascribe any relevance to this work outside of the
324 simulation community. It is for this reason that we chose a name for
325 this polymorph which involves an imaginary quantity. That said, there
326 are certain experimental conditions that would provide the most ideal
327 situation for possible observation. These include the negative
328 pressure or stretched solid regime, small clusters in vacuum
329 deposition environments, and in clathrate structures involving small
330 non-polar molecules.
331
332 \section{Acknowledgments}
333 Support for this project was provided by the National Science
334 Foundation under grant CHE-0134881. Computation time was provided by
335 the Notre Dame High Performance Computing Cluster and the Notre Dame
336 Bunch-of-Boxes (B.o.B) computer cluster (NSF grant DMR-0079647).
337
338 \newpage
339
340 \bibliographystyle{jcp}
341 \bibliography{iceiPaper}
342
343
344 \end{document}