ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/scienceIcei/iceiSupplemental.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/scienceIcei/iceiSupplemental.tex (file contents):
Revision 1872 by chrisfen, Thu Dec 9 20:23:48 2004 UTC vs.
Revision 1879 by chrisfen, Thu Dec 9 23:15:07 2004 UTC

# Line 35 | Line 35 | generate phase diagrams.  All simulations were carried
35   SSD/E water models.\cite{Baez95a} Liquid state free energies at 300
36   and 400 K for all of these water models were also determined using
37   this same technique, in order to determine melting points and to
38 < generate phase diagrams.  All simulations were carried out at
38 > generate phase diagrams.  System sizes were 648 or 1728 molecules for
39 > ice B, 1024 or 1280 molecules for ice $I_h$, 1000 molecules for ice
40 > $I_c$, and 1024 molecules for Ice-{\it i} and the liquid state
41 > simulations.  The larger crystal sizes were necessary for simulations
42 > involving larger cutoff values.  All simulations were carried out at
43   densities which correspond to a pressure of approximately 1 atm at
44   their respective temperatures.
45  
# Line 134 | Line 138 | predict changes to the free energy landscape.
138   and absence of PME was applied to the previous results in order to
139   predict changes to the free energy landscape.
140  
141 + Additionally, $g_{OO}(r)$ and $S(\vec{q})$ plots were generated for
142 + the two Ice-{\it i} variants (along with example ice $I_h$ and $I_c$
143 + plots) at 77K, and they are shown in figures \ref{fig:gofr} and
144 + \ref{fig:sofq}.  The $S(\vec{q})$ is related to a three dimensional
145 + Fourier transform of the radial distribution function, which
146 + simplifies to the following expression:
147 +
148 + \begin{equation}
149 + S(q) = 1 + 4\pi\rho\int_{0}^{\infty} r^2 \frac{\sin kr}{kr}g_{OO}(r)dr,
150 + \label{sofqEq}
151 + \end{equation}
152 +
153 + where $\rho$ is the number density.  To obtain a good estimation of
154 + $S(\vec{q})$, $g_{OO}(r)$ needs to extend to large $r$ values.  Thus,
155 + simulations to obtain these plots were run on crystals eight times the
156 + size of those used in the thermodynamic integrations.
157 +
158 + \begin{figure}
159 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{iceGofr.eps}
160 + \caption{Radial distribution functions of ice $I_h$, $I_c$, and
161 + Ice-{\it i} calculated from from simulations of the SSD/RF water model
162 + at 77 K.  The Ice-{\it i} distribution function was obtained from
163 + simulations composed of TIP4P water.}
164 + \label{fig:gofr}
165 + \end{figure}
166 +
167 + \begin{figure}
168 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{sofq.eps}
169 + \caption{Predicted structure factors for ice $I_h$, $I_c$, Ice-{\it i},
170 + and Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ at 77 K.  The raw structure factors have
171 + been convoluted with a gaussian instrument function (0.075 \AA$^{-1}$
172 + width) to compensate for the trunction effects in our finite size
173 + simulations.}
174 + \label{fig:sofq}
175 + \end{figure}
176 +
177 +
178   \newpage
179  
180   \bibliographystyle{jcp}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines