ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/scienceIcei/iceiSupplemental.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/scienceIcei/iceiSupplemental.tex (file contents):
Revision 1879 by chrisfen, Thu Dec 9 23:15:07 2004 UTC vs.
Revision 1888 by chrisfen, Wed Dec 15 18:47:55 2004 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1   %\documentclass[prb,aps,twocolumn,tabularx]{revtex4}
2   \documentclass[11pt]{article}
3 < \usepackage{endfloat}
3 > %\usepackage{endfloat}
4   \usepackage{amsmath}
5   \usepackage{epsf}
6   \usepackage{berkeley}
# Line 19 | Line 19 | Canonical ensemble (NVT) molecular dynamics calculatio
19  
20   \begin{document}
21  
22 + \LARGE
23 + Supplemental Material
24 + \normalsize
25 + \vspace{1cm}
26 +
27   Canonical ensemble (NVT) molecular dynamics calculations were
28   performed using the OOPSE molecular mechanics package.\cite{Meineke05}
29   All molecules were treated as rigid bodies, with orientational motion
# Line 97 | Line 102 | potential energy of the ideal crystal.\cite{Baez95a}
102   potential energy of the ideal crystal.\cite{Baez95a}
103  
104   \begin{figure}
105 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{rotSpring.eps}
105 > \begin{center}
106 > \includegraphics[width=3in]{rotSpring.eps}
107   \caption{Possible orientational motions for a restrained molecule.
108   $\theta$ angles correspond to displacement from the body-frame {\it
109   z}-axis, while $\omega$ angles correspond to rotation about the
# Line 105 | Line 111 | and $\omega$ directions.}
111   constants for the harmonic springs restraining motion in the $\theta$
112   and $\omega$ directions.}
113   \label{waterSpring}
114 + \end{center}
115   \end{figure}
116  
117   In the case of molecular liquids, the ideal vapor is chosen as the
# Line 113 | Line 120 | molecules.  In this study, we applied of one of the mo
120   literature.\cite{Hermens88,Quintana92,Mezei92,Baez95b} These methods
121   typically differ in regard to the path taken for switching off the
122   interaction potential to convert the system to an ideal gas of water
123 < molecules.  In this study, we applied of one of the most convenient
123 > molecules.  In this study, we applied one of the most convenient
124   methods and integrated over the $\lambda^4$ path, where all
125   interaction parameters are scaled equally by this transformation
126   parameter.  This method has been shown to be reversible and provide
# Line 131 | Line 138 | Finally, the affects provided by an Ewald summation we
138   series of the least computationally expensive models (SSD/E, SSD/RF,
139   TIP3P, and SPC/E), simulations were performed with longer cutoffs of
140   10.5, 12, 13.5, and 15 \AA\ to compare with the 9 \AA\ cutoff results.
141 < Finally, the affects provided by an Ewald summation were estimated for
141 > Finally, the effects provided by an Ewald summation were estimated for
142   TIP3P and SPC/E by performing single configuration calculations with
143   Particle-Mesh Ewald (PME) in the TINKER molecular mechanics software
144   package.\cite{Tinker} The calculated energy difference in the presence
# Line 156 | Line 163 | size of those used in the thermodynamic integrations.
163   size of those used in the thermodynamic integrations.
164  
165   \begin{figure}
166 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{iceGofr.eps}
166 > \begin{center}
167 > \includegraphics[width=4in]{iceGofr.eps}
168   \caption{Radial distribution functions of ice $I_h$, $I_c$, and
169   Ice-{\it i} calculated from from simulations of the SSD/RF water model
170   at 77 K.  The Ice-{\it i} distribution function was obtained from
171   simulations composed of TIP4P water.}
172   \label{fig:gofr}
173 + \end{center}
174   \end{figure}
175  
176   \begin{figure}
177 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{sofq.eps}
177 > \begin{center}
178 > \includegraphics[width=4in]{sofq.eps}
179   \caption{Predicted structure factors for ice $I_h$, $I_c$, Ice-{\it i},
180   and Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ at 77 K.  The raw structure factors have
181   been convoluted with a gaussian instrument function (0.075 \AA$^{-1}$
182   width) to compensate for the trunction effects in our finite size
183   simulations.}
184   \label{fig:sofq}
185 + \end{center}
186   \end{figure}
187  
188  

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines