ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/ssdePaper/nptSSD.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/ssdePaper/nptSSD.tex (file contents):
Revision 757 by chrisfen, Wed Sep 10 15:38:43 2003 UTC vs.
Revision 777 by chrisfen, Fri Sep 19 19:29:24 2003 UTC

# Line 23 | Line 23
23  
24   \begin{document}
25  
26 < \title{On the temperature dependent structural and transport properties of the soft sticky dipole (SSD) and related single point water models}
26 > \title{On the temperature dependent properties of the soft sticky dipole (SSD) and related single point water models}
27  
28   \author{Christopher J. Fennell and J. Daniel Gezelter{\thefootnote}
29   \footnote[1]{Corresponding author. \ Electronic mail: gezelter@nd.edu}}
# Line 146 | Line 146 | water.\cite{Ichiye96} In the original molecular dynami
146   simulations using this model, Ichiye \emph{et al.} reported a
147   calculation speed up of up to an order of magnitude over other
148   comparable models while maintaining the structural behavior of
149 < water.\cite{Ichiye96} In the original molecular dynamics studies of
150 < SSD, it was shown that it actually improves upon the prediction of
151 < water's dynamical properties 3 and 4-point models.\cite{Ichiye99} This
149 > water.\cite{Ichiye96} In the original molecular dynamics studies, it
150 > was shown that SSD improves on the prediction of many of water's
151 > dynamical properties over TIP3P and SPC/E.\cite{Ichiye99} This
152   attractive combination of speed and accurate depiction of solvent
153   properties makes SSD a model of interest for the simulation of large
154   scale biological systems, such as membrane phase behavior, a specific
# Line 160 | Line 160 | $N\log N$ calculation scaling orders for $N$ particles
160   systems, the Ewald summation and even particle-mesh Ewald become
161   computational burdens with their respective ideal $N^\frac{3}{2}$ and
162   $N\log N$ calculation scaling orders for $N$ particles.\cite{Darden99}
163 + In applying this water model in these types of systems, it would be
164 + useful to know its properties and behavior with the more
165 + computationally efficient reaction field (RF) technique, and even with
166 + a cutoff that lacks any form of long range correction. This study
167 + addresses these issues by looking at the structural and transport
168 + behavior of SSD over a variety of temperatures, with the purpose of
169 + utilizing the RF correction technique. Towards the end, we suggest
170 + alterations to the parameters that result in more water-like
171 + behavior. It should be noted that in a recent publication, some the
172 + original investigators of the SSD water model have put forth
173 + adjustments to the original SSD water model to address abnormal
174 + density behavior (also observed here), calling the corrected model
175 + SSD1.\cite{Ichiye03} This study will consider this new model's
176 + behavior as well, and hopefully improve upon its depiction of water
177 + under conditions without the Ewald Sum.
178  
164 Up to this point, a detailed look at the model's structure and ion
165 solvation abilities has been performed.\cite{Ichiye96} In addition, a
166 thorough investigation of the dynamic properties of SSD was performed
167 by Chandra and Ichiye focusing on translational and orientational
168 properties at 298 K.\cite{Ichiye99} This study focuses on determining
169 the density maximum for SSD utilizing both microcanonical and
170 isobaric-isothermal ensemble molecular dynamics, while using the
171 reaction field method for handling long-ranged dipolar interactions. A
172 reaction field method has been previously implemented in Monte Carlo
173 simulations by Liu and Ichiye in order to study the static dielectric
174 constant for the model.\cite{Ichiye96b} This paper will expand the
175 scope of these original simulations to look on how the reaction field
176 affects the physical and dynamic properties of SSD systems.
177
179   \section{Methods}
180  
181   As stated previously, in this study the long-range dipole-dipole
# Line 204 | Line 205 | SSD more compatible with a reaction field.
205   to the use of reaction field, simulations were also performed without
206   a surrounding dielectric and suggestions are proposed on how to make
207   SSD more compatible with a reaction field.
208 <
208 >
209   Simulations were performed in both the isobaric-isothermal and
210   microcanonical ensembles. The constant pressure simulations were
211   implemented using an integral thermostat and barostat as outlined by
212 < Hoover.\cite{Hoover85,Hoover86} For the constant pressure
213 < simulations, the \emph{Q} parameter for the was set to 5.0 amu
214 < \(\cdot\)\AA\(^{2}\), and the relaxation time (\(\tau\))\ was set at
215 < 100 ps.
212 > Hoover.\cite{Hoover85,Hoover86} All particles were treated as
213 > non-linear rigid bodies. Vibrational constraints are not necessary in
214 > simulations of SSD, because there are no explicit hydrogen atoms, and
215 > thus no molecular vibrational modes need to be considered.
216  
217   Integration of the equations of motion was carried out using the
218   symplectic splitting method proposed by Dullweber \emph{et
# Line 219 | Line 220 | requirement that is actually quite sensitive to errors
220   deals with poor energy conservation of rigid body systems using
221   quaternions. While quaternions work well for orientational motion in
222   alternate ensembles, the microcanonical ensemble has a constant energy
223 < requirement that is actually quite sensitive to errors in the
224 < equations of motion. The original implementation of this code utilized
225 < quaternions for rotational motion propagation; however, a detailed
226 < investigation showed that they resulted in a steady drift in the total
227 < energy, something that has been observed by others.\cite{Laird97}
223 > requirement that is quite sensitive to errors in the equations of
224 > motion. The original implementation of this code utilized quaternions
225 > for rotational motion propagation; however, a detailed investigation
226 > showed that they resulted in a steady drift in the total energy,
227 > something that has been observed by others.\cite{Laird97}
228  
229   The key difference in the integration method proposed by Dullweber
230   \emph{et al.} is that the entire rotation matrix is propagated from
# Line 232 | Line 233 | in energy conservation. There is still the issue of an
233   nine elements long as opposed to 3 or 4 elements for Euler angles and
234   quaternions respectively. System memory has become much less of an
235   issue in recent times, and this has resulted in substantial benefits
236 < in energy conservation. There is still the issue of an additional 5 or
237 < 6 additional elements for describing the orientation of each particle,
238 < which will increase dump files substantially. Simply translating the
239 < rotation matrix into its component Euler angles or quaternions for
240 < storage purposes relieves this burden.
236 > in energy conservation. There is still the issue of 5 or 6 additional
237 > elements for describing the orientation of each particle, which will
238 > increase dump files substantially. Simply translating the rotation
239 > matrix into its component Euler angles or quaternions for storage
240 > purposes relieves this burden.
241  
242   The symplectic splitting method allows for Verlet style integration of
243   both linear and angular motion of rigid bodies. In the integration
244   method, the orientational propagation involves a sequence of matrix
245   evaluations to update the rotation matrix.\cite{Dullweber1997} These
246   matrix rotations end up being more costly computationally than the
247 < simpler arithmetic quaternion propagation. On average, a 1000 SSD
248 < particle simulation shows a 7\% increase in simulation time using the
249 < symplectic step method in place of quaternions. This cost is more than
250 < justified when comparing the energy conservation of the two methods as
251 < illustrated in figure \ref{timestep}.
247 > simpler arithmetic quaternion propagation. With the same time step, a
248 > 1000 SSD particle simulation shows an average 7\% increase in
249 > computation time using the symplectic step method in place of
250 > quaternions. This cost is more than justified when comparing the
251 > energy conservation of the two methods as illustrated in figure
252 > \ref{timestep}.
253  
254   \begin{figure}
255   \includegraphics[width=61mm, angle=-90]{timeStep.epsi}
# Line 269 | Line 271 | demonstrated.
271   with the quaternion method showing a slight energy drift over time in
272   the 0.5 fs time step simulation. At time steps of 1 and 2 fs, the
273   energy conservation benefits of the symplectic step method are clearly
274 < demonstrated.
274 > demonstrated. Thus, while maintaining the same degree of energy
275 > conservation, one can take considerably longer time steps, leading to
276 > an overall reduction in computation time.
277  
278   Energy drift in these SSD particle simulations was unnoticeable for
279   time steps up to three femtoseconds. A slight energy drift on the
# Line 313 | Line 317 | volume fluctuations dampened out in all but the very c
317   increment was decreased from 25 K to 10 and then 5 K. The above
318   equilibration and production times were sufficient in that the system
319   volume fluctuations dampened out in all but the very cold simulations
320 < (below 225 K). In order to further improve statistics, five separate
321 < simulation progressions were performed, and the averaged results from
322 < the $I_h$ melting simulations are shown in figure \ref{dense1}.
319 <
320 < \begin{figure}
321 < \includegraphics[width=65mm, angle=-90]{1hdense.epsi}
322 < \caption{Average density of SSD water at increasing temperatures
323 < starting from ice $I_h$ lattice.}
324 < \label{dense1}
325 < \end{figure}
320 > (below 225 K). In order to further improve statistics, an ensemble
321 > average was accumulated from five separate simulation progressions,
322 > each starting from a different ice crystal.
323  
324   \subsection{Density Behavior}
325   In the initial average density versus temperature plot, the density
# Line 899 | Line 896 | The authors would like to thank the National Science F
896   simulations of biochemical systems.
897  
898   \section{Acknowledgments}
899 < The authors would like to thank the National Science Foundation for
900 < funding under grant CHE-0134881. Computation time was provided by the
901 < Notre Dame Bunch-of-Boxes (B.o.B) computer cluster under NSF grant DMR
902 < 00 79647.
899 > Support for this project was provided by the National Science
900 > Foundation under grant CHE-0134881. Computation time was provided by
901 > the Notre Dame Bunch-of-Boxes (B.o.B) computer cluster under NSF grant
902 > DMR 00 79647.
903  
904   \bibliographystyle{jcp}
905  

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines