ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/ssdePaper/nptSSD.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/ssdePaper/nptSSD.tex (file contents):
Revision 1030 by chrisfen, Thu Feb 5 22:54:57 2004 UTC vs.
Revision 1036 by gezelter, Fri Feb 6 21:43:00 2004 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1   %\documentclass[prb,aps,times,twocolumn,tabularx]{revtex4}
2 + %\documentclass[preprint,aps,endfloat]{revtex4}
3   \documentclass[11pt]{article}
4   \usepackage{endfloat}
5   \usepackage{amsmath}
# Line 8 | Line 9
9   \usepackage{tabularx}
10   \usepackage{graphicx}
11   \usepackage[ref]{overcite}
11 %\usepackage{berkeley}
12 %\usepackage{curves}
12   \pagestyle{plain}
13   \pagenumbering{arabic}
14   \oddsidemargin 0.0cm \evensidemargin 0.0cm
15   \topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt
16   \textheight 9.0in \textwidth 6.5in
17   \brokenpenalty=10000
19 \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.2}
20 \renewcommand\citemid{\ } % no comma in optional reference note
18  
19 + %\renewcommand\citemid{\ } % no comma in optional reference note
20 +
21   \begin{document}
22  
23   \title{On the structural and transport properties of the soft sticky
24   dipole (SSD) and related single point water models}
25  
26 < \author{Christopher J. Fennell and J. Daniel Gezelter\footnote{Corresponding author. \ Electronic mail: gezelter@nd.edu} \\
27 < Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\ University of Notre Dame\\
26 > \author{Christopher J. Fennell and J. Daniel
27 > Gezelter\footnote{Corresponding author. \ Electronic mail:
28 > gezelter@nd.edu} \\ Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\ University of Notre Dame\\
29   Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
30  
31   \date{\today}
32  
33   \maketitle
34 + \doublespacing
35  
36   \begin{abstract}
37   The density maximum and temperature dependence of the self-diffusion
38   constant were investigated for the soft sticky dipole (SSD) water
39 < model and two related re-parameterizations of this single-point model.
39 > model and two related reparameterizations of this single-point model.
40   A combination of microcanonical and isobaric-isothermal molecular
41   dynamics simulations were used to calculate these properties, both
42   with and without the use of reaction field to handle long-range
43   electrostatics.  The isobaric-isothermal (NPT) simulations of the
44   melting of both ice-$I_h$ and ice-$I_c$ showed a density maximum near
45 < 260 K.  In most cases, the use of the reaction field resulted in
45 > 260~K.  In most cases, the use of the reaction field resulted in
46   calculated densities which were were significantly lower than
47   experimental densities.  Analysis of self-diffusion constants shows
48   that the original SSD model captures the transport properties of
49   experimental water very well in both the normal and super-cooled
50 < liquid regimes.  We also present our re-parameterized versions of SSD
50 > liquid regimes.  We also present our reparameterized versions of SSD
51   for use both with the reaction field or without any long-range
52   electrostatic corrections.  These are called the SSD/RF and SSD/E
53   models respectively.  These modified models were shown to maintain or
# Line 62 | Line 63 | family.
63  
64   %\narrowtext
65  
65
66   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
67   %                              BODY OF TEXT
68   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
# Line 94 | Line 94 | which has an interaction site that is both a point dip
94   was developed by Ichiye \emph{et al.} as a modified form of the
95   hard-sphere water model proposed by Bratko, Blum, and
96   Luzar.\cite{Bratko85,Bratko95} SSD is a {\it single point} model
97 < which has an interaction site that is both a point dipole along with a
97 > which has an interaction site that is both a point dipole and a
98   Lennard-Jones core.  However, since the normal aligned and
99   anti-aligned geometries favored by point dipoles are poor mimics of
100   local structure in liquid water, a short ranged ``sticky'' potential
# Line 164 | Line 164 | simulations using this model, Ichiye {\it et al.} repo
164   Since SSD is a single-point {\it dipolar} model, the force
165   calculations are simplified significantly relative to the standard
166   {\it charged} multi-point models. In the original Monte Carlo
167 < simulations using this model, Ichiye {\it et al.} reported that using
168 < SSD decreased computer time by a factor of 6-7 compared to other
167 > simulations using this model, Liu and Ichiye reported that using SSD
168 > decreased computer time by a factor of 6-7 compared to other
169   models.\cite{Ichiye96} What is most impressive is that this savings
170   did not come at the expense of accurate depiction of the liquid state
171 < properties.  Indeed, SSD maintains reasonable agreement with the
172 < Soper data for the structural features of liquid
171 > properties.  Indeed, SSD maintains reasonable agreement with the Soper
172 > data for the structural features of liquid
173   water.\cite{Soper86,Ichiye96} Additionally, the dynamical properties
174   exhibited by SSD agree with experiment better than those of more
175   computationally expensive models (like TIP3P and
# Line 203 | Line 203 | utilizing the Reaction Field.
203   follows, we compare our reparamaterization of SSD with both the
204   original SSD and SSD1 models with the goal of improving
205   the bulk phase behavior of an SSD-derived model in simulations
206 < utilizing the Reaction Field.
206 > utilizing the reaction field.
207  
208   \section{Methods}
209  
210   Long-range dipole-dipole interactions were accounted for in this study
211 < by using either the reaction field method or by resorting to a simple
212 < cubic switching function at a cutoff radius.  The reaction field
213 < method was actually first used in Monte Carlo simulations of liquid
214 < water.\cite{Barker73} Under this method, the magnitude of the reaction
215 < field acting on dipole $i$ is
211 > by using either the reaction field technique or by resorting to a
212 > simple cubic switching function at a cutoff radius.  One of the early
213 > applications of a reaction field was actually in Monte Carlo
214 > simulations of liquid water.\cite{Barker73} Under this method, the
215 > magnitude of the reaction field acting on dipole $i$ is
216   \begin{equation}
217   \mathcal{E}_{i} = \frac{2(\varepsilon_{s} - 1)}{2\varepsilon_{s} + 1}
218   \frac{1}{r_{c}^{3}} \sum_{j\in{\mathcal{R}}} {\bf \mu}_{j} s(r_{ij}),
# Line 226 | Line 226 | field is known to alter the bulk orientational propert
226   total energy by particle $i$ is given by $-\frac{1}{2}{\bf
227   \mu}_{i}\cdot\mathcal{E}_{i}$ and the torque on dipole $i$ by ${\bf
228   \mu}_{i}\times\mathcal{E}_{i}$.\cite{AllenTildesley}  Use of the reaction
229 < field is known to alter the bulk orientational properties, such as the
230 < dielectric relaxation time.  There is particular sensitivity of this
231 < property on changes in the length of the cutoff
232 < radius.\cite{Berendsen98} This variable behavior makes reaction field
233 < a less attractive method than the Ewald sum.  However, for very large
234 < systems, the computational benefit of reaction field is dramatic.
229 > field is known to alter the bulk orientational properties of simulated
230 > water, and there is particular sensitivity of these properties on
231 > changes in the length of the cutoff radius.\cite{Berendsen98} This
232 > variable behavior makes reaction field a less attractive method than
233 > the Ewald sum.  However, for very large systems, the computational
234 > benefit of reaction field is dramatic.
235  
236   We have also performed a companion set of simulations {\it without} a
237   surrounding dielectric (i.e. using a simple cubic switching function
# Line 287 | Line 287 | time steps is illustrated in figure
287   \begin{center}
288   \epsfxsize=6in
289   \epsfbox{timeStep.epsi}
290 < \caption{Energy conservation using both quaternion-based integration and
291 < the {\sc dlm} method with increasing time step. The larger time step plots
292 < are shifted from the true energy baseline (that of $\Delta t$ = 0.1
293 < fs) for clarity.}
290 > \caption{Energy conservation using both quaternion-based integration and the
291 > {\sc dlm} method with increasing time step. The larger time step plots
292 > are shifted from the true energy baseline (that of $\Delta t$ =
293 > 0.1~fs) for clarity.}
294   \label{timestep}
295   \end{center}
296   \end{figure}
# Line 299 | Line 299 | handle orientational motion. At time steps of 0.1 and
299   steps for both the {\sc dlm} and quaternion integration schemes is
300   compared.  All of the 1000 SSD particle simulations started with
301   the same configuration, and the only difference was the method used to
302 < handle orientational motion. At time steps of 0.1 and 0.5 fs, both
302 > handle orientational motion. At time steps of 0.1 and 0.5~fs, both
303   methods for propagating the orientational degrees of freedom conserve
304   energy fairly well, with the quaternion method showing a slight energy
305 < drift over time in the 0.5 fs time step simulation. At time steps of 1
306 < and 2 fs, the energy conservation benefits of the {\sc dlm} method are
305 > drift over time in the 0.5~fs time step simulation. At time steps of 1
306 > and 2~fs, the energy conservation benefits of the {\sc dlm} method are
307   clearly demonstrated. Thus, while maintaining the same degree of
308   energy conservation, one can take considerably longer time steps,
309   leading to an overall reduction in computation time.
310  
311   Energy drift in the simulations using {\sc dlm} integration was
312 < unnoticeable for time steps up to 3 fs. A slight energy drift on the
313 < order of 0.012 kcal/mol per nanosecond was observed at a time step of
314 < 4 fs, and as expected, this drift increases dramatically with
312 > unnoticeable for time steps up to 3~fs. A slight energy drift on the
313 > order of 0.012~kcal/mol per nanosecond was observed at a time step of
314 > 4~fs, and as expected, this drift increases dramatically with
315   increasing time step. To insure accuracy in our microcanonical
316 < simulations, time steps were set at 2 fs and kept at this value for
316 > simulations, time steps were set at 2~fs and kept at this value for
317   constant pressure simulations as well.
318  
319   Proton-disordered ice crystals in both the $I_h$ and $I_c$ lattices
320   were generated as starting points for all simulations. The $I_h$
321 < crystals were formed by first arranging the centers of mass of the
322 < SSD particles into a ``hexagonal'' ice lattice of 1024
323 < particles. Because of the crystal structure of $I_h$ ice, the
324 < simulation box assumed an orthorhombic shape with an edge length ratio
325 < of approximately 1.00$\times$1.06$\times$1.23. The particles were then
326 < allowed to orient freely about fixed positions with angular momenta
327 < randomized at 400 K for varying times. The rotational temperature was
328 < then scaled down in stages to slowly cool the crystals to 25 K. The
329 < particles were then allowed to translate with fixed orientations at a
330 < constant pressure of 1 atm for 50 ps at 25 K. Finally, all constraints
331 < were removed and the ice crystals were allowed to equilibrate for 50
332 < ps at 25 K and a constant pressure of 1 atm.  This procedure resulted
333 < in structurally stable $I_h$ ice crystals that obey the Bernal-Fowler
321 > crystals were formed by first arranging the centers of mass of the SSD
322 > particles into a ``hexagonal'' ice lattice of 1024 particles. Because
323 > of the crystal structure of $I_h$ ice, the simulation box assumed an
324 > orthorhombic shape with an edge length ratio of approximately
325 > 1.00$\times$1.06$\times$1.23. The particles were then allowed to
326 > orient freely about fixed positions with angular momenta randomized at
327 > 400~K for varying times. The rotational temperature was then scaled
328 > down in stages to slowly cool the crystals to 25~K. The particles were
329 > then allowed to translate with fixed orientations at a constant
330 > pressure of 1 atm for 50~ps at 25~K. Finally, all constraints were
331 > removed and the ice crystals were allowed to equilibrate for 50~ps at
332 > 25~K and a constant pressure of 1~atm.  This procedure resulted in
333 > structurally stable $I_h$ ice crystals that obey the Bernal-Fowler
334   rules.\cite{Bernal33,Rahman72} This method was also utilized in the
335   making of diamond lattice $I_c$ ice crystals, with each cubic
336   simulation box consisting of either 512 or 1000 particles. Only
# Line 347 | Line 347 | for 100 ps prior to a 200 ps data collection run at ea
347   supercooled regime. An ensemble average from five separate melting
348   simulations was acquired, each starting from different ice crystals
349   generated as described previously. All simulations were equilibrated
350 < for 100 ps prior to a 200 ps data collection run at each temperature
351 < setting. The temperature range of study spanned from 25 to 400 K, with
352 < a maximum degree increment of 25 K. For regions of interest along this
353 < stepwise progression, the temperature increment was decreased from 25
354 < K to 10 and 5 K.  The above equilibration and production times were
350 > for 100~ps prior to a 200~ps data collection run at each temperature
351 > setting. The temperature range of study spanned from 25 to 400~K, with
352 > a maximum degree increment of 25~K. For regions of interest along this
353 > stepwise progression, the temperature increment was decreased from
354 > 25~K to 10 and 5~K.  The above equilibration and production times were
355   sufficient in that fluctuations in the volume autocorrelation function
356 < were damped out in all simulations in under 20 ps.
356 > were damped out in all simulations in under 20~ps.
357  
358   \subsection{Density Behavior}
359  
360   Our initial simulations focused on the original SSD water model,
361   and an average density versus temperature plot is shown in figure
362   \ref{dense1}. Note that the density maximum when using a reaction
363 < field appears between 255 and 265 K.  There were smaller fluctuations
364 < in the density at 260 K than at either 255 or 265, so we report this
363 > field appears between 255 and 265~K.  There were smaller fluctuations
364 > in the density at 260~K than at either 255 or 265~K, so we report this
365   value as the location of the density maximum. Figure \ref{dense1} was
366   constructed using ice $I_h$ crystals for the initial configuration;
367   though not pictured, the simulations starting from ice $I_c$ crystal
368   configurations showed similar results, with a liquid-phase density
369 < maximum in this same region (between 255 and 260 K).
369 > maximum in this same region (between 255 and 260~K).
370  
371   \begin{figure}
372   \begin{center}
373   \epsfxsize=6in
374   \epsfbox{denseSSDnew.eps}
375 < \caption{Density versus temperature for TIP4P [Ref. \citen{Jorgensen98b}],
375 > \caption{ Density versus temperature for TIP4P [Ref. \citen{Jorgensen98b}],
376   TIP3P [Ref. \citen{Jorgensen98b}], SPC/E [Ref. \citen{Clancy94}], SSD
377   without Reaction Field, SSD, and experiment [Ref. \citen{CRC80}]. The
378   arrows indicate the change in densities observed when turning off the
# Line 398 | Line 398 | cutoff radius of 12.0 \AA\ to complement the previous
398   dependent on the cutoff radius used both with and without the use of
399   reaction field.\cite{Berendsen98} In order to address the possible
400   effect of cutoff radius, simulations were performed with a dipolar
401 < cutoff radius of 12.0 \AA\ to complement the previous SSD
402 < simulations, all performed with a cutoff of 9.0 \AA. All of the
401 > cutoff radius of 12.0~\AA\ to complement the previous SSD
402 > simulations, all performed with a cutoff of 9.0~\AA. All of the
403   resulting densities overlapped within error and showed no significant
404   trend toward lower or higher densities as a function of cutoff radius,
405   for simulations both with and without reaction field. These results
# Line 412 | Line 412 | apparent at temperatures greater than 300 K. Lower tha
412   scaling of SSD relative to other common models at any given
413   temperature. SSD assumes a lower density than any of the other
414   listed models at the same pressure, behavior which is especially
415 < apparent at temperatures greater than 300 K. Lower than expected
415 > apparent at temperatures greater than 300~K. Lower than expected
416   densities have been observed for other systems using a reaction field
417   for long-range electrostatic interactions, so the most likely reason
418   for the significantly lower densities seen in these simulations is the
# Line 425 | Line 425 | however, a shift in the density maximum location, down
425   freezing point of liquid water. The shape of the curve is similar to
426   the curve produced from SSD simulations using reaction field,
427   specifically the rapidly decreasing densities at higher temperatures;
428 < however, a shift in the density maximum location, down to 245 K, is
428 > however, a shift in the density maximum location, down to 245~K, is
429   observed. This is a more accurate comparison to the other listed water
430   models, in that no long range corrections were applied in those
431   simulations.\cite{Clancy94,Jorgensen98b} However, even without the
432 < reaction field, the density around 300 K is still significantly lower
432 > reaction field, the density around 300~K is still significantly lower
433   than experiment and comparable water models. This anomalous behavior
434   was what lead Tan {\it et al.} to recently reparameterize
435   SSD.\cite{Ichiye03} Throughout the remainder of the paper our
# Line 444 | Line 444 | underwent 50 ps of temperature scaling and 50 ps of co
444   constant energy (NVE) simulations were performed at the average
445   density obtained by the NPT simulations at an identical target
446   temperature. Simulations started with randomized velocities and
447 < underwent 50 ps of temperature scaling and 50 ps of constant energy
448 < equilibration before a 200 ps data collection run. Diffusion constants
447 > underwent 50~ps of temperature scaling and 50~ps of constant energy
448 > equilibration before a 200~ps data collection run. Diffusion constants
449   were calculated via linear fits to the long-time behavior of the
450   mean-square displacement as a function of time. The averaged results
451   from five sets of NVE simulations are displayed in figure
# Line 456 | Line 456 | results.\cite{Gillen72,Holz00,Clancy94,Jorgensen01}
456   \begin{center}
457   \epsfxsize=6in
458   \epsfbox{betterDiffuse.epsi}
459 < \caption{Average self-diffusion constant as a function of temperature for
459 > \caption{ Average self-diffusion constant as a function of temperature for
460   SSD, SPC/E [Ref. \citen{Clancy94}], and TIP5P
461   [Ref. \citen{Jorgensen01}] compared with experimental data
462   [Refs. \citen{Gillen72} and \citen{Holz00}]. Of the three water models
# Line 471 | Line 471 | reproducing values similar to experiment around 290 K;
471   strengths of the SSD model. Of the three models shown, the SSD model
472   has the most accurate depiction of self-diffusion in both the
473   supercooled and liquid regimes.  SPC/E does a respectable job by
474 < reproducing values similar to experiment around 290 K; however, it
474 > reproducing values similar to experiment around 290~K; however, it
475   deviates at both higher and lower temperatures, failing to predict the
476   correct thermal trend. TIP5P and SSD both start off low at colder
477   temperatures and tend to diffuse too rapidly at higher temperatures.
# Line 490 | Line 490 | at 245 K, indicating a first order phase transition fo
490   capacity (C$_\text{p}$) was monitored to locate the melting transition
491   in each of the simulations. In the melting simulations of the 1024
492   particle ice $I_h$ simulations, a large spike in C$_\text{p}$ occurs
493 < at 245 K, indicating a first order phase transition for the melting of
493 > at 245~K, indicating a first order phase transition for the melting of
494   these ice crystals. When the reaction field is turned off, the melting
495 < transition occurs at 235 K.  These melting transitions are
495 > transition occurs at 235~K.  These melting transitions are
496   considerably lower than the experimental value.
497
498 \begin{figure}
499 \begin{center}
500 \epsfxsize=6in
501 \epsfbox{corrDiag.eps}
502 \caption{An illustration of angles involved in the correlations observed in Fig. \ref{contour}.}
503 \label{corrAngle}
504 \end{center}
505 \end{figure}
497  
498   \begin{figure}
499   \begin{center}
500   \epsfxsize=6in
501   \epsfbox{fullContours.eps}
502 < \caption{Contour plots of 2D angular pair correlation functions for
503 < 512 SSD molecules at 100 K (A \& B) and 300 K (C \& D). Dark areas
502 > \caption{ Contour plots of 2D angular pair correlation functions for
503 > 512 SSD molecules at 100~K (A \& B) and 300~K (C \& D). Dark areas
504   signify regions of enhanced density while light areas signify
505   depletion relative to the bulk density. White areas have pair
506   correlation values below 0.5 and black areas have values above 1.5.}
# Line 517 | Line 508 | Additional analysis of the melting process was perform
508   \end{center}
509   \end{figure}
510  
511 + \begin{figure}
512 + \begin{center}
513 + \epsfxsize=6in
514 + \epsfbox{corrDiag.eps}
515 + \caption{ An illustration of angles involved in the correlations observed in Fig. \ref{contour}.}
516 + \label{corrAngle}
517 + \end{center}
518 + \end{figure}
519 +
520   Additional analysis of the melting process was performed using
521   two-dimensional structure and dipole angle correlations. Expressions
522   for these correlations are as follows:
# Line 555 | Line 555 | this split character alters to show the leading 4 \AA\
555   $g_\mathrm{OO}(r)$.\cite{Ichiye96} At low temperatures, the second
556   solvation shell peak appears to have two distinct components that
557   blend together to form one observable peak. At higher temperatures,
558 < this split character alters to show the leading 4 \AA\ peak dominated
558 > this split character alters to show the leading 4~\AA\ peak dominated
559   by equatorial anti-parallel dipole orientations. There is also a
560   tightly bunched group of axially arranged dipoles that most likely
561   consist of the smaller fraction of aligned dipole pairs. The trailing
562 < component of the split peak at 5 \AA\ is dominated by aligned dipoles
562 > component of the split peak at 5~\AA\ is dominated by aligned dipoles
563   that assume hydrogen bond arrangements similar to those seen in the
564   first solvation shell. This evidence indicates that the dipole pair
565   interaction begins to dominate outside of the range of the dipolar
566   repulsion term.  The energetically favorable dipole arrangements
567   populate the region immediately outside this repulsion region (around
568 < 4 \AA), while arrangements that seek to satisfy both the sticky and
568 > 4~\AA), while arrangements that seek to satisfy both the sticky and
569   dipole forces locate themselves just beyond this initial buildup
570 < (around 5 \AA).
570 > (around 5~\AA).
571  
572   From these findings, the split second peak is primarily the product of
573   the dipolar repulsion term of the sticky potential. In fact, the inner
574   peak can be pushed out and merged with the outer split peak just by
575   extending the switching function ($s^\prime(r_{ij})$) from its normal
576 < 4.0 \AA\ cutoff to values of 4.5 or even 5 \AA. This type of
576 > 4.0~\AA\ cutoff to values of 4.5 or even 5~\AA. This type of
577   correction is not recommended for improving the liquid structure,
578   since the second solvation shell would still be shifted too far
579   out. In addition, this would have an even more detrimental effect on
# Line 608 | Line 608 | the liquid structure in simulations without a long-ran
608  
609   \begin{table}
610   \begin{center}
611 < \caption{Parameters for the original and adjusted models}
611 > \caption{ Parameters for the original and adjusted models}
612   \begin{tabular}{ l  c  c  c  c }
613   \hline \\[-3mm]
614   \ \ \ Parameters\ \ \  & \ \ \ SSD [Ref. \citen{Ichiye96}] \ \ \
615 < & \ SSD1 [Ref. \citen{Ichiye03}]\ \  & \ SSD/E\ \  & \ SSD/RF \\
615 > & \ SSD1 [Ref. \citen{Ichiye03}]\ \  & \ SSD/E\ \  & \ \ SSD/RF \\
616   \hline \\[-3mm]
617   \ \ \ $\sigma$ (\AA)  & 3.051 & 3.016 & 3.035 & 3.019\\
618   \ \ \ $\epsilon$ (kcal/mol) & 0.152 & 0.152 & 0.152 & 0.152\\
# Line 632 | Line 632 | the liquid structure in simulations without a long-ran
632   \begin{center}
633   \epsfxsize=5in
634   \epsfbox{GofRCompare.epsi}
635 < \caption{Plots comparing experiment [Ref. \citen{Head-Gordon00_1}] with
635 > \caption{ Plots comparing experiment [Ref. \citen{Head-Gordon00_1}] with
636   SSD/E and SSD1 without reaction field (top), as well as
637   SSD/RF and SSD1 with reaction field turned on
638   (bottom). The insets show the respective first peaks in detail. Note
# Line 646 | Line 646 | peak of SSD/E and SSD/RF.}
646   \begin{center}
647   \epsfxsize=6in
648   \epsfbox{dualsticky_bw.eps}
649 < \caption{Positive and negative isosurfaces of the sticky potential for
649 > \caption{ Positive and negative isosurfaces of the sticky potential for
650   SSD1 (left) and SSD/E \& SSD/RF (right). Light areas
651   correspond to the tetrahedral attractive component, and darker areas
652   correspond to the dipolar repulsive component.}
# Line 688 | Line 688 | persistence of full dipolar character below the previo
688   particles feel the pull of the ``hydrogen bonds''. Aside from
689   improving the shape of the first peak in the g(\emph{r}), this
690   modification improves the densities considerably by allowing the
691 < persistence of full dipolar character below the previous 4.0 \AA\
691 > persistence of full dipolar character below the previous 4.0~\AA\
692   cutoff.
693  
694   While adjusting the location and shape of the first peak of $g(r)$
695   improves the densities, these changes alone are insufficient to bring
696   the system densities up to the values observed experimentally.  To
697   further increase the densities, the dipole moments were increased in
698 < both of our adjusted models. Since SSD is a dipole based model,
699 < the structure and transport are very sensitive to changes in the
700 < dipole moment. The original SSD simply used the dipole moment
701 < calculated from the TIP3P water model, which at 2.35 D is
702 < significantly greater than the experimental gas phase value of 1.84
703 < D. The larger dipole moment is a more realistic value and improves the
704 < dielectric properties of the fluid. Both theoretical and experimental
705 < measurements indicate a liquid phase dipole moment ranging from 2.4 D
706 < to values as high as 3.11 D, providing a substantial range of
707 < reasonable values for a dipole
708 < moment.\cite{Sprik91,Kusalik02,Badyal00,Barriol64} Moderately
709 < increasing the dipole moments to 2.42 and 2.48 D for SSD/E and
710 < SSD/RF, respectively, leads to significant changes in the
711 < density and transport of the water models.
698 > both of our adjusted models. Since SSD is a dipole based model, the
699 > structure and transport are very sensitive to changes in the dipole
700 > moment. The original SSD simply used the dipole moment calculated from
701 > the TIP3P water model, which at 2.35~D is significantly greater than
702 > the experimental gas phase value of 1.84~D. The larger dipole moment
703 > is a more realistic value and improves the dielectric properties of
704 > the fluid. Both theoretical and experimental measurements indicate a
705 > liquid phase dipole moment ranging from 2.4~D to values as high as
706 > 3.11~D, providing a substantial range of reasonable values for a
707 > dipole moment.\cite{Sprik91,Kusalik02,Badyal00,Barriol64} Moderately
708 > increasing the dipole moments to 2.42 and 2.48~D for SSD/E and SSD/RF,
709 > respectively, leads to significant changes in the density and
710 > transport of the water models.
711  
712   In order to demonstrate the benefits of these reparameterizations, a
713   series of NPT and NVE simulations were performed to probe the density
# Line 719 | Line 718 | simulation was equilibrated for 100 ps before a 200 ps
718   results are obtained from five separate simulations of 1024 particle
719   systems, and the melting sequences were started from different ice
720   $I_h$ crystals constructed as described previously. Each NPT
721 < simulation was equilibrated for 100 ps before a 200 ps data collection
721 > simulation was equilibrated for 100~ps before a 200~ps data collection
722   run at each temperature step, and the final configuration from the
723   previous temperature simulation was used as a starting point. All NVE
724   simulations had the same thermalization, equilibration, and data
# Line 729 | Line 728 | collection times as stated previously.
728   \begin{center}
729   \epsfxsize=6in
730   \epsfbox{ssdeDense.epsi}
731 < \caption{Comparison of densities calculated with SSD/E to
731 > \caption{ Comparison of densities calculated with SSD/E to
732   SSD1 without a reaction field, TIP3P [Ref. \citen{Jorgensen98b}],
733   TIP5P [Ref. \citen{Jorgensen00}], SPC/E [Ref. \citen{Clancy94}] and
734   experiment [Ref. \citen{CRC80}]. The window shows a expansion around
# Line 759 | Line 758 | melting transition for SSD/E was shown to occur at 235
758   strengthening of the dipolar character. However, this increasing
759   disorder in the SSD/E model has little effect on the melting
760   transition. By monitoring $C_p$ throughout these simulations, the
761 < melting transition for SSD/E was shown to occur at 235 K.  The
761 > melting transition for SSD/E was shown to occur at 235~K.  The
762   same transition temperature observed with SSD and SSD1.
763  
764   \begin{figure}
765   \begin{center}
766   \epsfxsize=6in
767   \epsfbox{ssdrfDense.epsi}
768 < \caption{Comparison of densities calculated with SSD/RF to
768 > \caption{ Comparison of densities calculated with SSD/RF to
769   SSD1 with a reaction field, TIP3P [Ref. \citen{Jorgensen98b}],
770   TIP5P [Ref. \citen{Jorgensen00}], SPC/E [Ref. \citen{Clancy94}], and
771   experiment [Ref. \citen{CRC80}]. The inset shows the necessity of
# Line 790 | Line 789 | which observed at 245 K for SSD/RF, is identical to SS
789   further emphasize the importance of reparameterization in order to
790   model the density properly under different simulation conditions.
791   Again, these changes have only a minor effect on the melting point,
792 < which observed at 245 K for SSD/RF, is identical to SSD and only 5 K
792 > which observed at 245~K for SSD/RF, is identical to SSD and only 5~K
793   lower than SSD1 with a reaction field. Additionally, the difference in
794   density maxima is not as extreme, with SSD/RF showing a density
795 < maximum at 255 K, fairly close to the density maxima of 260 K and 265
796 < K, shown by SSD and SSD1 respectively.
795 > maximum at 255~K, fairly close to the density maxima of 260~K and
796 > 265~K, shown by SSD and SSD1 respectively.
797  
798   \begin{figure}
799   \begin{center}
800   \epsfxsize=6in
801   \epsfbox{ssdeDiffuse.epsi}
802 < \caption{The diffusion constants calculated from SSD/E and
802 > \caption{ The diffusion constants calculated from SSD/E and
803   SSD1 (both without a reaction field) along with experimental results
804   [Refs. \citen{Gillen72} and \citen{Holz00}]. The NVE calculations were
805   performed at the average densities observed in the 1 atm NPT
# Line 823 | Line 822 | K). Both models follow the shape of the experimental c
822   SSD/E is consistently higher than experiment, while SSD1 remains lower
823   than experiment until relatively high temperatures (around 360
824   K). Both models follow the shape of the experimental curve well below
825 < 300 K but tend to diffuse too rapidly at higher temperatures, as seen
826 < in SSD1's crossing above 360 K.  This increasing diffusion relative to
825 > 300~K but tend to diffuse too rapidly at higher temperatures, as seen
826 > in SSD1's crossing above 360~K.  This increasing diffusion relative to
827   the experimental values is caused by the rapidly decreasing system
828   density with increasing temperature.  Both SSD1 and SSD/E show this
829   deviation in particle mobility, but this trend has different
# Line 841 | Line 840 | conditions.
840   \begin{center}
841   \epsfxsize=6in
842   \epsfbox{ssdrfDiffuse.epsi}
843 < \caption{The diffusion constants calculated from SSD/RF and
843 > \caption{ The diffusion constants calculated from SSD/RF and
844   SSD1 (both with an active reaction field) along with
845   experimental results [Refs. \citen{Gillen72} and \citen{Holz00}]. The
846   NVE calculations were performed at the average densities observed in
# Line 860 | Line 859 | temperatures greater than 330 K.  As stated above, thi
859   throughout most of the temperature range shown and exhibiting only a
860   slight increasing trend at higher temperatures. SSD1 tends to diffuse
861   more slowly at low temperatures and deviates to diffuse too rapidly at
862 < temperatures greater than 330 K.  As stated above, this deviation away
862 > temperatures greater than 330~K.  As stated above, this deviation away
863   from the ideal trend is due to a rapid decrease in density at higher
864   temperatures. SSD/RF does not suffer from this problem as much as SSD1
865   because the calculated densities are closer to the experimental
# Line 871 | Line 870 | reparameterization when using an altered long-range co
870   \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
871   \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\thempfootnote}
872   \begin{center}
873 < \caption{Properties of the single-point water models compared with
874 < experimental data at ambient conditions}
873 > \caption{ Properties of the single-point water models compared with
874 > experimental data at ambient conditions. Deviations of the of the
875 > averages are given in parentheses.}
876   \begin{tabular}{ l  c  c  c  c  c }
877   \hline \\[-3mm]
878 < \ \ \ \ \ \  & \ \ \ SSD1 \ \ \ & \ SSD/E \ \ \ & \ SSD1 (RF) \ \
879 < \ & \ SSD/RF \ \ \ & \ Expt. \\
878 > \ \ \ \ \ \  & \ \ \ SSD1 \ \ \ & \ \ SSD/E \ \ \ & \ \ SSD1 (RF) \ \
879 > \ & \ \ SSD/RF \ \ \ & \ \ Expt. \\
880   \hline \\[-3mm]
881 < \ \ \ $\rho$ (g/cm$^3$) & 0.999 $\pm$0.001 & 0.996 $\pm$0.001 & 0.972 $\pm$0.002 & 0.997 $\pm$0.001 & 0.997 \\
882 < \ \ \ $C_p$ (cal/mol K) & 28.80 $\pm$0.11 & 25.45 $\pm$0.09 & 28.28 $\pm$0.06 & 23.83 $\pm$0.16 & 17.98 \\
883 < \ \ \ $D$ ($10^{-5}$ cm$^2$/s) & 1.78 $\pm$0.07 & 2.51 $\pm$0.18 &
884 < 2.00 $\pm$0.17 & 2.32 $\pm$0.06 & 2.299\cite{Mills73} \\
885 < \ \ \ Coordination Number ($n_C$) & 3.9 & 4.3 & 3.8 & 4.4 &
881 > \ \ $\rho$ (g/cm$^3$) & 0.999(0.001) & 0.996(0.001) & 0.972(0.002) & 0.997(0.001) & 0.997 \\
882 > \ \ $C_p$ (cal/mol K) & 28.80(0.11) & 25.45(0.09) & 28.28(0.06) & 23.83(0.16) & 17.98 \\
883 > \ \ $D$ ($10^{-5}$ cm$^2$/s) & 1.78(0.7) & 2.51(0.18) & 2.00(0.17) & 2.32(0.06) & 2.299\cite{Mills73} \\
884 > \ \ Coordination Number ($n_C$) & 3.9 & 4.3 & 3.8 & 4.4 &
885   4.7\footnote{Calculated by integrating $g_{\text{OO}}(r)$ in
886   Ref. \citen{Head-Gordon00_1}} \\
887 < \ \ \ H-bonds per particle ($n_H$) & 3.7 & 3.6 & 3.7 & 3.7 &
887 > \ \ H-bonds per particle ($n_H$) & 3.7 & 3.6 & 3.7 & 3.7 &
888   3.5\footnote{Calculated by integrating $g_{\text{OH}}(r)$ in
889   Ref. \citen{Soper86}}  \\
890 < \ \ \ $\tau_1$ (ps) & 10.9 $\pm$0.6 & 7.3 $\pm$0.4 & 7.5 $\pm$0.7 &
891 < 7.2 $\pm$0.4 & 5.7\footnote{Calculated for 298 K from data in Ref. \citen{Eisenberg69}} \\
893 < \ \ \ $\tau_2$ (ps) & 4.7 $\pm$0.4 & 3.1 $\pm$0.2 & 3.5 $\pm$0.3 & 3.2
894 < $\pm$0.2 & 2.3\footnote{Calculated for 298 K from data in
890 > \ \ $\tau_1$ (ps) & 10.9(0.6) & 7.3(0.4) & 7.5(0.7) & 7.2(0.4) & 5.7\footnote{Calculated for 298 K from data in Ref. \citen{Eisenberg69}} \\
891 > \ \ $\tau_2$ (ps) & 4.7(0.4) & 3.1(0.2) & 3.5(0.3) & 3.2(0.2) & 2.3\footnote{Calculated for 298 K from data in
892   Ref. \citen{Krynicki66}}
893   \end{tabular}
894   \label{liquidproperties}
# Line 943 | Line 940 | dependence of $\tau_2$, it is necessary to recalculate
940   the commonly cited value of 1.9 ps for $\tau_2$ was determined from
941   the NMR data in Ref. \citen{Krynicki66} at a temperature near
942   34$^\circ$C.\cite{Rahman71} Because of the strong temperature
943 < dependence of $\tau_2$, it is necessary to recalculate it at 298 K to
943 > dependence of $\tau_2$, it is necessary to recalculate it at 298~K to
944   make proper comparisons. The value shown in Table
945   \ref{liquidproperties} was calculated from the same NMR data in the
946   fashion described in Ref. \citen{Krynicki66}. Similarly, $\tau_1$ was
947 < recomputed for 298 K from the data in Ref. \citen{Eisenberg69}.
947 > recomputed for 298~K from the data in Ref. \citen{Eisenberg69}.
948   Again, SSD/E and SSD/RF show improved behavior over SSD1, both with
949   and without an active reaction field. Turning on the reaction field
950   leads to much improved time constants for SSD1; however, these results
# Line 962 | Line 959 | can be attributed to the use of the Ewald sum.\cite{Ic
959   \begin{center}
960   \epsfxsize=6in
961   \epsfbox{icei_bw.eps}
962 < \caption{The most stable crystal structure assumed by the SSD family
962 > \caption{ The most stable crystal structure assumed by the SSD family
963   of water models.  We refer to this structure as Ice-{\it i} to
964   indicate its origins in computer simulation.  This image was taken of
965   the (001) face of the crystal.}
# Line 973 | Line 970 | water.  After melting at 235 K, two of five systems un
970   While performing a series of melting simulations on an early iteration
971   of SSD/E not discussed in this paper, we observed
972   recrystallization into a novel structure not previously known for
973 < water.  After melting at 235 K, two of five systems underwent
974 < crystallization events near 245 K.  The two systems remained
975 < crystalline up to 320 and 330 K, respectively.  The crystal exhibits
973 > water.  After melting at 235~K, two of five systems underwent
974 > crystallization events near 245~K.  The two systems remained
975 > crystalline up to 320 and 330~K, respectively.  The crystal exhibits
976   an expanded zeolite-like structure that does not correspond to any
977   known form of ice.  This appears to be an artifact of the point
978   dipolar models, so to distinguish it from the experimentally observed
# Line 1009 | Line 1006 | family, Ice-{\it i} had the lowest calculated enthalpy
1006  
1007   \begin{table}
1008   \begin{center}
1009 < \caption{Enthalpies of Formation (in kcal / mol) of the three crystal
1009 > \caption{ Enthalpies of Formation (in kcal / mol) of the three crystal
1010   structures (at 1 K) exhibited by the SSD family of water models}
1011   \begin{tabular}{ l  c  c  c  }
1012   \hline \\[-3mm]
1013 < \ \ \ Water Model \ \ \  & \ \ \ Ice-$I_h$ \ \ \ & \ Ice-$I_c$\ \  & \
1014 < Ice-{\it i} \\
1013 > \ \ \ Water Model \ \ \  & \ \ \ Ice-$I_h$ \ \ \ & \ \ \ Ice-$I_c$ \ \ \  &
1014 > \ \ \ \ Ice-{\it i} \\
1015   \hline \\[-3mm]
1016   \ \ \ SSD/E & -72.444 & -72.450 & -73.748 \\
1017   \ \ \ SSD/RF & -73.093 & -73.075 & -74.180 \\
# Line 1026 | Line 1023 | performed with ice-{\it i} as the initial configuratio
1023   \end{table}
1024  
1025   In addition to these energetic comparisons, melting simulations were
1026 < performed with ice-{\it i} as the initial configuration using SSD/E,
1026 > performed with Ice-{\it i} as the initial configuration using SSD/E,
1027   SSD/RF, and SSD1 both with and without a reaction field. The melting
1028   transitions for both SSD/E and SSD1 without reaction field occurred at
1029   temperature in excess of 375~K.  SSD/RF and SSD1 with a reaction field
# Line 1084 | Line 1081 | DMR-0079647.
1081   \newpage
1082  
1083   \bibliographystyle{jcp}
1084 < \bibliography{nptSSD}
1084 > \bibliography{nptSSD}
1085  
1089 %\pagebreak
1086  
1087   \end{document}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines