ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/ssdePaper/nptSSD.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/ssdePaper/nptSSD.tex (file contents):
Revision 1021 by chrisfen, Wed Feb 4 20:19:21 2004 UTC vs.
Revision 1022 by chrisfen, Wed Feb 4 22:13:36 2004 UTC

# Line 235 | Line 235 | at the cutoff radius) and as a result we have two repa
235  
236   We have also performed a companion set of simulations {\it without} a
237   surrounding dielectric (i.e. using a simple cubic switching function
238 < at the cutoff radius) and as a result we have two reparamaterizations
239 < of SSD which could be used either with or without the Reaction Field
238 > at the cutoff radius), and as a result we have two reparamaterizations
239 > of SSD which could be used either with or without the reaction field
240   turned on.
241  
242   Simulations to obtain the preferred density were performed in the
# Line 254 | Line 254 | traditional quaternion integration.\cite{Evans77,Evans
254   symplectic splitting method proposed by Dullweber {\it et
255   al.}\cite{Dullweber1997} Our reason for selecting this integrator
256   centers on poor energy conservation of rigid body dynamics using
257 < traditional quaternion integration.\cite{Evans77,Evans77b} While quaternions
258 < may work well for orientational motion under NVT or NPT integrators,
259 < our limits on energy drift in the microcanonical ensemble were quite
260 < strict, and the drift under quaternions was substantially greater than
261 < in the symplectic splitting method.  This steady drift in the total
262 < energy has also been observed by Kol {\it et al.}\cite{Laird97}
257 > traditional quaternion integration.\cite{Evans77,Evans77b} In typical
258 > microcanonical ensemble simulations, the energy drift when using
259 > quaternions was substantially greater than when using the symplectic
260 > splitting method (fig. \ref{timestep}).  This steady drift in the
261 > total energy has also been observed by Kol {\it et al.}\cite{Laird97}
262  
263   The key difference in the integration method proposed by Dullweber
264   \emph{et al.} is that the entire rotation matrix is propagated from
# Line 449 | Line 448 | results.\cite{Gillen72,Mills73,Clancy94,Jorgensen01}
448   mean-square displacement as a function of time. The averaged results
449   from five sets of NVE simulations are displayed in figure
450   \ref{diffuse}, alongside experimental, SPC/E, and TIP5P
451 < results.\cite{Gillen72,Mills73,Clancy94,Jorgensen01}
451 > results.\cite{Gillen72,Holz00,Clancy94,Jorgensen01}
452  
453   \begin{figure}
454   \begin{center}
# Line 457 | Line 456 | and Experimental data [Refs. \citen{Gillen72} and \cit
456   \epsfbox{betterDiffuse.epsi}
457   \caption{Average self-diffusion constant as a function of temperature for
458   SSD, SPC/E [Ref. \citen{Clancy94}], TIP5P [Ref. \citen{Jorgensen01}],
459 < and Experimental data [Refs. \citen{Gillen72} and \citen{Mills73}]. Of
459 > and Experimental data [Refs. \citen{Gillen72} and \citen{Holz00}]. Of
460   the three water models shown, SSD has the least deviation from the
461   experimental values. The rapidly increasing diffusion constants for
462   TIP5P and SSD correspond to significant decrease in density at the
# Line 919 | Line 918 | performed at the STP density for each of the respectiv
918   vector can be calculated from an exponential fit in the long-time
919   regime ($t > \tau_l^\mu$).\cite{Rothschild84} Calculation of these
920   time constants were averaged from five detailed NVE simulations
921 < performed at the STP density for each of the respective models. Again,
922 < SSD/E and SSD/RF show improved behavior over SSD1 both with and
923 < without an active reaction field. Numbers published from the original
924 < SSD dynamics studies appear closer to the experimental values, and we
925 < attribute this discrepancy to the implimentation of an Ewald sum
926 < versus a reaction field.
921 > performed at the STP density for each of the respective models. It
922 > should be noted that the commonly cited value for $\tau_2$ of 1.9 ps
923 > was determined from the NMR data in reference \citen{Krynicki66} at a
924 > temperature near 34$^\circ$C.\cite{Rahman73} Because of the strong
925 > temperature dependence of $\tau_2$, it is necessary to recalculate it
926 > at 298 K to make proper comparisons. The value shown in Table
927 > \ref{liquidproperties} was calculated from the same NMR data in the
928 > fashion described in reference \citen{Krynicki66}. Again, SSD/E and
929 > SSD/RF show improved behavior over SSD1, both with and without an
930 > active reaction field. Turning on the reaction field leads to much
931 > improved time constants for SSD1; however, these results also include
932 > a corresponding decrease in system density. Numbers published from the
933 > original SSD dynamics studies appear closer to the experimental
934 > values, and this difference can be attributed to the use of the Ewald
935 > sum technique versus a reaction field.\cite{Ichiye99}
936  
937   \subsection{Additional Observations}
938  

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines