ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/ssdePaper/nptSSD.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/ssdePaper/nptSSD.tex (file contents):
Revision 1024 by chrisfen, Wed Feb 4 22:42:52 2004 UTC vs.
Revision 1027 by chrisfen, Thu Feb 5 18:42:59 2004 UTC

# Line 215 | Line 215 | field acting on dipole $i$ is
215   field acting on dipole $i$ is
216   \begin{equation}
217   \mathcal{E}_{i} = \frac{2(\varepsilon_{s} - 1)}{2\varepsilon_{s} + 1}
218 < \frac{1}{r_{c}^{3}} \sum_{j\in{\mathcal{R}}} {\bf \mu}_{j} f(r_{ij})\  ,
218 > \frac{1}{r_{c}^{3}} \sum_{j\in{\mathcal{R}}} {\bf \mu}_{j} f(r_{ij}),
219   \label{rfequation}
220   \end{equation}
221   where $\mathcal{R}$ is the cavity defined by the cutoff radius
222   ($r_{c}$), $\varepsilon_{s}$ is the dielectric constant imposed on the
223   system (80 in the case of liquid water), ${\bf \mu}_{j}$ is the dipole
224 < moment vector of particle $j$ and $f(r_{ij})$ is a cubic switching
224 > moment vector of particle $j$, and $f(r_{ij})$ is a cubic switching
225   function.\cite{AllenTildesley} The reaction field contribution to the
226   total energy by particle $i$ is given by $-\frac{1}{2}{\bf
227   \mu}_{i}\cdot\mathcal{E}_{i}$ and the torque on dipole $i$ by ${\bf
# Line 251 | Line 251 | symplectic splitting method proposed by Dullweber {\it
251   need to be considered.
252  
253   Integration of the equations of motion was carried out using the
254 < symplectic splitting method proposed by Dullweber {\it et
255 < al.}\cite{Dullweber1997} Our reason for selecting this integrator
256 < centers on poor energy conservation of rigid body dynamics using
257 < traditional quaternion integration.\cite{Evans77,Evans77b} In typical
258 < microcanonical ensemble simulations, the energy drift when using
259 < quaternions was substantially greater than when using the symplectic
260 < splitting method (fig. \ref{timestep}).  This steady drift in the
261 < total energy has also been observed by Kol {\it et al.}\cite{Laird97}
254 > symplectic splitting method proposed by Dullweber, Leimkuhler, and
255 > McLachlan (DLM).\cite{Dullweber1997} Our reason for selecting this
256 > integrator centers on poor energy conservation of rigid body dynamics
257 > using traditional quaternion integration.\cite{Evans77,Evans77b} In
258 > typical microcanonical ensemble simulations, the energy drift when
259 > using quaternions was substantially greater than when using the DLM
260 > method (fig. \ref{timestep}).  This steady drift in the total energy
261 > has also been observed by Kol {\it et al.}\cite{Laird97}
262  
263   The key difference in the integration method proposed by Dullweber
264   \emph{et al.} is that the entire rotation matrix is propagated from
# Line 267 | Line 267 | The symplectic splitting method allows for Verlet styl
267   rotation matrix into quaternions for storage purposes makes trajectory
268   data quite compact.
269  
270 < The symplectic splitting method allows for Verlet style integration of
271 < both translational and orientational motion of rigid bodies. In this
270 > The DML method allows for Verlet style integration of both
271 > translational and orientational motion of rigid bodies. In this
272   integration method, the orientational propagation involves a sequence
273   of matrix evaluations to update the rotation
274   matrix.\cite{Dullweber1997} These matrix rotations are more costly
275   than the simpler arithmetic quaternion propagation. With the same time
276   step, a 1000 SSD particle simulation shows an average 7\% increase in
277 < computation time using the symplectic step method in place of
278 < quaternions. The additional expense per step is justified when one
279 < considers the ability to use time steps that are nearly twice as large
280 < under symplectic splitting than would be usable under quaternion
281 < dynamics.  The energy conservation of the two methods using a number
282 < of different time steps is illustrated in figure
277 > computation time using the DML method in place of quaternions. The
278 > additional expense per step is justified when one considers the
279 > ability to use time steps that are nearly twice as large under DML
280 > than would be usable under quaternion dynamics.  The energy
281 > conservation of the two methods using a number of different time steps
282 > is illustrated in figure
283   \ref{timestep}.
284  
285   \begin{figure}
# Line 287 | Line 287 | the symplectic step method proposed by Dullweber \emph
287   \epsfxsize=6in
288   \epsfbox{timeStep.epsi}
289   \caption{Energy conservation using both quaternion based integration and
290 < the symplectic step method proposed by Dullweber \emph{et al.} with
291 < increasing time step. The larger time step plots are shifted from the
292 < true energy baseline (that of $\Delta t$ = 0.1 fs) for clarity.}
290 > the symplectic splitting method proposed by Dullweber \emph{et al.}
291 > with increasing time step. The larger time step plots are shifted from
292 > the true energy baseline (that of $\Delta t$ = 0.1 fs) for clarity.}
293   \label{timestep}
294   \end{center}
295   \end{figure}
296  
297   In figure \ref{timestep}, the resulting energy drift at various time
298 < steps for both the symplectic step and quaternion integration schemes
299 < is compared.  All of the 1000 SSD particle simulations started with
300 < the same configuration, and the only difference was the method used to
301 < handle orientational motion. At time steps of 0.1 and 0.5 fs, both
302 < methods for propagating the orientational degrees of freedom conserve
303 < energy fairly well, with the quaternion method showing a slight energy
304 < drift over time in the 0.5 fs time step simulation. At time steps of 1
305 < and 2 fs, the energy conservation benefits of the symplectic step
306 < method are clearly demonstrated. Thus, while maintaining the same
307 < degree of energy conservation, one can take considerably longer time
308 < steps, leading to an overall reduction in computation time.
298 > steps for both the DML and quaternion integration schemes is compared.
299 > All of the 1000 SSD particle simulations started with the same
300 > configuration, and the only difference was the method used to handle
301 > orientational motion. At time steps of 0.1 and 0.5 fs, both methods
302 > for propagating the orientational degrees of freedom conserve energy
303 > fairly well, with the quaternion method showing a slight energy drift
304 > over time in the 0.5 fs time step simulation. At time steps of 1 and 2
305 > fs, the energy conservation benefits of the DML method are clearly
306 > demonstrated. Thus, while maintaining the same degree of energy
307 > conservation, one can take considerably longer time steps, leading to
308 > an overall reduction in computation time.
309  
310 < Energy drift in the symplectic step simulations was unnoticeable for
311 < time steps up to 3 fs. A slight energy drift on the
312 < order of 0.012 kcal/mol per nanosecond was observed at a time step of
313 < 4 fs, and as expected, this drift increases dramatically
314 < with increasing time step. To insure accuracy in our microcanonical
315 < simulations, time steps were set at 2 fs and kept at this value for
316 < constant pressure simulations as well.
310 > Energy drift in the simulations using DML integration was unnoticeable
311 > for time steps up to 3 fs. A slight energy drift on the order of 0.012
312 > kcal/mol per nanosecond was observed at a time step of 4 fs, and as
313 > expected, this drift increases dramatically with increasing time
314 > step. To insure accuracy in our microcanonical simulations, time steps
315 > were set at 2 fs and kept at this value for constant pressure
316 > simulations as well.
317  
318   Proton-disordered ice crystals in both the $I_h$ and $I_c$ lattices
319   were generated as starting points for all simulations. The $I_h$
# Line 430 | Line 430 | was what lead Ichiye {\it et al.} to recently reparame
430   simulations.\cite{Clancy94,Jorgensen98b} However, even without the
431   reaction field, the density around 300 K is still significantly lower
432   than experiment and comparable water models. This anomalous behavior
433 < was what lead Ichiye {\it et al.} to recently reparameterize
433 > was what lead Tan {\it et al.} to recently reparameterize
434   SSD.\cite{Ichiye03} Throughout the remainder of the paper our
435   reparamaterizations of SSD will be compared with the newer SSD1 model.
436  
# Line 642 | Line 642 | and broadened the first peak of SSD/E and SSD/RF.}
642   \begin{figure}
643   \begin{center}
644   \epsfxsize=6in
645 < \epsfbox{dualsticky.ps}
645 > \epsfbox{dualsticky_bw.eps}
646   \caption{Isosurfaces of the sticky potential for SSD1 (left) and SSD/E \&
647   SSD/RF (right). Light areas correspond to the tetrahedral attractive
648   component, and darker areas correspond to the dipolar repulsive
# Line 812 | Line 812 | without an active reaction field at the densities calc
812   the densities, it is important that the excellent diffusive behavior
813   of SSD be maintained or improved. Figure \ref{ssdediffuse} compares
814   the temperature dependence of the diffusion constant of SSD/E to SSD1
815 < without an active reaction field at the densities calculated from the
816 < NPT simulations at 1 atm. The diffusion constant for SSD/E is
817 < consistently higher than experiment, while SSD1 remains lower than
818 < experiment until relatively high temperatures (around 360 K). Both
819 < models follow the shape of the experimental curve well below 300 K but
820 < tend to diffuse too rapidly at higher temperatures, as seen in SSD1's
821 < crossing above 360 K.  This increasing diffusion relative to the
822 < experimental values is caused by the rapidly decreasing system density
823 < with increasing temperature.  Both SSD1 and SSD/E show this deviation
824 < in diffusive behavior, but this trend has different implications on
825 < the diffusive behavior of the models.  While SSD1 shows more
826 < experimentally accurate diffusive behavior in the high temperature
827 < regimes, SSD/E shows more accurate behavior in the supercooled and
828 < biologically relevant temperature ranges.  Thus, the changes made to
829 < improve the liquid structure may have had an adverse affect on the
830 < density maximum, but they improve the transport behavior of SSD/E
831 < relative to SSD1 under the most commonly simulated conditions.
815 > without an active reaction field at the densities calculated from
816 > their respective NPT simulations at 1 atm. The diffusion constant for
817 > SSD/E is consistently higher than experiment, while SSD1 remains lower
818 > than experiment until relatively high temperatures (around 360
819 > K). Both models follow the shape of the experimental curve well below
820 > 300 K but tend to diffuse too rapidly at higher temperatures, as seen
821 > in SSD1's crossing above 360 K.  This increasing diffusion relative to
822 > the experimental values is caused by the rapidly decreasing system
823 > density with increasing temperature.  Both SSD1 and SSD/E show this
824 > deviation in particle mobility, but this trend has different
825 > implications on the diffusive behavior of the models.  While SSD1
826 > shows more experimentally accurate diffusive behavior in the high
827 > temperature regimes, SSD/E shows more accurate behavior in the
828 > supercooled and biologically relevant temperature ranges.  Thus, the
829 > changes made to improve the liquid structure may have had an adverse
830 > affect on the density maximum, but they improve the transport behavior
831 > of SSD/E relative to SSD1 under the most commonly simulated
832 > conditions.
833  
834   \begin{figure}
835   \begin{center}
# Line 862 | Line 863 | reparameterization when using an altered long-range co
863  
864   \begin{table}
865   \begin{center}
866 < \caption{Calculated and experimental properties of the single point waters and liquid water at 298 K and 1 atm. (a) Ref. [\citen{Mills73}]. (b) Calculated by integrating the data in ref. \citen{Head-Gordon00_1}. (c) Calculated by integrating the data in ref. \citen{Soper86}. (d) Ref. [\citen{Eisenberg69}]. (e) Calculated for 298 K from data in ref. \citen{Krynicki66}.}
866 > \caption{Calculated and experimental properties of the single point waters and liquid water at 298 K and 1 atm. (a) Ref. [\citen{Mills73}]. (b) Calculated by integrating the data in ref. \citen{Head-Gordon00_1}. (c) Calculated by integrating the data in ref. \citen{Soper86}. (d) Calculated for 298 K from data in ref. [\citen{Eisenberg69}]. (e) Calculated for 298 K from data in ref. \citen{Krynicki66}.}
867   \begin{tabular}{ l  c  c  c  c  c }
868   \hline \\[-3mm]
869   \ \ \ \ \ \  & \ \ \ SSD1 \ \ \ & \ SSD/E \ \ \ & \ SSD1 (RF) \ \
# Line 872 | Line 873 | reparameterization when using an altered long-range co
873   \ \ \ $C_p$ (cal/mol K) & 28.80 $\pm$0.11 & 25.45 $\pm$0.09 & 28.28 $\pm$0.06 & 23.83 $\pm$0.16 & 17.98 \\
874   \ \ \ $D$ ($10^{-5}$ cm$^2$/s) & 1.78 $\pm$0.07 & 2.51 $\pm$0.18 & 2.00 $\pm$0.17 & 2.32 $\pm$0.06 & 2.299$^\text{a}$ \\
875   \ \ \ Coordination Number & 3.9 & 4.3 & 3.8 & 4.4 & 4.7$^\text{b}$ \\
876 < \ \ \ H-bonds per particle & 3.7 & 3.6 & 3.7 & 3.7 & 3.4$^\text{c}$ \\
877 < \ \ \ $\tau_1^\mu$ (ps) & 10.9 $\pm$0.6 & 7.3 $\pm$0.4 & 7.5 $\pm$0.7 & 7.2 $\pm$0.4 & 4.76$^\text{d}$ \\
878 < \ \ \ $\tau_2^\mu$ (ps) & 4.7 $\pm$0.4 & 3.1 $\pm$0.2 & 3.5 $\pm$0.3 & 3.2 $\pm$0.2 & 2.3$^\text{e}$ \\
876 > \ \ \ H-bonds per particle & 3.7 & 3.6 & 3.7 & 3.7 & 3.5$^\text{c}$ \\
877 > \ \ \ $\tau_1$ (ps) & 10.9 $\pm$0.6 & 7.3 $\pm$0.4 & 7.5 $\pm$0.7 & 7.2 $\pm$0.4 & 5.7$^\text{d}$ \\
878 > \ \ \ $\tau_2$ (ps) & 4.7 $\pm$0.4 & 3.1 $\pm$0.2 & 3.5 $\pm$0.3 & 3.2 $\pm$0.2 & 2.3$^\text{e}$ \\
879   \end{tabular}
880   \label{liquidproperties}
881   \end{center}
# Line 883 | Line 884 | coordination number and hydrogen bonds per particle we
884   Table \ref{liquidproperties} gives a synopsis of the liquid state
885   properties of the water models compared in this study along with the
886   experimental values for liquid water at ambient conditions. The
887 < coordination number and hydrogen bonds per particle were calculated by
888 < integrating the following relation:
887 > coordination number ($N_C$) and hydrogen bonds per particle ($N_H$)
888 > were calculated by integrating the following relations:
889   \begin{equation}
890 < 4\pi\rho\int_{0}^{a}r^2\text{g}(r)dr,
890 > N_C = 4\pi\rho_{\text{OO}}\int_{0}^{a}r^2\text{g}_{\text{OO}}(r)dr,
891   \end{equation}
892 < where $\rho$ is the number density of pair interactions, $a$ is the
893 < radial location of the minima following the first solvation shell
894 < peak, and g$(r)$ is either g$_\text{OO}(r)$ or g$_\text{OH}(r)$ for
895 < calculation of the coordination number or hydrogen bonds per particle
892 > \begin{equation}
893 > N_H = 4\pi\rho_{\text{OH}}\int_{0}^{b}r^2\text{g}_{\text{OH}}(r)dr,
894 > \end{equation}
895 > where $\rho$ is the number density of the specified pair interactions,
896 > $a$ and $b$ are the radial locations of the minima following the first
897 > solvation shell peak in g$_\text{OO}(r)$ or g$_\text{OH}(r)$
898   respectively. The number of hydrogen bonds stays relatively constant
899   across all of the models, but the coordination numbers of SSD/E and
900   SSD/RF show an improvement over SSD1. This improvement is primarily
# Line 916 | Line 919 | regime ($t > \tau_l^\mu$).\cite{Rothschild84} Calculat
919   is the unit vector of the particle dipole.\cite{Rahman71} From these
920   correlation functions, the orientational relaxation time of the dipole
921   vector can be calculated from an exponential fit in the long-time
922 < regime ($t > \tau_l^\mu$).\cite{Rothschild84} Calculation of these
922 > regime ($t > \tau_l$).\cite{Rothschild84} Calculation of these
923   time constants were averaged from five detailed NVE simulations
924   performed at the STP density for each of the respective models. It
925   should be noted that the commonly cited value for $\tau_2$ of 1.9 ps
926   was determined from the NMR data in reference \citen{Krynicki66} at a
927 < temperature near 34$^\circ$C.\cite{Rahman73} Because of the strong
927 > temperature near 34$^\circ$C.\cite{Rahman71} Because of the strong
928   temperature dependence of $\tau_2$, it is necessary to recalculate it
929   at 298 K to make proper comparisons. The value shown in Table
930   \ref{liquidproperties} was calculated from the same NMR data in the
931 < fashion described in reference \citen{Krynicki66}. Again, SSD/E and
932 < SSD/RF show improved behavior over SSD1, both with and without an
933 < active reaction field. Turning on the reaction field leads to much
934 < improved time constants for SSD1; however, these results also include
935 < a corresponding decrease in system density. Numbers published from the
936 < original SSD dynamics studies appear closer to the experimental
937 < values, and this difference can be attributed to the use of the Ewald
938 < sum technique versus a reaction field.\cite{Ichiye99}
931 > fashion described in reference \citen{Krynicki66}. Similarly, $\tau_1$
932 > was recomputed for 298 K from the data in ref \citen{Eisenberg69}.
933 > Again, SSD/E and SSD/RF show improved behavior over SSD1, both with
934 > and without an active reaction field. Turning on the reaction field
935 > leads to much improved time constants for SSD1; however, these results
936 > also include a corresponding decrease in system density. Numbers
937 > published from the original SSD dynamics studies are shorter than the
938 > values observed here, and this difference can be attributed to the use
939 > of the Ewald sum technique versus a reaction field.\cite{Ichiye99}
940  
941   \subsection{Additional Observations}
942  
943   \begin{figure}
944   \begin{center}
945   \epsfxsize=6in
946 < \epsfbox{povIce.ps}
946 > \epsfbox{icei_bw.eps}
947   \caption{A water lattice built from the crystal structure assumed by
948   SSD/E when undergoing an extremely restricted temperature NPT
949   simulation. This form of ice is referred to as ice-{\it i} to
# Line 1019 | Line 1023 | super-cooled liquid regimes.
1023   significantly lower than the densities obtained from other water
1024   models (and experiment). Analysis of self-diffusion showed SSD to
1025   capture the transport properties of water well in both the liquid and
1026 < super-cooled liquid regimes.
1026 > supercooled liquid regimes.
1027  
1028   In order to correct the density behavior, the original SSD model was
1029   reparameterized for use both with and without a reaction field (SSD/RF
# Line 1035 | Line 1039 | effectively simulations of super-cooled or metastable
1039   The existence of a novel low-density ice structure that is preferred
1040   by the SSD family of water models is somewhat troubling, since liquid
1041   simulations on this family of water models at room temperature are
1042 < effectively simulations of super-cooled or metastable liquids.  One
1043 < way to de-stabilize this unphysical ice structure would be to make the
1042 > effectively simulations of supercooled or metastable liquids.  One
1043 > way to destabilize this unphysical ice structure would be to make the
1044   range of angles preferred by the attractive part of the sticky
1045   potential much narrower.  This would require extensive
1046   reparameterization to maintain the same level of agreement with the

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines