--- trunk/tengDissertation/Appendix.tex	2006/06/08 07:34:15	2823
+++ trunk/tengDissertation/Appendix.tex	2006/06/08 15:44:14	2824
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ The corresponding implementation is
   };
 \end{lstlisting}
 The corresponding implementation is
-\begin{lstlisting}[float,caption={[A classic Singleton design pattern implementation(II)] Implementation of {\tt IntegratorFactory} class.},label={appendixScheme:singletonImplementation}]
+\begin{lstlisting}[float,caption={[A classic implementation of Singleton design pattern (II)] Implementation of {\tt IntegratorFactory} class.},label={appendixScheme:singletonImplementation}]
 
 IntegratorFactory::instance_ = NULL;
 
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ result.
 identifier in the internal map. If it is found, it invokes the
 corresponding creator for the type identifier and returns its
 result.
-\begin{lstlisting}[float,caption={[].},label={appendixScheme:factoryDeclaration}]
+\begin{lstlisting}[float,caption={[The implementation of Factory pattern (I)].},label={appendixScheme:factoryDeclaration}]
   class IntegratorCreator;
   class IntegratorFactory {
     public:
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ result.
   };
 \end{lstlisting}
 
-\begin{lstlisting}[float,caption={[].},label={appendixScheme:factoryDeclarationImplementation}]
+\begin{lstlisting}[float,caption={[The implementation of Factory pattern (II)].},label={appendixScheme:factoryDeclarationImplementation}]
   bool IntegratorFactory::unregisterIntegrator(const string& id) {
     return creatorMap_.erase(id) == 1;
   }
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ result.
   }
 \end{lstlisting}
 
-\begin{lstlisting}[float,caption={[].},label={appendixScheme:integratorCreator}]
+\begin{lstlisting}[float,caption={[The implementation of Factory pattern (III)].},label={appendixScheme:integratorCreator}]
 
   class IntegratorCreator {
   public:
@@ -230,12 +230,23 @@ that you want to perform on the elements of a data str
 \subsection{\label{appendixSection:visitorPattern}Visitor}
 
 The purpose of the Visitor Pattern is to encapsulate an operation
-that you want to perform on the elements of a data structure. In
-this way, you can change the operation being performed on a
-structure without the need of changing the class heirarchy of the
-elements that you are operating on.
+that you want to perform on the elements. The operation being
+performed on a structure can be switched without changing the
+interfaces  of the elements. In other words, one can add virtual
+functions into a set of classes without modifying their interfaces.
+The UML class diagram of Visitor patten is shown in
+Fig.~\ref{appendixFig:visitorUML}. {\tt Dump2XYZ} program in
+Sec.~\ref{appendixSection:Dump2XYZ} uses Visitor pattern
+extensively.
 
-\begin{lstlisting}[float,caption={[].},label={appendixScheme:visitor}]
+\begin{figure}
+\centering
+\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{architecture.eps}
+\caption[The architecture of {\sc OOPSE}] {Overview of the structure
+of {\sc OOPSE}} \label{appendixFig:visitorUML}
+\end{figure}
+
+\begin{lstlisting}[float,caption={[The implementation of Visitor pattern (I)]Source code of the visitor classes.},label={appendixScheme:visitor}]
   class BaseVisitor{
     public:
       virtual void visit(Atom* atom);
@@ -243,7 +254,8 @@ elements that you are operating on.
       virtual void visit(RigidBody* rb);
   };
 \end{lstlisting}
-\begin{lstlisting}[float,caption={[].},label={appendixScheme:element}]
+
+\begin{lstlisting}[float,caption={[The implementation of Visitor pattern (II)]Source code of the element classes.},label={appendixScheme:element}]
   class StuntDouble {
     public:
       virtual void accept(BaseVisitor* v) = 0;