1 |
tim |
2685 |
\chapter{\label{chapt:introduction}INTRODUCTION AND THEORETICAL BACKGROUND} |
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
tim |
2692 |
\section{\label{introSection:molecularDynamics}Molecular Dynamics} |
4 |
tim |
2685 |
|
5 |
tim |
2692 |
As a special discipline of molecular modeling, Molecular dynamics |
6 |
|
|
has proven to be a powerful tool for studying the functions of |
7 |
|
|
biological systems, providing structural, thermodynamic and |
8 |
|
|
dynamical information. |
9 |
tim |
2685 |
|
10 |
tim |
2693 |
\section{\label{introSection:classicalMechanics}Classical |
11 |
|
|
Mechanics} |
12 |
tim |
2685 |
|
13 |
tim |
2692 |
Closely related to Classical Mechanics, Molecular Dynamics |
14 |
|
|
simulations are carried out by integrating the equations of motion |
15 |
|
|
for a given system of particles. There are three fundamental ideas |
16 |
|
|
behind classical mechanics. Firstly, One can determine the state of |
17 |
|
|
a mechanical system at any time of interest; Secondly, all the |
18 |
|
|
mechanical properties of the system at that time can be determined |
19 |
|
|
by combining the knowledge of the properties of the system with the |
20 |
|
|
specification of this state; Finally, the specification of the state |
21 |
|
|
when further combine with the laws of mechanics will also be |
22 |
|
|
sufficient to predict the future behavior of the system. |
23 |
tim |
2685 |
|
24 |
tim |
2693 |
\subsection{\label{introSection:newtonian}Newtonian Mechanics} |
25 |
tim |
2692 |
|
26 |
tim |
2693 |
\subsection{\label{introSection:lagrangian}Lagrangian Mechanics} |
27 |
tim |
2692 |
|
28 |
|
|
Newtonian Mechanics suffers from two important limitations: it |
29 |
|
|
describes their motion in special cartesian coordinate systems. |
30 |
|
|
Another limitation of Newtonian mechanics becomes obvious when we |
31 |
|
|
try to describe systems with large numbers of particles. It becomes |
32 |
|
|
very difficult to predict the properties of the system by carrying |
33 |
|
|
out calculations involving the each individual interaction between |
34 |
|
|
all the particles, even if we know all of the details of the |
35 |
|
|
interaction. In order to overcome some of the practical difficulties |
36 |
|
|
which arise in attempts to apply Newton's equation to complex |
37 |
|
|
system, alternative procedures may be developed. |
38 |
|
|
|
39 |
tim |
2693 |
\subsection{\label{introSection:halmiltonPrinciple}Hamilton's |
40 |
tim |
2692 |
Principle} |
41 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
Hamilton introduced the dynamical principle upon which it is |
43 |
|
|
possible to base all of mechanics and, indeed, most of classical |
44 |
|
|
physics. Hamilton's Principle may be stated as follow, |
45 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
The actual trajectory, along which a dynamical system may move from |
47 |
|
|
one point to another within a specified time, is derived by finding |
48 |
|
|
the path which minimizes the time integral of the difference between |
49 |
|
|
the kinetic, $K$, and potential energies, $U$. |
50 |
|
|
\begin{equation} |
51 |
|
|
\delta \int_{t_1 }^{t_2 } {(K - U)dt = 0} , |
52 |
tim |
2693 |
\label{introEquation:halmitonianPrinciple1} |
53 |
tim |
2692 |
\end{equation} |
54 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
For simple mechanical systems, where the forces acting on the |
56 |
|
|
different part are derivable from a potential and the velocities are |
57 |
|
|
small compared with that of light, the Lagrangian function $L$ can |
58 |
|
|
be define as the difference between the kinetic energy of the system |
59 |
|
|
and its potential energy, |
60 |
|
|
\begin{equation} |
61 |
|
|
L \equiv K - U = L(q_i ,\dot q_i ) , |
62 |
|
|
\label{introEquation:lagrangianDef} |
63 |
|
|
\end{equation} |
64 |
|
|
then Eq.~\ref{introEquation:halmitonianPrinciple1} becomes |
65 |
|
|
\begin{equation} |
66 |
tim |
2693 |
\delta \int_{t_1 }^{t_2 } {L dt = 0} , |
67 |
|
|
\label{introEquation:halmitonianPrinciple2} |
68 |
tim |
2692 |
\end{equation} |
69 |
|
|
|
70 |
tim |
2693 |
\subsection{\label{introSection:equationOfMotionLagrangian}The |
71 |
tim |
2692 |
Equations of Motion in Lagrangian Mechanics} |
72 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
for a holonomic system of $f$ degrees of freedom, the equations of |
74 |
|
|
motion in the Lagrangian form is |
75 |
|
|
\begin{equation} |
76 |
|
|
\frac{d}{{dt}}\frac{{\partial L}}{{\partial \dot q_i }} - |
77 |
|
|
\frac{{\partial L}}{{\partial q_i }} = 0,{\rm{ }}i = 1, \ldots,f |
78 |
tim |
2693 |
\label{introEquation:eqMotionLagrangian} |
79 |
tim |
2692 |
\end{equation} |
80 |
|
|
where $q_{i}$ is generalized coordinate and $\dot{q_{i}}$ is |
81 |
|
|
generalized velocity. |
82 |
|
|
|
83 |
tim |
2693 |
\subsection{\label{introSection:hamiltonian}Hamiltonian Mechanics} |
84 |
tim |
2692 |
|
85 |
|
|
Arising from Lagrangian Mechanics, Hamiltonian Mechanics was |
86 |
|
|
introduced by William Rowan Hamilton in 1833 as a re-formulation of |
87 |
|
|
classical mechanics. If the potential energy of a system is |
88 |
|
|
independent of generalized velocities, the generalized momenta can |
89 |
|
|
be defined as |
90 |
|
|
\begin{equation} |
91 |
|
|
p_i = \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot q_i} |
92 |
|
|
\label{introEquation:generalizedMomenta} |
93 |
|
|
\end{equation} |
94 |
tim |
2693 |
The Lagrange equations of motion are then expressed by |
95 |
tim |
2692 |
\begin{equation} |
96 |
tim |
2693 |
p_i = \frac{{\partial L}}{{\partial q_i }} |
97 |
|
|
\label{introEquation:generalizedMomentaDot} |
98 |
|
|
\end{equation} |
99 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
With the help of the generalized momenta, we may now define a new |
101 |
|
|
quantity $H$ by the equation |
102 |
|
|
\begin{equation} |
103 |
|
|
H = \sum\limits_k {p_k \dot q_k } - L , |
104 |
tim |
2692 |
\label{introEquation:hamiltonianDefByLagrangian} |
105 |
|
|
\end{equation} |
106 |
|
|
where $ \dot q_1 \ldots \dot q_f $ are generalized velocities and |
107 |
|
|
$L$ is the Lagrangian function for the system. |
108 |
|
|
|
109 |
tim |
2693 |
Differentiating Eq.~\ref{introEquation:hamiltonianDefByLagrangian}, |
110 |
|
|
one can obtain |
111 |
|
|
\begin{equation} |
112 |
|
|
dH = \sum\limits_k {\left( {p_k d\dot q_k + \dot q_k dp_k - |
113 |
|
|
\frac{{\partial L}}{{\partial q_k }}dq_k - \frac{{\partial |
114 |
|
|
L}}{{\partial \dot q_k }}d\dot q_k } \right)} - \frac{{\partial |
115 |
|
|
L}}{{\partial t}}dt \label{introEquation:diffHamiltonian1} |
116 |
|
|
\end{equation} |
117 |
|
|
Making use of Eq.~\ref{introEquation:generalizedMomenta}, the |
118 |
|
|
second and fourth terms in the parentheses cancel. Therefore, |
119 |
|
|
Eq.~\ref{introEquation:diffHamiltonian1} can be rewritten as |
120 |
|
|
\begin{equation} |
121 |
|
|
dH = \sum\limits_k {\left( {\dot q_k dp_k - \dot p_k dq_k } |
122 |
|
|
\right)} - \frac{{\partial L}}{{\partial t}}dt |
123 |
|
|
\label{introEquation:diffHamiltonian2} |
124 |
|
|
\end{equation} |
125 |
|
|
By identifying the coefficients of $dq_k$, $dp_k$ and dt, we can |
126 |
|
|
find |
127 |
|
|
\begin{equation} |
128 |
|
|
\frac{{\partial H}}{{\partial p_k }} = q_k |
129 |
|
|
\label{introEquation:motionHamiltonianCoordinate} |
130 |
|
|
\end{equation} |
131 |
|
|
\begin{equation} |
132 |
|
|
\frac{{\partial H}}{{\partial q_k }} = - p_k |
133 |
|
|
\label{introEquation:motionHamiltonianMomentum} |
134 |
|
|
\end{equation} |
135 |
|
|
and |
136 |
|
|
\begin{equation} |
137 |
|
|
\frac{{\partial H}}{{\partial t}} = - \frac{{\partial L}}{{\partial |
138 |
|
|
t}} |
139 |
|
|
\label{introEquation:motionHamiltonianTime} |
140 |
|
|
\end{equation} |
141 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
Eq.~\ref{introEquation:motionHamiltonianCoordinate} and |
143 |
|
|
Eq.~\ref{introEquation:motionHamiltonianMomentum} are Hamilton's |
144 |
|
|
equation of motion. Due to their symmetrical formula, they are also |
145 |
|
|
known as the canonical equations of motions. |
146 |
|
|
|
147 |
tim |
2692 |
An important difference between Lagrangian approach and the |
148 |
|
|
Hamiltonian approach is that the Lagrangian is considered to be a |
149 |
|
|
function of the generalized velocities $\dot q_i$ and the |
150 |
|
|
generalized coordinates $q_i$, while the Hamiltonian is considered |
151 |
|
|
to be a function of the generalized momenta $p_i$ and the conjugate |
152 |
|
|
generalized coordinate $q_i$. Hamiltonian Mechanics is more |
153 |
|
|
appropriate for application to statistical mechanics and quantum |
154 |
|
|
mechanics, since it treats the coordinate and its time derivative as |
155 |
|
|
independent variables and it only works with 1st-order differential |
156 |
|
|
equations. |
157 |
|
|
|
158 |
tim |
2693 |
\subsection{\label{introSection:poissonBrackets}Poisson Brackets} |
159 |
tim |
2692 |
|
160 |
tim |
2693 |
\subsection{\label{introSection:canonicalTransformation}Canonical |
161 |
|
|
Transformation} |
162 |
tim |
2692 |
|
163 |
tim |
2693 |
\section{\label{introSection:statisticalMechanics}Statistical |
164 |
|
|
Mechanics} |
165 |
tim |
2692 |
|
166 |
|
|
The thermodynamic behaviors and properties of Molecular Dynamics |
167 |
|
|
simulation are governed by the principle of Statistical Mechanics. |
168 |
|
|
The following section will give a brief introduction to some of the |
169 |
|
|
Statistical Mechanics concepts presented in this dissertation. |
170 |
|
|
|
171 |
tim |
2693 |
\subsection{\label{introSection::ensemble}Ensemble} |
172 |
tim |
2692 |
|
173 |
tim |
2693 |
\subsection{\label{introSection:ergodic}The Ergodic Hypothesis} |
174 |
tim |
2692 |
|
175 |
tim |
2693 |
\section{\label{introSection:rigidBody}Dynamics of Rigid Bodies} |
176 |
tim |
2692 |
|
177 |
tim |
2693 |
\section{\label{introSection:correlationFunctions}Correlation Functions} |
178 |
tim |
2692 |
|
179 |
tim |
2685 |
\section{\label{introSection:langevinDynamics}Langevin Dynamics} |
180 |
|
|
|
181 |
tim |
2692 |
\subsection{\label{introSection:generalizedLangevinDynamics}Generalized Langevin Dynamics} |
182 |
tim |
2685 |
|
183 |
tim |
2692 |
\subsection{\label{introSection:hydroynamics}Hydrodynamics} |