ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/tengDissertation/Introduction.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/tengDissertation/Introduction.tex (file contents):
Revision 2730 by tim, Mon Apr 24 18:49:32 2006 UTC vs.
Revision 2776 by tim, Thu May 25 21:32:14 2006 UTC

# Line 1262 | Line 1262 | simply evolve the system in constraint manifold. The t
1262   In general, there are two ways to satisfy the holonomic constraints.
1263   We can use constraint force provided by lagrange multiplier on the
1264   normal manifold to keep the motion on constraint space. Or we can
1265 < simply evolve the system in constraint manifold. The two method are
1266 < proved to be equivalent. The holonomic constraint and equations of
1267 < motions define a constraint manifold for rigid body
1265 > simply evolve the system in constraint manifold. These two methods
1266 > are proved to be equivalent. The holonomic constraint and equations
1267 > of motions define a constraint manifold for rigid body
1268   \[
1269   M = \left\{ {(Q,P):Q^T Q = 1,Q^T PJ^{ - 1}  + J^{ - 1} P^T Q = 0}
1270   \right\}.
# Line 1477 | Line 1477 | kinetic energy are listed in the below table,
1477   \]
1478   The equations of motion corresponding to potential energy and
1479   kinetic energy are listed in the below table,
1480 + \begin{table}
1481 + \caption{Equations of motion due to Potential and Kinetic Energies}
1482   \begin{center}
1483   \begin{tabular}{|l|l|}
1484    \hline
# Line 1489 | Line 1491 | A second-order symplectic method is now obtained by th
1491    \hline
1492   \end{tabular}
1493   \end{center}
1494 < A second-order symplectic method is now obtained by the composition
1495 < of the flow maps,
1494 > \end{table}
1495 > A second-order symplectic method is now obtained by the
1496 > composition of the flow maps,
1497   \[
1498   \varphi _{\Delta t}  = \varphi _{\Delta t/2,V}  \circ \varphi
1499   _{\Delta t,T}  \circ \varphi _{\Delta t/2,V}.
# Line 1786 | Line 1789 | Equation, \zeta can be taken as a scalar. In general,
1789   when the system become more and more complicate. Instead, various
1790   approaches based on hydrodynamics have been developed to calculate
1791   the friction coefficients. The friction effect is isotropic in
1792 < Equation, \zeta can be taken as a scalar. In general, friction
1793 < tensor \Xi is a $6\times 6$ matrix given by
1792 > Equation, $\zeta$ can be taken as a scalar. In general, friction
1793 > tensor $\Xi$ is a $6\times 6$ matrix given by
1794   \[
1795   \Xi  = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
1796     {\Xi _{}^{tt} } & {\Xi _{}^{rt} }  \\

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines