| 1 |
|
\chapter{\label{chapt:introduction}INTRODUCTION AND THEORETICAL BACKGROUND} |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
< |
\section{\label{introSection:molecularDynamics}Molecular Dynamics} |
| 3 |
> |
\section{\label{introSection:classicalMechanics}Classical |
| 4 |
> |
Mechanics} |
| 5 |
|
|
| 5 |
– |
As a special discipline of molecular modeling, Molecular dynamics |
| 6 |
– |
has proven to be a powerful tool for studying the functions of |
| 7 |
– |
biological systems, providing structural, thermodynamic and |
| 8 |
– |
dynamical information. |
| 9 |
– |
|
| 10 |
– |
\subsection{\label{introSection:classicalMechanics}Classical Mechanics} |
| 11 |
– |
|
| 6 |
|
Closely related to Classical Mechanics, Molecular Dynamics |
| 7 |
|
simulations are carried out by integrating the equations of motion |
| 8 |
|
for a given system of particles. There are three fundamental ideas |
| 14 |
|
when further combine with the laws of mechanics will also be |
| 15 |
|
sufficient to predict the future behavior of the system. |
| 16 |
|
|
| 17 |
< |
\subsubsection{\label{introSection:newtonian}Newtonian Mechanics} |
| 17 |
> |
\subsection{\label{introSection:newtonian}Newtonian Mechanics} |
| 18 |
> |
The discovery of Newton's three laws of mechanics which govern the |
| 19 |
> |
motion of particles is the foundation of the classical mechanics. |
| 20 |
> |
Newton¡¯s first law defines a class of inertial frames. Inertial |
| 21 |
> |
frames are reference frames where a particle not interacting with |
| 22 |
> |
other bodies will move with constant speed in the same direction. |
| 23 |
> |
With respect to inertial frames Newton¡¯s second law has the form |
| 24 |
> |
\begin{equation} |
| 25 |
> |
F = \frac {dp}{dt} = \frac {mv}{dt} |
| 26 |
> |
\label{introEquation:newtonSecondLaw} |
| 27 |
> |
\end{equation} |
| 28 |
> |
A point mass interacting with other bodies moves with the |
| 29 |
> |
acceleration along the direction of the force acting on it. Let |
| 30 |
> |
$F_ij$ be the force that particle $i$ exerts on particle $j$, and |
| 31 |
> |
$F_ji$ be the force that particle $j$ exerts on particle $i$. |
| 32 |
> |
Newton¡¯s third law states that |
| 33 |
> |
\begin{equation} |
| 34 |
> |
F_ij = -F_ji |
| 35 |
> |
\label{introEquation:newtonThirdLaw} |
| 36 |
> |
\end{equation} |
| 37 |
|
|
| 38 |
< |
\subsubsection{\label{introSection:lagrangian}Lagrangian Mechanics} |
| 38 |
> |
Conservation laws of Newtonian Mechanics play very important roles |
| 39 |
> |
in solving mechanics problems. The linear momentum of a particle is |
| 40 |
> |
conserved if it is free or it experiences no force. The second |
| 41 |
> |
conservation theorem concerns the angular momentum of a particle. |
| 42 |
> |
The angular momentum $L$ of a particle with respect to an origin |
| 43 |
> |
from which $r$ is measured is defined to be |
| 44 |
> |
\begin{equation} |
| 45 |
> |
L \equiv r \times p \label{introEquation:angularMomentumDefinition} |
| 46 |
> |
\end{equation} |
| 47 |
> |
The torque $\tau$ with respect to the same origin is defined to be |
| 48 |
> |
\begin{equation} |
| 49 |
> |
N \equiv r \times F \label{introEquation:torqueDefinition} |
| 50 |
> |
\end{equation} |
| 51 |
> |
Differentiating Eq.~\ref{introEquation:angularMomentumDefinition}, |
| 52 |
> |
\[ |
| 53 |
> |
\dot L = \frac{d}{{dt}}(r \times p) = (\dot r \times p) + (r \times |
| 54 |
> |
\dot p) |
| 55 |
> |
\] |
| 56 |
> |
since |
| 57 |
> |
\[ |
| 58 |
> |
\dot r \times p = \dot r \times mv = m\dot r \times \dot r \equiv 0 |
| 59 |
> |
\] |
| 60 |
> |
thus, |
| 61 |
> |
\begin{equation} |
| 62 |
> |
\dot L = r \times \dot p = N |
| 63 |
> |
\end{equation} |
| 64 |
> |
If there are no external torques acting on a body, the angular |
| 65 |
> |
momentum of it is conserved. The last conservation theorem state |
| 66 |
> |
that if all forces are conservative, Energy |
| 67 |
> |
\begin{equation}E = T + V \label{introEquation:energyConservation} |
| 68 |
> |
\end{equation} |
| 69 |
> |
is conserved. All of these conserved quantities are |
| 70 |
> |
important factors to determine the quality of numerical integration |
| 71 |
> |
scheme for rigid body \cite{Dullweber1997}. |
| 72 |
|
|
| 73 |
+ |
\subsection{\label{introSection:lagrangian}Lagrangian Mechanics} |
| 74 |
+ |
|
| 75 |
|
Newtonian Mechanics suffers from two important limitations: it |
| 76 |
|
describes their motion in special cartesian coordinate systems. |
| 77 |
|
Another limitation of Newtonian mechanics becomes obvious when we |
| 83 |
|
which arise in attempts to apply Newton's equation to complex |
| 84 |
|
system, alternative procedures may be developed. |
| 85 |
|
|
| 86 |
< |
\subsubsubsection{\label{introSection:halmiltonPrinciple}Hamilton's |
| 86 |
> |
\subsubsection{\label{introSection:halmiltonPrinciple}Hamilton's |
| 87 |
|
Principle} |
| 88 |
|
|
| 89 |
|
Hamilton introduced the dynamical principle upon which it is |
| 93 |
|
The actual trajectory, along which a dynamical system may move from |
| 94 |
|
one point to another within a specified time, is derived by finding |
| 95 |
|
the path which minimizes the time integral of the difference between |
| 96 |
< |
the kinetic, $K$, and potential energies, $U$. |
| 96 |
> |
the kinetic, $K$, and potential energies, $U$ \cite{tolman79}. |
| 97 |
|
\begin{equation} |
| 98 |
|
\delta \int_{t_1 }^{t_2 } {(K - U)dt = 0} , |
| 99 |
< |
\lable{introEquation:halmitonianPrinciple1} |
| 99 |
> |
\label{introEquation:halmitonianPrinciple1} |
| 100 |
|
\end{equation} |
| 101 |
|
|
| 102 |
|
For simple mechanical systems, where the forces acting on the |
| 110 |
|
\end{equation} |
| 111 |
|
then Eq.~\ref{introEquation:halmitonianPrinciple1} becomes |
| 112 |
|
\begin{equation} |
| 113 |
< |
\delta \int_{t_1 }^{t_2 } {K dt = 0} , |
| 114 |
< |
\lable{introEquation:halmitonianPrinciple2} |
| 113 |
> |
\delta \int_{t_1 }^{t_2 } {L dt = 0} , |
| 114 |
> |
\label{introEquation:halmitonianPrinciple2} |
| 115 |
|
\end{equation} |
| 116 |
|
|
| 117 |
< |
\subsubsubsection{\label{introSection:equationOfMotionLagrangian}The |
| 117 |
> |
\subsubsection{\label{introSection:equationOfMotionLagrangian}The |
| 118 |
|
Equations of Motion in Lagrangian Mechanics} |
| 119 |
|
|
| 120 |
|
for a holonomic system of $f$ degrees of freedom, the equations of |
| 122 |
|
\begin{equation} |
| 123 |
|
\frac{d}{{dt}}\frac{{\partial L}}{{\partial \dot q_i }} - |
| 124 |
|
\frac{{\partial L}}{{\partial q_i }} = 0,{\rm{ }}i = 1, \ldots,f |
| 125 |
< |
\lable{introEquation:eqMotionLagrangian} |
| 125 |
> |
\label{introEquation:eqMotionLagrangian} |
| 126 |
|
\end{equation} |
| 127 |
|
where $q_{i}$ is generalized coordinate and $\dot{q_{i}}$ is |
| 128 |
|
generalized velocity. |
| 129 |
|
|
| 130 |
< |
\subsubsection{\label{introSection:hamiltonian}Hamiltonian Mechanics} |
| 130 |
> |
\subsection{\label{introSection:hamiltonian}Hamiltonian Mechanics} |
| 131 |
|
|
| 132 |
|
Arising from Lagrangian Mechanics, Hamiltonian Mechanics was |
| 133 |
|
introduced by William Rowan Hamilton in 1833 as a re-formulation of |
| 138 |
|
p_i = \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot q_i} |
| 139 |
|
\label{introEquation:generalizedMomenta} |
| 140 |
|
\end{equation} |
| 141 |
< |
With the help of these momenta, we may now define a new quantity $H$ |
| 94 |
< |
by the equation |
| 141 |
> |
The Lagrange equations of motion are then expressed by |
| 142 |
|
\begin{equation} |
| 143 |
< |
H = p_1 \dot q_1 + \ldots + p_f \dot q_f - L, |
| 143 |
> |
p_i = \frac{{\partial L}}{{\partial q_i }} |
| 144 |
> |
\label{introEquation:generalizedMomentaDot} |
| 145 |
> |
\end{equation} |
| 146 |
> |
|
| 147 |
> |
With the help of the generalized momenta, we may now define a new |
| 148 |
> |
quantity $H$ by the equation |
| 149 |
> |
\begin{equation} |
| 150 |
> |
H = \sum\limits_k {p_k \dot q_k } - L , |
| 151 |
|
\label{introEquation:hamiltonianDefByLagrangian} |
| 152 |
|
\end{equation} |
| 153 |
|
where $ \dot q_1 \ldots \dot q_f $ are generalized velocities and |
| 154 |
|
$L$ is the Lagrangian function for the system. |
| 155 |
|
|
| 156 |
+ |
Differentiating Eq.~\ref{introEquation:hamiltonianDefByLagrangian}, |
| 157 |
+ |
one can obtain |
| 158 |
+ |
\begin{equation} |
| 159 |
+ |
dH = \sum\limits_k {\left( {p_k d\dot q_k + \dot q_k dp_k - |
| 160 |
+ |
\frac{{\partial L}}{{\partial q_k }}dq_k - \frac{{\partial |
| 161 |
+ |
L}}{{\partial \dot q_k }}d\dot q_k } \right)} - \frac{{\partial |
| 162 |
+ |
L}}{{\partial t}}dt \label{introEquation:diffHamiltonian1} |
| 163 |
+ |
\end{equation} |
| 164 |
+ |
Making use of Eq.~\ref{introEquation:generalizedMomenta}, the |
| 165 |
+ |
second and fourth terms in the parentheses cancel. Therefore, |
| 166 |
+ |
Eq.~\ref{introEquation:diffHamiltonian1} can be rewritten as |
| 167 |
+ |
\begin{equation} |
| 168 |
+ |
dH = \sum\limits_k {\left( {\dot q_k dp_k - \dot p_k dq_k } |
| 169 |
+ |
\right)} - \frac{{\partial L}}{{\partial t}}dt |
| 170 |
+ |
\label{introEquation:diffHamiltonian2} |
| 171 |
+ |
\end{equation} |
| 172 |
+ |
By identifying the coefficients of $dq_k$, $dp_k$ and dt, we can |
| 173 |
+ |
find |
| 174 |
+ |
\begin{equation} |
| 175 |
+ |
\frac{{\partial H}}{{\partial p_k }} = q_k |
| 176 |
+ |
\label{introEquation:motionHamiltonianCoordinate} |
| 177 |
+ |
\end{equation} |
| 178 |
+ |
\begin{equation} |
| 179 |
+ |
\frac{{\partial H}}{{\partial q_k }} = - p_k |
| 180 |
+ |
\label{introEquation:motionHamiltonianMomentum} |
| 181 |
+ |
\end{equation} |
| 182 |
+ |
and |
| 183 |
+ |
\begin{equation} |
| 184 |
+ |
\frac{{\partial H}}{{\partial t}} = - \frac{{\partial L}}{{\partial |
| 185 |
+ |
t}} |
| 186 |
+ |
\label{introEquation:motionHamiltonianTime} |
| 187 |
+ |
\end{equation} |
| 188 |
+ |
|
| 189 |
+ |
Eq.~\ref{introEquation:motionHamiltonianCoordinate} and |
| 190 |
+ |
Eq.~\ref{introEquation:motionHamiltonianMomentum} are Hamilton's |
| 191 |
+ |
equation of motion. Due to their symmetrical formula, they are also |
| 192 |
+ |
known as the canonical equations of motions \cite{Goldstein01}. |
| 193 |
+ |
|
| 194 |
|
An important difference between Lagrangian approach and the |
| 195 |
|
Hamiltonian approach is that the Lagrangian is considered to be a |
| 196 |
|
function of the generalized velocities $\dot q_i$ and the |
| 200 |
|
appropriate for application to statistical mechanics and quantum |
| 201 |
|
mechanics, since it treats the coordinate and its time derivative as |
| 202 |
|
independent variables and it only works with 1st-order differential |
| 203 |
< |
equations. |
| 203 |
> |
equations\cite{Marion90}. |
| 204 |
|
|
| 205 |
+ |
In Newtonian Mechanics, a system described by conservative forces |
| 206 |
+ |
conserves the total energy \ref{introEquation:energyConservation}. |
| 207 |
+ |
It follows that Hamilton's equations of motion conserve the total |
| 208 |
+ |
Hamiltonian. |
| 209 |
+ |
\begin{equation} |
| 210 |
+ |
\frac{{dH}}{{dt}} = \sum\limits_i {\left( {\frac{{\partial |
| 211 |
+ |
H}}{{\partial q_i }}\dot q_i + \frac{{\partial H}}{{\partial p_i |
| 212 |
+ |
}}\dot p_i } \right)} = \sum\limits_i {\left( {\frac{{\partial |
| 213 |
+ |
H}}{{\partial q_i }}\frac{{\partial H}}{{\partial p_i }} - |
| 214 |
+ |
\frac{{\partial H}}{{\partial p_i }}\frac{{\partial H}}{{\partial |
| 215 |
+ |
q_i }}} \right) = 0} |
| 216 |
+ |
\label{introEquation:conserveHalmitonian} |
| 217 |
+ |
\end{equation} |
| 218 |
|
|
| 219 |
< |
\subsubsection{\label{introSection:canonicalTransformation}Canonical Transformation} |
| 219 |
> |
When studying Hamiltonian system, it is more convenient to use |
| 220 |
> |
notation |
| 221 |
> |
\begin{equation} |
| 222 |
> |
r = r(q,p)^T |
| 223 |
> |
\end{equation} |
| 224 |
> |
and to introduce a $2n \times 2n$ canonical structure matrix $J$, |
| 225 |
> |
\begin{equation} |
| 226 |
> |
J = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} |
| 227 |
> |
0 & I \\ |
| 228 |
> |
{ - I} & 0 \\ |
| 229 |
> |
\end{array}} \right) |
| 230 |
> |
\label{introEquation:canonicalMatrix} |
| 231 |
> |
\end{equation} |
| 232 |
> |
where $I$ is a $n \times n$ identity matrix and $J$ is a |
| 233 |
> |
skew-symmetric matrix ($ J^T = - J $). Thus, Hamiltonian system |
| 234 |
> |
can be rewritten as, |
| 235 |
> |
\begin{equation} |
| 236 |
> |
\frac{d}{{dt}}r = J\nabla _r H(r) |
| 237 |
> |
\label{introEquation:compactHamiltonian} |
| 238 |
> |
\end{equation} |
| 239 |
|
|
| 240 |
< |
\subsection{\label{introSection:statisticalMechanics}Statistical Mechanics} |
| 240 |
> |
\section{\label{introSection:statisticalMechanics}Statistical |
| 241 |
> |
Mechanics} |
| 242 |
|
|
| 243 |
< |
The thermodynamic behaviors and properties of Molecular Dynamics |
| 243 |
> |
The thermodynamic behaviors and properties of Molecular Dynamics |
| 244 |
|
simulation are governed by the principle of Statistical Mechanics. |
| 245 |
|
The following section will give a brief introduction to some of the |
| 246 |
|
Statistical Mechanics concepts presented in this dissertation. |
| 247 |
|
|
| 248 |
< |
\subsubsection{\label{introSection::ensemble}Ensemble} |
| 248 |
> |
\subsection{\label{introSection:ensemble}Ensemble and Phase Space} |
| 249 |
|
|
| 250 |
< |
\subsubsection{\label{introSection:ergodic}The Ergodic Hypothesis} |
| 250 |
> |
\subsection{\label{introSection:ergodic}The Ergodic Hypothesis} |
| 251 |
|
|
| 252 |
< |
\subsection{\label{introSection:rigidBody}Dynamics of Rigid Bodies} |
| 252 |
> |
Various thermodynamic properties can be calculated from Molecular |
| 253 |
> |
Dynamics simulation. By comparing experimental values with the |
| 254 |
> |
calculated properties, one can determine the accuracy of the |
| 255 |
> |
simulation and the quality of the underlying model. However, both of |
| 256 |
> |
experiment and computer simulation are usually performed during a |
| 257 |
> |
certain time interval and the measurements are averaged over a |
| 258 |
> |
period of them which is different from the average behavior of |
| 259 |
> |
many-body system in Statistical Mechanics. Fortunately, Ergodic |
| 260 |
> |
Hypothesis is proposed to make a connection between time average and |
| 261 |
> |
ensemble average. It states that time average and average over the |
| 262 |
> |
statistical ensemble are identical \cite{Frenkel1996, leach01:mm}. |
| 263 |
> |
\begin{equation} |
| 264 |
> |
\langle A \rangle_t = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{t \to \infty } |
| 265 |
> |
\frac{1}{t}\int\limits_0^t {A(p(t),q(t))dt = \int\limits_\Gamma |
| 266 |
> |
{A(p(t),q(t))} } \rho (p(t), q(t)) dpdq |
| 267 |
> |
\end{equation} |
| 268 |
> |
where $\langle A \rangle_t$ is an equilibrium value of a physical |
| 269 |
> |
quantity and $\rho (p(t), q(t))$ is the equilibrium distribution |
| 270 |
> |
function. If an observation is averaged over a sufficiently long |
| 271 |
> |
time (longer than relaxation time), all accessible microstates in |
| 272 |
> |
phase space are assumed to be equally probed, giving a properly |
| 273 |
> |
weighted statistical average. This allows the researcher freedom of |
| 274 |
> |
choice when deciding how best to measure a given observable. In case |
| 275 |
> |
an ensemble averaged approach sounds most reasonable, the Monte |
| 276 |
> |
Carlo techniques\cite{metropolis:1949} can be utilized. Or if the |
| 277 |
> |
system lends itself to a time averaging approach, the Molecular |
| 278 |
> |
Dynamics techniques in Sec.~\ref{introSection:molecularDynamics} |
| 279 |
> |
will be the best choice\cite{Frenkel1996}. |
| 280 |
|
|
| 281 |
< |
\subsection{\label{introSection:correlationFunctions}Correlation Functions} |
| 281 |
> |
\section{\label{introSection:geometricIntegratos}Geometric Integrators} |
| 282 |
> |
A variety of numerical integrators were proposed to simulate the |
| 283 |
> |
motions. They usually begin with an initial conditionals and move |
| 284 |
> |
the objects in the direction governed by the differential equations. |
| 285 |
> |
However, most of them ignore the hidden physical law contained |
| 286 |
> |
within the equations. Since 1990, geometric integrators, which |
| 287 |
> |
preserve various phase-flow invariants such as symplectic structure, |
| 288 |
> |
volume and time reversal symmetry, are developed to address this |
| 289 |
> |
issue. The velocity verlet method, which happens to be a simple |
| 290 |
> |
example of symplectic integrator, continues to gain its popularity |
| 291 |
> |
in molecular dynamics community. This fact can be partly explained |
| 292 |
> |
by its geometric nature. |
| 293 |
|
|
| 294 |
+ |
\subsection{\label{introSection:symplecticManifold}Symplectic Manifold} |
| 295 |
+ |
A \emph{manifold} is an abstract mathematical space. It locally |
| 296 |
+ |
looks like Euclidean space, but when viewed globally, it may have |
| 297 |
+ |
more complicate structure. A good example of manifold is the surface |
| 298 |
+ |
of Earth. It seems to be flat locally, but it is round if viewed as |
| 299 |
+ |
a whole. A \emph{differentiable manifold} (also known as |
| 300 |
+ |
\emph{smooth manifold}) is a manifold with an open cover in which |
| 301 |
+ |
the covering neighborhoods are all smoothly isomorphic to one |
| 302 |
+ |
another. In other words,it is possible to apply calculus on |
| 303 |
+ |
\emph{differentiable manifold}. A \emph{symplectic manifold} is |
| 304 |
+ |
defined as a pair $(M, \omega)$ which consisting of a |
| 305 |
+ |
\emph{differentiable manifold} $M$ and a close, non-degenerated, |
| 306 |
+ |
bilinear symplectic form, $\omega$. A symplectic form on a vector |
| 307 |
+ |
space $V$ is a function $\omega(x, y)$ which satisfies |
| 308 |
+ |
$\omega(\lambda_1x_1+\lambda_2x_2, y) = \lambda_1\omega(x_1, y)+ |
| 309 |
+ |
\lambda_2\omega(x_2, y)$, $\omega(x, y) = - \omega(y, x)$ and |
| 310 |
+ |
$\omega(x, x) = 0$. Cross product operation in vector field is an |
| 311 |
+ |
example of symplectic form. |
| 312 |
+ |
|
| 313 |
+ |
One of the motivations to study \emph{symplectic manifold} in |
| 314 |
+ |
Hamiltonian Mechanics is that a symplectic manifold can represent |
| 315 |
+ |
all possible configurations of the system and the phase space of the |
| 316 |
+ |
system can be described by it's cotangent bundle. Every symplectic |
| 317 |
+ |
manifold is even dimensional. For instance, in Hamilton equations, |
| 318 |
+ |
coordinate and momentum always appear in pairs. |
| 319 |
+ |
|
| 320 |
+ |
Let $(M,\omega)$ and $(N, \eta)$ be symplectic manifolds. A map |
| 321 |
+ |
\[ |
| 322 |
+ |
f : M \rightarrow N |
| 323 |
+ |
\] |
| 324 |
+ |
is a \emph{symplectomorphism} if it is a \emph{diffeomorphims} and |
| 325 |
+ |
the \emph{pullback} of $\eta$ under f is equal to $\omega$. |
| 326 |
+ |
Canonical transformation is an example of symplectomorphism in |
| 327 |
+ |
classical mechanics. According to Liouville's theorem, the |
| 328 |
+ |
Hamiltonian \emph{flow} or \emph{symplectomorphism} generated by the |
| 329 |
+ |
Hamiltonian vector filed preserves the volume form on the phase |
| 330 |
+ |
space, which is the basis of classical statistical mechanics. |
| 331 |
+ |
|
| 332 |
+ |
\subsection{\label{introSection:exactFlow}The Exact Flow of ODE} |
| 333 |
+ |
|
| 334 |
+ |
\subsection{\label{introSection:hamiltonianSplitting}Hamiltonian Splitting} |
| 335 |
+ |
|
| 336 |
+ |
\section{\label{introSection:molecularDynamics}Molecular Dynamics} |
| 337 |
+ |
|
| 338 |
+ |
As a special discipline of molecular modeling, Molecular dynamics |
| 339 |
+ |
has proven to be a powerful tool for studying the functions of |
| 340 |
+ |
biological systems, providing structural, thermodynamic and |
| 341 |
+ |
dynamical information. |
| 342 |
+ |
|
| 343 |
+ |
\subsection{\label{introSec:mdInit}Initialization} |
| 344 |
+ |
|
| 345 |
+ |
\subsection{\label{introSection:mdIntegration} Integration of the Equations of Motion} |
| 346 |
+ |
|
| 347 |
+ |
\section{\label{introSection:rigidBody}Dynamics of Rigid Bodies} |
| 348 |
+ |
|
| 349 |
+ |
A rigid body is a body in which the distance between any two given |
| 350 |
+ |
points of a rigid body remains constant regardless of external |
| 351 |
+ |
forces exerted on it. A rigid body therefore conserves its shape |
| 352 |
+ |
during its motion. |
| 353 |
+ |
|
| 354 |
+ |
Applications of dynamics of rigid bodies. |
| 355 |
+ |
|
| 356 |
+ |
\subsection{\label{introSection:lieAlgebra}Lie Algebra} |
| 357 |
+ |
|
| 358 |
+ |
\subsection{\label{introSection:DLMMotionEquation}The Euler Equations of Rigid Body Motion} |
| 359 |
+ |
|
| 360 |
+ |
\subsection{\label{introSection:otherRBMotionEquation}Other Formulations for Rigid Body Motion} |
| 361 |
+ |
|
| 362 |
+ |
%\subsection{\label{introSection:poissonBrackets}Poisson Brackets} |
| 363 |
+ |
|
| 364 |
+ |
\section{\label{introSection:correlationFunctions}Correlation Functions} |
| 365 |
+ |
|
| 366 |
|
\section{\label{introSection:langevinDynamics}Langevin Dynamics} |
| 367 |
|
|
| 368 |
+ |
\subsection{\label{introSection:LDIntroduction}Introduction and application of Langevin Dynamics} |
| 369 |
+ |
|
| 370 |
|
\subsection{\label{introSection:generalizedLangevinDynamics}Generalized Langevin Dynamics} |
| 371 |
|
|
| 372 |
< |
\subsection{\label{introSection:hydroynamics}Hydrodynamics} |
| 372 |
> |
\begin{equation} |
| 373 |
> |
H = \frac{{p^2 }}{{2m}} + U(x) + H_B + \Delta U(x,x_1 , \ldots x_N) |
| 374 |
> |
\label{introEquation:bathGLE} |
| 375 |
> |
\end{equation} |
| 376 |
> |
where $H_B$ is harmonic bath Hamiltonian, |
| 377 |
> |
\[ |
| 378 |
> |
H_B =\sum\limits_{\alpha = 1}^N {\left\{ {\frac{{p_\alpha ^2 |
| 379 |
> |
}}{{2m_\alpha }} + \frac{1}{2}m_\alpha w_\alpha ^2 } \right\}} |
| 380 |
> |
\] |
| 381 |
> |
and $\Delta U$ is bilinear system-bath coupling, |
| 382 |
> |
\[ |
| 383 |
> |
\Delta U = - \sum\limits_{\alpha = 1}^N {g_\alpha x_\alpha x} |
| 384 |
> |
\] |
| 385 |
> |
Completing the square, |
| 386 |
> |
\[ |
| 387 |
> |
H_B + \Delta U = \sum\limits_{\alpha = 1}^N {\left\{ |
| 388 |
> |
{\frac{{p_\alpha ^2 }}{{2m_\alpha }} + \frac{1}{2}m_\alpha |
| 389 |
> |
w_\alpha ^2 \left( {x_\alpha - \frac{{g_\alpha }}{{m_\alpha |
| 390 |
> |
w_\alpha ^2 }}x} \right)^2 } \right\}} - \sum\limits_{\alpha = |
| 391 |
> |
1}^N {\frac{{g_\alpha ^2 }}{{2m_\alpha w_\alpha ^2 }}} x^2 |
| 392 |
> |
\] |
| 393 |
> |
and putting it back into Eq.~\ref{introEquation:bathGLE}, |
| 394 |
> |
\[ |
| 395 |
> |
H = \frac{{p^2 }}{{2m}} + W(x) + \sum\limits_{\alpha = 1}^N |
| 396 |
> |
{\left\{ {\frac{{p_\alpha ^2 }}{{2m_\alpha }} + \frac{1}{2}m_\alpha |
| 397 |
> |
w_\alpha ^2 \left( {x_\alpha - \frac{{g_\alpha }}{{m_\alpha |
| 398 |
> |
w_\alpha ^2 }}x} \right)^2 } \right\}} |
| 399 |
> |
\] |
| 400 |
> |
where |
| 401 |
> |
\[ |
| 402 |
> |
W(x) = U(x) - \sum\limits_{\alpha = 1}^N {\frac{{g_\alpha ^2 |
| 403 |
> |
}}{{2m_\alpha w_\alpha ^2 }}} x^2 |
| 404 |
> |
\] |
| 405 |
> |
Since the first two terms of the new Hamiltonian depend only on the |
| 406 |
> |
system coordinates, we can get the equations of motion for |
| 407 |
> |
Generalized Langevin Dynamics by Hamilton's equations |
| 408 |
> |
\ref{introEquation:motionHamiltonianCoordinate, |
| 409 |
> |
introEquation:motionHamiltonianMomentum}, |
| 410 |
> |
\begin{align} |
| 411 |
> |
\dot p &= - \frac{{\partial H}}{{\partial x}} |
| 412 |
> |
&= m\ddot x |
| 413 |
> |
&= - \frac{{\partial W(x)}}{{\partial x}} - \sum\limits_{\alpha = 1}^N {g_\alpha \left( {x_\alpha - \frac{{g_\alpha }}{{m_\alpha w_\alpha ^2 }}x} \right)} |
| 414 |
> |
\label{introEq:Lp5} |
| 415 |
> |
\end{align} |
| 416 |
> |
, and |
| 417 |
> |
\begin{align} |
| 418 |
> |
\dot p_\alpha &= - \frac{{\partial H}}{{\partial x_\alpha }} |
| 419 |
> |
&= m\ddot x_\alpha |
| 420 |
> |
&= \- m_\alpha w_\alpha ^2 \left( {x_\alpha - \frac{{g_\alpha}}{{m_\alpha w_\alpha ^2 }}x} \right) |
| 421 |
> |
\end{align} |
| 422 |
> |
|
| 423 |
> |
\subsection{\label{introSection:laplaceTransform}The Laplace Transform} |
| 424 |
> |
|
| 425 |
> |
\[ |
| 426 |
> |
L(x) = \int_0^\infty {x(t)e^{ - pt} dt} |
| 427 |
> |
\] |
| 428 |
> |
|
| 429 |
> |
\[ |
| 430 |
> |
L(x + y) = L(x) + L(y) |
| 431 |
> |
\] |
| 432 |
> |
|
| 433 |
> |
\[ |
| 434 |
> |
L(ax) = aL(x) |
| 435 |
> |
\] |
| 436 |
> |
|
| 437 |
> |
\[ |
| 438 |
> |
L(\dot x) = pL(x) - px(0) |
| 439 |
> |
\] |
| 440 |
> |
|
| 441 |
> |
\[ |
| 442 |
> |
L(\ddot x) = p^2 L(x) - px(0) - \dot x(0) |
| 443 |
> |
\] |
| 444 |
> |
|
| 445 |
> |
\[ |
| 446 |
> |
L\left( {\int_0^t {g(t - \tau )h(\tau )d\tau } } \right) = G(p)H(p) |
| 447 |
> |
\] |
| 448 |
> |
|
| 449 |
> |
Some relatively important transformation, |
| 450 |
> |
\[ |
| 451 |
> |
L(\cos at) = \frac{p}{{p^2 + a^2 }} |
| 452 |
> |
\] |
| 453 |
> |
|
| 454 |
> |
\[ |
| 455 |
> |
L(\sin at) = \frac{a}{{p^2 + a^2 }} |
| 456 |
> |
\] |
| 457 |
> |
|
| 458 |
> |
\[ |
| 459 |
> |
L(1) = \frac{1}{p} |
| 460 |
> |
\] |
| 461 |
> |
|
| 462 |
> |
First, the bath coordinates, |
| 463 |
> |
\[ |
| 464 |
> |
p^2 L(x_\alpha ) - px_\alpha (0) - \dot x_\alpha (0) = - \omega |
| 465 |
> |
_\alpha ^2 L(x_\alpha ) + \frac{{g_\alpha }}{{\omega _\alpha |
| 466 |
> |
}}L(x) |
| 467 |
> |
\] |
| 468 |
> |
\[ |
| 469 |
> |
L(x_\alpha ) = \frac{{\frac{{g_\alpha }}{{\omega _\alpha }}L(x) + |
| 470 |
> |
px_\alpha (0) + \dot x_\alpha (0)}}{{p^2 + \omega _\alpha ^2 }} |
| 471 |
> |
\] |
| 472 |
> |
Then, the system coordinates, |
| 473 |
> |
\begin{align} |
| 474 |
> |
mL(\ddot x) &= - \frac{1}{p}\frac{{\partial W(x)}}{{\partial x}} - |
| 475 |
> |
\sum\limits_{\alpha = 1}^N {\left\{ {\frac{{\frac{{g_\alpha |
| 476 |
> |
}}{{\omega _\alpha }}L(x) + px_\alpha (0) + \dot x_\alpha |
| 477 |
> |
(0)}}{{p^2 + \omega _\alpha ^2 }} - \frac{{g_\alpha ^2 }}{{m_\alpha |
| 478 |
> |
}}\omega _\alpha ^2 L(x)} \right\}} |
| 479 |
> |
% |
| 480 |
> |
&= - \frac{1}{p}\frac{{\partial W(x)}}{{\partial x}} - |
| 481 |
> |
\sum\limits_{\alpha = 1}^N {\left\{ { - \frac{{g_\alpha ^2 }}{{m_\alpha \omega _\alpha ^2 }}\frac{p}{{p^2 + \omega _\alpha ^2 }}pL(x) |
| 482 |
> |
- \frac{p}{{p^2 + \omega _\alpha ^2 }}g_\alpha x_\alpha (0) |
| 483 |
> |
- \frac{1}{{p^2 + \omega _\alpha ^2 }}g_\alpha \dot x_\alpha (0)} \right\}} |
| 484 |
> |
\end{align} |
| 485 |
> |
Then, the inverse transform, |
| 486 |
> |
|
| 487 |
> |
\begin{align} |
| 488 |
> |
m\ddot x &= - \frac{{\partial W(x)}}{{\partial x}} - |
| 489 |
> |
\sum\limits_{\alpha = 1}^N {\left\{ {\left( { - \frac{{g_\alpha ^2 |
| 490 |
> |
}}{{m_\alpha \omega _\alpha ^2 }}} \right)\int_0^t {\cos (\omega |
| 491 |
> |
_\alpha t)\dot x(t - \tau )d\tau - \left[ {g_\alpha x_\alpha (0) |
| 492 |
> |
- \frac{{g_\alpha }}{{m_\alpha \omega _\alpha }}} \right]\cos |
| 493 |
> |
(\omega _\alpha t) - \frac{{g_\alpha \dot x_\alpha (0)}}{{\omega |
| 494 |
> |
_\alpha }}\sin (\omega _\alpha t)} } \right\}} |
| 495 |
> |
% |
| 496 |
> |
&= - \frac{{\partial W(x)}}{{\partial x}} - \int_0^t |
| 497 |
> |
{\sum\limits_{\alpha = 1}^N {\left( { - \frac{{g_\alpha ^2 |
| 498 |
> |
}}{{m_\alpha \omega _\alpha ^2 }}} \right)\cos (\omega _\alpha |
| 499 |
> |
t)\dot x(t - \tau )d} \tau } + \sum\limits_{\alpha = 1}^N {\left\{ |
| 500 |
> |
{\left[ {g_\alpha x_\alpha (0) - \frac{{g_\alpha }}{{m_\alpha |
| 501 |
> |
\omega _\alpha }}} \right]\cos (\omega _\alpha t) + |
| 502 |
> |
\frac{{g_\alpha \dot x_\alpha (0)}}{{\omega _\alpha }}\sin |
| 503 |
> |
(\omega _\alpha t)} \right\}} |
| 504 |
> |
\end{align} |
| 505 |
> |
|
| 506 |
> |
\begin{equation} |
| 507 |
> |
m\ddot x = - \frac{{\partial W}}{{\partial x}} - \int_0^t {\xi |
| 508 |
> |
(t)\dot x(t - \tau )d\tau } + R(t) |
| 509 |
> |
\label{introEuqation:GeneralizedLangevinDynamics} |
| 510 |
> |
\end{equation} |
| 511 |
> |
%where $ {\xi (t)}$ is friction kernel, $R(t)$ is random force and |
| 512 |
> |
%$W$ is the potential of mean force. $W(x) = - kT\ln p(x)$ |
| 513 |
> |
\[ |
| 514 |
> |
\xi (t) = \sum\limits_{\alpha = 1}^N {\left( { - \frac{{g_\alpha ^2 |
| 515 |
> |
}}{{m_\alpha \omega _\alpha ^2 }}} \right)\cos (\omega _\alpha t)} |
| 516 |
> |
\] |
| 517 |
> |
For an infinite harmonic bath, we can use the spectral density and |
| 518 |
> |
an integral over frequencies. |
| 519 |
> |
|
| 520 |
> |
\[ |
| 521 |
> |
R(t) = \sum\limits_{\alpha = 1}^N {\left( {g_\alpha x_\alpha (0) |
| 522 |
> |
- \frac{{g_\alpha ^2 }}{{m_\alpha \omega _\alpha ^2 }}x(0)} |
| 523 |
> |
\right)\cos (\omega _\alpha t)} + \frac{{\dot x_\alpha |
| 524 |
> |
(0)}}{{\omega _\alpha }}\sin (\omega _\alpha t) |
| 525 |
> |
\] |
| 526 |
> |
The random forces depend only on initial conditions. |
| 527 |
> |
|
| 528 |
> |
\subsubsection{\label{introSection:secondFluctuationDissipation}The Second Fluctuation Dissipation Theorem} |
| 529 |
> |
So we can define a new set of coordinates, |
| 530 |
> |
\[ |
| 531 |
> |
q_\alpha (t) = x_\alpha (t) - \frac{1}{{m_\alpha \omega _\alpha |
| 532 |
> |
^2 }}x(0) |
| 533 |
> |
\] |
| 534 |
> |
This makes |
| 535 |
> |
\[ |
| 536 |
> |
R(t) = \sum\limits_{\alpha = 1}^N {g_\alpha q_\alpha (t)} |
| 537 |
> |
\] |
| 538 |
> |
And since the $q$ coordinates are harmonic oscillators, |
| 539 |
> |
\[ |
| 540 |
> |
\begin{array}{l} |
| 541 |
> |
\left\langle {q_\alpha (t)q_\alpha (0)} \right\rangle = \left\langle {q_\alpha ^2 (0)} \right\rangle \cos (\omega _\alpha t) \\ |
| 542 |
> |
\left\langle {q_\alpha (t)q_\beta (0)} \right\rangle = \delta _{\alpha \beta } \left\langle {q_\alpha (t)q_\alpha (0)} \right\rangle \\ |
| 543 |
> |
\end{array} |
| 544 |
> |
\] |
| 545 |
> |
|
| 546 |
> |
\begin{align} |
| 547 |
> |
\left\langle {R(t)R(0)} \right\rangle &= \sum\limits_\alpha |
| 548 |
> |
{\sum\limits_\beta {g_\alpha g_\beta \left\langle {q_\alpha |
| 549 |
> |
(t)q_\beta (0)} \right\rangle } } |
| 550 |
> |
% |
| 551 |
> |
&= \sum\limits_\alpha {g_\alpha ^2 \left\langle {q_\alpha ^2 (0)} |
| 552 |
> |
\right\rangle \cos (\omega _\alpha t)} |
| 553 |
> |
% |
| 554 |
> |
&= kT\xi (t) |
| 555 |
> |
\end{align} |
| 556 |
> |
|
| 557 |
> |
\begin{equation} |
| 558 |
> |
\xi (t) = \left\langle {R(t)R(0)} \right\rangle |
| 559 |
> |
\label{introEquation:secondFluctuationDissipation} |
| 560 |
> |
\end{equation} |
| 561 |
> |
|
| 562 |
> |
\section{\label{introSection:hydroynamics}Hydrodynamics} |
| 563 |
> |
|
| 564 |
> |
\subsection{\label{introSection:frictionTensor} Friction Tensor} |
| 565 |
> |
\subsection{\label{introSection:analyticalApproach}Analytical |
| 566 |
> |
Approach} |
| 567 |
> |
|
| 568 |
> |
\subsection{\label{introSection:approximationApproach}Approximation |
| 569 |
> |
Approach} |
| 570 |
> |
|
| 571 |
> |
\subsection{\label{introSection:centersRigidBody}Centers of Rigid |
| 572 |
> |
Body} |
