ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/tengDissertation/Introduction.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/tengDissertation/Introduction.tex (file contents):
Revision 2696 by tim, Thu Apr 6 22:06:50 2006 UTC vs.
Revision 2707 by tim, Thu Apr 13 22:17:13 2006 UTC

# Line 27 | Line 27 | $F_ij$ be the force that particle $i$ exerts on partic
27   \end{equation}
28   A point mass interacting with other bodies moves with the
29   acceleration along the direction of the force acting on it. Let
30 < $F_ij$ be the force that particle $i$ exerts on particle $j$, and
31 < $F_ji$ be the force that particle $j$ exerts on particle $i$.
30 > $F_{ij}$ be the force that particle $i$ exerts on particle $j$, and
31 > $F_{ji}$ be the force that particle $j$ exerts on particle $i$.
32   Newton¡¯s third law states that
33   \begin{equation}
34 < F_ij = -F_ji
34 > F_{ij} = -F_{ji}
35   \label{introEquation:newtonThirdLaw}
36   \end{equation}
37  
# Line 117 | Line 117 | for a holonomic system of $f$ degrees of freedom, the
117   \subsubsection{\label{introSection:equationOfMotionLagrangian}The
118   Equations of Motion in Lagrangian Mechanics}
119  
120 < for a holonomic system of $f$ degrees of freedom, the equations of
120 > For a holonomic system of $f$ degrees of freedom, the equations of
121   motion in the Lagrangian form is
122   \begin{equation}
123   \frac{d}{{dt}}\frac{{\partial L}}{{\partial \dot q_i }} -
# Line 212 | Line 212 | q_i }}} \right) = 0}
212   }}\dot p_i } \right)}  = \sum\limits_i {\left( {\frac{{\partial
213   H}}{{\partial q_i }}\frac{{\partial H}}{{\partial p_i }} -
214   \frac{{\partial H}}{{\partial p_i }}\frac{{\partial H}}{{\partial
215 < q_i }}} \right) = 0}
216 < \label{introEquation:conserveHalmitonian}
215 > q_i }}} \right) = 0} \label{introEquation:conserveHalmitonian}
216   \end{equation}
217  
218 < When studying Hamiltonian system, it is more convenient to use
219 < notation
218 > \section{\label{introSection:statisticalMechanics}Statistical
219 > Mechanics}
220 >
221 > The thermodynamic behaviors and properties of Molecular Dynamics
222 > simulation are governed by the principle of Statistical Mechanics.
223 > The following section will give a brief introduction to some of the
224 > Statistical Mechanics concepts and theorem presented in this
225 > dissertation.
226 >
227 > \subsection{\label{introSection:ensemble}Phase Space and Ensemble}
228 >
229 > Mathematically, phase space is the space which represents all
230 > possible states. Each possible state of the system corresponds to
231 > one unique point in the phase space. For mechanical systems, the
232 > phase space usually consists of all possible values of position and
233 > momentum variables. Consider a dynamic system in a cartesian space,
234 > where each of the $6f$ coordinates and momenta is assigned to one of
235 > $6f$ mutually orthogonal axes, the phase space of this system is a
236 > $6f$ dimensional space. A point, $x = (q_1 , \ldots ,q_f ,p_1 ,
237 > \ldots ,p_f )$, with a unique set of values of $6f$ coordinates and
238 > momenta is a phase space vector.
239 >
240 > A microscopic state or microstate of a classical system is
241 > specification of the complete phase space vector of a system at any
242 > instant in time. An ensemble is defined as a collection of systems
243 > sharing one or more macroscopic characteristics but each being in a
244 > unique microstate. The complete ensemble is specified by giving all
245 > systems or microstates consistent with the common macroscopic
246 > characteristics of the ensemble. Although the state of each
247 > individual system in the ensemble could be precisely described at
248 > any instance in time by a suitable phase space vector, when using
249 > ensembles for statistical purposes, there is no need to maintain
250 > distinctions between individual systems, since the numbers of
251 > systems at any time in the different states which correspond to
252 > different regions of the phase space are more interesting. Moreover,
253 > in the point of view of statistical mechanics, one would prefer to
254 > use ensembles containing a large enough population of separate
255 > members so that the numbers of systems in such different states can
256 > be regarded as changing continuously as we traverse different
257 > regions of the phase space. The condition of an ensemble at any time
258 > can be regarded as appropriately specified by the density $\rho$
259 > with which representative points are distributed over the phase
260 > space. The density of distribution for an ensemble with $f$ degrees
261 > of freedom is defined as,
262   \begin{equation}
263 < r = r(q,p)^T
263 > \rho  = \rho (q_1 , \ldots ,q_f ,p_1 , \ldots ,p_f ,t).
264 > \label{introEquation:densityDistribution}
265   \end{equation}
266 < and to introduce a $2n \times 2n$ canonical structure matrix $J$,
266 > Governed by the principles of mechanics, the phase points change
267 > their value which would change the density at any time at phase
268 > space. Hence, the density of distribution is also to be taken as a
269 > function of the time.
270 >
271 > The number of systems $\delta N$ at time $t$ can be determined by,
272   \begin{equation}
273 < J = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
274 <   0 & I  \\
228 <   { - I} & 0  \\
229 < \end{array}} \right)
230 < \label{introEquation:canonicalMatrix}
273 > \delta N = \rho (q,p,t)dq_1  \ldots dq_f dp_1  \ldots dp_f.
274 > \label{introEquation:deltaN}
275   \end{equation}
276 < where $I$ is a $n \times n$ identity matrix and $J$ is a
277 < skew-symmetric matrix ($ J^T  =  - J $). Thus, Hamiltonian system
278 < can be rewritten as,
276 > Assuming a large enough population of systems are exploited, we can
277 > sufficiently approximate $\delta N$ without introducing
278 > discontinuity when we go from one region in the phase space to
279 > another. By integrating over the whole phase space,
280   \begin{equation}
281 < \frac{d}{{dt}}r = J\nabla _r H(r)
282 < \label{introEquation:compactHamiltonian}
281 > N = \int { \ldots \int {\rho (q,p,t)dq_1 } ...dq_f dp_1 } ...dp_f
282 > \label{introEquation:totalNumberSystem}
283   \end{equation}
284 + gives us an expression for the total number of the systems. Hence,
285 + the probability per unit in the phase space can be obtained by,
286 + \begin{equation}
287 + \frac{{\rho (q,p,t)}}{N} = \frac{{\rho (q,p,t)}}{{\int { \ldots \int
288 + {\rho (q,p,t)dq_1 } ...dq_f dp_1 } ...dp_f }}.
289 + \label{introEquation:unitProbability}
290 + \end{equation}
291 + With the help of Equation(\ref{introEquation:unitProbability}) and
292 + the knowledge of the system, it is possible to calculate the average
293 + value of any desired quantity which depends on the coordinates and
294 + momenta of the system. Even when the dynamics of the real system is
295 + complex, or stochastic, or even discontinuous, the average
296 + properties of the ensemble of possibilities as a whole may still
297 + remain well defined. For a classical system in thermal equilibrium
298 + with its environment, the ensemble average of a mechanical quantity,
299 + $\langle A(q , p) \rangle_t$, takes the form of an integral over the
300 + phase space of the system,
301 + \begin{equation}
302 + \langle  A(q , p) \rangle_t = \frac{{\int { \ldots \int {A(q,p)\rho
303 + (q,p,t)dq_1 } ...dq_f dp_1 } ...dp_f }}{{\int { \ldots \int {\rho
304 + (q,p,t)dq_1 } ...dq_f dp_1 } ...dp_f }}
305 + \label{introEquation:ensembelAverage}
306 + \end{equation}
307  
308 < \section{\label{introSection:geometricIntegratos}Geometric Integrators}
308 > There are several different types of ensembles with different
309 > statistical characteristics. As a function of macroscopic
310 > parameters, such as temperature \textit{etc}, partition function can
311 > be used to describe the statistical properties of a system in
312 > thermodynamic equilibrium.
313  
314 < \subsection{\label{introSection:symplecticManifold}Symplectic Manifold}
315 < A \emph{manifold} is an abstract mathematical space. It locally
316 < looks like Euclidean space, but when viewed globally, it may have
317 < more complicate structure. A good example of manifold is the surface
318 < of Earth. It seems to be flat locally, but it is round if viewed as
319 < a whole. A \emph{differentiable manifold} (also known as
320 < \emph{smooth manifold}) is a manifold with an open cover in which
321 < the covering neighborhoods are all smoothly isomorphic to one
322 < another. In other words,it is possible to apply calculus on
323 < \emph{differentiable manifold}. A \emph{symplectic manifold} is
324 < defined as a pair $(M, \omega)$ consisting of a \emph{differentiable
325 < manifold} $M$ and a close, non-degenerated, bilinear symplectic
326 < form, $\omega$. One of the motivation to study \emph{symplectic
327 < manifold} in Hamiltonian Mechanics is that a symplectic manifold can
328 < represent all possible configurations of the system and the phase
329 < space of the system can be described by it's cotangent bundle. Every
330 < symplectic manifold is even dimensional. For instance, in Hamilton
331 < equations, coordinate and momentum always appear in pairs.
314 > As an ensemble of systems, each of which is known to be thermally
315 > isolated and conserve energy, Microcanonical ensemble(NVE) has a
316 > partition function like,
317 > \begin{equation}
318 > \Omega (N,V,E) = e^{\beta TS} \label{introEquation:NVEPartition}.
319 > \end{equation}
320 > A canonical ensemble(NVT)is an ensemble of systems, each of which
321 > can share its energy with a large heat reservoir. The distribution
322 > of the total energy amongst the possible dynamical states is given
323 > by the partition function,
324 > \begin{equation}
325 > \Omega (N,V,T) = e^{ - \beta A}
326 > \label{introEquation:NVTPartition}
327 > \end{equation}
328 > Here, $A$ is the Helmholtz free energy which is defined as $ A = U -
329 > TS$. Since most experiment are carried out under constant pressure
330 > condition, isothermal-isobaric ensemble(NPT) play a very important
331 > role in molecular simulation. The isothermal-isobaric ensemble allow
332 > the system to exchange energy with a heat bath of temperature $T$
333 > and to change the volume as well. Its partition function is given as
334 > \begin{equation}
335 > \Delta (N,P,T) =  - e^{\beta G}.
336 > \label{introEquation:NPTPartition}
337 > \end{equation}
338 > Here, $G = U - TS + PV$, and $G$ is called Gibbs free energy.
339  
340 < A \emph{symplectomorphism} is also known as a \emph{canonical
262 < transformation}.
340 > \subsection{\label{introSection:liouville}Liouville's theorem}
341  
342 < Any real-valued differentiable function H on a symplectic manifold
343 < can serve as an energy function or Hamiltonian. Associated to any
344 < Hamiltonian is a Hamiltonian vector field; the integral curves of
345 < the Hamiltonian vector field are solutions to the Hamilton-Jacobi
346 < equations. The Hamiltonian vector field defines a flow on the
347 < symplectic manifold, called a Hamiltonian flow or symplectomorphism.
348 < By Liouville's theorem, Hamiltonian flows preserve the volume form
349 < on the phase space.
342 > The Liouville's theorem is the foundation on which statistical
343 > mechanics rests. It describes the time evolution of phase space
344 > distribution function. In order to calculate the rate of change of
345 > $\rho$, we begin from Equation(\ref{introEquation:deltaN}). If we
346 > consider the two faces perpendicular to the $q_1$ axis, which are
347 > located at $q_1$ and $q_1 + \delta q_1$, the number of phase points
348 > leaving the opposite face is given by the expression,
349 > \begin{equation}
350 > \left( {\rho  + \frac{{\partial \rho }}{{\partial q_1 }}\delta q_1 }
351 > \right)\left( {\dot q_1  + \frac{{\partial \dot q_1 }}{{\partial q_1
352 > }}\delta q_1 } \right)\delta q_2  \ldots \delta q_f \delta p_1
353 > \ldots \delta p_f .
354 > \end{equation}
355 > Summing all over the phase space, we obtain
356 > \begin{equation}
357 > \frac{{d(\delta N)}}{{dt}} =  - \sum\limits_{i = 1}^f {\left[ {\rho
358 > \left( {\frac{{\partial \dot q_i }}{{\partial q_i }} +
359 > \frac{{\partial \dot p_i }}{{\partial p_i }}} \right) + \left(
360 > {\frac{{\partial \rho }}{{\partial q_i }}\dot q_i  + \frac{{\partial
361 > \rho }}{{\partial p_i }}\dot p_i } \right)} \right]} \delta q_1
362 > \ldots \delta q_f \delta p_1  \ldots \delta p_f .
363 > \end{equation}
364 > Differentiating the equations of motion in Hamiltonian formalism
365 > (\ref{introEquation:motionHamiltonianCoordinate},
366 > \ref{introEquation:motionHamiltonianMomentum}), we can show,
367 > \begin{equation}
368 > \sum\limits_i {\left( {\frac{{\partial \dot q_i }}{{\partial q_i }}
369 > + \frac{{\partial \dot p_i }}{{\partial p_i }}} \right)}  = 0 ,
370 > \end{equation}
371 > which cancels the first terms of the right hand side. Furthermore,
372 > divining $ \delta q_1  \ldots \delta q_f \delta p_1  \ldots \delta
373 > p_f $ in both sides, we can write out Liouville's theorem in a
374 > simple form,
375 > \begin{equation}
376 > \frac{{\partial \rho }}{{\partial t}} + \sum\limits_{i = 1}^f
377 > {\left( {\frac{{\partial \rho }}{{\partial q_i }}\dot q_i  +
378 > \frac{{\partial \rho }}{{\partial p_i }}\dot p_i } \right)}  = 0 .
379 > \label{introEquation:liouvilleTheorem}
380 > \end{equation}
381  
382 < \subsection{\label{Construction of Symplectic Methods}}
382 > Liouville's theorem states that the distribution function is
383 > constant along any trajectory in phase space. In classical
384 > statistical mechanics, since the number of particles in the system
385 > is huge, we may be able to believe the system is stationary,
386 > \begin{equation}
387 > \frac{{\partial \rho }}{{\partial t}} = 0.
388 > \label{introEquation:stationary}
389 > \end{equation}
390 > In such stationary system, the density of distribution $\rho$ can be
391 > connected to the Hamiltonian $H$ through Maxwell-Boltzmann
392 > distribution,
393 > \begin{equation}
394 > \rho  \propto e^{ - \beta H}
395 > \label{introEquation:densityAndHamiltonian}
396 > \end{equation}
397  
398 < \section{\label{introSection:statisticalMechanics}Statistical
399 < Mechanics}
400 <
401 < The thermodynamic behaviors and properties of Molecular Dynamics
402 < simulation are governed by the principle of Statistical Mechanics.
403 < The following section will give a brief introduction to some of the
404 < Statistical Mechanics concepts presented in this dissertation.
398 > \subsubsection{\label{introSection:phaseSpaceConservation}Conservation of Phase Space}
399 > Lets consider a region in the phase space,
400 > \begin{equation}
401 > \delta v = \int { \ldots \int {dq_1 } ...dq_f dp_1 } ..dp_f .
402 > \end{equation}
403 > If this region is small enough, the density $\rho$ can be regarded
404 > as uniform over the whole phase space. Thus, the number of phase
405 > points inside this region is given by,
406 > \begin{equation}
407 > \delta N = \rho \delta v = \rho \int { \ldots \int {dq_1 } ...dq_f
408 > dp_1 } ..dp_f.
409 > \end{equation}
410  
411 < \subsection{\label{introSection:ensemble}Ensemble and Phase Space}
411 > \begin{equation}
412 > \frac{{d(\delta N)}}{{dt}} = \frac{{d\rho }}{{dt}}\delta v + \rho
413 > \frac{d}{{dt}}(\delta v) = 0.
414 > \end{equation}
415 > With the help of stationary assumption
416 > (\ref{introEquation:stationary}), we obtain the principle of the
417 > \emph{conservation of extension in phase space},
418 > \begin{equation}
419 > \frac{d}{{dt}}(\delta v) = \frac{d}{{dt}}\int { \ldots \int {dq_1 }
420 > ...dq_f dp_1 } ..dp_f  = 0.
421 > \label{introEquation:volumePreserving}
422 > \end{equation}
423  
424 + \subsubsection{\label{introSection:liouvilleInOtherForms}Liouville's Theorem in Other Forms}
425 +
426 + Liouville's theorem can be expresses in a variety of different forms
427 + which are convenient within different contexts. For any two function
428 + $F$ and $G$ of the coordinates and momenta of a system, the Poisson
429 + bracket ${F, G}$ is defined as
430 + \begin{equation}
431 + \left\{ {F,G} \right\} = \sum\limits_i {\left( {\frac{{\partial
432 + F}}{{\partial q_i }}\frac{{\partial G}}{{\partial p_i }} -
433 + \frac{{\partial F}}{{\partial p_i }}\frac{{\partial G}}{{\partial
434 + q_i }}} \right)}.
435 + \label{introEquation:poissonBracket}
436 + \end{equation}
437 + Substituting equations of motion in Hamiltonian formalism(
438 + \ref{introEquation:motionHamiltonianCoordinate} ,
439 + \ref{introEquation:motionHamiltonianMomentum} ) into
440 + (\ref{introEquation:liouvilleTheorem}), we can rewrite Liouville's
441 + theorem using Poisson bracket notion,
442 + \begin{equation}
443 + \left( {\frac{{\partial \rho }}{{\partial t}}} \right) =  - \left\{
444 + {\rho ,H} \right\}.
445 + \label{introEquation:liouvilleTheromInPoissin}
446 + \end{equation}
447 + Moreover, the Liouville operator is defined as
448 + \begin{equation}
449 + iL = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^f {\left( {\frac{{\partial H}}{{\partial
450 + p_i }}\frac{\partial }{{\partial q_i }} - \frac{{\partial
451 + H}}{{\partial q_i }}\frac{\partial }{{\partial p_i }}} \right)}
452 + \label{introEquation:liouvilleOperator}
453 + \end{equation}
454 + In terms of Liouville operator, Liouville's equation can also be
455 + expressed as
456 + \begin{equation}
457 + \left( {\frac{{\partial \rho }}{{\partial t}}} \right) =  - iL\rho
458 + \label{introEquation:liouvilleTheoremInOperator}
459 + \end{equation}
460 +
461   \subsection{\label{introSection:ergodic}The Ergodic Hypothesis}
462  
463   Various thermodynamic properties can be calculated from Molecular
# Line 296 | Line 472 | statistical ensemble are identical \cite{Frenkel1996,
472   ensemble average. It states that time average and average over the
473   statistical ensemble are identical \cite{Frenkel1996, leach01:mm}.
474   \begin{equation}
475 < \langle A \rangle_t = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{t \to \infty }
476 < \frac{1}{t}\int\limits_0^t {A(p(t),q(t))dt = \int\limits_\Gamma
477 < {A(p(t),q(t))} } \rho (p(t), q(t)) dpdq
475 > \langle A(q , p) \rangle_t = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{t \to \infty }
476 > \frac{1}{t}\int\limits_0^t {A(q(t),p(t))dt = \int\limits_\Gamma
477 > {A(q(t),p(t))} } \rho (q(t), p(t)) dqdp
478   \end{equation}
479 < where $\langle A \rangle_t$ is an equilibrium value of a physical
480 < quantity and $\rho (p(t), q(t))$ is the equilibrium distribution
481 < function. If an observation is averaged over a sufficiently long
482 < time (longer than relaxation time), all accessible microstates in
483 < phase space are assumed to be equally probed, giving a properly
484 < weighted statistical average. This allows the researcher freedom of
485 < choice when deciding how best to measure a given observable. In case
486 < an ensemble averaged approach sounds most reasonable, the Monte
487 < Carlo techniques\cite{metropolis:1949} can be utilized. Or if the
488 < system lends itself to a time averaging approach, the Molecular
489 < Dynamics techniques in Sec.~\ref{introSection:molecularDynamics}
490 < will be the best choice\cite{Frenkel1996}.
479 > where $\langle  A(q , p) \rangle_t$ is an equilibrium value of a
480 > physical quantity and $\rho (p(t), q(t))$ is the equilibrium
481 > distribution function. If an observation is averaged over a
482 > sufficiently long time (longer than relaxation time), all accessible
483 > microstates in phase space are assumed to be equally probed, giving
484 > a properly weighted statistical average. This allows the researcher
485 > freedom of choice when deciding how best to measure a given
486 > observable. In case an ensemble averaged approach sounds most
487 > reasonable, the Monte Carlo techniques\cite{metropolis:1949} can be
488 > utilized. Or if the system lends itself to a time averaging
489 > approach, the Molecular Dynamics techniques in
490 > Sec.~\ref{introSection:molecularDynamics} will be the best
491 > choice\cite{Frenkel1996}.
492 >
493 > \section{\label{introSection:geometricIntegratos}Geometric Integrators}
494 > A variety of numerical integrators were proposed to simulate the
495 > motions. They usually begin with an initial conditionals and move
496 > the objects in the direction governed by the differential equations.
497 > However, most of them ignore the hidden physical law contained
498 > within the equations. Since 1990, geometric integrators, which
499 > preserve various phase-flow invariants such as symplectic structure,
500 > volume and time reversal symmetry, are developed to address this
501 > issue. The velocity verlet method, which happens to be a simple
502 > example of symplectic integrator, continues to gain its popularity
503 > in molecular dynamics community. This fact can be partly explained
504 > by its geometric nature.
505 >
506 > \subsection{\label{introSection:symplecticManifold}Symplectic Manifold}
507 > A \emph{manifold} is an abstract mathematical space. It locally
508 > looks like Euclidean space, but when viewed globally, it may have
509 > more complicate structure. A good example of manifold is the surface
510 > of Earth. It seems to be flat locally, but it is round if viewed as
511 > a whole. A \emph{differentiable manifold} (also known as
512 > \emph{smooth manifold}) is a manifold with an open cover in which
513 > the covering neighborhoods are all smoothly isomorphic to one
514 > another. In other words,it is possible to apply calculus on
515 > \emph{differentiable manifold}. A \emph{symplectic manifold} is
516 > defined as a pair $(M, \omega)$ which consisting of a
517 > \emph{differentiable manifold} $M$ and a close, non-degenerated,
518 > bilinear symplectic form, $\omega$. A symplectic form on a vector
519 > space $V$ is a function $\omega(x, y)$ which satisfies
520 > $\omega(\lambda_1x_1+\lambda_2x_2, y) = \lambda_1\omega(x_1, y)+
521 > \lambda_2\omega(x_2, y)$, $\omega(x, y) = - \omega(y, x)$ and
522 > $\omega(x, x) = 0$. Cross product operation in vector field is an
523 > example of symplectic form.
524 >
525 > One of the motivations to study \emph{symplectic manifold} in
526 > Hamiltonian Mechanics is that a symplectic manifold can represent
527 > all possible configurations of the system and the phase space of the
528 > system can be described by it's cotangent bundle. Every symplectic
529 > manifold is even dimensional. For instance, in Hamilton equations,
530 > coordinate and momentum always appear in pairs.
531 >
532 > Let  $(M,\omega)$ and $(N, \eta)$ be symplectic manifolds. A map
533 > \[
534 > f : M \rightarrow N
535 > \]
536 > is a \emph{symplectomorphism} if it is a \emph{diffeomorphims} and
537 > the \emph{pullback} of $\eta$ under f is equal to $\omega$.
538 > Canonical transformation is an example of symplectomorphism in
539 > classical mechanics.
540 >
541 > \subsection{\label{introSection:ODE}Ordinary Differential Equations}
542 >
543 > For a ordinary differential system defined as
544 > \begin{equation}
545 > \dot x = f(x)
546 > \end{equation}
547 > where $x = x(q,p)^T$, this system is canonical Hamiltonian, if
548 > \begin{equation}
549 > f(r) = J\nabla _x H(r).
550 > \end{equation}
551 > $H = H (q, p)$ is Hamiltonian function and $J$ is the skew-symmetric
552 > matrix
553 > \begin{equation}
554 > J = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
555 >   0 & I  \\
556 >   { - I} & 0  \\
557 > \end{array}} \right)
558 > \label{introEquation:canonicalMatrix}
559 > \end{equation}
560 > where $I$ is an identity matrix. Using this notation, Hamiltonian
561 > system can be rewritten as,
562 > \begin{equation}
563 > \frac{d}{{dt}}x = J\nabla _x H(x)
564 > \label{introEquation:compactHamiltonian}
565 > \end{equation}In this case, $f$ is
566 > called a \emph{Hamiltonian vector field}.
567 >
568 > Another generalization of Hamiltonian dynamics is Poisson Dynamics,
569 > \begin{equation}
570 > \dot x = J(x)\nabla _x H \label{introEquation:poissonHamiltonian}
571 > \end{equation}
572 > The most obvious change being that matrix $J$ now depends on $x$.
573 > The free rigid body is an example of Poisson system (actually a
574 > Lie-Poisson system) with Hamiltonian function of angular kinetic
575 > energy.
576 > \begin{equation}
577 > J(\pi ) = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
578 >   0 & {\pi _3 } & { - \pi _2 }  \\
579 >   { - \pi _3 } & 0 & {\pi _1 }  \\
580 >   {\pi _2 } & { - \pi _1 } & 0  \\
581 > \end{array}} \right)
582 > \end{equation}
583 >
584 > \begin{equation}
585 > H = \frac{1}{2}\left( {\frac{{\pi _1^2 }}{{I_1 }} + \frac{{\pi _2^2
586 > }}{{I_2 }} + \frac{{\pi _3^2 }}{{I_3 }}} \right)
587 > \end{equation}
588 >
589 > \subsection{\label{introSection:exactFlow}Exact Flow}
590 >
591 > Let $x(t)$ be the exact solution of the ODE system,
592 > \begin{equation}
593 > \frac{{dx}}{{dt}} = f(x) \label{introEquation:ODE}
594 > \end{equation}
595 > The exact flow(solution) $\varphi_\tau$ is defined by
596 > \[
597 > x(t+\tau) =\varphi_\tau(x(t))
598 > \]
599 > where $\tau$ is a fixed time step and $\varphi$ is a map from phase
600 > space to itself. The flow has the continuous group property,
601 > \begin{equation}
602 > \varphi _{\tau _1 }  \circ \varphi _{\tau _2 }  = \varphi _{\tau _1
603 > + \tau _2 } .
604 > \end{equation}
605 > In particular,
606 > \begin{equation}
607 > \varphi _\tau   \circ \varphi _{ - \tau }  = I
608 > \end{equation}
609 > Therefore, the exact flow is self-adjoint,
610 > \begin{equation}
611 > \varphi _\tau   = \varphi _{ - \tau }^{ - 1}.
612 > \end{equation}
613 > The exact flow can also be written in terms of the of an operator,
614 > \begin{equation}
615 > \varphi _\tau  (x) = e^{\tau \sum\limits_i {f_i (x)\frac{\partial
616 > }{{\partial x_i }}} } (x) \equiv \exp (\tau f)(x).
617 > \label{introEquation:exponentialOperator}
618 > \end{equation}
619 >
620 > In most cases, it is not easy to find the exact flow $\varphi_\tau$.
621 > Instead, we use a approximate map, $\psi_\tau$, which is usually
622 > called integrator. The order of an integrator $\psi_\tau$ is $p$, if
623 > the Taylor series of $\psi_\tau$ agree to order $p$,
624 > \begin{equation}
625 > \psi_tau(x) = x + \tau f(x) + O(\tau^{p+1})
626 > \end{equation}
627 >
628 > \subsection{\label{introSection:geometricProperties}Geometric Properties}
629 >
630 > The hidden geometric properties of ODE and its flow play important
631 > roles in numerical studies. Many of them can be found in systems
632 > which occur naturally in applications.
633 >
634 > Let $\varphi$ be the flow of Hamiltonian vector field, $\varphi$ is
635 > a \emph{symplectic} flow if it satisfies,
636 > \begin{equation}
637 > {\varphi '}^T J \varphi ' = J.
638 > \end{equation}
639 > According to Liouville's theorem, the symplectic volume is invariant
640 > under a Hamiltonian flow, which is the basis for classical
641 > statistical mechanics. Furthermore, the flow of a Hamiltonian vector
642 > field on a symplectic manifold can be shown to be a
643 > symplectomorphism. As to the Poisson system,
644 > \begin{equation}
645 > {\varphi '}^T J \varphi ' = J \circ \varphi
646 > \end{equation}
647 > is the property must be preserved by the integrator.
648  
649 + It is possible to construct a \emph{volume-preserving} flow for a
650 + source free($ \nabla \cdot f = 0 $) ODE, if the flow satisfies $
651 + \det d\varphi  = 1$. One can show easily that a symplectic flow will
652 + be volume-preserving.
653 +
654 + Changing the variables $y = h(x)$ in a ODE\ref{introEquation:ODE}
655 + will result in a new system,
656 + \[
657 + \dot y = \tilde f(y) = ((dh \cdot f)h^{ - 1} )(y).
658 + \]
659 + The vector filed $f$ has reversing symmetry $h$ if $f = - \tilde f$.
660 + In other words, the flow of this vector field is reversible if and
661 + only if $ h \circ \varphi ^{ - 1}  = \varphi  \circ h $.
662 +
663 + A \emph{first integral}, or conserved quantity of a general
664 + differential function is a function $ G:R^{2d}  \to R^d $ which is
665 + constant for all solutions of the ODE $\frac{{dx}}{{dt}} = f(x)$ ,
666 + \[
667 + \frac{{dG(x(t))}}{{dt}} = 0.
668 + \]
669 + Using chain rule, one may obtain,
670 + \[
671 + \sum\limits_i {\frac{{dG}}{{dx_i }}} f_i (x) = f \bullet \nabla G,
672 + \]
673 + which is the condition for conserving \emph{first integral}. For a
674 + canonical Hamiltonian system, the time evolution of an arbitrary
675 + smooth function $G$ is given by,
676 + \begin{equation}
677 + \begin{array}{c}
678 + \frac{{dG(x(t))}}{{dt}} = [\nabla _x G(x(t))]^T \dot x(t) \\
679 +  = [\nabla _x G(x(t))]^T J\nabla _x H(x(t)). \\
680 + \end{array}
681 + \label{introEquation:firstIntegral1}
682 + \end{equation}
683 + Using poisson bracket notion, Equation
684 + \ref{introEquation:firstIntegral1} can be rewritten as
685 + \[
686 + \frac{d}{{dt}}G(x(t)) = \left\{ {G,H} \right\}(x(t)).
687 + \]
688 + Therefore, the sufficient condition for $G$ to be the \emph{first
689 + integral} of a Hamiltonian system is
690 + \[
691 + \left\{ {G,H} \right\} = 0.
692 + \]
693 + As well known, the Hamiltonian (or energy) H of a Hamiltonian system
694 + is a \emph{first integral}, which is due to the fact $\{ H,H\}  =
695 + 0$.
696 +
697 +
698 + When designing any numerical methods, one should always try to
699 + preserve the structural properties of the original ODE and its flow.
700 +
701 + \subsection{\label{introSection:constructionSymplectic}Construction of Symplectic Methods}
702 + A lot of well established and very effective numerical methods have
703 + been successful precisely because of their symplecticities even
704 + though this fact was not recognized when they were first
705 + constructed. The most famous example is leapfrog methods in
706 + molecular dynamics. In general, symplectic integrators can be
707 + constructed using one of four different methods.
708 + \begin{enumerate}
709 + \item Generating functions
710 + \item Variational methods
711 + \item Runge-Kutta methods
712 + \item Splitting methods
713 + \end{enumerate}
714 +
715 + Generating function tends to lead to methods which are cumbersome
716 + and difficult to use. In dissipative systems, variational methods
717 + can capture the decay of energy accurately. Since their
718 + geometrically unstable nature against non-Hamiltonian perturbations,
719 + ordinary implicit Runge-Kutta methods are not suitable for
720 + Hamiltonian system. Recently, various high-order explicit
721 + Runge--Kutta methods have been developed to overcome this
722 + instability. However, due to computational penalty involved in
723 + implementing the Runge-Kutta methods, they do not attract too much
724 + attention from Molecular Dynamics community. Instead, splitting have
725 + been widely accepted since they exploit natural decompositions of
726 + the system\cite{Tuckerman92}.
727 +
728 + \subsubsection{\label{introSection:splittingMethod}Splitting Method}
729 +
730 + The main idea behind splitting methods is to decompose the discrete
731 + $\varphi_h$ as a composition of simpler flows,
732 + \begin{equation}
733 + \varphi _h  = \varphi _{h_1 }  \circ \varphi _{h_2 }  \ldots  \circ
734 + \varphi _{h_n }
735 + \label{introEquation:FlowDecomposition}
736 + \end{equation}
737 + where each of the sub-flow is chosen such that each represent a
738 + simpler integration of the system.
739 +
740 + Suppose that a Hamiltonian system takes the form,
741 + \[
742 + H = H_1 + H_2.
743 + \]
744 + Here, $H_1$ and $H_2$ may represent different physical processes of
745 + the system. For instance, they may relate to kinetic and potential
746 + energy respectively, which is a natural decomposition of the
747 + problem. If $H_1$ and $H_2$ can be integrated using exact flows
748 + $\varphi_1(t)$ and $\varphi_2(t)$, respectively, a simple first
749 + order is then given by the Lie-Trotter formula
750 + \begin{equation}
751 + \varphi _h  = \varphi _{1,h}  \circ \varphi _{2,h},
752 + \label{introEquation:firstOrderSplitting}
753 + \end{equation}
754 + where $\varphi _h$ is the result of applying the corresponding
755 + continuous $\varphi _i$ over a time $h$. By definition, as
756 + $\varphi_i(t)$ is the exact solution of a Hamiltonian system, it
757 + must follow that each operator $\varphi_i(t)$ is a symplectic map.
758 + It is easy to show that any composition of symplectic flows yields a
759 + symplectic map,
760 + \begin{equation}
761 + (\varphi '\phi ')^T J\varphi '\phi ' = \phi '^T \varphi '^T J\varphi
762 + '\phi ' = \phi '^T J\phi ' = J,
763 + \label{introEquation:SymplecticFlowComposition}
764 + \end{equation}
765 + where $\phi$ and $\psi$ both are symplectic maps. Thus operator
766 + splitting in this context automatically generates a symplectic map.
767 +
768 + The Lie-Trotter splitting(\ref{introEquation:firstOrderSplitting})
769 + introduces local errors proportional to $h^2$, while Strang
770 + splitting gives a second-order decomposition,
771 + \begin{equation}
772 + \varphi _h  = \varphi _{1,h/2}  \circ \varphi _{2,h}  \circ \varphi
773 + _{1,h/2} , \label{introEquation:secondOrderSplitting}
774 + \end{equation}
775 + which has a local error proportional to $h^3$. Sprang splitting's
776 + popularity in molecular simulation community attribute to its
777 + symmetric property,
778 + \begin{equation}
779 + \varphi _h^{ - 1} = \varphi _{ - h}.
780 + \label{introEquation:timeReversible}
781 + \end{equation}
782 +
783 + \subsubsection{\label{introSection:exampleSplittingMethod}Example of Splitting Method}
784 + The classical equation for a system consisting of interacting
785 + particles can be written in Hamiltonian form,
786 + \[
787 + H = T + V
788 + \]
789 + where $T$ is the kinetic energy and $V$ is the potential energy.
790 + Setting $H_1 = T, H_2 = V$ and applying Strang splitting, one
791 + obtains the following:
792 + \begin{align}
793 + q(\Delta t) &= q(0) + \dot{q}(0)\Delta t +
794 +    \frac{F[q(0)]}{m}\frac{\Delta t^2}{2}, %
795 + \label{introEquation:Lp10a} \\%
796 + %
797 + \dot{q}(\Delta t) &= \dot{q}(0) + \frac{\Delta t}{2m}
798 +    \biggl [F[q(0)] + F[q(\Delta t)] \biggr]. %
799 + \label{introEquation:Lp10b}
800 + \end{align}
801 + where $F(t)$ is the force at time $t$. This integration scheme is
802 + known as \emph{velocity verlet} which is
803 + symplectic(\ref{introEquation:SymplecticFlowComposition}),
804 + time-reversible(\ref{introEquation:timeReversible}) and
805 + volume-preserving (\ref{introEquation:volumePreserving}). These
806 + geometric properties attribute to its long-time stability and its
807 + popularity in the community. However, the most commonly used
808 + velocity verlet integration scheme is written as below,
809 + \begin{align}
810 + \dot{q}\biggl (\frac{\Delta t}{2}\biggr ) &=
811 +    \dot{q}(0) + \frac{\Delta t}{2m}\, F[q(0)], \label{introEquation:Lp9a}\\%
812 + %
813 + q(\Delta t) &= q(0) + \Delta t\, \dot{q}\biggl (\frac{\Delta t}{2}\biggr ),%
814 +    \label{introEquation:Lp9b}\\%
815 + %
816 + \dot{q}(\Delta t) &= \dot{q}\biggl (\frac{\Delta t}{2}\biggr ) +
817 +    \frac{\Delta t}{2m}\, F[q(0)]. \label{introEquation:Lp9c}
818 + \end{align}
819 + From the preceding splitting, one can see that the integration of
820 + the equations of motion would follow:
821 + \begin{enumerate}
822 + \item calculate the velocities at the half step, $\frac{\Delta t}{2}$, from the forces calculated at the initial position.
823 +
824 + \item Use the half step velocities to move positions one whole step, $\Delta t$.
825 +
826 + \item Evaluate the forces at the new positions, $\mathbf{r}(\Delta t)$, and use the new forces to complete the velocity move.
827 +
828 + \item Repeat from step 1 with the new position, velocities, and forces assuming the roles of the initial values.
829 + \end{enumerate}
830 +
831 + Simply switching the order of splitting and composing, a new
832 + integrator, the \emph{position verlet} integrator, can be generated,
833 + \begin{align}
834 + \dot q(\Delta t) &= \dot q(0) + \Delta tF(q(0))\left[ {q(0) +
835 + \frac{{\Delta t}}{{2m}}\dot q(0)} \right], %
836 + \label{introEquation:positionVerlet1} \\%
837 + %
838 + q(\Delta t) &= q(0) + \frac{{\Delta t}}{2}\left[ {\dot q(0) + \dot
839 + q(\Delta t)} \right]. %
840 + \label{introEquation:positionVerlet1}
841 + \end{align}
842 +
843 + \subsubsection{\label{introSection:errorAnalysis}Error Analysis and Higher Order Methods}
844 +
845 + Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula can be used to determine the local
846 + error of splitting method in terms of commutator of the
847 + operators(\ref{introEquation:exponentialOperator}) associated with
848 + the sub-flow. For operators $hX$ and $hY$ which are associate to
849 + $\varphi_1(t)$ and $\varphi_2(t$ respectively , we have
850 + \begin{equation}
851 + \exp (hX + hY) = \exp (hZ)
852 + \end{equation}
853 + where
854 + \begin{equation}
855 + hZ = hX + hY + \frac{{h^2 }}{2}[X,Y] + \frac{{h^3 }}{2}\left(
856 + {[X,[X,Y]] + [Y,[Y,X]]} \right) +  \ldots .
857 + \end{equation}
858 + Here, $[X,Y]$ is the commutators of operator $X$ and $Y$ given by
859 + \[
860 + [X,Y] = XY - YX .
861 + \]
862 + Applying Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula to Sprang splitting, we
863 + can obtain
864 + \begin{eqnarray*}
865 + \exp (h X/2)\exp (h Y)\exp (h X/2) & = & \exp (h X + h Y + h^2
866 + [X,Y]/4 + h^2 [Y,X]/4 \\ & & \mbox{} + h^2 [X,X]/8 + h^2 [Y,Y]/8 \\
867 + & & \mbox{} + h^3 [Y,[Y,X]]/12 - h^3 [X,[X,Y]]/24 & & \mbox{} +
868 + \ldots )
869 + \end{eqnarray*}
870 + Since \[ [X,Y] + [Y,X] = 0\] and \[ [X,X] = 0\], the dominant local
871 + error of Spring splitting is proportional to $h^3$. The same
872 + procedure can be applied to general splitting,  of the form
873 + \begin{equation}
874 + \varphi _{b_m h}^2  \circ \varphi _{a_m h}^1  \circ \varphi _{b_{m -
875 + 1} h}^2  \circ  \ldots  \circ \varphi _{a_1 h}^1 .
876 + \end{equation}
877 + Careful choice of coefficient $a_1 ,\ldot , b_m$ will lead to higher
878 + order method. Yoshida proposed an elegant way to compose higher
879 + order methods based on symmetric splitting. Given a symmetric second
880 + order base method $ \varphi _h^{(2)} $, a fourth-order symmetric
881 + method can be constructed by composing,
882 + \[
883 + \varphi _h^{(4)}  = \varphi _{\alpha h}^{(2)}  \circ \varphi _{\beta
884 + h}^{(2)}  \circ \varphi _{\alpha h}^{(2)}
885 + \]
886 + where $ \alpha  =  - \frac{{2^{1/3} }}{{2 - 2^{1/3} }}$ and $ \beta
887 + = \frac{{2^{1/3} }}{{2 - 2^{1/3} }}$. Moreover, a symmetric
888 + integrator $ \varphi _h^{(2n + 2)}$ can be composed by
889 + \begin{equation}
890 + \varphi _h^{(2n + 2)}  = \varphi _{\alpha h}^{(2n)}  \circ \varphi
891 + _{\beta h}^{(2n)}  \circ \varphi _{\alpha h}^{(2n)}
892 + \end{equation}
893 + , if the weights are chosen as
894 + \[
895 + \alpha  =  - \frac{{2^{1/(2n + 1)} }}{{2 - 2^{1/(2n + 1)} }},\beta =
896 + \frac{{2^{1/(2n + 1)} }}{{2 - 2^{1/(2n + 1)} }} .
897 + \]
898 +
899   \section{\label{introSection:molecularDynamics}Molecular Dynamics}
900  
901   As a special discipline of molecular modeling, Molecular dynamics
# Line 322 | Line 905 | dynamical information.
905  
906   \subsection{\label{introSec:mdInit}Initialization}
907  
908 + \subsection{\label{introSec:forceEvaluation}Force Evaluation}
909 +
910   \subsection{\label{introSection:mdIntegration} Integration of the Equations of Motion}
911  
912   \section{\label{introSection:rigidBody}Dynamics of Rigid Bodies}
913  
914 < A rigid body is a body in which the distance between any two given
915 < points of a rigid body remains constant regardless of external
916 < forces exerted on it. A rigid body therefore conserves its shape
917 < during its motion.
914 > Rigid bodies are frequently involved in the modeling of different
915 > areas, from engineering, physics, to chemistry. For example,
916 > missiles and vehicle are usually modeled by rigid bodies.  The
917 > movement of the objects in 3D gaming engine or other physics
918 > simulator is governed by the rigid body dynamics. In molecular
919 > simulation, rigid body is used to simplify the model in
920 > protein-protein docking study{\cite{Gray03}}.
921  
922 < Applications of dynamics of rigid bodies.
922 > It is very important to develop stable and efficient methods to
923 > integrate the equations of motion of orientational degrees of
924 > freedom. Euler angles are the nature choice to describe the
925 > rotational degrees of freedom. However, due to its singularity, the
926 > numerical integration of corresponding equations of motion is very
927 > inefficient and inaccurate. Although an alternative integrator using
928 > different sets of Euler angles can overcome this difficulty\cite{},
929 > the computational penalty and the lost of angular momentum
930 > conservation still remain. A singularity free representation
931 > utilizing quaternions was developed by Evans in 1977. Unfortunately,
932 > this approach suffer from the nonseparable Hamiltonian resulted from
933 > quaternion representation, which prevents the symplectic algorithm
934 > to be utilized. Another different approach is to apply holonomic
935 > constraints to the atoms belonging to the rigid body. Each atom
936 > moves independently under the normal forces deriving from potential
937 > energy and constraint forces which are used to guarantee the
938 > rigidness. However, due to their iterative nature, SHAKE and Rattle
939 > algorithm converge very slowly when the number of constraint
940 > increases.
941  
942 + The break through in geometric literature suggests that, in order to
943 + develop a long-term integration scheme, one should preserve the
944 + symplectic structure of the flow. Introducing conjugate momentum to
945 + rotation matrix $A$ and re-formulating Hamiltonian's equation, a
946 + symplectic integrator, RSHAKE, was proposed to evolve the
947 + Hamiltonian system in a constraint manifold by iteratively
948 + satisfying the orthogonality constraint $A_t A = 1$. An alternative
949 + method using quaternion representation was developed by Omelyan.
950 + However, both of these methods are iterative and inefficient. In
951 + this section, we will present a symplectic Lie-Poisson integrator
952 + for rigid body developed by Dullweber and his
953 + coworkers\cite{Dullweber1997}.
954 +
955   \subsection{\label{introSection:lieAlgebra}Lie Algebra}
956  
957 < \subsection{\label{introSection:DLMMotionEquation}The Euler Equations of Rigid Body Motion}
957 > \subsection{\label{introSection:constrainedHamiltonianRB}Constrained Hamiltonian for Rigid Body}
958  
959 < \subsection{\label{introSection:otherRBMotionEquation}Other Formulations for Rigid Body Motion}
959 > \begin{equation}
960 > H = \frac{1}{2}(p^T m^{ - 1} p) + \frac{1}{2}tr(PJ^{ - 1} P) +
961 > V(q,Q) + \frac{1}{2}tr[(QQ^T  - 1)\Lambda ].
962 > \label{introEquation:RBHamiltonian}
963 > \end{equation}
964 > Here, $q$ and $Q$  are the position and rotation matrix for the
965 > rigid-body, $p$ and $P$  are conjugate momenta to $q$  and $Q$ , and
966 > $J$, a diagonal matrix, is defined by
967 > \[
968 > I_{ii}^{ - 1}  = \frac{1}{2}\sum\limits_{i \ne j} {J_{jj}^{ - 1} }
969 > \]
970 > where $I_{ii}$ is the diagonal element of the inertia tensor. This
971 > constrained Hamiltonian equation subjects to a holonomic constraint,
972 > \begin{equation}
973 > Q^T Q = 1$, \label{introEquation:orthogonalConstraint}
974 > \end{equation}
975 > which is used to ensure rotation matrix's orthogonality.
976 > Differentiating \ref{introEquation:orthogonalConstraint} and using
977 > Equation \ref{introEquation:RBMotionMomentum}, one may obtain,
978 > \begin{equation}
979 > Q^T PJ^{ - 1}  + J^{ - 1} P^T Q = 0 . \\
980 > \label{introEquation:RBFirstOrderConstraint}
981 > \end{equation}
982  
983 < %\subsection{\label{introSection:poissonBrackets}Poisson Brackets}
983 > Using Equation (\ref{introEquation:motionHamiltonianCoordinate},
984 > \ref{introEquation:motionHamiltonianMomentum}), one can write down
985 > the equations of motion,
986 > \[
987 > \begin{array}{c}
988 > \frac{{dq}}{{dt}} = \frac{p}{m} \label{introEquation:RBMotionPosition}\\
989 > \frac{{dp}}{{dt}} =  - \nabla _q V(q,Q) \label{introEquation:RBMotionMomentum}\\
990 > \frac{{dQ}}{{dt}} = PJ^{ - 1}  \label{introEquation:RBMotionRotation}\\
991 > \frac{{dP}}{{dt}} =  - \nabla _Q V(q,Q) - 2Q\Lambda . \label{introEquation:RBMotionP}\\
992 > \end{array}
993 > \]
994  
995 < \section{\label{introSection:correlationFunctions}Correlation Functions}
995 > In general, there are two ways to satisfy the holonomic constraints.
996 > We can use constraint force provided by lagrange multiplier on the
997 > normal manifold to keep the motion on constraint space. Or we can
998 > simply evolve the system in constraint manifold. The two method are
999 > proved to be equivalent. The holonomic constraint and equations of
1000 > motions define a constraint manifold for rigid body
1001 > \[
1002 > M = \left\{ {(Q,P):Q^T Q = 1,Q^T PJ^{ - 1}  + J^{ - 1} P^T Q = 0}
1003 > \right\}.
1004 > \]
1005  
1006 + Unfortunately, this constraint manifold is not the cotangent bundle
1007 + $T_{\star}SO(3)$. However, it turns out that under symplectic
1008 + transformation, the cotangent space and the phase space are
1009 + diffeomorphic. Introducing
1010 + \[
1011 + \tilde Q = Q,\tilde P = \frac{1}{2}\left( {P - QP^T Q} \right),
1012 + \]
1013 + the mechanical system subject to a holonomic constraint manifold $M$
1014 + can be re-formulated as a Hamiltonian system on the cotangent space
1015 + \[
1016 + T^* SO(3) = \left\{ {(\tilde Q,\tilde P):\tilde Q^T \tilde Q =
1017 + 1,\tilde Q^T \tilde PJ^{ - 1}  + J^{ - 1} P^T \tilde Q = 0} \right\}
1018 + \]
1019 +
1020 + For a body fixed vector $X_i$ with respect to the center of mass of
1021 + the rigid body, its corresponding lab fixed vector $X_0^{lab}$  is
1022 + given as
1023 + \begin{equation}
1024 + X_i^{lab} = Q X_i + q.
1025 + \end{equation}
1026 + Therefore, potential energy $V(q,Q)$ is defined by
1027 + \[
1028 + V(q,Q) = V(Q X_0 + q).
1029 + \]
1030 + Hence,
1031 + \[
1032 + \nabla _q V(q,Q) = F(q,Q) = \sum\limits_i {F_i (q,Q)}
1033 + \]
1034 +
1035 + \[
1036 + \nabla _Q V(q,Q) = F(q,Q)X_i^t
1037 + \]
1038 +
1039 + As a common choice to describe the rotation dynamics of the rigid
1040 + body, angular momentum on body frame $\Pi  = Q^t P$ is introduced to
1041 + rewrite the equations of motion,
1042 + \begin{equation}
1043 + \begin{array}{l}
1044 + \mathop \Pi \limits^ \bullet   = J^{ - 1} \Pi ^T \Pi  + Q^T \sum\limits_i {F_i (q,Q)X_i^T }  - \Lambda  \\
1045 + \mathop Q\limits^{{\rm{   }} \bullet }  = Q\Pi {\rm{ }}J^{ - 1}  \\
1046 + \end{array}
1047 + \label{introEqaution:RBMotionPI}
1048 + \end{equation}
1049 + , as well as holonomic constraints,
1050 + \[
1051 + \begin{array}{l}
1052 + \Pi J^{ - 1}  + J^{ - 1} \Pi ^t  = 0 \\
1053 + Q^T Q = 1 \\
1054 + \end{array}
1055 + \]
1056 +
1057 + For a vector $v(v_1 ,v_2 ,v_3 ) \in R^3$ and a matrix $\hat v \in
1058 + so(3)^ \star$, the hat-map isomorphism,
1059 + \begin{equation}
1060 + v(v_1 ,v_2 ,v_3 ) \Leftrightarrow \hat v = \left(
1061 + {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
1062 +   0 & { - v_3 } & {v_2 }  \\
1063 +   {v_3 } & 0 & { - v_1 }  \\
1064 +   { - v_2 } & {v_1 } & 0  \\
1065 + \end{array}} \right),
1066 + \label{introEquation:hatmapIsomorphism}
1067 + \end{equation}
1068 + will let us associate the matrix products with traditional vector
1069 + operations
1070 + \[
1071 + \hat vu = v \times u
1072 + \]
1073 +
1074 + Using \ref{introEqaution:RBMotionPI}, one can construct a skew
1075 + matrix,
1076 + \begin{equation}
1077 + (\mathop \Pi \limits^ \bullet   - \mathop \Pi \limits^ \bullet  ^T
1078 + ){\rm{ }} = {\rm{ }}(\Pi  - \Pi ^T ){\rm{ }}(J^{ - 1} \Pi  + \Pi J^{
1079 + - 1} ) + \sum\limits_i {[Q^T F_i (r,Q)X_i^T  - X_i F_i (r,Q)^T Q]} -
1080 + (\Lambda  - \Lambda ^T ) . \label{introEquation:skewMatrixPI}
1081 + \end{equation}
1082 + Since $\Lambda$ is symmetric, the last term of Equation
1083 + \ref{introEquation:skewMatrixPI}, which implies the Lagrange
1084 + multiplier $\Lambda$ is ignored in the integration.
1085 +
1086 + Hence, applying hat-map isomorphism, we obtain the equation of
1087 + motion for angular momentum on body frame
1088 + \[
1089 + \dot \pi  = \pi  \times I^{ - 1} \pi  + Q^T \sum\limits_i {F_i (r,Q)
1090 + \times X_i }
1091 + \]
1092 + In the same manner, the equation of motion for rotation matrix is
1093 + given by
1094 + \[
1095 + \dot Q = Qskew(M^{ - 1} \pi )
1096 + \]
1097 +
1098 + The free rigid body equation is an example of a non-canonical
1099 + Hamiltonian system.
1100 +
1101 + \subsection{\label{introSection:symplecticDiscretizationRB}Symplectic Integration of Euler Equations}
1102 +
1103 + \[
1104 + \varphi _{\Delta t}  = \varphi _{\Delta t/2,V}  \circ \varphi
1105 + _{\Delta t,T}  \circ \varphi _{\Delta t/2,V}
1106 + \]
1107 +
1108 + \[
1109 + \varphi _{\Delta t,T}  = \varphi _{\Delta t,R}  \circ \varphi
1110 + _{\Delta t,\pi }
1111 + \]
1112 +
1113 + \[
1114 + \varphi _{\Delta t,\pi }  = \varphi _{\Delta t/2,\pi _1 }  \circ
1115 + \varphi _{\Delta t/2,\pi _2 }  \circ \varphi _{\Delta t,\pi _3 }
1116 + \circ \varphi _{\Delta t/2,\pi _2 }  \circ \varphi _{\Delta t/2,\pi
1117 + _1 }
1118 + \]
1119 +
1120 + \[
1121 + \varphi _{\Delta t/2,V}  = \varphi _{\Delta t/2,F}  \circ \varphi
1122 + _{\Delta t/2,\tau }
1123 + \]
1124 +
1125 +
1126   \section{\label{introSection:langevinDynamics}Langevin Dynamics}
1127  
1128   \subsection{\label{introSection:LDIntroduction}Introduction and application of Langevin Dynamics}
# Line 391 | Line 1171 | introEquation:motionHamiltonianMomentum},
1171   \dot p &=  - \frac{{\partial H}}{{\partial x}}
1172         &= m\ddot x
1173         &= - \frac{{\partial W(x)}}{{\partial x}} - \sum\limits_{\alpha  = 1}^N {g_\alpha  \left( {x_\alpha   - \frac{{g_\alpha  }}{{m_\alpha  w_\alpha ^2 }}x} \right)}
1174 < \label{introEq:Lp5}
1174 > \label{introEquation:Lp5}
1175   \end{align}
1176   , and
1177   \begin{align}
# Line 550 | Line 1330 | Body}
1330  
1331   \subsection{\label{introSection:centersRigidBody}Centers of Rigid
1332   Body}
1333 +
1334 + \section{\label{introSection:correlationFunctions}Correlation Functions}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines