ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/tengDissertation/Introduction.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/tengDissertation/Introduction.tex (file contents):
Revision 2721 by tim, Thu Apr 20 03:42:21 2006 UTC vs.
Revision 2779 by tim, Fri May 26 18:25:41 2006 UTC

# Line 831 | Line 831 | $\varphi_1(t)$ and $\varphi_2(t$ respectively , we hav
831   error of splitting method in terms of commutator of the
832   operators(\ref{introEquation:exponentialOperator}) associated with
833   the sub-flow. For operators $hX$ and $hY$ which are associate to
834 < $\varphi_1(t)$ and $\varphi_2(t$ respectively , we have
834 > $\varphi_1(t)$ and $\varphi_2(t)$ respectively , we have
835   \begin{equation}
836   \exp (hX + hY) = \exp (hZ)
837   \end{equation}
# Line 847 | Line 847 | can obtain
847   Applying Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula to Sprang splitting, we
848   can obtain
849   \begin{eqnarray*}
850 < \exp (h X/2)\exp (h Y)\exp (h X/2) & = & \exp (h X + h Y + h^2
851 < [X,Y]/4 + h^2 [Y,X]/4 \\ & & \mbox{} + h^2 [X,X]/8 + h^2 [Y,Y]/8 \\
852 < & & \mbox{} + h^3 [Y,[Y,X]]/12 - h^3 [X,[X,Y]]/24 & & \mbox{} +
853 < \ldots )
850 > \exp (h X/2)\exp (h Y)\exp (h X/2) & = & \exp (h X + h Y + h^2 [X,Y]/4 + h^2 [Y,X]/4 \\
851 >                                   &   & \mbox{} + h^2 [X,X]/8 + h^2 [Y,Y]/8 \\
852 >                                   &   & \mbox{} + h^3 [Y,[Y,X]]/12 - h^3[X,[X,Y]]/24 + \ldots )
853   \end{eqnarray*}
854   Since \[ [X,Y] + [Y,X] = 0\] and \[ [X,X] = 0\], the dominant local
855   error of Spring splitting is proportional to $h^3$. The same
# Line 859 | Line 858 | Careful choice of coefficient $a_1 ,\ldot , b_m$ will
858   \varphi _{b_m h}^2  \circ \varphi _{a_m h}^1  \circ \varphi _{b_{m -
859   1} h}^2  \circ  \ldots  \circ \varphi _{a_1 h}^1 .
860   \end{equation}
861 < Careful choice of coefficient $a_1 ,\ldot , b_m$ will lead to higher
861 > Careful choice of coefficient $a_1 \ldot b_m$ will lead to higher
862   order method. Yoshida proposed an elegant way to compose higher
863   order methods based on symmetric splitting. Given a symmetric second
864   order base method $ \varphi _h^{(2)} $, a fourth-order symmetric
# Line 892 | Line 891 | T(t) = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^N {\frac{{m_i v_i^2 }}{{fk_
891   simulations. For instance, instantaneous temperature of an
892   Hamiltonian system of $N$ particle can be measured by
893   \[
894 < T(t) = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^N {\frac{{m_i v_i^2 }}{{fk_B }}}
894 > T = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^N {\frac{{m_i v_i^2 }}{{fk_B }}}
895   \]
896   where $m_i$ and $v_i$ are the mass and velocity of $i$th particle
897   respectively, $f$ is the number of degrees of freedom, and $k_B$ is
# Line 913 | Line 912 | discusses issues in production run, including the forc
912   These three individual steps will be covered in the following
913   sections. Sec.~\ref{introSec:initialSystemSettings} deals with the
914   initialization of a simulation. Sec.~\ref{introSec:production} will
915 < discusses issues in production run, including the force evaluation
916 < and the numerical integration schemes of the equations of motion .
918 < Sec.~\ref{introSection:Analysis} provides the theoretical tools for
919 < trajectory analysis.
915 > discusses issues in production run. Sec.~\ref{introSection:Analysis}
916 > provides the theoretical tools for trajectory analysis.
917  
918   \subsection{\label{introSec:initialSystemSettings}Initialization}
919  
# Line 986 | Line 983 | way.
983  
984   \subsection{\label{introSection:production}Production}
985  
986 < \subsubsection{\label{introSec:forceCalculation}The Force Calculation}
986 > Production run is the most important steps of the simulation, in
987 > which the equilibrated structure is used as a starting point and the
988 > motions of the molecules are collected for later analysis. In order
989 > to capture the macroscopic properties of the system, the molecular
990 > dynamics simulation must be performed in correct and efficient way.
991  
992 < \subsubsection{\label{introSection:integrationSchemes} Integration
993 < Schemes}
992 > The most expensive part of a molecular dynamics simulation is the
993 > calculation of non-bonded forces, such as van der Waals force and
994 > Coulombic forces \textit{etc}. For a system of $N$ particles, the
995 > complexity of the algorithm for pair-wise interactions is $O(N^2 )$,
996 > which making large simulations prohibitive in the absence of any
997 > computation saving techniques.
998 >
999 > A natural approach to avoid system size issue is to represent the
1000 > bulk behavior by a finite number of the particles. However, this
1001 > approach will suffer from the surface effect. To offset this,
1002 > \textit{Periodic boundary condition} is developed to simulate bulk
1003 > properties with a relatively small number of particles. In this
1004 > method, the simulation box is replicated throughout space to form an
1005 > infinite lattice. During the simulation, when a particle moves in
1006 > the primary cell, its image in other cells move in exactly the same
1007 > direction with exactly the same orientation. Thus, as a particle
1008 > leaves the primary cell, one of its images will enter through the
1009 > opposite face.
1010 > %\begin{figure}
1011 > %\centering
1012 > %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{pbcFig.eps}
1013 > %\caption[An illustration of periodic boundary conditions]{A 2-D
1014 > %illustration of periodic boundary conditions. As one particle leaves
1015 > %the right of the simulation box, an image of it enters the left.}
1016 > %\label{introFig:pbc}
1017 > %\end{figure}
1018  
1019 + %cutoff and minimum image convention
1020 + Another important technique to improve the efficiency of force
1021 + evaluation is to apply cutoff where particles farther than a
1022 + predetermined distance, are not included in the calculation
1023 + \cite{Frenkel1996}. The use of a cutoff radius will cause a
1024 + discontinuity in the potential energy curve. Fortunately, one can
1025 + shift the potential to ensure the potential curve go smoothly to
1026 + zero at the cutoff radius. Cutoff strategy works pretty well for
1027 + Lennard-Jones interaction because of its short range nature.
1028 + However, simply truncating the electrostatic interaction with the
1029 + use of cutoff has been shown to lead to severe artifacts in
1030 + simulations. Ewald summation, in which the slowly conditionally
1031 + convergent Coulomb potential is transformed into direct and
1032 + reciprocal sums with rapid and absolute convergence, has proved to
1033 + minimize the periodicity artifacts in liquid simulations. Taking the
1034 + advantages of the fast Fourier transform (FFT) for calculating
1035 + discrete Fourier transforms, the particle mesh-based methods are
1036 + accelerated from $O(N^{3/2})$ to $O(N logN)$. An alternative
1037 + approach is \emph{fast multipole method}, which treats Coulombic
1038 + interaction exactly at short range, and approximate the potential at
1039 + long range through multipolar expansion. In spite of their wide
1040 + acceptances at the molecular simulation community, these two methods
1041 + are hard to be implemented correctly and efficiently. Instead, we
1042 + use a damped and charge-neutralized Coulomb potential method
1043 + developed by Wolf and his coworkers. The shifted Coulomb potential
1044 + for particle $i$ and particle $j$ at distance $r_{rj}$ is given by:
1045 + \begin{equation}
1046 + V(r_{ij})= \frac{q_i q_j \textrm{erfc}(\alpha
1047 + r_{ij})}{r_{ij}}-\lim_{r_{ij}\rightarrow
1048 + R_\textrm{c}}\left\{\frac{q_iq_j \textrm{erfc}(\alpha
1049 + r_{ij})}{r_{ij}}\right\}. \label{introEquation:shiftedCoulomb}
1050 + \end{equation}
1051 + where $\alpha$ is the convergence parameter. Due to the lack of
1052 + inherent periodicity and rapid convergence,this method is extremely
1053 + efficient and easy to implement.
1054 + %\begin{figure}
1055 + %\centering
1056 + %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{pbcFig.eps}
1057 + %\caption[An illustration of shifted Coulomb potential]{An illustration of shifted Coulomb potential.}
1058 + %\label{introFigure:shiftedCoulomb}
1059 + %\end{figure}
1060 +
1061 + %multiple time step
1062 +
1063   \subsection{\label{introSection:Analysis} Analysis}
1064  
1065   Recently, advanced visualization technique are widely applied to
# Line 1005 | Line 1074 | from the trajectories.
1074  
1075   \subsubsection{\label{introSection:thermodynamicsProperties}Thermodynamics Properties}
1076  
1077 + Thermodynamics properties, which can be expressed in terms of some
1078 + function of the coordinates and momenta of all particles in the
1079 + system, can be directly computed from molecular dynamics. The usual
1080 + way to measure the pressure is based on virial theorem of Clausius
1081 + which states that the virial is equal to $-3Nk_BT$. For a system
1082 + with forces between particles, the total virial, $W$, contains the
1083 + contribution from external pressure and interaction between the
1084 + particles:
1085 + \[
1086 + W =  - 3PV + \left\langle {\sum\limits_{i < j} {r{}_{ij} \cdot
1087 + f_{ij} } } \right\rangle
1088 + \]
1089 + where $f_{ij}$ is the force between particle $i$ and $j$ at a
1090 + distance $r_{ij}$. Thus, the expression for the pressure is given
1091 + by:
1092 + \begin{equation}
1093 + P = \frac{{Nk_B T}}{V} - \frac{1}{{3V}}\left\langle {\sum\limits_{i
1094 + < j} {r{}_{ij} \cdot f_{ij} } } \right\rangle
1095 + \end{equation}
1096 +
1097   \subsubsection{\label{introSection:structuralProperties}Structural Properties}
1098  
1099   Structural Properties of a simple fluid can be described by a set of
1100   distribution functions. Among these functions,\emph{pair
1101   distribution function}, also known as \emph{radial distribution
1102 < function}, are of most fundamental importance to liquid-state
1103 < theory. Pair distribution function can be gathered by Fourier
1104 < transforming raw data from a series of neutron diffraction
1105 < experiments and integrating over the surface factor \cite{Powles73}.
1106 < The experiment result can serve as a criterion to justify the
1107 < correctness of the theory. Moreover, various equilibrium
1108 < thermodynamic and structural properties can also be expressed in
1109 < terms of radial distribution function \cite{allen87:csl}.
1102 > function}, is of most fundamental importance to liquid-state theory.
1103 > Pair distribution function can be gathered by Fourier transforming
1104 > raw data from a series of neutron diffraction experiments and
1105 > integrating over the surface factor \cite{Powles73}. The experiment
1106 > result can serve as a criterion to justify the correctness of the
1107 > theory. Moreover, various equilibrium thermodynamic and structural
1108 > properties can also be expressed in terms of radial distribution
1109 > function \cite{allen87:csl}.
1110  
1111   A pair distribution functions $g(r)$ gives the probability that a
1112   particle $i$ will be located at a distance $r$ from a another
# Line 1059 | Line 1148 | liquids. Another example is the calculation of the IR
1148   function is called \emph{auto correlation function}. One example of
1149   auto correlation function is velocity auto-correlation function
1150   which is directly related to transport properties of molecular
1151 < liquids. Another example is the calculation of the IR spectrum
1152 < through a Fourier transform of the dipole autocorrelation function.
1151 > liquids:
1152 > \[
1153 > D = \frac{1}{3}\int\limits_0^\infty  {\left\langle {v(t) \cdot v(0)}
1154 > \right\rangle } dt
1155 > \]
1156 > where $D$ is diffusion constant. Unlike velocity autocorrelation
1157 > function which is averaging over time origins and over all the
1158 > atoms, dipole autocorrelation are calculated for the entire system.
1159 > The dipole autocorrelation function is given by:
1160 > \[
1161 > c_{dipole}  = \left\langle {u_{tot} (t) \cdot u_{tot} (t)}
1162 > \right\rangle
1163 > \]
1164 > Here $u_{tot}$ is the net dipole of the entire system and is given
1165 > by
1166 > \[
1167 > u_{tot} (t) = \sum\limits_i {u_i (t)}
1168 > \]
1169 > In principle, many time correlation functions can be related with
1170 > Fourier transforms of the infrared, Raman, and inelastic neutron
1171 > scattering spectra of molecular liquids. In practice, one can
1172 > extract the IR spectrum from the intensity of dipole fluctuation at
1173 > each frequency using the following relationship:
1174 > \[
1175 > \hat c_{dipole} (v) = \int_{ - \infty }^\infty  {c_{dipole} (t)e^{ -
1176 > i2\pi vt} dt}
1177 > \]
1178  
1179   \section{\label{introSection:rigidBody}Dynamics of Rigid Bodies}
1180  
# Line 1122 | Line 1236 | Q^T Q = 1$, \label{introEquation:orthogonalConstraint}
1236   where $I_{ii}$ is the diagonal element of the inertia tensor. This
1237   constrained Hamiltonian equation subjects to a holonomic constraint,
1238   \begin{equation}
1239 < Q^T Q = 1$, \label{introEquation:orthogonalConstraint}
1239 > Q^T Q = 1, \label{introEquation:orthogonalConstraint}
1240   \end{equation}
1241   which is used to ensure rotation matrix's orthogonality.
1242   Differentiating \ref{introEquation:orthogonalConstraint} and using
# Line 1147 | Line 1261 | simply evolve the system in constraint manifold. The t
1261   In general, there are two ways to satisfy the holonomic constraints.
1262   We can use constraint force provided by lagrange multiplier on the
1263   normal manifold to keep the motion on constraint space. Or we can
1264 < simply evolve the system in constraint manifold. The two method are
1265 < proved to be equivalent. The holonomic constraint and equations of
1266 < motions define a constraint manifold for rigid body
1264 > simply evolve the system in constraint manifold. These two methods
1265 > are proved to be equivalent. The holonomic constraint and equations
1266 > of motions define a constraint manifold for rigid body
1267   \[
1268   M = \left\{ {(Q,P):Q^T Q = 1,Q^T PJ^{ - 1}  + J^{ - 1} P^T Q = 0}
1269   \right\}.
# Line 1362 | Line 1476 | kinetic energy are listed in the below table,
1476   \]
1477   The equations of motion corresponding to potential energy and
1478   kinetic energy are listed in the below table,
1479 + \begin{table}
1480 + \caption{Equations of motion due to Potential and Kinetic Energies}
1481   \begin{center}
1482   \begin{tabular}{|l|l|}
1483    \hline
# Line 1374 | Line 1490 | A second-order symplectic method is now obtained by th
1490    \hline
1491   \end{tabular}
1492   \end{center}
1493 < A second-order symplectic method is now obtained by the composition
1494 < of the flow maps,
1493 > \end{table}
1494 > A second-order symplectic method is now obtained by the
1495 > composition of the flow maps,
1496   \[
1497   \varphi _{\Delta t}  = \varphi _{\Delta t/2,V}  \circ \varphi
1498   _{\Delta t,T}  \circ \varphi _{\Delta t/2,V}.
# Line 1671 | Line 1788 | Equation, \zeta can be taken as a scalar. In general,
1788   when the system become more and more complicate. Instead, various
1789   approaches based on hydrodynamics have been developed to calculate
1790   the friction coefficients. The friction effect is isotropic in
1791 < Equation, \zeta can be taken as a scalar. In general, friction
1792 < tensor \Xi is a $6\times 6$ matrix given by
1791 > Equation, $\zeta$ can be taken as a scalar. In general, friction
1792 > tensor $\Xi$ is a $6\times 6$ matrix given by
1793   \[
1794   \Xi  = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
1795     {\Xi _{}^{tt} } & {\Xi _{}^{rt} }  \\

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines