ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/tengDissertation/Introduction.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/tengDissertation/Introduction.tex (file contents):
Revision 2912 by tim, Fri Jun 30 02:45:29 2006 UTC vs.
Revision 2942 by tim, Mon Jul 17 20:54:17 2006 UTC

# Line 67 | Line 67 | All of these conserved quantities are important factor
67   \begin{equation}E = T + V. \label{introEquation:energyConservation}
68   \end{equation}
69   All of these conserved quantities are important factors to determine
70 < the quality of numerical integration schemes for rigid bodies
71 < \cite{Dullweber1997}.
70 > the quality of numerical integration schemes for rigid
71 > bodies.\cite{Dullweber1997}
72  
73   \subsection{\label{introSection:lagrangian}Lagrangian Mechanics}
74  
# Line 178 | Line 178 | equation of motion. Due to their symmetrical formula,
178   where Eq.~\ref{introEquation:motionHamiltonianCoordinate} and
179   Eq.~\ref{introEquation:motionHamiltonianMomentum} are Hamilton's
180   equation of motion. Due to their symmetrical formula, they are also
181 < known as the canonical equations of motions \cite{Goldstein2001}.
181 > known as the canonical equations of motions.\cite{Goldstein2001}
182  
183   An important difference between Lagrangian approach and the
184   Hamiltonian approach is that the Lagrangian is considered to be a
# Line 188 | Line 188 | coordinate and its time derivative as independent vari
188   Hamiltonian Mechanics is more appropriate for application to
189   statistical mechanics and quantum mechanics, since it treats the
190   coordinate and its time derivative as independent variables and it
191 < only works with 1st-order differential equations\cite{Marion1990}.
191 > only works with 1st-order differential equations.\cite{Marion1990}
192   In Newtonian Mechanics, a system described by conservative forces
193   conserves the total energy
194   (Eq.~\ref{introEquation:energyConservation}). It follows that
# Line 208 | Line 208 | The following section will give a brief introduction t
208   The thermodynamic behaviors and properties of Molecular Dynamics
209   simulation are governed by the principle of Statistical Mechanics.
210   The following section will give a brief introduction to some of the
211 < Statistical Mechanics concepts and theorem presented in this
211 > Statistical Mechanics concepts and theorems presented in this
212   dissertation.
213  
214   \subsection{\label{introSection:ensemble}Phase Space and Ensemble}
# Line 372 | Line 372 | $F$ and $G$ of the coordinates and momenta of a system
372   Liouville's theorem can be expressed in a variety of different forms
373   which are convenient within different contexts. For any two function
374   $F$ and $G$ of the coordinates and momenta of a system, the Poisson
375 < bracket ${F, G}$ is defined as
375 > bracket $\{F,G\}$ is defined as
376   \begin{equation}
377   \left\{ {F,G} \right\} = \sum\limits_i {\left( {\frac{{\partial
378   F}}{{\partial q_i }}\frac{{\partial G}}{{\partial p_i }} -
# Line 416 | Line 416 | average. It states that the time average and average o
416   many-body system in Statistical Mechanics. Fortunately, the Ergodic
417   Hypothesis makes a connection between time average and the ensemble
418   average. It states that the time average and average over the
419 < statistical ensemble are identical \cite{Frenkel1996, Leach2001}:
419 > statistical ensemble are identical:\cite{Frenkel1996, Leach2001}
420   \begin{equation}
421   \langle A(q , p) \rangle_t = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{t \to \infty }
422   \frac{1}{t}\int\limits_0^t {A(q(t),p(t))dt = \int\limits_\Gamma
# Line 434 | Line 434 | Sec.~\ref{introSection:molecularDynamics} will be the
434   utilized. Or if the system lends itself to a time averaging
435   approach, the Molecular Dynamics techniques in
436   Sec.~\ref{introSection:molecularDynamics} will be the best
437 < choice\cite{Frenkel1996}.
437 > choice.\cite{Frenkel1996}
438  
439   \section{\label{introSection:geometricIntegratos}Geometric Integrators}
440   A variety of numerical integrators have been proposed to simulate
441   the motions of atoms in MD simulation. They usually begin with
442 < initial conditionals and move the objects in the direction governed
443 < by the differential equations. However, most of them ignore the
444 < hidden physical laws contained within the equations. Since 1990,
445 < geometric integrators, which preserve various phase-flow invariants
446 < such as symplectic structure, volume and time reversal symmetry,
447 < were developed to address this issue\cite{Dullweber1997,
448 < McLachlan1998, Leimkuhler1999}. The velocity Verlet method, which
449 < happens to be a simple example of symplectic integrator, continues
450 < to gain popularity in the molecular dynamics community. This fact
451 < can be partly explained by its geometric nature.
442 > initial conditions and move the objects in the direction governed by
443 > the differential equations. However, most of them ignore the hidden
444 > physical laws contained within the equations. Since 1990, geometric
445 > integrators, which preserve various phase-flow invariants such as
446 > symplectic structure, volume and time reversal symmetry, were
447 > developed to address this issue.\cite{Dullweber1997, McLachlan1998,
448 > Leimkuhler1999} The velocity Verlet method, which happens to be a
449 > simple example of symplectic integrator, continues to gain
450 > popularity in the molecular dynamics community. This fact can be
451 > partly explained by its geometric nature.
452  
453   \subsection{\label{introSection:symplecticManifold}Symplectic Manifolds}
454   A \emph{manifold} is an abstract mathematical space. It looks
# Line 457 | Line 457 | viewed as a whole. A \emph{differentiable manifold} (a
457   surface of Earth. It seems to be flat locally, but it is round if
458   viewed as a whole. A \emph{differentiable manifold} (also known as
459   \emph{smooth manifold}) is a manifold on which it is possible to
460 < apply calculus\cite{Hirsch1997}. A \emph{symplectic manifold} is
460 > apply calculus.\cite{Hirsch1997} A \emph{symplectic manifold} is
461   defined as a pair $(M, \omega)$ which consists of a
462 < \emph{differentiable manifold} $M$ and a close, non-degenerated,
462 > \emph{differentiable manifold} $M$ and a close, non-degenerate,
463   bilinear symplectic form, $\omega$. A symplectic form on a vector
464   space $V$ is a function $\omega(x, y)$ which satisfies
465   $\omega(\lambda_1x_1+\lambda_2x_2, y) = \lambda_1\omega(x_1, y)+
466   \lambda_2\omega(x_2, y)$, $\omega(x, y) = - \omega(y, x)$ and
467 < $\omega(x, x) = 0$\cite{McDuff1998}. The cross product operation in
467 > $\omega(x, x) = 0$.\cite{McDuff1998} The cross product operation in
468   vector field is an example of symplectic form. One of the
469   motivations to study \emph{symplectic manifolds} in Hamiltonian
470   Mechanics is that a symplectic manifold can represent all possible
471   configurations of the system and the phase space of the system can
472 < be described by it's cotangent bundle\cite{Jost2002}. Every
472 > be described by it's cotangent bundle.\cite{Jost2002} Every
473   symplectic manifold is even dimensional. For instance, in Hamilton
474   equations, coordinate and momentum always appear in pairs.
475  
# Line 479 | Line 479 | For an ordinary differential system defined as
479   \begin{equation}
480   \dot x = f(x)
481   \end{equation}
482 < where $x = x(q,p)^T$, this system is a canonical Hamiltonian, if
482 > where $x = x(q,p)$, this system is a canonical Hamiltonian, if
483   $f(x) = J\nabla _x H(x)$. Here, $H = H (q, p)$ is Hamiltonian
484   function and $J$ is the skew-symmetric matrix
485   \begin{equation}
# Line 496 | Line 496 | called a \emph{Hamiltonian vector field}. Another gene
496   \label{introEquation:compactHamiltonian}
497   \end{equation}In this case, $f$ is
498   called a \emph{Hamiltonian vector field}. Another generalization of
499 < Hamiltonian dynamics is Poisson Dynamics\cite{Olver1986},
499 > Hamiltonian dynamics is Poisson Dynamics,\cite{Olver1986}
500   \begin{equation}
501   \dot x = J(x)\nabla _x H \label{introEquation:poissonHamiltonian}
502   \end{equation}
503 < The most obvious change being that matrix $J$ now depends on $x$.
503 > where the most obvious change being that matrix $J$ now depends on
504 > $x$.
505  
506   \subsection{\label{introSection:exactFlow}Exact Propagator}
507  
# Line 527 | Line 528 | Therefore, the exact propagator is self-adjoint,
528   \begin{equation}
529   \varphi _\tau   = \varphi _{ - \tau }^{ - 1}.
530   \end{equation}
531 < The exact propagator can also be written in terms of operator,
531 > The exact propagator can also be written as an operator,
532   \begin{equation}
533   \varphi _\tau  (x) = e^{\tau \sum\limits_i {f_i (x)\frac{\partial
534   }{{\partial x_i }}} } (x) \equiv \exp (\tau f)(x).
# Line 620 | Line 621 | variational methods can capture the decay of energy
621   Generating functions\cite{Channell1990} tend to lead to methods
622   which are cumbersome and difficult to use. In dissipative systems,
623   variational methods can capture the decay of energy
624 < accurately\cite{Kane2000}. Since they are geometrically unstable
624 > accurately.\cite{Kane2000} Since they are geometrically unstable
625   against non-Hamiltonian perturbations, ordinary implicit Runge-Kutta
626 < methods are not suitable for Hamiltonian system. Recently, various
627 < high-order explicit Runge-Kutta methods \cite{Owren1992,Chen2003}
628 < have been developed to overcome this instability. However, due to
629 < computational penalty involved in implementing the Runge-Kutta
630 < methods, they have not attracted much attention from the Molecular
631 < Dynamics community. Instead, splitting methods have been widely
632 < accepted since they exploit natural decompositions of the
633 < system\cite{Tuckerman1992, McLachlan1998}.
626 > methods are not suitable for Hamiltonian
627 > system.\cite{Cartwright1992} Recently, various high-order explicit
628 > Runge-Kutta methods \cite{Owren1992,Chen2003} have been developed to
629 > overcome this instability. However, due to computational penalty
630 > involved in implementing the Runge-Kutta methods, they have not
631 > attracted much attention from the Molecular Dynamics community.
632 > Instead, splitting methods have been widely accepted since they
633 > exploit natural decompositions of the system.\cite{McLachlan1998,
634 > Tuckerman1992}
635  
636   \subsubsection{\label{introSection:splittingMethod}\textbf{Splitting Methods}}
637  
# Line 652 | Line 654 | simple first order expression is then given by the Lie
654   problem. If $H_1$ and $H_2$ can be integrated using exact
655   propagators $\varphi_1(t)$ and $\varphi_2(t)$, respectively, a
656   simple first order expression is then given by the Lie-Trotter
657 < formula
657 > formula\cite{Trotter1959}
658   \begin{equation}
659   \varphi _h  = \varphi _{1,h}  \circ \varphi _{2,h},
660   \label{introEquation:firstOrderSplitting}
# Line 673 | Line 675 | local errors proportional to $h^2$, while the Strang s
675   The Lie-Trotter
676   splitting(Eq.~\ref{introEquation:firstOrderSplitting}) introduces
677   local errors proportional to $h^2$, while the Strang splitting gives
678 < a second-order decomposition,
678 > a second-order decomposition,\cite{Strang1968}
679   \begin{equation}
680   \varphi _h  = \varphi _{1,h/2}  \circ \varphi _{2,h}  \circ \varphi
681   _{1,h/2} , \label{introEquation:secondOrderSplitting}
# Line 729 | Line 731 | the equations of motion would follow:
731  
732   \item Use the half step velocities to move positions one whole step, $\Delta t$.
733  
734 < \item Evaluate the forces at the new positions, $\mathbf{q}(\Delta t)$, and use the new forces to complete the velocity move.
734 > \item Evaluate the forces at the new positions, $q(\Delta t)$, and use the new forces to complete the velocity move.
735  
736   \item Repeat from step 1 with the new position, velocities, and forces assuming the roles of the initial values.
737   \end{enumerate}
# Line 748 | Line 750 | q(\Delta t)} \right]. %
750  
751   \subsubsection{\label{introSection:errorAnalysis}\textbf{Error Analysis and Higher Order Methods}}
752  
753 < The Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula can be used to determine the
754 < local error of a splitting method in terms of the commutator of the
755 < operators(Eq.~\ref{introEquation:exponentialOperator}) associated with
756 < the sub-propagator. For operators $hX$ and $hY$ which are associated
757 < with $\varphi_1(t)$ and $\varphi_2(t)$ respectively , we have
753 > The Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula\cite{Gilmore1974} can be used
754 > to determine the local error of a splitting method in terms of the
755 > commutator of the
756 > operators(Eq.~\ref{introEquation:exponentialOperator}) associated
757 > with the sub-propagator. For operators $hX$ and $hY$ which are
758 > associated with $\varphi_1(t)$ and $\varphi_2(t)$ respectively , we
759 > have
760   \begin{equation}
761   \exp (hX + hY) = \exp (hZ)
762   \end{equation}
# Line 782 | Line 786 | order methods. Yoshida proposed an elegant way to comp
786   \end{equation}
787   A careful choice of coefficient $a_1 \ldots b_m$ will lead to higher
788   order methods. Yoshida proposed an elegant way to compose higher
789 < order methods based on symmetric splitting\cite{Yoshida1990}. Given
789 > order methods based on symmetric splitting.\cite{Yoshida1990} Given
790   a symmetric second order base method $ \varphi _h^{(2)} $, a
791   fourth-order symmetric method can be constructed by composing,
792   \[
# Line 868 | Line 872 | surface and to locate the local minimum. While converg
872   minimization to find a more reasonable conformation. Several energy
873   minimization methods have been developed to exploit the energy
874   surface and to locate the local minimum. While converging slowly
875 < near the minimum, steepest descent method is extremely robust when
875 > near the minimum, the steepest descent method is extremely robust when
876   systems are strongly anharmonic. Thus, it is often used to refine
877   structures from crystallographic data. Relying on the Hessian,
878   advanced methods like Newton-Raphson converge rapidly to a local
# Line 887 | Line 891 | end up setting the temperature of the system to a fina
891   temperature. Beginning at a lower temperature and gradually
892   increasing the temperature by assigning larger random velocities, we
893   end up setting the temperature of the system to a final temperature
894 < at which the simulation will be conducted. In heating phase, we
894 > at which the simulation will be conducted. In the heating phase, we
895   should also keep the system from drifting or rotating as a whole. To
896   do this, the net linear momentum and angular momentum of the system
897   is shifted to zero after each resampling from the Maxwell -Boltzman
# Line 943 | Line 947 | evaluation is to apply spherical cutoffs where particl
947   %cutoff and minimum image convention
948   Another important technique to improve the efficiency of force
949   evaluation is to apply spherical cutoffs where particles farther
950 < than a predetermined distance are not included in the calculation
951 < \cite{Frenkel1996}. The use of a cutoff radius will cause a
952 < discontinuity in the potential energy curve. Fortunately, one can
950 > than a predetermined distance are not included in the
951 > calculation.\cite{Frenkel1996} The use of a cutoff radius will cause
952 > a discontinuity in the potential energy curve. Fortunately, one can
953   shift a simple radial potential to ensure the potential curve go
954   smoothly to zero at the cutoff radius. The cutoff strategy works
955   well for Lennard-Jones interaction because of its short range
# Line 954 | Line 958 | with rapid and absolute convergence, has proved to min
958   in simulations. The Ewald summation, in which the slowly decaying
959   Coulomb potential is transformed into direct and reciprocal sums
960   with rapid and absolute convergence, has proved to minimize the
961 < periodicity artifacts in liquid simulations. Taking the advantages
962 < of the fast Fourier transform (FFT) for calculating discrete Fourier
963 < transforms, the particle mesh-based
961 > periodicity artifacts in liquid simulations. Taking advantage of
962 > fast Fourier transform (FFT) techniques for calculating discrete
963 > Fourier transforms, the particle mesh-based
964   methods\cite{Hockney1981,Shimada1993, Luty1994} are accelerated from
965   $O(N^{3/2})$ to $O(N logN)$. An alternative approach is the
966   \emph{fast multipole method}\cite{Greengard1987, Greengard1994},
# Line 966 | Line 970 | charge-neutralized Coulomb potential method developed
970   simulation community, these two methods are difficult to implement
971   correctly and efficiently. Instead, we use a damped and
972   charge-neutralized Coulomb potential method developed by Wolf and
973 < his coworkers\cite{Wolf1999}. The shifted Coulomb potential for
973 > his coworkers.\cite{Wolf1999} The shifted Coulomb potential for
974   particle $i$ and particle $j$ at distance $r_{rj}$ is given by:
975   \begin{equation}
976   V(r_{ij})= \frac{q_i q_j \textrm{erfc}(\alpha
# Line 1029 | Line 1033 | Fourier transforming raw data from a series of neutron
1033   function}, is of most fundamental importance to liquid theory.
1034   Experimentally, pair distribution functions can be gathered by
1035   Fourier transforming raw data from a series of neutron diffraction
1036 < experiments and integrating over the surface factor
1037 < \cite{Powles1973}. The experimental results can serve as a criterion
1038 < to justify the correctness of a liquid model. Moreover, various
1039 < equilibrium thermodynamic and structural properties can also be
1040 < expressed in terms of the radial distribution function
1041 < \cite{Allen1987}. The pair distribution functions $g(r)$ gives the
1042 < probability that a particle $i$ will be located at a distance $r$
1043 < from a another particle $j$ in the system
1036 > experiments and integrating over the surface
1037 > factor.\cite{Powles1973} The experimental results can serve as a
1038 > criterion to justify the correctness of a liquid model. Moreover,
1039 > various equilibrium thermodynamic and structural properties can also
1040 > be expressed in terms of the radial distribution
1041 > function.\cite{Allen1987} The pair distribution functions $g(r)$
1042 > gives the probability that a particle $i$ will be located at a
1043 > distance $r$ from a another particle $j$ in the system
1044   \begin{equation}
1045   g(r) = \frac{V}{{N^2 }}\left\langle {\sum\limits_i {\sum\limits_{j
1046   \ne i} {\delta (r - r_{ij} )} } } \right\rangle = \frac{\rho
# Line 1059 | Line 1063 | If $A$ and $B$ refer to same variable, this kind of co
1063   \label{introEquation:timeCorrelationFunction}
1064   \end{equation}
1065   If $A$ and $B$ refer to same variable, this kind of correlation
1066 < functions are called \emph{autocorrelation functions}. One example
1063 < of auto correlation function is the velocity auto-correlation
1066 > functions are called \emph{autocorrelation functions}. One typical example is the velocity autocorrelation
1067   function which is directly related to transport properties of
1068   molecular liquids:
1069 < \[
1069 > \begin{equation}
1070   D = \frac{1}{3}\int\limits_0^\infty  {\left\langle {v(t) \cdot v(0)}
1071   \right\rangle } dt
1072 < \]
1072 > \end{equation}
1073   where $D$ is diffusion constant. Unlike the velocity autocorrelation
1074   function, which is averaged over time origins and over all the
1075   atoms, the dipole autocorrelation functions is calculated for the
1076   entire system. The dipole autocorrelation function is given by:
1077 < \[
1077 > \begin{equation}
1078   c_{dipole}  = \left\langle {u_{tot} (t) \cdot u_{tot} (t)}
1079   \right\rangle
1080 < \]
1080 > \end{equation}
1081   Here $u_{tot}$ is the net dipole of the entire system and is given
1082   by
1083 < \[
1083 > \begin{equation}
1084   u_{tot} (t) = \sum\limits_i {u_i (t)}.
1085 < \]
1085 > \end{equation}
1086   In principle, many time correlation functions can be related to
1087   Fourier transforms of the infrared, Raman, and inelastic neutron
1088   scattering spectra of molecular liquids. In practice, one can
1089   extract the IR spectrum from the intensity of the molecular dipole
1090   fluctuation at each frequency using the following relationship:
1091 < \[
1091 > \begin{equation}
1092   \hat c_{dipole} (v) = \int_{ - \infty }^\infty  {c_{dipole} (t)e^{ -
1093   i2\pi vt} dt}.
1094 < \]
1094 > \end{equation}
1095  
1096   \section{\label{introSection:rigidBody}Dynamics of Rigid Bodies}
1097  
1098   Rigid bodies are frequently involved in the modeling of different
1099 < areas, from engineering, physics, to chemistry. For example,
1099 > areas, including engineering, physics and chemistry. For example,
1100   missiles and vehicles are usually modeled by rigid bodies.  The
1101   movement of the objects in 3D gaming engines or other physics
1102   simulators is governed by rigid body dynamics. In molecular
1103   simulations, rigid bodies are used to simplify protein-protein
1104 < docking studies\cite{Gray2003}.
1104 > docking studies.\cite{Gray2003}
1105  
1106   It is very important to develop stable and efficient methods to
1107   integrate the equations of motion for orientational degrees of
# Line 1110 | Line 1113 | still remain. A singularity-free representation utiliz
1113   angles can overcome this difficulty\cite{Barojas1973}, the
1114   computational penalty and the loss of angular momentum conservation
1115   still remain. A singularity-free representation utilizing
1116 < quaternions was developed by Evans in 1977\cite{Evans1977}.
1116 > quaternions was developed by Evans in 1977.\cite{Evans1977}
1117   Unfortunately, this approach used a nonseparable Hamiltonian
1118   resulting from the quaternion representation, which prevented the
1119   symplectic algorithm from being utilized. Another different approach
# Line 1119 | Line 1122 | the SHAKE and Rattle algorithms also converge very slo
1122   deriving from potential energy and constraint forces which are used
1123   to guarantee the rigidness. However, due to their iterative nature,
1124   the SHAKE and Rattle algorithms also converge very slowly when the
1125 < number of constraints increases\cite{Ryckaert1977, Andersen1983}.
1125 > number of constraints increases.\cite{Ryckaert1977, Andersen1983}
1126  
1127   A break-through in geometric literature suggests that, in order to
1128   develop a long-term integration scheme, one should preserve the
# Line 1129 | Line 1132 | An alternative method using the quaternion representat
1132   proposed to evolve the Hamiltonian system in a constraint manifold
1133   by iteratively satisfying the orthogonality constraint $Q^T Q = 1$.
1134   An alternative method using the quaternion representation was
1135 < developed by Omelyan\cite{Omelyan1998}. However, both of these
1135 > developed by Omelyan.\cite{Omelyan1998} However, both of these
1136   methods are iterative and inefficient. In this section, we descibe a
1137   symplectic Lie-Poisson integrator for rigid bodies developed by
1138   Dullweber and his coworkers\cite{Dullweber1997} in depth.
1139  
1140   \subsection{\label{introSection:constrainedHamiltonianRB}Constrained Hamiltonian for Rigid Bodies}
1141 < The motion of a rigid body is Hamiltonian with the Hamiltonian
1139 < function
1141 > The Hamiltonian of a rigid body is given by
1142   \begin{equation}
1143   H = \frac{1}{2}(p^T m^{ - 1} p) + \frac{1}{2}tr(PJ^{ - 1} P) +
1144   V(q,Q) + \frac{1}{2}tr[(QQ^T  - 1)\Lambda ].
# Line 1250 | Line 1252 | motion. This unique property eliminates the requiremen
1252   Eq.~\ref{introEquation:skewMatrixPI} is zero, which implies the
1253   Lagrange multiplier $\Lambda$ is absent from the equations of
1254   motion. This unique property eliminates the requirement of
1255 < iterations which can not be avoided in other methods\cite{Kol1997,
1256 < Omelyan1998}. Applying the hat-map isomorphism, we obtain the
1255 > iterations which can not be avoided in other methods.\cite{Kol1997,
1256 > Omelyan1998} Applying the hat-map isomorphism, we obtain the
1257   equation of motion for angular momentum in the body frame
1258   \begin{equation}
1259   \dot \pi  = \pi  \times I^{ - 1} \pi  + \sum\limits_i {\left( {Q^T
# Line 1348 | Line 1350 | _1 }.
1350   \circ \varphi _{\Delta t/2,\pi _2 }  \circ \varphi _{\Delta t/2,\pi
1351   _1 }.
1352   \]
1353 < The non-canonical Lie-Poisson bracket ${F, G}$ of two function
1352 < $F(\pi )$ and $G(\pi )$ is defined by
1353 > The non-canonical Lie-Poisson bracket $\{F, G\}$ of two functions $F(\pi )$ and $G(\pi )$ is defined by
1354   \[
1355   \{ F,G\} (\pi ) = [\nabla _\pi  F(\pi )]^T J(\pi )\nabla _\pi  G(\pi
1356   ).
# Line 1358 | Line 1359 | norm of the angular momentum, $\parallel \pi
1359   function $G$ is zero, $F$ is a \emph{Casimir}, which is the
1360   conserved quantity in Poisson system. We can easily verify that the
1361   norm of the angular momentum, $\parallel \pi
1362 < \parallel$, is a \emph{Casimir}\cite{McLachlan1993}. Let$ F(\pi ) = S(\frac{{\parallel
1362 > \parallel$, is a \emph{Casimir}.\cite{McLachlan1993} Let $F(\pi ) = S(\frac{{\parallel
1363   \pi \parallel ^2 }}{2})$ for an arbitrary function $ S:R \to R$ ,
1364   then by the chain rule
1365   \[
# Line 1379 | Line 1380 | of motion corresponding to potential energy and kineti
1380   The Hamiltonian of rigid body can be separated in terms of kinetic
1381   energy and potential energy, $H = T(p,\pi ) + V(q,Q)$. The equations
1382   of motion corresponding to potential energy and kinetic energy are
1383 < listed in Table~\ref{introTable:rbEquations}
1383 > listed in Table~\ref{introTable:rbEquations}.
1384   \begin{table}
1385   \caption{EQUATIONS OF MOTION DUE TO POTENTIAL AND KINETIC ENERGIES}
1386   \label{introTable:rbEquations}
# Line 1437 | Line 1438 | has been applied in a variety of studies. This section
1438   As an alternative to newtonian dynamics, Langevin dynamics, which
1439   mimics a simple heat bath with stochastic and dissipative forces,
1440   has been applied in a variety of studies. This section will review
1441 < the theory of Langevin dynamics. A brief derivation of generalized
1441 > the theory of Langevin dynamics. A brief derivation of the generalized
1442   Langevin equation will be given first. Following that, we will
1443 < discuss the physical meaning of the terms appearing in the equation
1443 < as well as the calculation of friction tensor from hydrodynamics
1444 < theory.
1443 > discuss the physical meaning of the terms appearing in the equation.
1444  
1445   \subsection{\label{introSection:generalizedLangevinDynamics}Derivation of Generalized Langevin Equation}
1446  
# Line 1450 | Line 1449 | Harmonic bath model is the derivation of the Generaliz
1449   environment, has been widely used in quantum chemistry and
1450   statistical mechanics. One of the successful applications of
1451   Harmonic bath model is the derivation of the Generalized Langevin
1452 < Dynamics (GLE). Lets consider a system, in which the degree of
1452 > Dynamics (GLE). Consider a system, in which the degree of
1453   freedom $x$ is assumed to couple to the bath linearly, giving a
1454   Hamiltonian of the form
1455   \begin{equation}
# Line 1461 | Line 1460 | H_B  = \sum\limits_{\alpha  = 1}^N {\left\{ {\frac{{p_
1460   with this degree of freedom, $H_B$ is a harmonic bath Hamiltonian,
1461   \[
1462   H_B  = \sum\limits_{\alpha  = 1}^N {\left\{ {\frac{{p_\alpha ^2
1463 < }}{{2m_\alpha  }} + \frac{1}{2}m_\alpha  \omega _\alpha ^2 }
1463 > }}{{2m_\alpha  }} + \frac{1}{2}m_\alpha  x_\alpha ^2 }
1464   \right\}}
1465   \]
1466   where the index $\alpha$ runs over all the bath degrees of freedom,
# Line 1514 | Line 1513 | where  $p$ is real and  $L$ is called the Laplace Tran
1513   L(f(t)) \equiv F(p) = \int_0^\infty  {f(t)e^{ - pt} dt}
1514   \]
1515   where  $p$ is real and  $L$ is called the Laplace Transform
1516 < Operator. Below are some important properties of Laplace transform
1516 > Operator. Below are some important properties of the Laplace transform
1517   \begin{eqnarray*}
1518   L(x + y)  & = & L(x) + L(y) \\
1519   L(ax)     & = & aL(x) \\
# Line 1583 | Line 1582 | m\ddot x =  - \frac{{\partial W}}{{\partial x}} - \int
1582   (t)\dot x(t - \tau )d\tau }  + R(t)
1583   \label{introEuqation:GeneralizedLangevinDynamics}
1584   \end{equation}
1585 < which is known as the \emph{generalized Langevin equation}.
1585 > which is known as the \emph{generalized Langevin equation} (GLE).
1586  
1587   \subsubsection{\label{introSection:randomForceDynamicFrictionKernel}\textbf{Random Force and Dynamic Friction Kernel}}
1588  
1589   One may notice that $R(t)$ depends only on initial conditions, which
1590   implies it is completely deterministic within the context of a
1591   harmonic bath. However, it is easy to verify that $R(t)$ is totally
1592 < uncorrelated to $x$ and $\dot x$,$\left\langle {x(t)R(t)}
1592 > uncorrelated to $x$ and $\dot x$, $\left\langle {x(t)R(t)}
1593   \right\rangle  = 0, \left\langle {\dot x(t)R(t)} \right\rangle  =
1594   0.$ This property is what we expect from a truly random process. As
1595   long as the model chosen for $R(t)$ was a gaussian distribution in
# Line 1619 | Line 1618 | taken as a $delta$ function in time:
1618   infinitely quickly to motions in the system. Thus, $\xi (t)$ can be
1619   taken as a $delta$ function in time:
1620   \[
1621 < \xi (t) = 2\xi _0 \delta (t)
1621 > \xi (t) = 2\xi _0 \delta (t).
1622   \]
1623   Hence, the convolution integral becomes
1624   \[
# Line 1644 | Line 1643 | q_\alpha  (t) = x_\alpha  (t) - \frac{1}{{m_\alpha  \o
1643   q_\alpha  (t) = x_\alpha  (t) - \frac{1}{{m_\alpha  \omega _\alpha
1644   ^2 }}x(0),
1645   \]
1646 < we can rewrite $R(T)$ as
1646 > we can rewrite $R(t)$ as
1647   \[
1648   R(t) = \sum\limits_{\alpha  = 1}^N {g_\alpha  q_\alpha  (t)}.
1649   \]

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines