1 |
|
|
2 |
< |
\chapter{\label{chapt:methodology}LANGEVIN DYNAMICS FOR RIGID BODIES OF ARBITRARY SHAPE} |
2 |
> |
\chapter{\label{chapt:langevin}LANGEVIN DYNAMICS FOR RIGID BODIES OF ARBITRARY SHAPE} |
3 |
|
|
4 |
|
\section{Introduction} |
5 |
|
|
28 |
|
between the native and denatured states. Because of its stability |
29 |
|
against noise, Langevin dynamics is very suitable for studying |
30 |
|
remagnetization processes in various |
31 |
< |
systems\cite{Garcia-Palacios1998,Berkov2002,Denisov2003}. For |
32 |
< |
instance, the oscillation power spectrum of nanoparticles from |
33 |
< |
Langevin dynamics simulation has the same peak frequencies for |
34 |
< |
different wave vectors,which recovers the property of magnetic |
35 |
< |
excitations in small finite structures\cite{Berkov2005a}. In an |
36 |
< |
attempt to reduce the computational cost of simulation, multiple |
37 |
< |
time stepping (MTS) methods have been introduced and have been of |
38 |
< |
great interest to macromolecule and protein |
39 |
< |
community\cite{Tuckerman1992}. Relying on the observation that |
40 |
< |
forces between distant atoms generally demonstrate slower |
41 |
< |
fluctuations than forces between close atoms, MTS method are |
42 |
< |
generally implemented by evaluating the slowly fluctuating forces |
43 |
< |
less frequently than the fast ones. Unfortunately, nonlinear |
44 |
< |
instability resulting from increasing timestep in MTS simulation |
45 |
< |
have became a critical obstruction preventing the long time |
46 |
< |
simulation. Due to the coupling to the heat bath, Langevin dynamics |
47 |
< |
has been shown to be able to damp out the resonance artifact more |
48 |
< |
efficiently\cite{Sandu1999}. |
31 |
> |
systems\cite{Palacios1998,Berkov2002,Denisov2003}. For instance, the |
32 |
> |
oscillation power spectrum of nanoparticles from Langevin dynamics |
33 |
> |
simulation has the same peak frequencies for different wave |
34 |
> |
vectors,which recovers the property of magnetic excitations in small |
35 |
> |
finite structures\cite{Berkov2005a}. In an attempt to reduce the |
36 |
> |
computational cost of simulation, multiple time stepping (MTS) |
37 |
> |
methods have been introduced and have been of great interest to |
38 |
> |
macromolecule and protein community\cite{Tuckerman1992}. Relying on |
39 |
> |
the observation that forces between distant atoms generally |
40 |
> |
demonstrate slower fluctuations than forces between close atoms, MTS |
41 |
> |
method are generally implemented by evaluating the slowly |
42 |
> |
fluctuating forces less frequently than the fast ones. |
43 |
> |
Unfortunately, nonlinear instability resulting from increasing |
44 |
> |
timestep in MTS simulation have became a critical obstruction |
45 |
> |
preventing the long time simulation. Due to the coupling to the heat |
46 |
> |
bath, Langevin dynamics has been shown to be able to damp out the |
47 |
> |
resonance artifact more efficiently\cite{Sandu1999}. |
48 |
|
|
49 |
|
%review langevin/browninan dynamics for arbitrarily shaped rigid body |
50 |
|
Combining Langevin or Brownian dynamics with rigid body dynamics, |
78 |
|
average acceleration is not always true for cooperative motion which |
79 |
|
is common in protein motion. An inertial Brownian dynamics (IBD) was |
80 |
|
proposed to address this issue by adding an inertial correction |
81 |
< |
term\cite{Beard2001}. As a complement to IBD which has a lower bound |
81 |
> |
term\cite{Beard2000}. As a complement to IBD which has a lower bound |
82 |
|
in time step because of the inertial relaxation time, long-time-step |
83 |
|
inertial dynamics (LTID) can be used to investigate the inertial |
84 |
|
behavior of the polymer segments in low friction |
85 |
< |
regime\cite{Beard2001}. LTID can also deal with the rotational |
85 |
> |
regime\cite{Beard2000}. LTID can also deal with the rotational |
86 |
|
dynamics for nonskew bodies without translation-rotation coupling by |
87 |
|
separating the translation and rotation motion and taking advantage |
88 |
|
of the analytical solution of hydrodynamics properties. However, |
100 |
|
\section{Computational Methods{\label{methodSec}}} |
101 |
|
|
102 |
|
\subsection{\label{introSection:frictionTensor}Friction Tensor} |
103 |
< |
Theoretically, the friction kernel can be determined using velocity |
104 |
< |
autocorrelation function. However, this approach become impractical |
105 |
< |
when the system become more and more complicate. Instead, various |
106 |
< |
approaches based on hydrodynamics have been developed to calculate |
107 |
< |
the friction coefficients. The friction effect is isotropic in |
108 |
< |
Equation, $\zeta$ can be taken as a scalar. In general, friction |
110 |
< |
tensor $\Xi$ is a $6\times 6$ matrix given by |
103 |
> |
Theoretically, the friction kernel can be determined using the |
104 |
> |
velocity autocorrelation function. However, this approach become |
105 |
> |
impractical when the system become more and more complicate. |
106 |
> |
Instead, various approaches based on hydrodynamics have been |
107 |
> |
developed to calculate the friction coefficients. In general, |
108 |
> |
friction tensor $\Xi$ is a $6\times 6$ matrix given by |
109 |
|
\[ |
110 |
|
\Xi = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} |
111 |
|
{\Xi _{}^{tt} } & {\Xi _{}^{rt} } \\ |
136 |
|
|
137 |
|
\subsubsection{\label{introSection:resistanceTensorRegular}\textbf{The Resistance Tensor for Regular Shape}} |
138 |
|
|
139 |
< |
For a spherical particle, the translational and rotational friction |
140 |
< |
constant can be calculated from Stoke's law, |
139 |
> |
For a spherical particle with slip boundary conditions, the |
140 |
> |
translational and rotational friction constant can be calculated |
141 |
> |
from Stoke's law, |
142 |
|
\[ |
143 |
|
\Xi ^{tt} = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} |
144 |
|
{6\pi \eta R} & 0 & 0 \\ |
160 |
|
Other non-spherical shape, such as cylinder and ellipsoid |
161 |
|
\textit{etc}, are widely used as reference for developing new |
162 |
|
hydrodynamics theory, because their properties can be calculated |
163 |
< |
exactly. In 1936, Perrin extended Stokes's law to general ellipsoid, |
164 |
< |
also called a triaxial ellipsoid, which is given in Cartesian |
165 |
< |
coordinates by\cite{Perrin1934, Perrin1936} |
163 |
> |
exactly. In 1936, Perrin extended Stokes's law to general |
164 |
> |
ellipsoids, also called a triaxial ellipsoid, which is given in |
165 |
> |
Cartesian coordinates by\cite{Perrin1934, Perrin1936} |
166 |
|
\[ |
167 |
|
\frac{{x^2 }}{{a^2 }} + \frac{{y^2 }}{{b^2 }} + \frac{{z^2 }}{{c^2 |
168 |
|
}} = 1 |
171 |
|
due to the complexity of the elliptic integral, only the ellipsoid |
172 |
|
with the restriction of two axes having to be equal, \textit{i.e.} |
173 |
|
prolate($ a \ge b = c$) and oblate ($ a < b = c $), can be solved |
174 |
< |
exactly. Introducing an elliptic integral parameter $S$ for prolate, |
174 |
> |
exactly. Introducing an elliptic integral parameter $S$ for prolate |
175 |
> |
: |
176 |
|
\[ |
177 |
|
S = \frac{2}{{\sqrt {a^2 - b^2 } }}\ln \frac{{a + \sqrt {a^2 - b^2 |
178 |
|
} }}{b}, |
179 |
|
\] |
180 |
< |
and oblate, |
180 |
> |
and oblate : |
181 |
|
\[ |
182 |
|
S = \frac{2}{{\sqrt {b^2 - a^2 } }}arctg\frac{{\sqrt {b^2 - a^2 } |
183 |
|
}}{a} |
186 |
|
tensors |
187 |
|
\[ |
188 |
|
\begin{array}{l} |
189 |
< |
\Xi _a^{tt} = 16\pi \eta \frac{{a^2 - b^2 }}{{(2a^2 - b^2 )S - 2a}} \\ |
190 |
< |
\Xi _b^{tt} = \Xi _c^{tt} = 32\pi \eta \frac{{a^2 - b^2 }}{{(2a^2 - 3b^2 )S + 2a}} \\ |
191 |
< |
\end{array}, |
189 |
> |
\Xi _a^{tt} = 16\pi \eta \frac{{a^2 - b^2 }}{{(2a^2 - b^2 )S - 2a}}. \\ |
190 |
> |
\Xi _b^{tt} = \Xi _c^{tt} = 32\pi \eta \frac{{a^2 - b^2 }}{{(2a^2 - 3b^2 )S + |
191 |
> |
2a}}, |
192 |
> |
\end{array} |
193 |
|
\] |
194 |
|
and |
195 |
|
\[ |
196 |
|
\begin{array}{l} |
197 |
< |
\Xi _a^{rr} = \frac{{32\pi }}{3}\eta \frac{{(a^2 - b^2 )b^2 }}{{2a - b^2 S}} \\ |
197 |
> |
\Xi _a^{rr} = \frac{{32\pi }}{3}\eta \frac{{(a^2 - b^2 )b^2 }}{{2a - b^2 S}}, \\ |
198 |
|
\Xi _b^{rr} = \Xi _c^{rr} = \frac{{32\pi }}{3}\eta \frac{{(a^4 - b^4 )}}{{(2a^2 - b^2 )S - 2a}} \\ |
199 |
|
\end{array}. |
200 |
|
\] |
201 |
|
|
202 |
< |
\subsubsection{\label{introSection:resistanceTensorRegularArbitrary}\textbf{The Resistance Tensor for Arbitrary Shape}} |
202 |
> |
\subsubsection{\label{introSection:resistanceTensorRegularArbitrary}\textbf{The Resistance Tensor for Arbitrary Shapes}} |
203 |
|
|
204 |
< |
Unlike spherical and other regular shaped molecules, there is not |
205 |
< |
analytical solution for friction tensor of any arbitrary shaped |
204 |
> |
Unlike spherical and other simply shaped molecules, there is no |
205 |
> |
analytical solution for the friction tensor for arbitrarily shaped |
206 |
|
rigid molecules. The ellipsoid of revolution model and general |
207 |
|
triaxial ellipsoid model have been used to approximate the |
208 |
|
hydrodynamic properties of rigid bodies. However, since the mapping |
209 |
< |
from all possible ellipsoidal space, $r$-space, to all possible |
210 |
< |
combination of rotational diffusion coefficients, $D$-space is not |
209 |
> |
from all possible ellipsoidal spaces, $r$-space, to all possible |
210 |
> |
combination of rotational diffusion coefficients, $D$-space, is not |
211 |
|
unique\cite{Wegener1979} as well as the intrinsic coupling between |
212 |
< |
translational and rotational motion of rigid body, general ellipsoid |
213 |
< |
is not always suitable for modeling arbitrarily shaped rigid |
214 |
< |
molecule. A number of studies have been devoted to determine the |
215 |
< |
friction tensor for irregularly shaped rigid bodies using more |
212 |
> |
translational and rotational motion of rigid body, general |
213 |
> |
ellipsoids are not always suitable for modeling arbitrarily shaped |
214 |
> |
rigid molecule. A number of studies have been devoted to determine |
215 |
> |
the friction tensor for irregularly shaped rigid bodies using more |
216 |
|
advanced method where the molecule of interest was modeled by |
217 |
|
combinations of spheres(beads)\cite{Carrasco1999} and the |
218 |
|
hydrodynamics properties of the molecule can be calculated using the |
274 |
|
B_{ij} = \delta _{ij} \frac{I}{{6\pi \eta R}} + (1 - \delta _{ij} |
275 |
|
)T_{ij} |
276 |
|
\] |
277 |
< |
where $\delta _{ij}$ is Kronecker delta function. Inverting matrix |
278 |
< |
$B$, we obtain |
277 |
> |
where $\delta _{ij}$ is Kronecker delta function. Inverting the $B$ |
278 |
> |
matrix, we obtain |
279 |
|
|
280 |
|
\[ |
281 |
|
C = B^{ - 1} = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} |
307 |
|
|
308 |
|
The resistance tensor depends on the origin to which they refer. The |
309 |
|
proper location for applying friction force is the center of |
310 |
< |
resistance (reaction), at which the trace of rotational resistance |
311 |
< |
tensor, $ \Xi ^{rr}$ reaches minimum. Mathematically, the center of |
312 |
< |
resistance is defined as an unique point of the rigid body at which |
313 |
< |
the translation-rotation coupling tensor are symmetric, |
310 |
> |
resistance (or center of reaction), at which the trace of rotational |
311 |
> |
resistance tensor, $ \Xi ^{rr}$ reaches a minimum value. |
312 |
> |
Mathematically, the center of resistance is defined as an unique |
313 |
> |
point of the rigid body at which the translation-rotation coupling |
314 |
> |
tensor are symmetric, |
315 |
|
\begin{equation} |
316 |
|
\Xi^{tr} = \left( {\Xi^{tr} } \right)^T |
317 |
|
\label{introEquation:definitionCR} |
318 |
|
\end{equation} |
319 |
< |
Form Equation \ref{introEquation:ResistanceTensorArbitraryOrigin}, |
319 |
> |
From Equation \ref{introEquation:ResistanceTensorArbitraryOrigin}, |
320 |
|
we can easily find out that the translational resistance tensor is |
321 |
|
origin independent, while the rotational resistance tensor and |
322 |
|
translation-rotation coupling resistance tensor depend on the |
323 |
< |
origin. Given resistance tensor at an arbitrary origin $O$, and a |
324 |
< |
vector ,$r_{OP}(x_{OP}, y_{OP}, z_{OP})$, from $O$ to $P$, we can |
323 |
> |
origin. Given the resistance tensor at an arbitrary origin $O$, and |
324 |
> |
a vector ,$r_{OP}(x_{OP}, y_{OP}, z_{OP})$, from $O$ to $P$, we can |
325 |
|
obtain the resistance tensor at $P$ by |
326 |
|
\begin{equation} |
327 |
|
\begin{array}{l} |
542 |
|
explained by the finite size effect and relative slow relaxation |
543 |
|
rate at lower viscosity regime. |
544 |
|
\begin{table} |
545 |
< |
\caption{Average temperatures from Langevin dynamics simulations of |
546 |
< |
SSD water molecules with reference temperature at 300~K.} |
545 |
> |
\caption{AVERAGE TEMPERATURES FROM LANGEVIN DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS OF |
546 |
> |
SSD WATER MOLECULES WITH REFERENCE TEMPERATURE AT 300~K.} |
547 |
|
\label{langevin:viscosity} |
548 |
|
\begin{center} |
549 |
|
\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|} |
581 |
|
|
582 |
|
\subsection{Langevin Dynamics of Banana Shaped Molecule} |
583 |
|
|
584 |
+ |
In order to verify that Langevin dynamics can mimic the dynamics of |
585 |
+ |
the systems absent of explicit solvents, we carried out two sets of |
586 |
+ |
simulations and compare their dynamic properties. |
587 |
+ |
|
588 |
+ |
Fig.~\ref{langevin:twoBanana} shows a snapshot of the simulation |
589 |
+ |
made of 256 pentane molecules and two banana shaped molecules at |
590 |
+ |
273~K. It has an equivalent implicit solvent system containing only |
591 |
+ |
two banana shaped molecules with viscosity of 0.289 center poise. To |
592 |
+ |
calculate the hydrodynamic properties of the banana shaped molecule, |
593 |
+ |
we create a rough shell model (see Fig.~\ref{langevin:roughShell}), |
594 |
+ |
in which the banana shaped molecule is represented as a ``shell'' |
595 |
+ |
made of 2266 small identical beads with size of 0.3 $\AA$ on the |
596 |
+ |
surface. Applying the procedure described in |
597 |
+ |
Sec.~\ref{introEquation:ResistanceTensorArbitraryOrigin}, we |
598 |
+ |
identified the center of resistance at $(0, 0.7482, -0.1988)$, as |
599 |
+ |
well as the resistance tensor, |
600 |
+ |
\[ |
601 |
+ |
\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} |
602 |
+ |
0.9261 & 1.310e-14 & -7.292e-15&5.067e-14&0.08585&0.2057\\ |
603 |
+ |
3.968e-14& 0.9270&-0.007063& 0.08585&6.764e-14&4.846e-14\\ |
604 |
+ |
-6.561e-16&-0.007063&0.7494&0.2057&4.846e-14&1.5036e-14\\ |
605 |
+ |
5.067e-14&0.0858&0.2057& 58.64& 8.563e-13&-8.5736\\ |
606 |
+ |
0.08585&6.764e-14&4.846e-14&1.555e-12&48.30&3.219&\\ |
607 |
+ |
0.2057&4.846e-14&1.5036e-14&-3.904e-13&3.219&10.7373\\ |
608 |
+ |
\end{array}} \right). |
609 |
+ |
\] |
610 |
|
|
611 |
|
|
584 |
– |
\begin{figure} |
585 |
– |
\centering |
586 |
– |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{one_banana.eps} |
587 |
– |
\caption[]{.} \label{langevin:banana} |
588 |
– |
\end{figure} |
612 |
|
|
613 |
|
\begin{figure} |
614 |
|
\centering |
625 |
|
molecules and 256 pentane molecules.} \label{langevin:twoBanana} |
626 |
|
\end{figure} |
627 |
|
|
628 |
+ |
\begin{figure} |
629 |
+ |
\centering |
630 |
+ |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{vacf.eps} |
631 |
+ |
\caption[Plots of Velocity Auto-correlation functions]{Velocity |
632 |
+ |
Auto-correlation function of NVE (blue) and Langevin dynamics |
633 |
+ |
(red).} \label{langevin:twoBanana} |
634 |
+ |
\end{figure} |
635 |
+ |
|
636 |
+ |
\begin{figure} |
637 |
+ |
\centering |
638 |
+ |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{uacf.eps} |
639 |
+ |
\caption[Snapshot from Simulation of Two Banana Shaped Molecules and |
640 |
+ |
256 Pentane Molecules]{Snapshot from simulation of two Banana shaped |
641 |
+ |
molecules and 256 pentane molecules.} \label{langevin:twoBanana} |
642 |
+ |
\end{figure} |
643 |
+ |
|
644 |
|
\section{Conclusions} |