ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/tengDissertation/Langevin.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/tengDissertation/Langevin.tex (file contents):
Revision 2945 by tim, Tue Jul 18 14:19:49 2006 UTC vs.
Revision 2949 by tim, Tue Jul 18 15:23:09 2006 UTC

# Line 576 | Line 576 | where the units for translational, translation-rotatio
576   0.2057&0&0&0&3.219&10.7373\\
577   \end{array}} \right).
578   \]
579 < where the units for translational, translation-rotation coupling and
580 < rotational tensors are $\frac{kcal \cdot fs}{mol \cdot \rm{\AA}^2}$,
581 < $\frac{kcal \cdot fs}{mol \cdot \rm{\AA} \cdot rad}$ and $\frac{kcal
582 < \cdot fs}{mol \cdot rad^2}$ respectively. Curves of the velocity
583 < auto-correlation functions in Fig.~\ref{langevin:vacf} were shown to
584 < match each other very well. However, because of the stochastic
585 < nature, simulation using Langevin dynamics was shown to decay
586 < slightly faster than MD. In order to study the rotational motion of
587 < the molecules, we also calculated the auto-correlation function of
588 < the principle axis of the second GB particle, $u$. The discrepancy
589 < shown in Fig.~\ref{langevin:uacf} was probably due to the reason
590 < that we used the experimental viscosity directly instead of
591 < calculating bulk viscosity from simulation.
579 > where the units for translational, translation-rotation coupling and rotational tensors are $\frac{kcal \cdot fs}{mol \cdot \rm{\AA}^2}$, $\frac{kcal \cdot fs}{mol \cdot \rm{\AA} \cdot rad}$ and $\frac{kcal \cdot fs}{mol \cdot rad^2}$ respectively.
580 > Curves of the velocity auto-correlation functions in
581 > Fig.~\ref{langevin:vacf} were shown to match each other very well.
582 > However, because of the stochastic nature, simulation using Langevin
583 > dynamics was shown to decay slightly faster than MD. In order to
584 > study the rotational motion of the molecules, we also calculated the
585 > auto-correlation function of the principle axis of the second GB
586 > particle, $u$. The discrepancy shown in Fig.~\ref{langevin:uacf} was
587 > probably due to the reason that we used the experimental viscosity directly instead of calculating bulk viscosity from simulation.
588  
589   \begin{figure}
590   \centering

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines