28 |
|
between the native and denatured states. Because of its stability |
29 |
|
against noise, Langevin dynamics is very suitable for studying |
30 |
|
remagnetization processes in various |
31 |
< |
systems\cite{Garcia-Palacios1998,Berkov2002,Denisov2003}. For |
32 |
< |
instance, the oscillation power spectrum of nanoparticles from |
33 |
< |
Langevin dynamics simulation has the same peak frequencies for |
34 |
< |
different wave vectors,which recovers the property of magnetic |
35 |
< |
excitations in small finite structures\cite{Berkov2005a}. In an |
36 |
< |
attempt to reduce the computational cost of simulation, multiple |
37 |
< |
time stepping (MTS) methods have been introduced and have been of |
38 |
< |
great interest to macromolecule and protein |
39 |
< |
community\cite{Tuckerman1992}. Relying on the observation that |
40 |
< |
forces between distant atoms generally demonstrate slower |
41 |
< |
fluctuations than forces between close atoms, MTS method are |
42 |
< |
generally implemented by evaluating the slowly fluctuating forces |
43 |
< |
less frequently than the fast ones. Unfortunately, nonlinear |
44 |
< |
instability resulting from increasing timestep in MTS simulation |
45 |
< |
have became a critical obstruction preventing the long time |
46 |
< |
simulation. Due to the coupling to the heat bath, Langevin dynamics |
47 |
< |
has been shown to be able to damp out the resonance artifact more |
48 |
< |
efficiently\cite{Sandu1999}. |
31 |
> |
systems\cite{Palacios1998,Berkov2002,Denisov2003}. For instance, the |
32 |
> |
oscillation power spectrum of nanoparticles from Langevin dynamics |
33 |
> |
simulation has the same peak frequencies for different wave |
34 |
> |
vectors,which recovers the property of magnetic excitations in small |
35 |
> |
finite structures\cite{Berkov2005a}. In an attempt to reduce the |
36 |
> |
computational cost of simulation, multiple time stepping (MTS) |
37 |
> |
methods have been introduced and have been of great interest to |
38 |
> |
macromolecule and protein community\cite{Tuckerman1992}. Relying on |
39 |
> |
the observation that forces between distant atoms generally |
40 |
> |
demonstrate slower fluctuations than forces between close atoms, MTS |
41 |
> |
method are generally implemented by evaluating the slowly |
42 |
> |
fluctuating forces less frequently than the fast ones. |
43 |
> |
Unfortunately, nonlinear instability resulting from increasing |
44 |
> |
timestep in MTS simulation have became a critical obstruction |
45 |
> |
preventing the long time simulation. Due to the coupling to the heat |
46 |
> |
bath, Langevin dynamics has been shown to be able to damp out the |
47 |
> |
resonance artifact more efficiently\cite{Sandu1999}. |
48 |
|
|
49 |
|
%review langevin/browninan dynamics for arbitrarily shaped rigid body |
50 |
|
Combining Langevin or Brownian dynamics with rigid body dynamics, |
171 |
|
due to the complexity of the elliptic integral, only the ellipsoid |
172 |
|
with the restriction of two axes having to be equal, \textit{i.e.} |
173 |
|
prolate($ a \ge b = c$) and oblate ($ a < b = c $), can be solved |
174 |
< |
exactly. Introducing an elliptic integral parameter $S$ for prolate, |
174 |
> |
exactly. Introducing an elliptic integral parameter $S$ for prolate |
175 |
> |
: |
176 |
|
\[ |
177 |
|
S = \frac{2}{{\sqrt {a^2 - b^2 } }}\ln \frac{{a + \sqrt {a^2 - b^2 |
178 |
|
} }}{b}, |
179 |
|
\] |
180 |
< |
and oblate, |
180 |
> |
and oblate : |
181 |
|
\[ |
182 |
|
S = \frac{2}{{\sqrt {b^2 - a^2 } }}arctg\frac{{\sqrt {b^2 - a^2 } |
183 |
|
}}{a} |
186 |
|
tensors |
187 |
|
\[ |
188 |
|
\begin{array}{l} |
189 |
< |
\Xi _a^{tt} = 16\pi \eta \frac{{a^2 - b^2 }}{{(2a^2 - b^2 )S - 2a}} \\ |
190 |
< |
\Xi _b^{tt} = \Xi _c^{tt} = 32\pi \eta \frac{{a^2 - b^2 }}{{(2a^2 - 3b^2 )S + 2a}} \\ |
191 |
< |
\end{array}, |
189 |
> |
\Xi _a^{tt} = 16\pi \eta \frac{{a^2 - b^2 }}{{(2a^2 - b^2 )S - 2a}}. \\ |
190 |
> |
\Xi _b^{tt} = \Xi _c^{tt} = 32\pi \eta \frac{{a^2 - b^2 }}{{(2a^2 - 3b^2 )S + |
191 |
> |
2a}}, |
192 |
> |
\end{array} |
193 |
|
\] |
194 |
|
and |
195 |
|
\[ |
196 |
|
\begin{array}{l} |
197 |
< |
\Xi _a^{rr} = \frac{{32\pi }}{3}\eta \frac{{(a^2 - b^2 )b^2 }}{{2a - b^2 S}} \\ |
197 |
> |
\Xi _a^{rr} = \frac{{32\pi }}{3}\eta \frac{{(a^2 - b^2 )b^2 }}{{2a - b^2 S}}, \\ |
198 |
|
\Xi _b^{rr} = \Xi _c^{rr} = \frac{{32\pi }}{3}\eta \frac{{(a^4 - b^4 )}}{{(2a^2 - b^2 )S - 2a}} \\ |
199 |
|
\end{array}. |
200 |
|
\] |
585 |
|
the systems absent of explicit solvents, we carried out two sets of |
586 |
|
simulations and compare their dynamic properties. |
587 |
|
|
588 |
< |
\subsubsection{Simulations Contain One Banana Shaped Molecule} |
589 |
< |
|
589 |
< |
Fig.~\ref{langevin:oneBanana} shows a snapshot of the simulation |
590 |
< |
made of 256 pentane molecules and one banana shaped molecule at |
588 |
> |
Fig.~\ref{langevin:twoBanana} shows a snapshot of the simulation |
589 |
> |
made of 256 pentane molecules and two banana shaped molecules at |
590 |
|
273~K. It has an equivalent implicit solvent system containing only |
591 |
< |
one banana shaped molecule with viscosity of 0.289 center poise. To |
591 |
> |
two banana shaped molecules with viscosity of 0.289 center poise. To |
592 |
|
calculate the hydrodynamic properties of the banana shaped molecule, |
593 |
|
we create a rough shell model (see Fig.~\ref{langevin:roughShell}), |
594 |
|
in which the banana shaped molecule is represented as a ``shell'' |
608 |
|
\end{array}} \right). |
609 |
|
\] |
610 |
|
|
611 |
+ |
|
612 |
+ |
|
613 |
|
\begin{figure} |
614 |
|
\centering |
615 |
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{roughShell.eps} |
617 |
|
model for banana shaped molecule.} \label{langevin:roughShell} |
618 |
|
\end{figure} |
619 |
|
|
620 |
< |
%\begin{figure} |
621 |
< |
%\centering |
622 |
< |
%\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{oneBanana.eps} |
623 |
< |
%\caption[Snapshot from Simulation of One Banana Shaped Molecules and |
624 |
< |
%256 Pentane Molecules]{Snapshot from simulation of one Banana shaped |
625 |
< |
%molecules and 256 pentane molecules.} \label{langevin:oneBanana} |
626 |
< |
%\end{figure} |
620 |
> |
\begin{figure} |
621 |
> |
\centering |
622 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{twoBanana.eps} |
623 |
> |
\caption[Snapshot from Simulation of Two Banana Shaped Molecules and |
624 |
> |
256 Pentane Molecules]{Snapshot from simulation of two Banana shaped |
625 |
> |
molecules and 256 pentane molecules.} \label{langevin:twoBanana} |
626 |
> |
\end{figure} |
627 |
|
|
628 |
< |
\subsubsection{Simulations Contain Two Banana Shaped Molecules} |
628 |
> |
\begin{figure} |
629 |
> |
\centering |
630 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{vacf.eps} |
631 |
> |
\caption[Plots of Velocity Auto-correlation functions]{Velocity |
632 |
> |
Auto-correlation function of NVE (blue) and Langevin dynamics |
633 |
> |
(red).} \label{langevin:twoBanana} |
634 |
> |
\end{figure} |
635 |
|
|
636 |
|
\begin{figure} |
637 |
|
\centering |
638 |
< |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{twoBanana.eps} |
638 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{uacf.eps} |
639 |
|
\caption[Snapshot from Simulation of Two Banana Shaped Molecules and |
640 |
|
256 Pentane Molecules]{Snapshot from simulation of two Banana shaped |
641 |
|
molecules and 256 pentane molecules.} \label{langevin:twoBanana} |