ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/tengDissertation/Langevin.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/tengDissertation/Langevin.tex (file contents):
Revision 2886 by tim, Sun Jun 25 18:46:09 2006 UTC vs.
Revision 2887 by tim, Sun Jun 25 19:43:39 2006 UTC

# Line 28 | Line 28 | systems\cite{Garcia-Palacios1998,Berkov2002,Denisov200
28   between the native and denatured states. Because of its stability
29   against noise, Langevin dynamics is very suitable for studying
30   remagnetization processes in various
31 < systems\cite{Garcia-Palacios1998,Berkov2002,Denisov2003}. For
32 < instance, the oscillation power spectrum of nanoparticles from
33 < Langevin dynamics simulation has the same peak frequencies for
34 < different wave vectors,which recovers the property of magnetic
35 < excitations in small finite structures\cite{Berkov2005a}. In an
36 < attempt to reduce the computational cost of simulation, multiple
37 < time stepping (MTS) methods have been introduced and have been of
38 < great interest to macromolecule and protein
39 < community\cite{Tuckerman1992}. Relying on the observation that
40 < forces between distant atoms generally demonstrate slower
41 < fluctuations than forces between close atoms, MTS method are
42 < generally implemented by evaluating the slowly fluctuating forces
43 < less frequently than the fast ones. Unfortunately, nonlinear
44 < instability resulting from increasing timestep in MTS simulation
45 < have became a critical obstruction preventing the long time
46 < simulation. Due to the coupling to the heat bath, Langevin dynamics
47 < has been shown to be able to damp out the resonance artifact more
48 < efficiently\cite{Sandu1999}.
31 > systems\cite{Palacios1998,Berkov2002,Denisov2003}. For instance, the
32 > oscillation power spectrum of nanoparticles from Langevin dynamics
33 > simulation has the same peak frequencies for different wave
34 > vectors,which recovers the property of magnetic excitations in small
35 > finite structures\cite{Berkov2005a}. In an attempt to reduce the
36 > computational cost of simulation, multiple time stepping (MTS)
37 > methods have been introduced and have been of great interest to
38 > macromolecule and protein community\cite{Tuckerman1992}. Relying on
39 > the observation that forces between distant atoms generally
40 > demonstrate slower fluctuations than forces between close atoms, MTS
41 > method are generally implemented by evaluating the slowly
42 > fluctuating forces less frequently than the fast ones.
43 > Unfortunately, nonlinear instability resulting from increasing
44 > timestep in MTS simulation have became a critical obstruction
45 > preventing the long time simulation. Due to the coupling to the heat
46 > bath, Langevin dynamics has been shown to be able to damp out the
47 > resonance artifact more efficiently\cite{Sandu1999}.
48  
49   %review langevin/browninan dynamics for arbitrarily shaped rigid body
50   Combining Langevin or Brownian dynamics with rigid body dynamics,
# Line 172 | Line 171 | exactly. Introducing an elliptic integral parameter $S
171   due to the complexity of the elliptic integral, only the ellipsoid
172   with the restriction of two axes having to be equal, \textit{i.e.}
173   prolate($ a \ge b = c$) and oblate ($ a < b = c $), can be solved
174 < exactly. Introducing an elliptic integral parameter $S$ for prolate,
174 > exactly. Introducing an elliptic integral parameter $S$ for prolate
175 > :
176   \[
177   S = \frac{2}{{\sqrt {a^2  - b^2 } }}\ln \frac{{a + \sqrt {a^2  - b^2
178   } }}{b},
179   \]
180 < and oblate,
180 > and oblate :
181   \[
182   S = \frac{2}{{\sqrt {b^2  - a^2 } }}arctg\frac{{\sqrt {b^2  - a^2 }
183   }}{a}
# Line 186 | Line 186 | tensors
186   tensors
187   \[
188   \begin{array}{l}
189 < \Xi _a^{tt}  = 16\pi \eta \frac{{a^2  - b^2 }}{{(2a^2  - b^2 )S - 2a}} \\
190 < \Xi _b^{tt}  = \Xi _c^{tt}  = 32\pi \eta \frac{{a^2  - b^2 }}{{(2a^2  - 3b^2 )S + 2a}} \\
191 < \end{array},
189 > \Xi _a^{tt}  = 16\pi \eta \frac{{a^2  - b^2 }}{{(2a^2  - b^2 )S - 2a}}. \\
190 > \Xi _b^{tt}  = \Xi _c^{tt}  = 32\pi \eta \frac{{a^2  - b^2 }}{{(2a^2  - 3b^2 )S +
191 > 2a}},
192 > \end{array}
193   \]
194   and
195   \[
196   \begin{array}{l}
197 < \Xi _a^{rr}  = \frac{{32\pi }}{3}\eta \frac{{(a^2  - b^2 )b^2 }}{{2a - b^2 S}} \\
197 > \Xi _a^{rr}  = \frac{{32\pi }}{3}\eta \frac{{(a^2  - b^2 )b^2 }}{{2a - b^2 S}}, \\
198   \Xi _b^{rr}  = \Xi _c^{rr}  = \frac{{32\pi }}{3}\eta \frac{{(a^4  - b^4 )}}{{(2a^2  - b^2 )S - 2a}} \\
199   \end{array}.
200   \]
# Line 584 | Line 585 | simulations and compare their dynamic properties.
585   the systems absent of explicit solvents, we carried out two sets of
586   simulations and compare their dynamic properties.
587  
588 < \subsubsection{Simulations Contain One Banana Shaped Molecule}
589 <
589 < Fig.~\ref{langevin:oneBanana} shows a snapshot of the simulation
590 < made of 256 pentane molecules and one banana shaped molecule at
588 > Fig.~\ref{langevin:twoBanana} shows a snapshot of the simulation
589 > made of 256 pentane molecules and two banana shaped molecules at
590   273~K. It has an equivalent implicit solvent system containing only
591 < one banana shaped molecule with viscosity of 0.289 center poise. To
591 > two banana shaped molecules with viscosity of 0.289 center poise. To
592   calculate the hydrodynamic properties of the banana shaped molecule,
593   we create a rough shell model (see Fig.~\ref{langevin:roughShell}),
594   in which the banana shaped molecule is represented as a ``shell''
# Line 609 | Line 608 | -6.561e-16&-0.007063&0.7494&0.2057&4.846e-14&1.5036e-1
608   \end{array}} \right).
609   \]
610  
611 +
612 +
613   \begin{figure}
614   \centering
615   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{roughShell.eps}
# Line 616 | Line 617 | model for banana shaped molecule.} \label{langevin:rou
617   model for banana shaped molecule.} \label{langevin:roughShell}
618   \end{figure}
619  
620 < %\begin{figure}
621 < %\centering
622 < %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{oneBanana.eps}
623 < %\caption[Snapshot from Simulation of One Banana Shaped Molecules and
624 < %256 Pentane Molecules]{Snapshot from simulation of one Banana shaped
625 < %molecules and 256 pentane molecules.} \label{langevin:oneBanana}
626 < %\end{figure}
620 > \begin{figure}
621 > \centering
622 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{twoBanana.eps}
623 > \caption[Snapshot from Simulation of Two Banana Shaped Molecules and
624 > 256 Pentane Molecules]{Snapshot from simulation of two Banana shaped
625 > molecules and 256 pentane molecules.} \label{langevin:twoBanana}
626 > \end{figure}
627  
628 < \subsubsection{Simulations Contain Two Banana Shaped Molecules}
628 > \begin{figure}
629 > \centering
630 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{vacf.eps}
631 > \caption[Plots of Velocity Auto-correlation functions]{Velocity
632 > Auto-correlation function of NVE (blue) and Langevin dynamics
633 > (red).} \label{langevin:twoBanana}
634 > \end{figure}
635  
636   \begin{figure}
637   \centering
638 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{twoBanana.eps}
638 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{uacf.eps}
639   \caption[Snapshot from Simulation of Two Banana Shaped Molecules and
640   256 Pentane Molecules]{Snapshot from simulation of two Banana shaped
641   molecules and 256 pentane molecules.} \label{langevin:twoBanana}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines