11 |
|
small number of water molecules are strongly held around the |
12 |
|
different parts of the headgroup and are oriented by them with |
13 |
|
residence times for the first hydration shell being around 0.5 - 1 |
14 |
< |
ns. In the second solvation shell, some water molecules are weakly |
15 |
< |
bound, but are still essential for determining the properties of the |
16 |
< |
system. Transport of various molecular species into living cells is |
17 |
< |
one of the major functions of membranes. A thorough understanding of |
18 |
< |
the underlying molecular mechanism for solute diffusion is crucial |
19 |
< |
to the further studies of other related biological processes. All |
20 |
< |
transport across cell membranes takes place by one of two |
21 |
< |
fundamental processes: Passive transport is driven by bulk or |
22 |
< |
inter-diffusion of the molecules being transported or by membrane |
23 |
< |
pores which facilitate crossing. Active transport depends upon the |
24 |
< |
expenditure of cellular energy in the form of ATP hydrolysis. As the |
25 |
< |
central processes of membrane assembly, translocation of |
26 |
< |
phospholipids across membrane bilayers requires the hydrophilic head |
27 |
< |
of the phospholipid to pass through the highly hydrophobic interior |
28 |
< |
of the membrane, and for the hydrophobic tails to be exposed to the |
29 |
< |
aqueous environment. A number of studies indicate that the flipping |
30 |
< |
of phospholipids occurs rapidly in the eukaryotic ER and the |
31 |
< |
bacterial cytoplasmic membrane via a bi-directional, facilitated |
32 |
< |
diffusion process requiring no metabolic energy input. Another |
33 |
< |
system of interest would be the distribution of sites occupied by |
34 |
< |
inhaled anesthetics in membrane. Although the physiological effects |
35 |
< |
of anesthetics have been extensively studied, the controversy over |
14 |
> |
ns\cite{Ho1992}. In the second solvation shell, some water molecules |
15 |
> |
are weakly bound, but are still essential for determining the |
16 |
> |
properties of the system. Transport of various molecular species |
17 |
> |
into living cells is one of the major functions of membranes. A |
18 |
> |
thorough understanding of the underlying molecular mechanism for |
19 |
> |
solute diffusion is crucial to the further studies of other related |
20 |
> |
biological processes. All transport across cell membranes takes |
21 |
> |
place by one of two fundamental processes: Passive transport is |
22 |
> |
driven by bulk or inter-diffusion of the molecules being transported |
23 |
> |
or by membrane pores which facilitate crossing. Active transport |
24 |
> |
depends upon the expenditure of cellular energy in the form of ATP |
25 |
> |
hydrolysis. As the central processes of membrane assembly, |
26 |
> |
translocation of phospholipids across membrane bilayers requires the |
27 |
> |
hydrophilic head of the phospholipid to pass through the highly |
28 |
> |
hydrophobic interior of the membrane, and for the hydrophobic tails |
29 |
> |
to be exposed to the aqueous environment\cite{Sasaki2004}. A number |
30 |
> |
of studies indicate that the flipping of phospholipids occurs |
31 |
> |
rapidly in the eukaryotic endoplasmic reticulum and the bacterial |
32 |
> |
cytoplasmic membrane via a bi-directional, facilitated diffusion |
33 |
> |
process requiring no metabolic energy input. Another system of |
34 |
> |
interest is the distribution of sites occupied by inhaled |
35 |
> |
anesthetics in membrane. Although the physiological effects of |
36 |
> |
anesthetics have been extensively studied, the controversy over |
37 |
|
their effects on lipid bilayers still continues. Recent deuterium |
38 |
< |
NMR measurements on halothane in POPC lipid bilayers suggest the |
39 |
< |
anesthetics are primarily located at the hydrocarbon chain region. |
40 |
< |
Infrared spectroscopy experiments suggest that halothane in DMPC |
41 |
< |
lipid bilayers lives near the membrane/water interface. |
38 |
> |
NMR measurements on halothane on POPC lipid bilayers suggest the |
39 |
> |
anesthetics are primarily located at the hydrocarbon chain |
40 |
> |
region\cite{Baber1995}. However, infrared spectroscopy experiments |
41 |
> |
suggest that halothane in DMPC lipid bilayers lives near the |
42 |
> |
membrane/water interface\cite{Lieb1982}. |
43 |
|
|
44 |
|
Molecular dynamics simulations have proven to be a powerful tool for |
45 |
|
studying the functions of biological systems, providing structural, |
48 |
|
the range of current simulation technologies. Several schemes are |
49 |
|
proposed in this chapter to overcome these difficulties. |
50 |
|
|
51 |
< |
\section{\label{lipidSection:model}Model} |
51 |
> |
\section{\label{lipidSection:model}Model and Methodology} |
52 |
|
|
53 |
|
\subsection{\label{lipidSection:SSD}The Soft Sticky Dipole Water Model} |
54 |
|
|
55 |
|
In a typical bilayer simulation, the dominant portion of the |
56 |
|
computation time will be spent calculating water-water interactions. |
57 |
|
As an efficient solvent model, the Soft Sticky Dipole (SSD) water |
58 |
< |
model is used as the explicit solvent in this project. Unlike other |
59 |
< |
water models which have partial charges distributed throughout the |
60 |
< |
whole molecule, the SSD water model consists of a single site which |
61 |
< |
is a Lennard-Jones interaction site, as well as a point dipole. A |
62 |
< |
tetrahedral potential is added to correct for hydrogen bonding. The |
63 |
< |
following equation describes the interaction between two water |
64 |
< |
molecules: |
65 |
< |
\[ |
58 |
> |
model\cite{Chandra1999,Fennell2004} is used as the explicit solvent |
59 |
> |
in this project. Unlike other water models which have partial |
60 |
> |
charges distributed throughout the whole molecule, the SSD water |
61 |
> |
model consists of a single site which is a Lennard-Jones interaction |
62 |
> |
site, as well as a point dipole. A tetrahedral potential is added to |
63 |
> |
correct for hydrogen bonding. The following equation describes the |
64 |
> |
interaction between two water molecules: |
65 |
> |
\begin{equation} |
66 |
|
V_{SSD} = V_{LJ} (r_{ij} ) + V_{dp} (r_{ij} ,\Omega _i ,\Omega _j ) |
67 |
|
+ V_{sticky} (r_{ij} ,\Omega _i ,\Omega _j ) |
68 |
< |
\] |
69 |
< |
where $r_{ij}$ is the vector between molecule $i$ and molecule $j$, |
68 |
> |
\label{lipidSection:ssdEquation} |
69 |
> |
\end{equation} |
70 |
> |
where$r_{ij}$ is the vector between molecule $i$ and molecule $j$, |
71 |
|
$\Omega _i$ and $\Omega _j$ are the orientational degrees of freedom |
72 |
< |
for molecule $i$ and molecule $j$ respectively. |
73 |
< |
\[ |
74 |
< |
V_{LJ} (r_{ij} ) = 4\varepsilon _{ij} \left[ {\left( {\frac{{\sigma |
75 |
< |
_{ij} }}{{r_{ij} }}} \right)^{12} - \left( {\frac{{\sigma _{ij} |
76 |
< |
}}{{r_{ij} }}} \right)^6 } \right] |
77 |
< |
\] |
78 |
< |
\[ |
79 |
< |
V_{dp} (r_{ij} ,\Omega _i ,\Omega _j ) = \frac{1}{{4\pi \varepsilon |
80 |
< |
_0 }}\left[ {\frac{{\mu _i \cdot \mu _j }}{{r_{ij}^3 }} - |
81 |
< |
\frac{{3\left( {\mu _i \cdot r_{ij} } \right)\left( {\mu _i \cdot |
82 |
< |
r_{ij} } \right)}}{{r_{ij}^5 }}} \right] |
83 |
< |
\] |
84 |
< |
\[ |
85 |
< |
V_{sticky} (r_{ij} ,\Omega _i ,\Omega _j ) = v_0 [s(r_{ij} )w(r_{ij} |
86 |
< |
,\Omega _i ,\Omega _j ) + s'(r_{ij} )w'(r_{ij} ,\Omega _i ,\Omega _j |
84 |
< |
)] |
85 |
< |
\] |
72 |
> |
for molecule $i$ and molecule $j$ respectively. The potential terms |
73 |
> |
in Eq.~\ref{lipidSection:ssdEquation} are given by : |
74 |
> |
\begin{eqnarray} |
75 |
> |
V_{LJ} (r_{ij} ) &= &4\varepsilon _{ij} \left[ {\left( |
76 |
> |
{\frac{{\sigma _{ij} }}{{r_{ij} }}} \right)^{12} - \left( |
77 |
> |
{\frac{{\sigma _{ij} |
78 |
> |
}}{{r_{ij} }}} \right)^6 } \right], \\ |
79 |
> |
V_{dp} (r_{ij} ,\Omega _i ,\Omega _j ) &= & |
80 |
> |
\frac{|\mu_i||\mu_j|}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}r_{ij}^{3}} \biggl[ |
81 |
> |
\hat{u}_{i} \cdot \hat{u}_{j} - 3(\hat{u}_i \cdot \hat{\mathbf{r}}_{ij}) % |
82 |
> |
(\hat{u}_j \cdot \hat{\mathbf{r}}_{ij}) \biggr],\\ |
83 |
> |
V_{sticky} (r_{ij} ,\Omega _i ,\Omega _j ) &=& v_0 [s(r_{ij} |
84 |
> |
)w(r_{ij} ,\Omega _i ,\Omega _j ) + s'(r_{ij} )w'(r_{ij} ,\Omega _i |
85 |
> |
,\Omega _j )] |
86 |
> |
\end{eqnarray} |
87 |
|
where $v_0$ is a strength parameter, $s$ and $s'$ are cubic |
88 |
< |
switching functions, while $w$ and $w'$ are responsible for the |
88 |
> |
switching functions, while $w$ and $w'$ are responsible for the |
89 |
|
tetrahedral potential and the short-range correction to the dipolar |
90 |
< |
interaction respectively. |
91 |
< |
\[ |
92 |
< |
\begin{array}{l} |
93 |
< |
w(r_{ij} ,\Omega _i ,\Omega _j ) = \sin \theta _{ij} \sin 2\theta _{ij} \cos 2\phi _{ij} \\ |
94 |
< |
w'(r_{ij} ,\Omega _i ,\Omega _j ) = (\cos \theta _{ij} - 0.6)^2 (\cos \theta _{ij} + 0.8)^2 - w_0 \\ |
95 |
< |
\end{array} |
96 |
< |
\] |
97 |
< |
Although dipole-dipole and sticky interactions are more |
90 |
> |
interaction respectively: |
91 |
> |
\begin{eqnarray} |
92 |
> |
w(r_{ij} ,\Omega _i ,\Omega _j )& = &\sin \theta _{ij} \sin 2\theta _{ij} \cos 2\phi _{ij}, \\ |
93 |
> |
w'(r_{ij} ,\Omega _i ,\Omega _j )& = &(\cos \theta _{ij} - 0.6)^2 (\cos \theta _{ij} + 0.8)^2 - |
94 |
> |
w_0. |
95 |
> |
\end{eqnarray} |
96 |
> |
Here $\theta _{ij}$ and $\phi _{ij}$ are the spherical polar angles |
97 |
> |
representing relative orientations between molecule $i$ and molecule |
98 |
> |
$j$. Although the dipole-dipole and sticky interactions are more |
99 |
|
mathematically complicated than Coulomb interactions, the number of |
100 |
|
pair interactions is reduced dramatically both because the model |
101 |
|
only contains a single-point as well as "short range" nature of the |
102 |
< |
higher order interaction. |
102 |
> |
more expensive interaction. |
103 |
|
|
104 |
|
\subsection{\label{lipidSection:coarseGrained}The Coarse-Grained Phospholipid Model} |
105 |
|
|
106 |
< |
Figure 1 shows a schematic for our coarse-grained phospholipid |
107 |
< |
model. The lipid head group is modeled by a linear rigid body which |
108 |
< |
consists of three Lennard-Jones spheres and a centrally located |
109 |
< |
point-dipole. The backbone atoms in the glycerol motif are modeled |
110 |
< |
by Lennard-Jones spheres with dipoles. Alkyl groups in hydrocarbon |
111 |
< |
chains are replaced with unified CH2 or CH3 atoms. |
106 |
> |
Fig.~\ref{lipidFigure:coarseGrained} shows a schematic for our |
107 |
> |
coarse-grained phospholipid model. The lipid head group is modeled |
108 |
> |
by a linear rigid body which consists of three Lennard-Jones spheres |
109 |
> |
and a centrally located point-dipole. The backbone atoms in the |
110 |
> |
glycerol motif are modeled by Lennard-Jones spheres with dipoles. |
111 |
> |
Alkyl groups in hydrocarbon chains are replaced with unified |
112 |
> |
$\text{{\sc CH}}_2$ or $\text{{\sc CH}}_3$ atoms. |
113 |
|
|
114 |
+ |
\begin{figure} |
115 |
+ |
\centering |
116 |
+ |
\includegraphics[width=3in]{coarse_grained.eps} |
117 |
+ |
\caption[A representation of coarse-grained phospholipid model]{A |
118 |
+ |
representation of coarse-grained phospholipid model. The lipid |
119 |
+ |
headgroup consists of $\text{{\sc PO}}_4$ group (yellow), |
120 |
+ |
$\text{{\sc NC}}_4$ group (blue) and a united C atom (gray) with a |
121 |
+ |
dipole, while the glycerol backbone includes dipolar $\text{{\sc |
122 |
+ |
CE}}$ (red) and $\text{{\sc CK}}$ (pink) groups. Alkyl groups in |
123 |
+ |
hydrocarbon chains are simply represented by gray united atoms.} |
124 |
+ |
\label{lipidFigure:coarseGrained} |
125 |
+ |
\end{figure} |
126 |
+ |
|
127 |
|
Accurate and efficient computation of electrostatics is one of the |
128 |
|
most difficult tasks in molecular modeling. Traditionally, the |
129 |
|
electrostatic interaction between two molecular species is |
135 |
|
\] |
136 |
|
where $N_A$ and $N_B$ are the number of point charges in the two |
137 |
|
molecular species. Originally developed to study ionic crystals, the |
138 |
< |
Ewald summation method mathematically transforms this |
139 |
< |
straightforward but conditionally convergent summation into two more |
140 |
< |
complicated but rapidly convergent sums. One summation is carried |
141 |
< |
out in reciprocal space while the other is carried out in real |
142 |
< |
space. An alternative approach is a multipole expansion, which is |
143 |
< |
based on electrostatic moments, such as charge (monopole), dipole, |
128 |
< |
quadruple etc. |
138 |
> |
Ewald sum method mathematically transforms this straightforward but |
139 |
> |
conditionally convergent summation into two more complicated but |
140 |
> |
rapidly convergent sums. One summation is carried out in reciprocal |
141 |
> |
space while the other is carried out in real space. An alternative |
142 |
> |
approach is the multipole expansion, which is based on electrostatic |
143 |
> |
moments, such as charge (monopole), dipole, quadrupole etc. |
144 |
|
|
145 |
|
Here we consider a linear molecule which consists of two point |
146 |
|
charges $\pm q$ located at $ ( \pm \frac{d}{2},0)$. The |
153 |
|
\theta } }}} \right) |
154 |
|
\] |
155 |
|
|
156 |
+ |
\begin{figure} |
157 |
+ |
\centering |
158 |
+ |
\includegraphics[width=3in]{charge_dipole.eps} |
159 |
+ |
\caption[An illustration of split-dipole |
160 |
+ |
approximation]{Electrostatic potential due to a linear molecule |
161 |
+ |
comprising two point charges with opposite charges. } |
162 |
+ |
\label{lipidFigure:chargeDipole} |
163 |
+ |
\end{figure} |
164 |
+ |
|
165 |
|
The basic assumption of the multipole expansion is $r \gg d$ , thus, |
166 |
|
$\frac{{d^2 }}{4}$ inside the square root of the denominator is |
167 |
|
neglected. This is a reasonable approximation in most cases. |
168 |
|
Unfortunately, in our headgroup model, the distance of charge |
169 |
< |
separation $d$ (4.63 $\AA$ in PC headgroup) may be comparable to |
170 |
< |
$r$. Nevertheless, we could still assume $ \cos \theta \approx 0$ |
171 |
< |
in the central region of the headgroup. Using Taylor expansion and |
169 |
> |
separation $d$ (4.63 \AA in PC headgroup) may be comparable to $r$. |
170 |
> |
Nevertheless, we could still assume $ \cos \theta \approx 0$ in |
171 |
> |
the central region of the headgroup. Using Taylor expansion and |
172 |
|
associating appropriate terms with electric moments will result in a |
173 |
|
"split-dipole" approximation: |
174 |
|
\[ |
186 |
|
\] |
187 |
|
where $\mu _i$ and $\mu _j$ are the dipole moment of molecule $i$ |
188 |
|
and molecule $j$ respectively, $r_{ij}$ is vector between molecule |
189 |
< |
$i$ and molecule $j$, and $R_{ij{$ is given by, |
189 |
> |
$i$ and molecule $j$, and $R_{ij}$ is given by, |
190 |
|
\[ |
191 |
|
R_{ij} = \sqrt {r_{ij}^2 + \frac{{d_i^2 }}{4} + \frac{{d_j^2 |
192 |
|
}}{4}} |
195 |
|
and respectively. This approximation to the multipole expansion |
196 |
|
maintains the fast fall-off of the multipole potentials but lacks |
197 |
|
the normal divergences when two polar groups get close to one |
198 |
< |
another. |
199 |
< |
|
198 |
> |
another. The comparision between different electrostatic |
199 |
> |
approximation is shown in \ref{lipidFigure:splitDipole}. Due to the |
200 |
> |
divergence at the central region of the headgroup introduced by |
201 |
> |
dipole-dipole approximation, we discover that water molecules are |
202 |
> |
locked into the central region in the simulation. This artifact can |
203 |
> |
be corrected using split-dipole approximation or other accurate |
204 |
> |
methods. |
205 |
|
\begin{figure} |
206 |
|
\centering |
207 |
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{split_dipole.eps} |
208 |
< |
\caption[Comparison between electrostatic approximation]{Electron |
209 |
< |
density profile along the bilayer normal.} |
210 |
< |
\label{lipidFigure:splitDipole} |
208 |
> |
\caption[Comparison between electrostatic |
209 |
> |
approximation]{Electrostatic potential map for two pairs of charges |
210 |
> |
with different alignments: (a) illustration of different alignments; |
211 |
> |
(b) charge-charge interaction; (c) dipole-dipole approximation; (d) |
212 |
> |
split-dipole approximation.} \label{lipidFigure:splitDipole} |
213 |
|
\end{figure} |
214 |
|
|
215 |
|
%\section{\label{lipidSection:methods}Methods} |
218 |
|
|
219 |
|
\subsection{One Lipid in Sea of Water Molecules} |
220 |
|
|
221 |
< |
To exclude the inter-headgroup interaction, atomistic models of one |
222 |
< |
lipid (DMPC or DLPE) in sea of water molecules (TIP3P) were built |
223 |
< |
and studied using atomistic molecular dynamics. The simulation was |
224 |
< |
analyzed using a set of radial distribution functions, which give |
225 |
< |
the probability of finding a pair of molecular species a distance |
226 |
< |
apart, relative to the probability expected for a completely random |
227 |
< |
distribution function at the same density. |
221 |
> |
To tune our parameters without the inter-headgroup interactions, |
222 |
> |
atomistic models of one lipid (DMPC or DLPE) in sea of water |
223 |
> |
molecules (TIP3P) were built and studied using atomistic molecular |
224 |
> |
dynamics. The simulation was analyzed using a set of radial |
225 |
> |
distribution functions, which give the probability of finding a pair |
226 |
> |
of molecular species a distance apart, relative to the probability |
227 |
> |
expected for a completely random distribution function at the same |
228 |
> |
density. |
229 |
|
|
230 |
|
\begin{equation} |
231 |
|
g_{AB} (r) = \frac{1}{{\rho _B }}\frac{1}{{N_A }} < \sum\limits_{i |
237 |
|
} \delta (\cos \theta _{ij} - \cos \theta ) > |
238 |
|
\end{equation} |
239 |
|
|
240 |
< |
From figure 4(a), we can identify the first solvation shell (3.5 |
241 |
< |
$\AA$) and the second solvation shell (5.0 $\AA$) from both plots. |
242 |
< |
However, the corresponding orientations are different. In DLPE, |
243 |
< |
water molecules prefer to sit around -NH3 group due to the hydrogen |
244 |
< |
bonding. In contrast, because of the hydrophobic effect of the |
245 |
< |
-N(CH3)3 group, the preferred position of water molecules in DMPC is |
246 |
< |
around the -PO4 Group. When the water molecules are far from the |
247 |
< |
headgroup, the distribution of the two angles should be uniform. The |
248 |
< |
correlation close to center of the headgroup dipole (< 5 $\AA$) in |
249 |
< |
both plots tell us that in the closely-bound region, the dipoles of |
250 |
< |
the water molecules are preferentially anti-aligned with the dipole |
251 |
< |
of headgroup. |
240 |
> |
From Fig.~\ref{lipidFigure:PCFAtom}, we can identify the first |
241 |
> |
solvation shell (3.5 \AA) and the second solvation shell (5.0 \AA) |
242 |
> |
from both plots. However, the corresponding orientations are |
243 |
> |
different. In DLPE, water molecules prefer to sit around $\text{{\sc |
244 |
> |
NH}}_3$ group due to the hydrogen bonding. In contrast, because of |
245 |
> |
the hydrophobic effect of the $ {\rm{N(CH}}_{\rm{3}} |
246 |
> |
{\rm{)}}_{\rm{3}} $ group, the preferred position of water molecules |
247 |
> |
in DMPC is around the $\text{{\sc PO}}_4$ Group. When the water |
248 |
> |
molecules are far from the headgroup, the distribution of the two |
249 |
> |
angles should be uniform. The correlation close to center of the |
250 |
> |
headgroup dipole in both plots tells us that in the closely-bound |
251 |
> |
region, the dipoles of the water molecules are preferentially |
252 |
> |
anti-aligned with the dipole of headgroup. When the water molecules |
253 |
> |
are far from the headgroup, the distribution of the two angles |
254 |
> |
should be uniform. The correlation close to center of the headgroup |
255 |
> |
dipole in both plots tell us that in the closely-bound region, the |
256 |
> |
dipoles of the water molecules are preferentially aligned with the |
257 |
> |
dipole of headgroup. |
258 |
|
|
259 |
|
\begin{figure} |
260 |
|
\centering |
261 |
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{g_atom.eps} |
262 |
< |
\caption[The pair correlation functions for atomistic models]{} |
262 |
> |
\caption[The pair correlation functions for atomistic models]{The |
263 |
> |
pair correlation functions for atomistic models: (a)$g(r,\cos \theta |
264 |
> |
)$ for DMPC; (b) $g(r,\cos \theta )$ for DLPE; (c)$g(r,\cos \omega |
265 |
> |
)$ for DMPC; (d)$g(r,\cos \omega )$ for DLPE; (e)$g(\cos \theta,\cos |
266 |
> |
\omega)$ for DMPC; (f)$g(\cos \theta,\cos \omega)$ for DMLPE.} |
267 |
|
\label{lipidFigure:PCFAtom} |
268 |
|
\end{figure} |
269 |
|
|
282 |
|
\begin{figure} |
283 |
|
\centering |
284 |
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{g_coarse.eps} |
285 |
< |
\caption[The pair correlation functions for coarse-grained models]{} |
285 |
> |
\caption[The pair correlation functions for coarse-grained |
286 |
> |
models]{The pair correlation functions for coarse-grained models: |
287 |
> |
(a)$g(r,\cos \theta )$ for DMPC; (b) $g(r,\cos \theta )$ for DLPE.} |
288 |
|
\label{lipidFigure:PCFCoarse} |
289 |
|
\end{figure} |
290 |
|
|
291 |
|
\begin{figure} |
292 |
|
\centering |
293 |
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{EWD_coarse.eps} |
294 |
< |
\caption[Excess water density of coarse-grained phospholipids]{ } |
295 |
< |
\label{lipidFigure:EWDCoarse} |
294 |
> |
\caption[Excess water density of coarse-grained |
295 |
> |
phospholipids]{Excess water density of coarse-grained |
296 |
> |
phospholipids.} \label{lipidFigure:EWDCoarse} |
297 |
|
\end{figure} |
298 |
|
|
299 |
|
\begin{table} |
304 |
|
\hline |
305 |
|
% after \\: \hline or \cline{col1-col2} \cline{col3-col4} ... |
306 |
|
Atom type & Mass & $\sigma$ & $\epsilon$ & charge & Dipole \\ |
262 |
– |
|
307 |
|
$\text{{\sc CH}}_2$ & 14.03 & 3.95 & 0.0914 & 0 & 0 \\ |
308 |
|
$\text{{\sc CH}}_3$ & 15.04 & 3.75 & 0.195 & 0 & 0 \\ |
309 |
< |
$\text{{\sc CE}}$ & 28.01 & 3.427& 0.294 & 0 & 1.693 |
309 |
> |
$\text{{\sc CE}}$ & 28.01 & 3.427& 0.294 & 0 & 1.693 \\ |
310 |
|
$\text{{\sc CK}}$ & 28.01 & 3.592& 0.311 & 0 & 2.478 \\ |
311 |
|
$\text{{\sc PO}}_4$ & 108.995& 3.9 & 1.88 & -1& 0 \\ |
312 |
|
$\text{{\sc HDP}}$ & 14.03 & 4.0 & 0.13 & 0 & 0 \\ |
320 |
|
\subsection{Bilayer Simulations Using Coarse-grained Model} |
321 |
|
|
322 |
|
A bilayer system consisting of 128 DMPC lipids and 3655 water |
323 |
< |
molecules has been constructed from an atomistic coordinate |
324 |
< |
file.[15] The MD simulation is performed at constant temperature, T |
325 |
< |
= 300K, and constant pressure, p = 1 atm, and consisted of an |
326 |
< |
equilibration period of 2 ns. During the equilibration period, the |
327 |
< |
system was initially simulated at constant volume for 1ns. Once the |
328 |
< |
system was equilibrated at constant volume, the cell dimensions of |
329 |
< |
the system was relaxed by performing under NPT conditions using |
330 |
< |
Nos¨¦-Hoover extended system isothermal-isobaric dynamics. After |
331 |
< |
equilibration, different properties were evaluated over a production |
288 |
< |
run of 5 ns. |
323 |
> |
molecules has been constructed from an atomistic coordinate file. |
324 |
> |
The MD simulation is performed at constant temperature, T = 300K, |
325 |
> |
and constant pressure, p = 1 atm, and consisted of an equilibration |
326 |
> |
period of 2 ns. During the equilibration period, the system was |
327 |
> |
initially simulated at constant volume for 1 ns. Once the system was |
328 |
> |
equilibrated at constant volume, the cell dimensions of the system |
329 |
> |
was relaxed by performing under NPT conditions using Nos\'{e}-Hoover |
330 |
> |
extended system isothermal-isobaric dynamics. After equilibration, |
331 |
> |
different properties were evaluated over a production run of 5 ns. |
332 |
|
|
333 |
|
\begin{figure} |
334 |
|
\centering |
339 |
|
\label{lipidFigure:bilayer} |
340 |
|
\end{figure} |
341 |
|
|
342 |
< |
\subsubsection{Electron Density Profile (EDP)} |
342 |
> |
\subsubsection{\textbf{Electron Density Profile (EDP)}} |
343 |
|
|
344 |
|
Assuming a gaussian distribution of electrons on each atomic center |
345 |
|
with a variance estimated from the size of the van der Waals radius, |
346 |
|
the EDPs which are proportional to the density profiles measured |
347 |
|
along the bilayer normal obtained by x-ray scattering experiment, |
348 |
< |
can be expressed by |
348 |
> |
can be expressed by\cite{Tu1995} |
349 |
|
\begin{equation} |
350 |
|
\rho _{x - ray} (z)dz \propto \sum\limits_{i = 1}^N {\frac{{n_i |
351 |
|
}}{V}\frac{1}{{\sqrt {2\pi \sigma ^2 } }}e^{ - (z - z_i )^2 /2\sigma |
360 |
|
electron density is in the hydrocarbon region. As a good |
361 |
|
approximation to the thickness of the bilayer, the headgroup spacing |
362 |
|
, is defined as the distance between two peaks in the electron |
363 |
< |
density profile, calculated from our simulations to be 34.1 $\AA$. |
363 |
> |
density profile, calculated from our simulations to be 34.1 \AA. |
364 |
|
This value is close to the x-ray diffraction experimental value 34.4 |
365 |
< |
$\AA$. |
365 |
> |
\AA\cite{Petrache1998}. |
366 |
|
|
367 |
|
\begin{figure} |
368 |
|
\centering |
375 |
|
\label{lipidFigure:electronDensity} |
376 |
|
\end{figure} |
377 |
|
|
378 |
< |
\subsubsection{$\text{S}_{\text{{\sc cd}}}$ Order Parameter} |
378 |
> |
\subsubsection{\textbf{$\text{S}_{\text{{\sc cd}}}$ Order Parameter}} |
379 |
|
|
380 |
|
Measuring deuterium order parameters by NMR is a useful technique to |
381 |
|
study the orientation of hydrocarbon chains in phospholipids. The |
396 |
|
\end{itemize} |
397 |
|
In coarse-grained model, although there are no explicit hydrogens, |
398 |
|
the order parameter can still be written in terms of carbon ordering |
399 |
< |
at each point of the chain |
399 |
> |
at each point of the chain\cite{Egberts1988} |
400 |
|
\begin{equation} |
401 |
|
S_{ij} = \frac{1}{2} < 3\cos \theta _i \cos \theta _j - \delta |
402 |
|
_{ij} >. |
404 |
|
|
405 |
|
Fig.~\ref{lipidFigure:Scd} shows the order parameter profile |
406 |
|
calculated for our coarse-grained DMPC bilayer system at 300K. Also |
407 |
< |
shown are the experimental data of Tiburu. The fact that |
407 |
> |
shown are the experimental data of Tu\cite{Tu1995}. The fact that |
408 |
|
$\text{S}_{\text{{\sc cd}}}$ order parameters calculated from |
409 |
|
simulation are higher than the experimental ones is ascribed to the |
410 |
|
assumption of the locations of implicit hydrogen atoms which are |
416 |
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{scd.eps} |
417 |
|
\caption[$\text{S}_{\text{{\sc cd}}}$ order parameter]{A comparison |
418 |
|
of $|\text{S}_{\text{{\sc cd}}}|$ between coarse-grained model |
419 |
< |
(blue) and DMPC\cite{petrache00} (black) near 300~K.} |
419 |
> |
(blue) and DMPC\cite{Petrache2000} (black) near 300~K.} |
420 |
|
\label{lipidFigure:Scd} |
421 |
|
\end{figure} |
422 |
+ |
|
423 |
+ |
%\subsection{Bilayer Simulations Using Gay-Berne Ellipsoid Model} |
424 |
+ |
|
425 |
+ |
\section{\label{lipidSection:Conclusion}Conclusion} |
426 |
+ |
|
427 |
+ |
Atomistic simulations have been used in this study to determine the |
428 |
+ |
preferred orientation and location of water molecules relative to |
429 |
+ |
the location and orientation of the PC and PE lipid headgroups. |
430 |
+ |
Based on the results from our all-atom simulations, we developed a |
431 |
+ |
simple coarse-grained model which captures the essential features of |
432 |
+ |
the headgroup solvation which is crucial to transport process in |
433 |
+ |
membrane system. In addition, the model has been explored in a |
434 |
+ |
bilayer system was shown to have reasonable electron density |
435 |
+ |
profiles, $\text{S}_{\text{{\sc cd}}}$ order parameter and other |
436 |
+ |
structural properties. The accuracy of this model is achieved by |
437 |
+ |
matching atomistic result. It is also easy to represent different |
438 |
+ |
phospholipids by changing a few parameters of the model. Another |
439 |
+ |
important characteristic of this model distinguishing itself from |
440 |
+ |
other models\cite{Goetz1998,Marrink2004} is the computational speed |
441 |
+ |
gained by introducing a short range electrostatic approximation. |
442 |
+ |
Further studies of this system using z-constraint method could |
443 |
+ |
extend the time length of the simulations to study transport |
444 |
+ |
phenomena in large-scale membrane systems. |