166 |
|
$\frac{{d^2 }}{4}$ inside the square root of the denominator is |
167 |
|
neglected. This is a reasonable approximation in most cases. |
168 |
|
Unfortunately, in our headgroup model, the distance of charge |
169 |
< |
separation $d$ (4.63 $\AA$ in PC headgroup) may be comparable to |
170 |
< |
$r$. Nevertheless, we could still assume $ \cos \theta \approx 0$ |
171 |
< |
in the central region of the headgroup. Using Taylor expansion and |
169 |
> |
separation $d$ (4.63 \AA in PC headgroup) may be comparable to $r$. |
170 |
> |
Nevertheless, we could still assume $ \cos \theta \approx 0$ in |
171 |
> |
the central region of the headgroup. Using Taylor expansion and |
172 |
|
associating appropriate terms with electric moments will result in a |
173 |
|
"split-dipole" approximation: |
174 |
|
\[ |
238 |
|
\end{equation} |
239 |
|
|
240 |
|
From Fig.~\ref{lipidFigure:PCFAtom}, we can identify the first |
241 |
< |
solvation shell (3.5 $\AA$) and the second solvation shell (5.0 |
242 |
< |
$\AA$) from both plots. However, the corresponding orientations are |
241 |
> |
solvation shell (3.5 \AA) and the second solvation shell (5.0 \AA) |
242 |
> |
from both plots. However, the corresponding orientations are |
243 |
|
different. In DLPE, water molecules prefer to sit around $\text{{\sc |
244 |
|
NH}}_3$ group due to the hydrogen bonding. In contrast, because of |
245 |
|
the hydrophobic effect of the $ {\rm{N(CH}}_{\rm{3}} |
360 |
|
electron density is in the hydrocarbon region. As a good |
361 |
|
approximation to the thickness of the bilayer, the headgroup spacing |
362 |
|
, is defined as the distance between two peaks in the electron |
363 |
< |
density profile, calculated from our simulations to be 34.1 $\AA$. |
363 |
> |
density profile, calculated from our simulations to be 34.1 \AA. |
364 |
|
This value is close to the x-ray diffraction experimental value 34.4 |
365 |
< |
$\AA$\cite{Petrache1998}. |
365 |
> |
\AA\cite{Petrache1998}. |
366 |
|
|
367 |
|
\begin{figure} |
368 |
|
\centering |