ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/tengDissertation/LiquidCrystal.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/tengDissertation/LiquidCrystal.tex (file contents):
Revision 2782 by tim, Thu Jun 1 05:11:14 2006 UTC vs.
Revision 2888 by tim, Mon Jun 26 13:34:46 2006 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1   \chapter{\label{chapt:liquidcrystal}LIQUID CRYSTAL}
2  
3   \section{\label{liquidCrystalSection:introduction}Introduction}
4 % liquid crystal
4  
5   Long range orientational order is one of the most fundamental
6   properties of liquid crystal mesophases. This orientational
7   anisotropy of the macroscopic phases originates in the shape
8   anisotropy of the constituent molecules. Among these anisotropy
9   mesogens, rod-like (calamitic) and disk-like molecules have been
10 < exploited in great detail in the last two decades. Typically, these
11 < mesogens consist of a rigid aromatic core and one or more attached
12 < aliphatic chains. For short chain molecules, only nematic phases, in
13 < which positional order is limited or absent, can be observed,
14 < because the entropy of mixing different parts of the mesogens is
15 < paramount to the dispersion interaction. In contrast, formation of
16 < the one dimension lamellar sematic phase in rod-like molecules with
17 < sufficiently long aliphatic chains has been reported, as well as the
18 < segregation phenomena in disk-like molecules.
10 > exploited in great detail in the last two decades\cite{Huh2004}.
11 > Typically, these mesogens consist of a rigid aromatic core and one
12 > or more attached aliphatic chains. For short chain molecules, only
13 > nematic phases, in which positional order is limited or absent, can
14 > be observed, because the entropy of mixing different parts of the
15 > mesogens is paramount to the dispersion interaction. In contrast,
16 > formation of the one dimension lamellar sematic phase in rod-like
17 > molecules with sufficiently long aliphatic chains has been reported,
18 > as well as the segregation phenomena in disk-like molecules.
19  
21 % banana shaped
20   Recently, the banana-shaped or bent-core liquid crystal have became
21   one of the most active research areas in mesogenic materials and
22 < supramolecular chemistry. Unlike rods and disks, the polarity and
23 < biaxiality of the banana-shaped molecules allow the molecules
24 < organize into a variety of novel liquid crystalline phases which
25 < show interesting material properties. Of particular interest is the
26 < spontaneous formation of macroscopic chiral layers from achiral
27 < banana-shaped molecules, where polar molecule orientational ordering
28 < is shown within the layer plane as well as the tilted arrangement of
29 < the molecules relative to the polar axis. As a consequence of
30 < supramolecular chirality, the spontaneous polarization arises in
31 < ferroelectric (FE) and antiferroelectic (AF) switching of smectic
32 < liquid crystal phases, demonstrating some promising applications in
33 < second-order nonlinear optical devices. The most widely investigated
34 < mesophase formed by banana-shaped moleculed is the $\text{B}_2$
35 < phase, which is also referred to as $\text{SmCP}$. Of the most
22 > supramolecular chemistry\cite{Niori1996, Link1997, Pelzl1999}.
23 > Unlike rods and disks, the polarity and biaxiality of the
24 > banana-shaped molecules allow the molecules organize into a variety
25 > of novel liquid crystalline phases which show interesting material
26 > properties. Of particular interest is the spontaneous formation of
27 > macroscopic chiral layers from achiral banana-shaped molecules,
28 > where polar molecule orientational ordering is shown within the
29 > layer plane as well as the tilted arrangement of the molecules
30 > relative to the polar axis. As a consequence of supramolecular
31 > chirality, the spontaneous polarization arises in ferroelectric (FE)
32 > and antiferroelectic (AF) switching of smectic liquid crystal
33 > phases, demonstrating some promising applications in second-order
34 > nonlinear optical devices. The most widely investigated mesophase
35 > formed by banana-shaped moleculed is the $\text{B}_2$ phase, which
36 > is also referred to as $\text{SmCP}$\cite{Link1997}. Of the most
37   important discover in this tilt lamellar phase is the four distinct
38   packing arrangements (two conglomerates and two macroscopic
39   racemates), which depend on the tilt direction and the polar
40   direction of the molecule in adjacent layer (see
41 < Fig.~\cite{LCFig:SMCP}).
41 > Fig.~\ref{LCFig:SMCP}).
42  
43 < %general banana-shaped molecule modeling
43 > \begin{figure}
44 > \centering
45 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{smcp.eps}
46 > \caption[SmCP Phase Packing] {Four possible SmCP phase packings that
47 > are characterized by the relative tilt direction(A and S refer an
48 > anticlinic tilt or a synclinic ) and the polarization orientation (A
49 > and F represent antiferroelectric or ferroelectric polar order).}
50 > \label{LCFig:SMCP}
51 > \end{figure}
52 >
53   Many liquid crystal synthesis experiments suggest that the
54   occurrence of polarity and chirality strongly relies on the
55 < molecular structure and intermolecular interaction. From a
56 < theoretical point of view, it is of fundamental interest to study
57 < the structural properties of liquid crystal phases formed by
55 > molecular structure and intermolecular interaction\cite{Reddy2006}.
56 > From a theoretical point of view, it is of fundamental interest to
57 > study the structural properties of liquid crystal phases formed by
58   banana-shaped molecules and understand their connection to the
59   molecular structure, especially with respect to the spontaneous
60   achiral symmetry breaking. As a complementary tool to experiment,
# Line 57 | Line 65 | limitation of time scale required for phase
65   smectic arrangements\cite{Cook2000, Lansac2001}, as well as other
66   bulk properties, such as rotational viscosity and flexoelectric
67   coefficients\cite{Cheung2002, Cheung2004}. However, due to the
68 < limitation of time scale required for phase
69 < transition\cite{Wilson1999} and the length scale required for
70 < representing bulk behavior, the dominant models in the field of
71 < liquid crystal phase behavior are generic
72 < models\cite{Lebwohl1972,Perram1984, Gay1981}, which are based on the
73 < observation that liquid crystal order is exhibited by a range of
74 < non-molecular bodies with high shape anisotropies. Previous
75 < simulation studies using hard spherocylinder dimer
76 < model\cite{Camp1999} produce nematic phases, while hard rod
77 < simulation studies identified a Landau point\cite{Bates2005}, at
78 < which the isotropic phase undergoes a transition directly to the
79 < biaxial nematic, as well as some possible liquid crystal
80 < phases\cite{Lansac2003}. Other anisotropic models using Gay-Berne
81 < potential give the evidence of the novel packing arrangement of
74 < bent-core molecules\cite{Memmer2002,Orlandi2006}.
68 > limitation of time scale required for phase transition and the
69 > length scale required for representing bulk behavior,
70 > models\cite{Perram1985, Gay1981}, which are based on the observation
71 > that liquid crystal order is exhibited by a range of non-molecular
72 > bodies with high shape anisotropies, became the dominant models in
73 > the field of liquid crystal phase behavior. Previous simulation
74 > studies using hard spherocylinder dimer model\cite{Camp1999} produce
75 > nematic phases, while hard rod simulation studies identified a
76 > Landau point\cite{Bates2005}, at which the isotropic phase undergoes
77 > a direct transition to the biaxial nematic, as well as some possible
78 > liquid crystal phases\cite{Lansac2003}. Other anisotropic models
79 > using Gay-Berne(GB) potential, which produce interactions that favor
80 > local alignment, give the evidence of the novel packing arrangements
81 > of bent-core molecules\cite{Memmer2002,Orlandi2006}.
82  
83 + Experimental studies by Levelut {\it et al.}~\cite{Levelut1981}
84 + revealed that terminal cyano or nitro groups usually induce
85 + permanent longitudinal dipole moments, which affect the phase
86 + behavior considerably. A series of theoretical studies also drawn
87 + equivalent conclusions. Monte Carlo studies of the GB potential with
88 + fixed longitudinal dipoles (i.e. pointed along the principal axis of
89 + rotation) were shown to enhance smectic phase
90 + stability~\cite{Berardi1996,Satoh1996}. Molecular simulation of GB
91 + ellipsoids with transverse dipoles at the terminus of the molecule
92 + also demonstrated that partial striped bilayer structures were
93 + developed from the smectic phase ~\cite{Berardi1996}. More
94 + significant effects have been shown by including multiple
95 + electrostatic moments. Adding longitudinal point quadrupole moments
96 + to rod-shaped GB mesogens, Withers \textit{et al} induced tilted
97 + smectic behaviour in the molecular system~\cite{Withers2003}. Thus,
98 + it is clear that many liquid-crystal forming molecules, specially,
99 + bent-core molecules, could be modeled more accurately by
100 + incorporating electrostatic interaction.
101 +
102 + In this chapter, we consider system consisting of banana-shaped
103 + molecule represented by three rigid GB particles with one or two
104 + point dipoles at different location. Performing a series of
105 + molecular dynamics simulations, we explore the structural properties
106 + of tilted smectic phases as well as the effect of electrostatic
107 + interactions.
108 +
109   \section{\label{liquidCrystalSection:model}Model}
110  
111 < \section{\label{liquidCrystalSection:methods}Methods}
111 > A typical banana-shaped molecule consists of a rigid aromatic
112 > central bent unit with several rod-like wings which are held
113 > together by some linking units and terminal chains (see
114 > Fig.~\ref{LCFig:BananaMolecule}). In this work, each banana-shaped
115 > mesogen has been modeled as a rigid body consisting of three
116 > equivalent prolate ellipsoidal GB particles. The GB interaction
117 > potential used to mimic the apolar characteristics of liquid crystal
118 > molecules takes the familiar form of Lennard-Jones function with
119 > orientation and position dependent range ($\sigma$) and well depth
120 > ($\epsilon$) parameters. The potential between a pair of three-site
121 > banana-shaped molecules $a$ and $b$ is given by
122 > \begin{equation}
123 > V_{ab}^{GB}  = \sum\limits_{i \in a,j \in b} {V_{ij}^{GB} }.
124 > \end{equation}
125 > Every site-site interaction can can be expressed as,
126 > \begin{equation}
127 > V_{ij}^{GB}  = 4\epsilon (\hat u_i ,\hat u_j ,\hat r_{ij} )\left[
128 > {\left( {\frac{{\sigma _0 }}{{r_{ij}  - \sigma (\hat u_i ,\hat u_j
129 > ,\hat r_{ij} )}}} \right)^{12}  - \left( {\frac{{\sigma _0
130 > }}{{r_{ij}  - \sigma (\hat u_i ,\hat u_j ,\hat r_{ij} )}}} \right)^6
131 > } \right] \label{LCEquation:gb}
132 > \end{equation}
133 > where $\hat u_i,\hat u_j$ are unit vectors specifying the
134 > orientation of two molecules $i$ and $j$ separated by intermolecular
135 > vector $r_{ij}$. $\hat r_{ij}$ is the unit vector along the
136 > intermolecular vector. A schematic diagram of the orientation
137 > vectors is shown in Fig.\ref{LCFigure:GBScheme}. The functional form
138 > for $\sigma$ is given by
139 > \begin{equation}
140 > \sigma (\hat u_i ,\hat u_i ,\hat r_{ij} ) = \sigma _0 \left[ {1 -
141 > \frac{\chi }{2}\left( {\frac{{(\hat r_{ij}  \cdot \hat u_i  + \hat
142 > r_{ij}  \cdot \hat u_j )^2 }}{{1 + \chi \hat u_i  \cdot \hat u_j }}
143 > + \frac{{(\hat r_{ij}  \cdot \hat u_i  - \hat r_{ij}  \cdot \hat u_j
144 > )^2 }}{{1 - \chi \hat u_i  \cdot \hat u_j }}} \right)} \right]^{ -
145 > \frac{1}{2}},
146 > \end{equation}
147 > where the aspect ratio of the particles is governed by shape
148 > anisotropy parameter
149 > \begin{equation}
150 > \chi  = \frac{{(\sigma _e /\sigma _s )^2  - 1}}{{(\sigma _e /\sigma
151 > _s )^2  + 1}}.
152 > \label{LCEquation:chi}
153 > \end{equation}
154 > Here, $\sigma_ s$ and $\sigma_{e}$ refer to the side-by-side breadth
155 > and the end-to-end length of the ellipsoid, respectively. The well
156 > depth parameters takes the form
157 > \begin{equation}
158 > \epsilon (\hat u_i ,\hat u_j ,\hat r_{ij} ) = \epsilon _0 \epsilon
159 > ^v (\hat u_i ,\hat u_j )\epsilon '^\mu (\hat u_i ,\hat u_j ,\hat
160 > r_{ij} )
161 > \end{equation}
162 > where $\epsilon_{0}$ is a constant term and
163 > \begin{equation}
164 > \epsilon (\hat u_i ,\hat u_j ) = \frac{1}{{\sqrt {1 - \chi ^2 (\hat
165 > u_i  \cdot \hat u_j )^2 } }}
166 > \end{equation}
167 > and
168 > \begin{equation}
169 > \epsilon '(\hat u_i ,\hat u_j ,\hat r_{ij} ) = 1 - \frac{{\chi
170 > '}}{2}\left[ {\frac{{(\hat r_{ij}  \cdot \hat u_i  + \hat r_{ij}
171 > \cdot \hat u_j )^2 }}{{1 + \chi '\hat u_i  \cdot \hat u_j }} +
172 > \frac{{(\hat r_{ij}  \cdot \hat u_i  - \hat r_{ij}  \cdot \hat u_j
173 > )^2 }}{{1 - \chi '\hat u_i  \cdot \hat u_j }}} \right]
174 > \end{equation}
175 > where the well depth anisotropy parameter $\chi '$ depends on the
176 > ratio between \textit{end-to-end} well depth $\epsilon _e$ and
177 > \textit{side-by-side} well depth $\epsilon_s$,
178 > \begin{equation}
179 > \chi ' = \frac{{1 - (\epsilon _e /\epsilon _s )^{1/\mu} }}{{1 +
180 > (\epsilon _e /\epsilon _s )^{1/\mu} }}.
181 > \end{equation}
182  
183 < \section{\label{liquidCrystalSection:resultDiscussion}Results and Discussion}
183 > \begin{figure}
184 > \centering
185 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{banana.eps}
186 > \caption[Schematic representation of a typical banana shaped
187 > molecule]{Schematic representation of a typical banana shaped
188 > molecule.} \label{LCFig:BananaMolecule}
189 > \end{figure}
190 >
191 > %\begin{figure}
192 > %\centering
193 > %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{bananGB.eps}
194 > %\caption[]{} \label{LCFigure:BananaGB}
195 > %\end{figure}
196 >
197 > \begin{figure}
198 > \centering
199 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{gb_scheme.eps}
200 > \caption[]{Schematic diagram showing definitions of the orientation
201 > vectors for a pair of Gay-Berne molecules}
202 > \label{LCFigure:GBScheme}
203 > \end{figure}
204 >
205 > To account for the permanent dipolar interactions, there should be
206 > an electrostatic interaction term of the form
207 > \begin{equation}
208 > V_{ab}^{dp}  = \sum\limits_{i \in a,j \in b} {\frac{1}{{4\pi
209 > \epsilon _{fs} }}\left[ {\frac{{\mu _i  \cdot \mu _j }}{{r_{ij}^3 }}
210 > - \frac{{3\left( {\mu _i  \cdot r_{ij} } \right)\left( {\mu _i \cdot
211 > r_{ij} } \right)}}{{r_{ij}^5 }}} \right]}
212 > \end{equation}
213 > where $\epsilon _{fs}$ is the permittivity of free space.
214 >
215 > \section{Computational Methodology}
216 >
217 > A series of molecular dynamics simulations were perform to study the
218 > phase behavior of banana shaped liquid crystals. In each simulation,
219 > every banana shaped molecule has been represented by three GB
220 > particles which is characterized by $\mu = 1,~ \nu = 2,
221 > ~\epsilon_{e}/\epsilon_{s} = 1/5$ and $\sigma_{e}/\sigma_{s} = 3$.
222 > All of the simulations begin with same equilibrated isotropic
223 > configuration where 1024 molecules without dipoles were confined in
224 > a $160\times 160 \times 120$ box. After the dipolar interactions are
225 > switched on, 2~ns NPTi cooling run with themostat of 2~ps and
226 > barostat of 50~ps were used to equilibrate the system to desired
227 > temperature and pressure.
228 >
229 > \subsection{Order Parameters}
230 >
231 > To investigate the phase structure of the model liquid crystal, we
232 > calculated various order parameters and correlation functions.
233 > Particulary, the $P_2$ order parameter allows us to estimate average
234 > alignment along the director axis $Z$ which can be identified from
235 > the largest eigen value obtained by diagonalizing the order
236 > parameter tensor
237 > \begin{equation}
238 > \overleftrightarrow{\mathsf{Q}} = \frac{1}{N}\sum_i^N %
239 >    \begin{pmatrix} %
240 >    u_{ix}u_{ix}-\frac{1}{3} & u_{ix}u_{iy} & u_{ix}u_{iz} \\
241 >    u_{iy}u_{ix} & u_{iy}u_{iy}-\frac{1}{3} & u_{iy}u_{iz} \\
242 >    u_{iz}u_{ix} & u_{iz}u_{iy} & u_{iz}u_{iz}-\frac{1}{3} %
243 >    \end{pmatrix},
244 > \label{lipidEq:po1}
245 > \end{equation}
246 > where the $u_{i\alpha}$ is the $\alpha$ element of the unit vector
247 > $\mathbf{\hat{u}}_i$, and the sum over $i$ averages over the whole
248 > collection of unit vectors. The $P_2$ order parameter for uniaxial
249 > phase is then simply given by
250 > \begin{equation}
251 > \langle P_2 \rangle = \frac{3}{2}\lambda_{\text{max}}.
252 > \label{lipidEq:po3}
253 > \end{equation}
254 > In addition to the $P_2$ order parameter, $ R_{2,2}^2$ order
255 > parameter for biaxial phase is introduced to describe the ordering
256 > in the plane orthogonal to the director by
257 > \begin{equation}
258 > R_{2,2}^2  = \frac{1}{4}\left\langle {(x_i  \cdot X)^2  - (x_i \cdot
259 > Y)^2  - (y_i  \cdot X)^2  + (y_i  \cdot Y)^2 } \right\rangle
260 > \end{equation}
261 > where $X$, $Y$ and $Z$ are axis of the director frame.
262 >
263 > \subsection{Structure Properties}
264 >
265 > It is more important to show the density correlation along the
266 > director
267 > \begin{equation}
268 > g(z) =< \delta (z-z_{ij})>_{ij} / \pi R^{2} \rho
269 > \end{equation},
270 > where $z_{ij} = r_{ij} \dot Z$ was measured in the director frame
271 > and $R$ is the radius of the cylindrical sampling region.
272 >
273 > \subsection{Rotational Invariants}
274 >
275 > As a useful set of correlation functions to describe
276 > position-orientation correlation, rotation invariants were first
277 > applied in a spherical symmetric system to study x-ray and light
278 > scatting\cite{Blum1972}. Latterly, expansion of the orientation pair
279 > correlation in terms of rotation invariant for molecules of
280 > arbitrary shape was introduce by Stone\cite{Stone1978} and adopted
281 > by other researchers in liquid crystal studies\cite{Berardi2003}.
282 >
283 > \begin{eqnarray}
284 > S_{22}^{220} (r) & = & \frac{1}{{4\sqrt 5 }} \left< \delta (r -
285 > r_{ij} )((\hat x_i  \cdot \hat x_j )^2  - (\hat x_i  \cdot \hat y_j
286 > )^2  - (\hat y_i  \cdot \hat x_j )^2  + (\hat y_i  \cdot \hat y_j
287 > )^2 ) \right. \\
288 > & & \left. - 2(\hat x_i  \cdot \hat y_j )(\hat y_i \cdot \hat x_j ) -
289 > 2(\hat x_i  \cdot \hat x_j )(\hat y_i  \cdot \hat y_j )) \right>
290 > \end{eqnarray}
291 >
292 > \begin{equation}
293 > S_{00}^{221} (r) =  - \frac{{\sqrt 3 }}{{\sqrt {10} }}\left\langle
294 > {\delta (r - r_{ij} )((\hat z_i  \cdot \hat z_j )(\hat z_i  \cdot
295 > \hat z_j  \times \hat r_{ij} ))} \right\rangle
296 > \end{equation}
297 >
298 > \section{Results and Conclusion}
299 > \label{sec:results and conclusion}
300 >
301 > To investigate the molecular organization behavior due to different
302 > dipolar orientation and position with respect to the center of the
303 > molecule,

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines