ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/tengDissertation/LiquidCrystal.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/tengDissertation/LiquidCrystal.tex (file contents):
Revision 2781 by tim, Wed May 31 04:29:44 2006 UTC vs.
Revision 2867 by tim, Sat Jun 17 18:43:58 2006 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1   \chapter{\label{chapt:liquidcrystal}LIQUID CRYSTAL}
2  
3   \section{\label{liquidCrystalSection:introduction}Introduction}
4 % liquid crystal
4  
5   Long range orientational order is one of the most fundamental
6   properties of liquid crystal mesophases. This orientational
7   anisotropy of the macroscopic phases originates in the shape
8   anisotropy of the constituent molecules. Among these anisotropy
9   mesogens, rod-like (calamitic) and disk-like molecules have been
10 < exploited in great detail in the last two decades. Typically, these
11 < mesogens consist of a rigid aromatic core and one or more attached
12 < aliphatic chains. For short chain molecules, only nematic phases, in
13 < which positional order is limited or absent, can be observed,
14 < because the entropy of mixing different parts of the mesogens is
15 < paramount to the dispersion interaction. In contrast, formation of
16 < the one dimension lamellar sematic phase in rod-like molecules with
17 < sufficiently long aliphatic chains has been reported, as well as the
18 < segregation phenomena in disk-like molecules.
10 > exploited in great detail in the last two decades\cite{Huh2004}.
11 > Typically, these mesogens consist of a rigid aromatic core and one
12 > or more attached aliphatic chains. For short chain molecules, only
13 > nematic phases, in which positional order is limited or absent, can
14 > be observed, because the entropy of mixing different parts of the
15 > mesogens is paramount to the dispersion interaction. In contrast,
16 > formation of the one dimension lamellar sematic phase in rod-like
17 > molecules with sufficiently long aliphatic chains has been reported,
18 > as well as the segregation phenomena in disk-like molecules.
19  
21 % banana shaped
20   Recently, the banana-shaped or bent-core liquid crystal have became
21   one of the most active research areas in mesogenic materials and
22 < supramolecular chemistry. Unlike rods and disks, the polarity and
23 < biaxiality of the banana-shaped molecules allow the molecules
24 < organize into a variety of novel liquid crystalline phases which
25 < show interesting material properties. Of particular interest is the
26 < spontaneous formation of macroscopic chiral layers from achiral
27 < banana-shaped molecules, where polar molecule orientational ordering
28 < is shown within the layer plane as well as the tilted arrangement of
29 < the molecules relative to the polar axis. As a consequence of
30 < supramolecular chirality, the spontaneous polarization arises in
31 < ferroelectric (FE) and antiferroelectic (AF) switching of smectic
32 < liquid crystal phases, demonstrating some promising applications in
33 < second-order nonlinear optical devices.
22 > supramolecular chemistry\cite{Niori1996, Link1997, Pelzl1999}.
23 > Unlike rods and disks, the polarity and biaxiality of the
24 > banana-shaped molecules allow the molecules organize into a variety
25 > of novel liquid crystalline phases which show interesting material
26 > properties. Of particular interest is the spontaneous formation of
27 > macroscopic chiral layers from achiral banana-shaped molecules,
28 > where polar molecule orientational ordering is shown within the
29 > layer plane as well as the tilted arrangement of the molecules
30 > relative to the polar axis. As a consequence of supramolecular
31 > chirality, the spontaneous polarization arises in ferroelectric (FE)
32 > and antiferroelectic (AF) switching of smectic liquid crystal
33 > phases, demonstrating some promising applications in second-order
34 > nonlinear optical devices. The most widely investigated mesophase
35 > formed by banana-shaped moleculed is the $\text{B}_2$ phase, which
36 > is also referred to as $\text{SmCP}$\cite{Link1997}. Of the most
37 > important discover in this tilt lamellar phase is the four distinct
38 > packing arrangements (two conglomerates and two macroscopic
39 > racemates), which depend on the tilt direction and the polar
40 > direction of the molecule in adjacent layer (see
41 > Fig.~\ref{LCFig:SMCP}).
42  
43 < The most widely investigated mesophase formed by banana-shaped
44 < moleculed is the $\text{B}_2$ phase, which is also known as
45 < $\text{SmCP}$.
43 > \begin{figure}
44 > \centering
45 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{smcp.eps}
46 > \caption[]
47 > {}
48 > \label{LCFig:SMCP}
49 > \end{figure}
50  
51 < %Previous Theoretical Studies
51 > Many liquid crystal synthesis experiments suggest that the
52 > occurrence of polarity and chirality strongly relies on the
53 > molecular structure and intermolecular interaction\cite{Reddy2006}.
54 > From a theoretical point of view, it is of fundamental interest to
55 > study the structural properties of liquid crystal phases formed by
56 > banana-shaped molecules and understand their connection to the
57 > molecular structure, especially with respect to the spontaneous
58 > achiral symmetry breaking. As a complementary tool to experiment,
59 > computer simulation can provide unique insight into molecular
60 > ordering and phase behavior, and hence improve the development of
61 > new experiments and theories. In the last two decades, all-atom
62 > models have been adopted to investigate the structural properties of
63 > smectic arrangements\cite{Cook2000, Lansac2001}, as well as other
64 > bulk properties, such as rotational viscosity and flexoelectric
65 > coefficients\cite{Cheung2002, Cheung2004}. However, due to the
66 > limitation of time scale required for phase transition and the
67 > length scale required for representing bulk behavior,
68 > models\cite{Perram1985, Gay1981}, which are based on the observation
69 > that liquid crystal order is exhibited by a range of non-molecular
70 > bodies with high shape anisotropies, became the dominant models in
71 > the field of liquid crystal phase behavior. Previous simulation
72 > studies using hard spherocylinder dimer model\cite{Camp1999} produce
73 > nematic phases, while hard rod simulation studies identified a
74 > Landau point\cite{Bates2005}, at which the isotropic phase undergoes
75 > a direct transition to the biaxial nematic, as well as some possible
76 > liquid crystal phases\cite{Lansac2003}. Other anisotropic models
77 > using Gay-Berne(GB) potential, which produce interactions that favor
78 > local alignment, give the evidence of the novel packing arrangements
79 > of bent-core molecules\cite{Memmer2002,Orlandi2006}.
80  
81 + Experimental studies by Levelut {\it et al.}~\cite{Levelut1981}
82 + revealed that terminal cyano or nitro groups usually induce
83 + permanent longitudinal dipole moments, which affect the phase
84 + behavior considerably. A series of theoretical studies also drawn
85 + equivalent conclusions. Monte Carlo studies of the GB potential with
86 + fixed longitudinal dipoles (i.e. pointed along the principal axis of
87 + rotation) were shown to enhance smectic phase
88 + stability~\cite{Berardi1996,Satoh1996}. Molecular simulation of GB
89 + ellipsoids with transverse dipoles at the terminus of the molecule
90 + also demonstrated that partial striped bilayer structures were
91 + developed from the smectic phase ~\cite{Berardi1996}. More
92 + significant effects have been shown by including multiple
93 + electrostatic moments. Adding longitudinal point quadrupole moments
94 + to rod-shaped GB mesogens, Withers \textit{et al} induced tilted
95 + smectic behaviour in the molecular system~\cite{Withers2003}. Thus,
96 + it is clear that many liquid-crystal forming molecules, specially,
97 + bent-core molecules, could be modeled more accurately by
98 + incorporating electrostatic interaction.
99 +
100 + In this chapter, we consider system consisting of banana-shaped
101 + molecule represented by three rigid GB particles with one or two
102 + point dipoles at different location. Performing a series of
103 + molecular dynamics simulations, we explore the structural properties
104 + of tilted smectic phases as well as the effect of electrostatic
105 + interactions.
106 +
107   \section{\label{liquidCrystalSection:model}Model}
108  
109 + A typical banana-shaped molecule consists of a rigid aromatic
110 + central bent unit with several rod-like wings which are held
111 + together by some linking units and terminal chains (see
112 + Fig.~\ref{LCFig:BananaMolecule}). In this work, each banana-shaped
113 + mesogen has been modeled as a rigid body consisting of three
114 + equivalent prolate ellipsoidal GB particles. The GB interaction
115 + potential used to mimic the apolar characteristics of liquid crystal
116 + molecules takes the familiar form of Lennard-Jones function with
117 + orientation and position dependent range ($\sigma$) and well depth
118 + ($\epsilon$) parameters. The potential between a pair of three-site
119 + banana-shaped molecules $a$ and $b$ is given by
120 + \begin{equation}
121 + V_{ab}^{GB}  = \sum\limits_{i \in a,j \in b} {V_{ij}^{GB} }.
122 + \end{equation}
123 + Every site-site interaction can can be expressed as,
124 + \begin{equation}
125 + V_{ij}^{GB}  = 4\epsilon (\hat u_i ,\hat u_j ,\hat r_{ij} )\left[
126 + {\left( {\frac{{\sigma _0 }}{{r_{ij}  - \sigma (\hat u_i ,\hat u_j
127 + ,\hat r_{ij} )}}} \right)^{12}  - \left( {\frac{{\sigma _0
128 + }}{{r_{ij}  - \sigma (\hat u_i ,\hat u_j ,\hat r_{ij} )}}} \right)^6
129 + } \right] \label{LCEquation:gb}
130 + \end{equation}
131 + where $\hat u_i,\hat u_j$ are unit vectors specifying the
132 + orientation of two molecules $i$ and $j$ separated by intermolecular
133 + vector $r_{ij}$. $\hat r_{ij}$ is the unit vector along the
134 + intermolecular vector. A schematic diagram of the orientation
135 + vectors is shown in Fig.\ref{LCFigure:GBScheme}. The functional form
136 + for $\sigma$ is given by
137 + \begin{equation}
138 + \sigma (\hat u_i ,\hat u_i ,\hat r_{ij} ) = \sigma _0 \left[ {1 -
139 + \frac{\chi }{2}\left( {\frac{{(\hat r_{ij}  \cdot \hat u_i  + \hat
140 + r_{ij}  \cdot \hat u_j )^2 }}{{1 + \chi \hat u_i  \cdot \hat u_j }}
141 + + \frac{{(\hat r_{ij}  \cdot \hat u_i  - \hat r_{ij}  \cdot \hat u_j
142 + )^2 }}{{1 - \chi \hat u_i  \cdot \hat u_j }}} \right)} \right]^{ -
143 + \frac{1}{2}},
144 + \end{equation}
145 + where the aspect ratio of the particles is governed by shape
146 + anisotropy parameter
147 + \begin{equation}
148 + \chi  = \frac{{(\sigma _e /\sigma _s )^2  - 1}}{{(\sigma _e /\sigma
149 + _s )^2  + 1}}.
150 + \label{LCEquation:chi}
151 + \end{equation}
152 + Here, $\sigma_ s$ and $\sigma_{e}$ refer to the side-by-side breadth
153 + and the end-to-end length of the ellipsoid, respectively. The well
154 + depth parameters takes the form
155 + \begin{equation}
156 + \epsilon (\hat u_i ,\hat u_j ,\hat r_{ij} ) = \epsilon _0 \epsilon
157 + ^v (\hat u_i ,\hat u_j )\epsilon '^\mu (\hat u_i ,\hat u_j ,\hat
158 + r_{ij} )
159 + \end{equation}
160 + where $\epsilon_{0}$ is a constant term and
161 + \begin{equation}
162 + \epsilon (\hat u_i ,\hat u_j ) = \frac{1}{{\sqrt {1 - \chi ^2 (\hat
163 + u_i  \cdot \hat u_j )^2 } }}
164 + \end{equation}
165 + and
166 + \begin{equation}
167 + \epsilon '(\hat u_i ,\hat u_j ,\hat r_{ij} ) = 1 - \frac{{\chi
168 + '}}{2}\left[ {\frac{{(\hat r_{ij}  \cdot \hat u_i  + \hat r_{ij}
169 + \cdot \hat u_j )^2 }}{{1 + \chi '\hat u_i  \cdot \hat u_j }} +
170 + \frac{{(\hat r_{ij}  \cdot \hat u_i  - \hat r_{ij}  \cdot \hat u_j
171 + )^2 }}{{1 - \chi '\hat u_i  \cdot \hat u_j }}} \right]
172 + \end{equation}
173 + where the well depth anisotropy parameter $\chi '$ depends on the
174 + ratio between \textit{end-to-end} well depth $\epsilon _e$ and
175 + \textit{side-by-side} well depth $\epsilon_s$,
176 + \begin{equation}
177 + \chi ' = \frac{{1 - (\epsilon _e /\epsilon _s )^{1/\mu} }}{{1 +
178 + (\epsilon _e /\epsilon _s )^{1/\mu} }}.
179 + \end{equation}
180 +
181 + \begin{figure}
182 + \centering
183 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{banana.eps}
184 + \caption[]{} \label{LCFig:BananaMolecule}
185 + \end{figure}
186 +
187 + %\begin{figure}
188 + %\centering
189 + %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{bananGB.eps}
190 + %\caption[]{} \label{LCFigure:BananaGB}
191 + %\end{figure}
192 +
193 + \begin{figure}
194 + \centering
195 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{gb_scheme.eps}
196 + \caption[]{Schematic diagram showing definitions of the orientation
197 + vectors for a pair of Gay-Berne molecules}
198 + \label{LCFigure:GBScheme}
199 + \end{figure}
200 +
201 + To account for the permanent dipolar interactions, there should be
202 + an electrostatic interaction term of the form
203 + \begin{equation}
204 + V_{ab}^{dp}  = \sum\limits_{i \in a,j \in b} {\frac{1}{{4\pi
205 + \epsilon _{fs} }}\left[ {\frac{{\mu _i  \cdot \mu _j }}{{r_{ij}^3 }}
206 + - \frac{{3\left( {\mu _i  \cdot r_{ij} } \right)\left( {\mu _i \cdot
207 + r_{ij} } \right)}}{{r_{ij}^5 }}} \right]}
208 + \end{equation}
209 + where $\epsilon _{fs}$ is the permittivity of free space.
210 +
211 + \section{Computational Methodology}
212 +
213 + A series of molecular dynamics simulations were perform to study the
214 + phase behavior of banana shaped liquid crystals.
215 +
216 + In each simulation, rod-like polar molecules have been represented
217 + by polar ellipsoidal Gay-Berne (GB) particles. The four parameters
218 + characterizing G-B potential were taken as   $\mu = 1,~ \nu = 2,
219 + ~\epsilon_{e}/\epsilon_{s}
220 + = 1/5$ and $\sigma_{e}/\sigma_{s} = 3$. The components of the
221 + scaled moment of inertia $(I^{*} = I/m \sigma_{s}^{2})$ along the
222 + major and minor axes were $I_{z}^{*} = 0.2$ and $I_{\perp}^{*} =
223 + 1.0$.  We used the reduced dipole moments $ \mu^{*} = \mu/(4 \pi
224 + \epsilon_{fs} \sigma_{0}^{3})^{1/2}= 1.0$ for terminal dipole and
225 + $ \mu^{*} = \mu/(4
226 + \pi \epsilon_{fs} \sigma_{0}^{3})^{1/2}= 0.5$ for second dipole,
227 + where $\epsilon_{fs}$ was the permitivitty of free space. For all
228 + simulations the position of the terminal dipole
229 + has been kept
230 + at a fixed distance $d^{*} = d/\sigma_{s} = 1.0 $ from the
231 + centre of mass on the molecular symmetry axis. The second dipole
232 + takes  $d^{*} = d/\sigma_{s} = 0.0 $ i.e. it is on the centre of
233 + mass. To investigate the molecular organization behaviour due to
234 + different dipolar orientation with respect to the symmetry axis, we
235 + selected dipolar angle $\alpha_{d} = 0$ to model terminal outward
236 + longitudinal dipole and $\alpha_{d} = \pi/2$ to model transverse
237 + outward dipole where the second dipole takes  relative  anti
238 + antiparallel orientation with respect to the first. System of
239 + molecules having a single transverse terminal dipole has also been
240 + studied. We ran a series of simulations to investigate the effect of
241 + dipoles on molecular organization.
242 +
243 + In each of the simulations 864 molecules were confined in a cubic
244 + box with periodic boundary conditions. The run started from a
245 + density $\rho^{*} = \rho \sigma_{0}^{3}$ = 0.01 with nonpolar
246 + molecules loacted on the sites of FCC lattice and having parallel
247 + orientation. This structure was not a stable structure at this
248 + density and it was melted at a reduced temperature $T^{*} = k_{B}T/
249 + \epsilon_{0} = 4.0$ . We used this isotropic configuration which was
250 + both orientationally and translationally disordered, as the initial
251 + configuration for each simulation. The dipoles were also switched on
252 + from this point. Initial translational and angular velocities were
253 + assigned from the gaussian distribution of velocities.
254 +
255 + To get the ordered structure for each system of particular dipolar
256 + angles we increased the density from $\rho^{*} = 0.01$ to $\rho_{*}
257 + = 0.3$ with an increament size of 0.002 upto $\rho^{*} = 0.1$ and
258 + 0.01 for the rest at some higher temperature. Temperature was then
259 + lowered in finer steps to avoid ending up with disordered glass
260 + phase and thus to help the molecules set with more order. For each
261 + system this process required altogether $5 \times 10^{6}$ MC cycles
262 + for equilibration.
263 +
264 + The torques and forces were calculated using velocity verlet
265 + algorithm. The time step size $\delta t^{*} = \delta t/(m
266 + \sigma_{0}^{2} / \epsilon_{0})^{1/2}$ was set at 0.0012 during the
267 + process. The orientations of molecules were described by quaternions
268 + instead of Eulerian angles to get the singularity-free orientational
269 + equations of motion.
270 +
271 + The interaction potential was truncated at a cut-off radius $r_{c} =
272 + 3.8 \sigma_{0}$. The long range dipole-dipole interaction potential
273 + and torque were handled by the application of reaction field method
274 + ~\cite{Allen87}.
275 +
276 + To investigate the phase structure of the model liquid crystal
277 + family  we calculated the orientational order parameter, correlation
278 + functions. To identify a particular phase we took configurational
279 + snapshots at the onset of each layered phase.
280 +
281 + The orientational order parameter for uniaxial phase was calculated
282 + from the largest eigen value obtained by diagonalization of the
283 + order parameter tensor
284 +
285 + \begin{equation}
286 + \begin{array}{lr}
287 + Q_{\alpha \beta} = \frac{1}{2 N} \sum(3 e_{i \alpha} e_{i \beta}
288 + - \delta_{\alpha \beta})  & \alpha, \beta = x,y,z \\
289 + \end{array}
290 + \end{equation}
291 +
292 + where $e_{i \alpha}$ was the $\alpha$ th component of the unit
293 + vector $e_{i}$ along the symmetry axis of the i th molecule.
294 + Corresponding eigenvector gave the director which defines the
295 + average direction of molecular alignment.
296 +
297 + The density correlation along the director is $g(z) = < \delta
298 + (z-z_{ij})>_{ij} / \pi R^{2} \rho $, where $z_{ij} = r_{ij} cos
299 + \beta_{r_{ij}}$ was measured in the director frame and $R$ is the
300 + radius of the cylindrical sampling region.
301 +
302 +
303 + \section{Results and Conclusion}
304 + \label{sec:results and conclusion}
305 +
306 + Analysis of the simulation results shows that relative dipolar
307 + orientation angle of the molecules  can give rise to rich
308 + polymorphism of polar mesophases.
309 +
310 + The correlation function g(z) shows layering along perpendicular
311 + direction to the plane for a system of G-B molecules with two
312 + transverse outward pointing dipoles in fig. \ref{fig:1}. Both the
313 + correlation plot and the snapshot (fig. \ref{fig:4}) of their
314 + organization indicate a bilayer phase. Snapshot for larger system of
315 + 1372 molecules also confirms bilayer structure (Fig. \ref{fig:7}).
316 + Fig. \ref{fig:2} shows g(z) for a system of molecules having two
317 + antiparallel longitudinal dipoles and the snapshot of their
318 + organization shows a monolayer phase (Fig. \ref{fig:5}). Fig.
319 + \ref{fig:3} gives g(z) for a system of G-B molecules with single
320 + transverse outward pointing dipole and fig. \ref{fig:6} gives the
321 + snapshot. Their organization is like a wavy antiphase (stripe
322 + domain).  Fig. \ref{fig:8} gives the snapshot for 1372 molecules
323 + with single transverse dipole near the end of the molecule.
324 +
325 + \begin{figure}
326 + \begin{center}
327 + \epsfxsize=3in \epsfbox{fig1.ps}
328 + \end{center}
329 + \caption { Density projection of molecular centres (solid) and
330 + terminal dipoles (broken) with respect to the director g(z) for a
331 + system of G-B molecules with two transverse outward pointing
332 + dipoles, the first dipole having $d^{*}=1.0$, $\mu^{*}=1.0$ and the
333 + second dipole having $d^{*}=0.0$, $\mu^{*}=0.5$} \label{fig:1}
334 + \end{figure}
335 +
336 +
337 + \begin{figure}
338 + \begin{center}
339 + \epsfxsize=3in \epsfbox{fig2.ps}
340 + \end{center}
341 + \caption { Density projection of molecular centres (solid) and
342 + terminal dipoles (broken) with respect to the director g(z) for a
343 + system of G-B molecules with two antiparallel longitudinal dipoles,
344 + the first outward pointing dipole having $d^{*}=1.0$, $\mu^{*}=1.0$
345 + and the second dipole having $d^{*}=0.0$, $\mu^{*}=0.5$}
346 + \label{fig:2}
347 + \end{figure}
348 +
349 + \begin{figure}
350 + \begin{center}
351 + \epsfxsize=3in \epsfbox{fig3.ps}
352 + \end{center}
353 + \caption {Density projection of molecular centres (solid) and
354 + terminal
355 + dipoles (broken) with respect to the director g(z)
356 + for a system of G-B molecules with single transverse outward
357 + pointing dipole, having $d^{*}=1.0$, $\mu^{*}=1.0$} \label{fig:3}
358 + \end{figure}
359 +
360 + \begin{figure}
361 + \centering \epsfxsize=2.5in \epsfbox{fig4.eps} \caption{Typical
362 + configuration for a system of 864 G-B molecules with two transverse
363 + dipoles, the first dipole having $d^{*}=1.0$, $\mu^{*}=1.0$ and the
364 + second dipole having $d^{*}=0.0$, $\mu^{*}=0.5$. The white caps
365 + indicate the location of the terminal dipole, while the orientation
366 + of the dipoles is indicated by the blue/gold coloring.}
367 + \label{fig:4}
368 + \end{figure}
369 +
370 + \begin{figure}
371 + \begin{center}
372 + \epsfxsize=3in \epsfbox{fig5.ps}
373 + \end{center}
374 + \caption {Snapshot of molecular configuration for a system of 864
375 + G-B molecules with two antiparallel longitudinal dipoles, the first
376 + outward pointing dipole
377 + having $d^{*}=1.0$, $\mu^{*}=1.0$ and the second dipole having $d^{*}=0.0$,
378 + $\mu^{*}=0.5$ (fine lines are molecular symmetry axes and small
379 + thick lines show terminal dipolar direction, central dipoles are not
380 + shown).} \label{fig:5}
381 + \end{figure}
382 +
383 +
384 + \begin{figure}
385 + \begin{center}
386 + \epsfxsize=3in \epsfbox{fig6.ps}
387 + \end{center}
388 + \caption {Snapshot of molecular configuration for  a system of 864
389 + G-B molecules with single transverse outward pointing dipole, having
390 + $d^{*}=1.0$, $\mu^{*}=1.0$ (fine lines are molecular symmetry axes
391 + and small thick lines show terminal dipolar direction).}
392 + \label{fig:6}
393 + \end{figure}
394 +
395 + \begin{figure}
396 + \begin{center}
397 + \epsfxsize=3in \epsfbox{fig7.ps}
398 + \end{center}
399 + \caption {Snapshot of molecular configuration for a system of 1372
400 + G-B molecules with two transverse outward pointing dipoles, the
401 + first dipole having $d^{*}=1.0$, $\mu^{*}=1.0$ and the second dipole
402 + having $d^{*}=0.0$, $\mu^{*}=0.5$(fine lines are molecular symmetry
403 + axes and small thick lines show terminal dipolar direction,  central
404 + dipoles are not shown).} \label{fig:7}
405 + \end{figure}
406 +
407 + \begin{figure}
408 + \begin{center}
409 + \epsfxsize=3in \epsfbox{fig8.ps}
410 + \end{center}
411 + \caption {Snapshot of molecular configuration for a system of 1372
412 + G-B molecules with single transverse outward pointing dipole, having
413 + $d^{*}=1.0$, $\mu^{*}=1.0$ (fine lines are molecular symmetry axes
414 + and small thick lines show terminal dipolar direction).}
415 + \label{fig:8}
416 + \end{figure}
417 +
418 + Starting from an isotropic configuaration of polar Gay-Berne
419 + molecules, we could successfully simulate perfect bilayer, antiphase
420 + and monolayer structure. To break the up-down symmetry i.e. the
421 + nonequivalence of directions ${\bf \hat {n}}$ and ${ -\bf \hat{n}}$,
422 + the molecules should have permanent electric or magnetic dipoles.
423 + Longitudinal electric dipole interaction could not form polar
424 + nematic phase as orientationally disordered phase with larger
425 + entropy is stabler than polarly ordered phase. In fact, stronger
426 + central dipole moment opposes polar nematic ordering more
427 + effectively in case of rod-like molecules. However, polar ordering
428 + like bilayer $A_{2}$, interdigitated $A_{d}$, and wavy $\tilde A$ in
429 + smectic layers can be achieved, where adjacent layers with opposite
430 + polarities makes bulk phase a-polar. More so, lyotropic liquid
431 + crystals and bilayer bio-membranes can have polar layers. These
432 + arrangements appear to get favours with the shifting of longitudinal
433 + dipole moment to the molecular terminus, so that they can have
434 + anti-ferroelectric dipolar arrangement giving rise to local (within
435 + the sublayer) breaking of up-down symmetry along the director.
436 + Transverse polarity breaks two-fold rotational symmetry, which
437 + favours more in-plane polar order. However, the molecular origin of
438 + these phases requires something more which are apparent from the
439 + earlier simulation results. We have shown that to get perfect
440 + bilayer structure in a G-B system, alongwith transverse terminal
441 + dipole, another central dipole (or a polarizable core) is required
442 + so that polar head and a-polar tail of Gay-Berne molecules go to
443 + opposite directions within a bilayer. This gives some kind of
444 + clipping interactions which forbid the molecular tail go in other
445 + way. Moreover, we could simulate other varieties of polar smectic
446 + phases e.g. monolayer $A_{1}$, antiphase $\tilde A$ successfully.
447 + Apart from guiding chemical synthesization of ferroelectric,
448 + antiferroelectric liquid crystals for technological applications,
449 + the present study will be of scientific interest in understanding
450 + molecular level interactions of lyotropic liquid crystals as well as
451 + nature-designed bio-membranes.
452 +
453   \section{\label{liquidCrystalSection:methods}Methods}
454  
455   \section{\label{liquidCrystalSection:resultDiscussion}Results and Discussion}
456 +
457 + \section{Conclusion}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines