ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/tengDissertation/LiquidCrystal.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/tengDissertation/LiquidCrystal.tex (file contents):
Revision 2781 by tim, Wed May 31 04:29:44 2006 UTC vs.
Revision 2882 by tim, Fri Jun 23 21:33:52 2006 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1   \chapter{\label{chapt:liquidcrystal}LIQUID CRYSTAL}
2  
3   \section{\label{liquidCrystalSection:introduction}Introduction}
4 % liquid crystal
4  
5   Long range orientational order is one of the most fundamental
6   properties of liquid crystal mesophases. This orientational
7   anisotropy of the macroscopic phases originates in the shape
8   anisotropy of the constituent molecules. Among these anisotropy
9   mesogens, rod-like (calamitic) and disk-like molecules have been
10 < exploited in great detail in the last two decades. Typically, these
11 < mesogens consist of a rigid aromatic core and one or more attached
12 < aliphatic chains. For short chain molecules, only nematic phases, in
13 < which positional order is limited or absent, can be observed,
14 < because the entropy of mixing different parts of the mesogens is
15 < paramount to the dispersion interaction. In contrast, formation of
16 < the one dimension lamellar sematic phase in rod-like molecules with
17 < sufficiently long aliphatic chains has been reported, as well as the
18 < segregation phenomena in disk-like molecules.
10 > exploited in great detail in the last two decades\cite{Huh2004}.
11 > Typically, these mesogens consist of a rigid aromatic core and one
12 > or more attached aliphatic chains. For short chain molecules, only
13 > nematic phases, in which positional order is limited or absent, can
14 > be observed, because the entropy of mixing different parts of the
15 > mesogens is paramount to the dispersion interaction. In contrast,
16 > formation of the one dimension lamellar sematic phase in rod-like
17 > molecules with sufficiently long aliphatic chains has been reported,
18 > as well as the segregation phenomena in disk-like molecules.
19  
21 % banana shaped
20   Recently, the banana-shaped or bent-core liquid crystal have became
21   one of the most active research areas in mesogenic materials and
22 < supramolecular chemistry. Unlike rods and disks, the polarity and
23 < biaxiality of the banana-shaped molecules allow the molecules
24 < organize into a variety of novel liquid crystalline phases which
25 < show interesting material properties. Of particular interest is the
26 < spontaneous formation of macroscopic chiral layers from achiral
27 < banana-shaped molecules, where polar molecule orientational ordering
28 < is shown within the layer plane as well as the tilted arrangement of
29 < the molecules relative to the polar axis. As a consequence of
30 < supramolecular chirality, the spontaneous polarization arises in
31 < ferroelectric (FE) and antiferroelectic (AF) switching of smectic
32 < liquid crystal phases, demonstrating some promising applications in
33 < second-order nonlinear optical devices.
22 > supramolecular chemistry\cite{Niori1996, Link1997, Pelzl1999}.
23 > Unlike rods and disks, the polarity and biaxiality of the
24 > banana-shaped molecules allow the molecules organize into a variety
25 > of novel liquid crystalline phases which show interesting material
26 > properties. Of particular interest is the spontaneous formation of
27 > macroscopic chiral layers from achiral banana-shaped molecules,
28 > where polar molecule orientational ordering is shown within the
29 > layer plane as well as the tilted arrangement of the molecules
30 > relative to the polar axis. As a consequence of supramolecular
31 > chirality, the spontaneous polarization arises in ferroelectric (FE)
32 > and antiferroelectic (AF) switching of smectic liquid crystal
33 > phases, demonstrating some promising applications in second-order
34 > nonlinear optical devices. The most widely investigated mesophase
35 > formed by banana-shaped moleculed is the $\text{B}_2$ phase, which
36 > is also referred to as $\text{SmCP}$\cite{Link1997}. Of the most
37 > important discover in this tilt lamellar phase is the four distinct
38 > packing arrangements (two conglomerates and two macroscopic
39 > racemates), which depend on the tilt direction and the polar
40 > direction of the molecule in adjacent layer (see
41 > Fig.~\ref{LCFig:SMCP}).
42  
43 < The most widely investigated mesophase formed by banana-shaped
44 < moleculed is the $\text{B}_2$ phase, which is also known as
45 < $\text{SmCP}$.
43 > \begin{figure}
44 > \centering
45 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{smcp.eps}
46 > \caption[]
47 > {}
48 > \label{LCFig:SMCP}
49 > \end{figure}
50  
51 < %Previous Theoretical Studies
51 > Many liquid crystal synthesis experiments suggest that the
52 > occurrence of polarity and chirality strongly relies on the
53 > molecular structure and intermolecular interaction\cite{Reddy2006}.
54 > From a theoretical point of view, it is of fundamental interest to
55 > study the structural properties of liquid crystal phases formed by
56 > banana-shaped molecules and understand their connection to the
57 > molecular structure, especially with respect to the spontaneous
58 > achiral symmetry breaking. As a complementary tool to experiment,
59 > computer simulation can provide unique insight into molecular
60 > ordering and phase behavior, and hence improve the development of
61 > new experiments and theories. In the last two decades, all-atom
62 > models have been adopted to investigate the structural properties of
63 > smectic arrangements\cite{Cook2000, Lansac2001}, as well as other
64 > bulk properties, such as rotational viscosity and flexoelectric
65 > coefficients\cite{Cheung2002, Cheung2004}. However, due to the
66 > limitation of time scale required for phase transition and the
67 > length scale required for representing bulk behavior,
68 > models\cite{Perram1985, Gay1981}, which are based on the observation
69 > that liquid crystal order is exhibited by a range of non-molecular
70 > bodies with high shape anisotropies, became the dominant models in
71 > the field of liquid crystal phase behavior. Previous simulation
72 > studies using hard spherocylinder dimer model\cite{Camp1999} produce
73 > nematic phases, while hard rod simulation studies identified a
74 > Landau point\cite{Bates2005}, at which the isotropic phase undergoes
75 > a direct transition to the biaxial nematic, as well as some possible
76 > liquid crystal phases\cite{Lansac2003}. Other anisotropic models
77 > using Gay-Berne(GB) potential, which produce interactions that favor
78 > local alignment, give the evidence of the novel packing arrangements
79 > of bent-core molecules\cite{Memmer2002,Orlandi2006}.
80  
81 + Experimental studies by Levelut {\it et al.}~\cite{Levelut1981}
82 + revealed that terminal cyano or nitro groups usually induce
83 + permanent longitudinal dipole moments, which affect the phase
84 + behavior considerably. A series of theoretical studies also drawn
85 + equivalent conclusions. Monte Carlo studies of the GB potential with
86 + fixed longitudinal dipoles (i.e. pointed along the principal axis of
87 + rotation) were shown to enhance smectic phase
88 + stability~\cite{Berardi1996,Satoh1996}. Molecular simulation of GB
89 + ellipsoids with transverse dipoles at the terminus of the molecule
90 + also demonstrated that partial striped bilayer structures were
91 + developed from the smectic phase ~\cite{Berardi1996}. More
92 + significant effects have been shown by including multiple
93 + electrostatic moments. Adding longitudinal point quadrupole moments
94 + to rod-shaped GB mesogens, Withers \textit{et al} induced tilted
95 + smectic behaviour in the molecular system~\cite{Withers2003}. Thus,
96 + it is clear that many liquid-crystal forming molecules, specially,
97 + bent-core molecules, could be modeled more accurately by
98 + incorporating electrostatic interaction.
99 +
100 + In this chapter, we consider system consisting of banana-shaped
101 + molecule represented by three rigid GB particles with one or two
102 + point dipoles at different location. Performing a series of
103 + molecular dynamics simulations, we explore the structural properties
104 + of tilted smectic phases as well as the effect of electrostatic
105 + interactions.
106 +
107   \section{\label{liquidCrystalSection:model}Model}
108  
109 < \section{\label{liquidCrystalSection:methods}Methods}
109 > A typical banana-shaped molecule consists of a rigid aromatic
110 > central bent unit with several rod-like wings which are held
111 > together by some linking units and terminal chains (see
112 > Fig.~\ref{LCFig:BananaMolecule}). In this work, each banana-shaped
113 > mesogen has been modeled as a rigid body consisting of three
114 > equivalent prolate ellipsoidal GB particles. The GB interaction
115 > potential used to mimic the apolar characteristics of liquid crystal
116 > molecules takes the familiar form of Lennard-Jones function with
117 > orientation and position dependent range ($\sigma$) and well depth
118 > ($\epsilon$) parameters. The potential between a pair of three-site
119 > banana-shaped molecules $a$ and $b$ is given by
120 > \begin{equation}
121 > V_{ab}^{GB}  = \sum\limits_{i \in a,j \in b} {V_{ij}^{GB} }.
122 > \end{equation}
123 > Every site-site interaction can can be expressed as,
124 > \begin{equation}
125 > V_{ij}^{GB}  = 4\epsilon (\hat u_i ,\hat u_j ,\hat r_{ij} )\left[
126 > {\left( {\frac{{\sigma _0 }}{{r_{ij}  - \sigma (\hat u_i ,\hat u_j
127 > ,\hat r_{ij} )}}} \right)^{12}  - \left( {\frac{{\sigma _0
128 > }}{{r_{ij}  - \sigma (\hat u_i ,\hat u_j ,\hat r_{ij} )}}} \right)^6
129 > } \right] \label{LCEquation:gb}
130 > \end{equation}
131 > where $\hat u_i,\hat u_j$ are unit vectors specifying the
132 > orientation of two molecules $i$ and $j$ separated by intermolecular
133 > vector $r_{ij}$. $\hat r_{ij}$ is the unit vector along the
134 > intermolecular vector. A schematic diagram of the orientation
135 > vectors is shown in Fig.\ref{LCFigure:GBScheme}. The functional form
136 > for $\sigma$ is given by
137 > \begin{equation}
138 > \sigma (\hat u_i ,\hat u_i ,\hat r_{ij} ) = \sigma _0 \left[ {1 -
139 > \frac{\chi }{2}\left( {\frac{{(\hat r_{ij}  \cdot \hat u_i  + \hat
140 > r_{ij}  \cdot \hat u_j )^2 }}{{1 + \chi \hat u_i  \cdot \hat u_j }}
141 > + \frac{{(\hat r_{ij}  \cdot \hat u_i  - \hat r_{ij}  \cdot \hat u_j
142 > )^2 }}{{1 - \chi \hat u_i  \cdot \hat u_j }}} \right)} \right]^{ -
143 > \frac{1}{2}},
144 > \end{equation}
145 > where the aspect ratio of the particles is governed by shape
146 > anisotropy parameter
147 > \begin{equation}
148 > \chi  = \frac{{(\sigma _e /\sigma _s )^2  - 1}}{{(\sigma _e /\sigma
149 > _s )^2  + 1}}.
150 > \label{LCEquation:chi}
151 > \end{equation}
152 > Here, $\sigma_ s$ and $\sigma_{e}$ refer to the side-by-side breadth
153 > and the end-to-end length of the ellipsoid, respectively. The well
154 > depth parameters takes the form
155 > \begin{equation}
156 > \epsilon (\hat u_i ,\hat u_j ,\hat r_{ij} ) = \epsilon _0 \epsilon
157 > ^v (\hat u_i ,\hat u_j )\epsilon '^\mu (\hat u_i ,\hat u_j ,\hat
158 > r_{ij} )
159 > \end{equation}
160 > where $\epsilon_{0}$ is a constant term and
161 > \begin{equation}
162 > \epsilon (\hat u_i ,\hat u_j ) = \frac{1}{{\sqrt {1 - \chi ^2 (\hat
163 > u_i  \cdot \hat u_j )^2 } }}
164 > \end{equation}
165 > and
166 > \begin{equation}
167 > \epsilon '(\hat u_i ,\hat u_j ,\hat r_{ij} ) = 1 - \frac{{\chi
168 > '}}{2}\left[ {\frac{{(\hat r_{ij}  \cdot \hat u_i  + \hat r_{ij}
169 > \cdot \hat u_j )^2 }}{{1 + \chi '\hat u_i  \cdot \hat u_j }} +
170 > \frac{{(\hat r_{ij}  \cdot \hat u_i  - \hat r_{ij}  \cdot \hat u_j
171 > )^2 }}{{1 - \chi '\hat u_i  \cdot \hat u_j }}} \right]
172 > \end{equation}
173 > where the well depth anisotropy parameter $\chi '$ depends on the
174 > ratio between \textit{end-to-end} well depth $\epsilon _e$ and
175 > \textit{side-by-side} well depth $\epsilon_s$,
176 > \begin{equation}
177 > \chi ' = \frac{{1 - (\epsilon _e /\epsilon _s )^{1/\mu} }}{{1 +
178 > (\epsilon _e /\epsilon _s )^{1/\mu} }}.
179 > \end{equation}
180  
181 < \section{\label{liquidCrystalSection:resultDiscussion}Results and Discussion}
181 > \begin{figure}
182 > \centering
183 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{banana.eps}
184 > \caption[]{} \label{LCFig:BananaMolecule}
185 > \end{figure}
186 >
187 > %\begin{figure}
188 > %\centering
189 > %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{bananGB.eps}
190 > %\caption[]{} \label{LCFigure:BananaGB}
191 > %\end{figure}
192 >
193 > \begin{figure}
194 > \centering
195 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{gb_scheme.eps}
196 > \caption[]{Schematic diagram showing definitions of the orientation
197 > vectors for a pair of Gay-Berne molecules}
198 > \label{LCFigure:GBScheme}
199 > \end{figure}
200 >
201 > To account for the permanent dipolar interactions, there should be
202 > an electrostatic interaction term of the form
203 > \begin{equation}
204 > V_{ab}^{dp}  = \sum\limits_{i \in a,j \in b} {\frac{1}{{4\pi
205 > \epsilon _{fs} }}\left[ {\frac{{\mu _i  \cdot \mu _j }}{{r_{ij}^3 }}
206 > - \frac{{3\left( {\mu _i  \cdot r_{ij} } \right)\left( {\mu _i \cdot
207 > r_{ij} } \right)}}{{r_{ij}^5 }}} \right]}
208 > \end{equation}
209 > where $\epsilon _{fs}$ is the permittivity of free space.
210 >
211 > \section{Computational Methodology}
212 >
213 > A series of molecular dynamics simulations were perform to study the
214 > phase behavior of banana shaped liquid crystals. In each simulation,
215 > every banana shaped molecule has been represented by three GB
216 > particles which is characterized by $\mu = 1,~ \nu = 2,
217 > ~\epsilon_{e}/\epsilon_{s} = 1/5$ and $\sigma_{e}/\sigma_{s} = 3$.
218 > All of the simulations begin with same equilibrated isotropic
219 > configuration where 1024 molecules without dipoles were confined in
220 > a $160\times 160 \times 120$ box. After the dipolar interactions are
221 > switched on, 2~ns NPTi cooling run with themostat of 2~ps and
222 > barostat of 50~ps were used to equilibrate the system to desired
223 > temperature and pressure.
224 >
225 > \subsection{Order Parameters}
226 >
227 > To investigate the phase structure of the model liquid crystal, we
228 > calculated various order parameters and correlation functions.
229 > Particulary, the $P_2$ order parameter allows us to estimate average
230 > alignment along the director axis $Z$ which can be identified from
231 > the largest eigen value obtained by diagonalizing the order
232 > parameter tensor
233 > \begin{equation}
234 > \overleftrightarrow{\mathsf{Q}} = \frac{1}{N}\sum_i^N %
235 >    \begin{pmatrix} %
236 >    u_{ix}u_{ix}-\frac{1}{3} & u_{ix}u_{iy} & u_{ix}u_{iz} \\
237 >    u_{iy}u_{ix} & u_{iy}u_{iy}-\frac{1}{3} & u_{iy}u_{iz} \\
238 >    u_{iz}u_{ix} & u_{iz}u_{iy} & u_{iz}u_{iz}-\frac{1}{3} %
239 >    \end{pmatrix},
240 > \label{lipidEq:po1}
241 > \end{equation}
242 > where the $u_{i\alpha}$ is the $\alpha$ element of the unit vector
243 > $\mathbf{\hat{u}}_i$, and the sum over $i$ averages over the whole
244 > collection of unit vectors. The $P_2$ order parameter for uniaxial
245 > phase is then simply given by
246 > \begin{equation}
247 > \langle P_2 \rangle = \frac{3}{2}\lambda_{\text{max}}.
248 > \label{lipidEq:po3}
249 > \end{equation}
250 > In addition to the $P_2$ order parameter, $ R_{2,2}^2$ order
251 > parameter for biaxial phase is introduced to describe the ordering
252 > in the plane orthogonal to the director by
253 > \begin{equation}
254 > R_{2,2}^2  = \frac{1}{4}\left\langle {(x_i  \cdot X)^2  - (x_i \cdot
255 > Y)^2  - (y_i  \cdot X)^2  + (y_i  \cdot Y)^2 } \right\rangle
256 > \end{equation}
257 > where $X$, $Y$ and $Z$ are axis of the director frame.
258 >
259 > \subsection{Structure Properties}
260 >
261 > It is more important to show the density correlation along the
262 > director
263 > \begin{equation}
264 > g(z) =< \delta (z-z_{ij})>_{ij} / \pi R^{2} \rho
265 > \end{equation},
266 > where $z_{ij} = r_{ij} \dot Z$ was measured in the director frame
267 > and $R$ is the radius of the cylindrical sampling region.
268 >
269 > \subsection{Rotational Invariants}
270 >
271 > As a useful set of correlation functions to describe
272 > position-orientation correlation, rotation invariants were first
273 > applied in a spherical symmetric system to study x-ray and light
274 > scatting\cite{Blum1971}. Latterly, expansion of the orientation pair
275 > correlation in terms of rotation invariant for molecules of
276 > arbitrary shape was introduce by Stone\cite{Stone1978} and adopted
277 > by other researchers in liquid crystal studies\cite{Berardi2000}.
278 >
279 > \begin{eqnarray}
280 > S_{22}^{220} (r) & = & \frac{1}{{4\sqrt 5 }} \left< \delta (r -
281 > r_{ij} )((\hat x_i  \cdot \hat x_j )^2  - (\hat x_i  \cdot \hat y_j
282 > )^2  - (\hat y_i  \cdot \hat x_j )^2  + (\hat y_i  \cdot \hat y_j
283 > )^2 ) \right. \\
284 > & & \left. - 2(\hat x_i  \cdot \hat y_j )(\hat y_i \cdot \hat x_j ) -
285 > 2(\hat x_i  \cdot \hat x_j )(\hat y_i  \cdot \hat y_j )) \right>
286 > \end{eqnarray}
287 >
288 > \begin{equation}
289 > S_{00}^{221} (r) =  - \frac{{\sqrt 3 }}{{\sqrt {10} }}\left\langle
290 > {\delta (r - r_{ij} )((\hat z_i  \cdot \hat z_j )(\hat z_i  \cdot
291 > \hat z_j  \times \hat r_{ij} ))} \right\rangle
292 > \end{equation}
293 >
294 > \section{Results and Conclusion}
295 > \label{sec:results and conclusion}
296 >
297 > To investigate the molecular organization behavior due to different
298 > dipolar orientation and position with respect to the center of the
299 > molecule,

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines