ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/tengDissertation/LiquidCrystal.tex
Revision: 2876
Committed: Wed Jun 21 19:46:01 2006 UTC (18 years ago) by tim
Content type: application/x-tex
File size: 13860 byte(s)
Log Message:
minor fixes

File Contents

# Content
1 \chapter{\label{chapt:liquidcrystal}LIQUID CRYSTAL}
2
3 \section{\label{liquidCrystalSection:introduction}Introduction}
4
5 Long range orientational order is one of the most fundamental
6 properties of liquid crystal mesophases. This orientational
7 anisotropy of the macroscopic phases originates in the shape
8 anisotropy of the constituent molecules. Among these anisotropy
9 mesogens, rod-like (calamitic) and disk-like molecules have been
10 exploited in great detail in the last two decades\cite{Huh2004}.
11 Typically, these mesogens consist of a rigid aromatic core and one
12 or more attached aliphatic chains. For short chain molecules, only
13 nematic phases, in which positional order is limited or absent, can
14 be observed, because the entropy of mixing different parts of the
15 mesogens is paramount to the dispersion interaction. In contrast,
16 formation of the one dimension lamellar sematic phase in rod-like
17 molecules with sufficiently long aliphatic chains has been reported,
18 as well as the segregation phenomena in disk-like molecules.
19
20 Recently, the banana-shaped or bent-core liquid crystal have became
21 one of the most active research areas in mesogenic materials and
22 supramolecular chemistry\cite{Niori1996, Link1997, Pelzl1999}.
23 Unlike rods and disks, the polarity and biaxiality of the
24 banana-shaped molecules allow the molecules organize into a variety
25 of novel liquid crystalline phases which show interesting material
26 properties. Of particular interest is the spontaneous formation of
27 macroscopic chiral layers from achiral banana-shaped molecules,
28 where polar molecule orientational ordering is shown within the
29 layer plane as well as the tilted arrangement of the molecules
30 relative to the polar axis. As a consequence of supramolecular
31 chirality, the spontaneous polarization arises in ferroelectric (FE)
32 and antiferroelectic (AF) switching of smectic liquid crystal
33 phases, demonstrating some promising applications in second-order
34 nonlinear optical devices. The most widely investigated mesophase
35 formed by banana-shaped moleculed is the $\text{B}_2$ phase, which
36 is also referred to as $\text{SmCP}$\cite{Link1997}. Of the most
37 important discover in this tilt lamellar phase is the four distinct
38 packing arrangements (two conglomerates and two macroscopic
39 racemates), which depend on the tilt direction and the polar
40 direction of the molecule in adjacent layer (see
41 Fig.~\ref{LCFig:SMCP}).
42
43 \begin{figure}
44 \centering
45 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{smcp.eps}
46 \caption[]
47 {}
48 \label{LCFig:SMCP}
49 \end{figure}
50
51 Many liquid crystal synthesis experiments suggest that the
52 occurrence of polarity and chirality strongly relies on the
53 molecular structure and intermolecular interaction\cite{Reddy2006}.
54 From a theoretical point of view, it is of fundamental interest to
55 study the structural properties of liquid crystal phases formed by
56 banana-shaped molecules and understand their connection to the
57 molecular structure, especially with respect to the spontaneous
58 achiral symmetry breaking. As a complementary tool to experiment,
59 computer simulation can provide unique insight into molecular
60 ordering and phase behavior, and hence improve the development of
61 new experiments and theories. In the last two decades, all-atom
62 models have been adopted to investigate the structural properties of
63 smectic arrangements\cite{Cook2000, Lansac2001}, as well as other
64 bulk properties, such as rotational viscosity and flexoelectric
65 coefficients\cite{Cheung2002, Cheung2004}. However, due to the
66 limitation of time scale required for phase transition and the
67 length scale required for representing bulk behavior,
68 models\cite{Perram1985, Gay1981}, which are based on the observation
69 that liquid crystal order is exhibited by a range of non-molecular
70 bodies with high shape anisotropies, became the dominant models in
71 the field of liquid crystal phase behavior. Previous simulation
72 studies using hard spherocylinder dimer model\cite{Camp1999} produce
73 nematic phases, while hard rod simulation studies identified a
74 Landau point\cite{Bates2005}, at which the isotropic phase undergoes
75 a direct transition to the biaxial nematic, as well as some possible
76 liquid crystal phases\cite{Lansac2003}. Other anisotropic models
77 using Gay-Berne(GB) potential, which produce interactions that favor
78 local alignment, give the evidence of the novel packing arrangements
79 of bent-core molecules\cite{Memmer2002,Orlandi2006}.
80
81 Experimental studies by Levelut {\it et al.}~\cite{Levelut1981}
82 revealed that terminal cyano or nitro groups usually induce
83 permanent longitudinal dipole moments, which affect the phase
84 behavior considerably. A series of theoretical studies also drawn
85 equivalent conclusions. Monte Carlo studies of the GB potential with
86 fixed longitudinal dipoles (i.e. pointed along the principal axis of
87 rotation) were shown to enhance smectic phase
88 stability~\cite{Berardi1996,Satoh1996}. Molecular simulation of GB
89 ellipsoids with transverse dipoles at the terminus of the molecule
90 also demonstrated that partial striped bilayer structures were
91 developed from the smectic phase ~\cite{Berardi1996}. More
92 significant effects have been shown by including multiple
93 electrostatic moments. Adding longitudinal point quadrupole moments
94 to rod-shaped GB mesogens, Withers \textit{et al} induced tilted
95 smectic behaviour in the molecular system~\cite{Withers2003}. Thus,
96 it is clear that many liquid-crystal forming molecules, specially,
97 bent-core molecules, could be modeled more accurately by
98 incorporating electrostatic interaction.
99
100 In this chapter, we consider system consisting of banana-shaped
101 molecule represented by three rigid GB particles with one or two
102 point dipoles at different location. Performing a series of
103 molecular dynamics simulations, we explore the structural properties
104 of tilted smectic phases as well as the effect of electrostatic
105 interactions.
106
107 \section{\label{liquidCrystalSection:model}Model}
108
109 A typical banana-shaped molecule consists of a rigid aromatic
110 central bent unit with several rod-like wings which are held
111 together by some linking units and terminal chains (see
112 Fig.~\ref{LCFig:BananaMolecule}). In this work, each banana-shaped
113 mesogen has been modeled as a rigid body consisting of three
114 equivalent prolate ellipsoidal GB particles. The GB interaction
115 potential used to mimic the apolar characteristics of liquid crystal
116 molecules takes the familiar form of Lennard-Jones function with
117 orientation and position dependent range ($\sigma$) and well depth
118 ($\epsilon$) parameters. The potential between a pair of three-site
119 banana-shaped molecules $a$ and $b$ is given by
120 \begin{equation}
121 V_{ab}^{GB} = \sum\limits_{i \in a,j \in b} {V_{ij}^{GB} }.
122 \end{equation}
123 Every site-site interaction can can be expressed as,
124 \begin{equation}
125 V_{ij}^{GB} = 4\epsilon (\hat u_i ,\hat u_j ,\hat r_{ij} )\left[
126 {\left( {\frac{{\sigma _0 }}{{r_{ij} - \sigma (\hat u_i ,\hat u_j
127 ,\hat r_{ij} )}}} \right)^{12} - \left( {\frac{{\sigma _0
128 }}{{r_{ij} - \sigma (\hat u_i ,\hat u_j ,\hat r_{ij} )}}} \right)^6
129 } \right] \label{LCEquation:gb}
130 \end{equation}
131 where $\hat u_i,\hat u_j$ are unit vectors specifying the
132 orientation of two molecules $i$ and $j$ separated by intermolecular
133 vector $r_{ij}$. $\hat r_{ij}$ is the unit vector along the
134 intermolecular vector. A schematic diagram of the orientation
135 vectors is shown in Fig.\ref{LCFigure:GBScheme}. The functional form
136 for $\sigma$ is given by
137 \begin{equation}
138 \sigma (\hat u_i ,\hat u_i ,\hat r_{ij} ) = \sigma _0 \left[ {1 -
139 \frac{\chi }{2}\left( {\frac{{(\hat r_{ij} \cdot \hat u_i + \hat
140 r_{ij} \cdot \hat u_j )^2 }}{{1 + \chi \hat u_i \cdot \hat u_j }}
141 + \frac{{(\hat r_{ij} \cdot \hat u_i - \hat r_{ij} \cdot \hat u_j
142 )^2 }}{{1 - \chi \hat u_i \cdot \hat u_j }}} \right)} \right]^{ -
143 \frac{1}{2}},
144 \end{equation}
145 where the aspect ratio of the particles is governed by shape
146 anisotropy parameter
147 \begin{equation}
148 \chi = \frac{{(\sigma _e /\sigma _s )^2 - 1}}{{(\sigma _e /\sigma
149 _s )^2 + 1}}.
150 \label{LCEquation:chi}
151 \end{equation}
152 Here, $\sigma_ s$ and $\sigma_{e}$ refer to the side-by-side breadth
153 and the end-to-end length of the ellipsoid, respectively. The well
154 depth parameters takes the form
155 \begin{equation}
156 \epsilon (\hat u_i ,\hat u_j ,\hat r_{ij} ) = \epsilon _0 \epsilon
157 ^v (\hat u_i ,\hat u_j )\epsilon '^\mu (\hat u_i ,\hat u_j ,\hat
158 r_{ij} )
159 \end{equation}
160 where $\epsilon_{0}$ is a constant term and
161 \begin{equation}
162 \epsilon (\hat u_i ,\hat u_j ) = \frac{1}{{\sqrt {1 - \chi ^2 (\hat
163 u_i \cdot \hat u_j )^2 } }}
164 \end{equation}
165 and
166 \begin{equation}
167 \epsilon '(\hat u_i ,\hat u_j ,\hat r_{ij} ) = 1 - \frac{{\chi
168 '}}{2}\left[ {\frac{{(\hat r_{ij} \cdot \hat u_i + \hat r_{ij}
169 \cdot \hat u_j )^2 }}{{1 + \chi '\hat u_i \cdot \hat u_j }} +
170 \frac{{(\hat r_{ij} \cdot \hat u_i - \hat r_{ij} \cdot \hat u_j
171 )^2 }}{{1 - \chi '\hat u_i \cdot \hat u_j }}} \right]
172 \end{equation}
173 where the well depth anisotropy parameter $\chi '$ depends on the
174 ratio between \textit{end-to-end} well depth $\epsilon _e$ and
175 \textit{side-by-side} well depth $\epsilon_s$,
176 \begin{equation}
177 \chi ' = \frac{{1 - (\epsilon _e /\epsilon _s )^{1/\mu} }}{{1 +
178 (\epsilon _e /\epsilon _s )^{1/\mu} }}.
179 \end{equation}
180
181 \begin{figure}
182 \centering
183 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{banana.eps}
184 \caption[]{} \label{LCFig:BananaMolecule}
185 \end{figure}
186
187 %\begin{figure}
188 %\centering
189 %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{bananGB.eps}
190 %\caption[]{} \label{LCFigure:BananaGB}
191 %\end{figure}
192
193 \begin{figure}
194 \centering
195 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{gb_scheme.eps}
196 \caption[]{Schematic diagram showing definitions of the orientation
197 vectors for a pair of Gay-Berne molecules}
198 \label{LCFigure:GBScheme}
199 \end{figure}
200
201 To account for the permanent dipolar interactions, there should be
202 an electrostatic interaction term of the form
203 \begin{equation}
204 V_{ab}^{dp} = \sum\limits_{i \in a,j \in b} {\frac{1}{{4\pi
205 \epsilon _{fs} }}\left[ {\frac{{\mu _i \cdot \mu _j }}{{r_{ij}^3 }}
206 - \frac{{3\left( {\mu _i \cdot r_{ij} } \right)\left( {\mu _i \cdot
207 r_{ij} } \right)}}{{r_{ij}^5 }}} \right]}
208 \end{equation}
209 where $\epsilon _{fs}$ is the permittivity of free space.
210
211 \section{Computational Methodology}
212
213 A series of molecular dynamics simulations were perform to study the
214 phase behavior of banana shaped liquid crystals. In each simulation,
215 every banana shaped molecule has been represented three GB particles
216 which is characterized by $\mu = 1,~ \nu = 2,
217 ~\epsilon_{e}/\epsilon_{s} = 1/5$ and $\sigma_{e}/\sigma_{s} = 3$.
218 All of the simulations begin with same equilibrated isotropic
219 configuration where 1024 molecules without dipoles were confined in
220 a $160\times 160 \times 120$ box. After the dipolar interactions are
221 switched on, 2~ns NPTi cooling run with themostat of 2~ps and
222 barostat of 50~ps were used to equilibrate the system to desired
223 temperature and pressure.
224
225 \subsection{Order Parameters}
226
227 To investigate the phase structure of the model liquid crystal, we
228 calculated various order parameters and correlation functions.
229 Particulary, the $P_2$ order parameter allows us to estimate average
230 alignment along the director axis $Z$ which can be identified from
231 the largest eigen value obtained by diagonalizing the order
232 parameter tensor
233 \begin{equation}
234 \overleftrightarrow{\mathsf{Q}} = \frac{1}{N}\sum_i^N %
235 \begin{pmatrix} %
236 u_{ix}u_{ix}-\frac{1}{3} & u_{ix}u_{iy} & u_{ix}u_{iz} \\
237 u_{iy}u_{ix} & u_{iy}u_{iy}-\frac{1}{3} & u_{iy}u_{iz} \\
238 u_{iz}u_{ix} & u_{iz}u_{iy} & u_{iz}u_{iz}-\frac{1}{3} %
239 \end{pmatrix},
240 \label{lipidEq:po1}
241 \end{equation}
242 where the $u_{i\alpha}$ is the $\alpha$ element of the unit vector
243 $\mathbf{\hat{u}}_i$, and the sum over $i$ averages over the whole
244 collection of unit vectors. The $P_2$ order parameter for uniaxial
245 phase is then simply given by
246 \begin{equation}
247 \langle P_2 \rangle = \frac{3}{2}\lambda_{\text{max}}.
248 \label{lipidEq:po3}
249 \end{equation}
250 In addition to the $P_2$ order parameter, $ R_{2,2}^2$ order
251 parameter for biaxial phase is introduced to describe the ordering
252 in the plane orthogonal to the director by
253 \begin{equation}
254 R_{2,2}^2 = \frac{1}{4}\left\langle {(x_i \cdot X)^2 - (x_i \cdot
255 Y)^2 - (y_i \cdot X)^2 + (y_i \cdot Y)^2 } \right\rangle
256 \end{equation}
257 where $X$, $Y$ and $Z$ are axis of the director frame.
258
259 \subsection{Structure Properties}
260
261 It is more important to show the density correlation along the
262 director
263 \begin{equation}
264 g(z) =< \delta (z-z_{ij})>_{ij} / \pi R^{2} \rho
265 \end{equation},
266 where $z_{ij} = r_{ij} \dot Z$ was measured in the director frame
267 and $R$ is the radius of the cylindrical sampling region.
268
269 \subsection{Rotational Invariants}
270
271 As a useful set of correlation functions to describe
272 position-orientation correlation, rotation invariants were first
273 applied in a spherical symmetric system to study x-ray and light
274 scatting\cite{Blum1971}. Latterly, expansion of the orientation pair
275 correlation in terms of rotation invariant for molecules of
276 arbitrary shape was introduce by Stone\cite{Stone1978} and adopted
277 by other researchers in liquid crystal studies\cite{Berardi2000}.
278
279 \begin{eqnarray}
280 S_{22}^{220} (r) & = & \frac{1}{{4\sqrt 5 }}\left\langle {\delta (r
281 - r_{ij} )((\hat x_i \cdot \hat x_j )^2 - (\hat x_i \cdot \hat
282 y_j )^2 - (\hat y_i \cdot \hat x_j )^2 + (\hat y_i \cdot \hat
283 y_j )^2 ) \\
284 & & - 2(\hat x_i \cdot \hat y_j )(\hat y_i \cdot \hat x_j ) -
285 2(\hat x_i \cdot \hat x_j )(\hat y_i \cdot \hat y_j ))}
286 \right\rangle
287 \end{eqnarray}
288
289 \begin{equation}
290 S_{00}^{221} (r) = - \frac{{\sqrt 3 }}{{\sqrt {10} }}\left\langle
291 {\delta (r - r_{ij} )((\hat z_i \cdot \hat z_j )(\hat z_i \cdot
292 \hat z_j \times \hat r_{ij} ))} \right\rangle
293 \end{equation}
294
295 \section{Results and Conclusion}
296 \label{sec:results and conclusion}
297
298 To investigate the molecular organization behavior due to different
299 dipolar orientation and position with respect to the center of the
300 molecule,