ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/xDissertation/mc.tex
Revision: 3362
Committed: Fri Mar 7 01:53:18 2008 UTC (16 years, 4 months ago) by xsun
Content type: application/x-tex
File size: 32507 byte(s)
Log Message:
writing up the dissertation.

File Contents

# User Rev Content
1 xsun 3360 \chapter{\label{chap:mc}SPONTANEOUS CORRUGATION OF DIPOLAR MEMBRANES}
2 xsun 3354
3     \section{Introduction}
4     \label{mc:sec:Int}
5    
6     The properties of polymeric membranes are known to depend sensitively
7     on the details of the internal interactions between the constituent
8     monomers. A flexible membrane will always have a competition between
9     the energy of curvature and the in-plane stretching energy and will be
10     able to buckle in certain limits of surface tension and
11     temperature.\cite{Safran94} The buckling can be non-specific and
12     centered at dislocation~\cite{Seung1988} or grain-boundary
13     defects,\cite{Carraro1993} or it can be directional and cause long
14     ``roof-tile'' or tube-like structures to appear in
15     partially-polymerized phospholipid vesicles.\cite{Mutz1991}
16    
17     One would expect that anisotropic local interactions could lead to
18     interesting properties of the buckled membrane. We report here on the
19     buckling behavior of a membrane composed of harmonically-bound, but
20     freely-rotating electrostatic dipoles. The dipoles have strongly
21     anisotropic local interactions and the membrane exhibits coupling
22     between the buckling and the long-range ordering of the dipoles.
23    
24     Buckling behavior in liquid crystalline and biological membranes is a
25     well-known phenomenon. Relatively pure phosphatidylcholine (PC)
26     bilayers form a corrugated or ``rippled'' phase ($P_{\beta'}$) which
27     appears as an intermediate phase between the gel ($L_\beta$) and fluid
28     ($L_{\alpha}$) phases. The $P_{\beta'}$ phase has attracted
29     substantial experimental interest over the past 30 years. Most
30     structural information of the ripple phase has been obtained by the
31     X-ray diffraction~\cite{Sun96,Katsaras00} and freeze-fracture electron
32 xsun 3361 microscopy (FFEM).~\cite{Copeland80,Meyer96} The X-ray diffraction
33     work by Katsaras {\it et al.} showed that a rich phase diagram
34     exhibiting both {\it asymmetric} and {\it symmetric} ripples is
35     possible for lecithin bilayers.\cite{Katsaras00} Recently, Kaasgaard
36     {\it et al.} used atomic force microscopy (AFM) to observe ripple
37     phase morphology in bilayers supported on mica.~\cite{Kaasgaard03} The
38 xsun 3354 experimental results provide strong support for a 2-dimensional
39     triangular packing lattice of the lipid molecules within the ripple
40     phase. This is a notable change from the observed lipid packing
41 xsun 3361 within the gel phase,~\cite{Cevc87} although Tenchov {\it et al.} have
42     recently observed near-hexagonal packing in some phosphatidylcholine
43     (PC) gel phases.~\cite{Tenchov2001} There have been a number of
44 xsun 3354 theoretical
45 xsun 3361 approaches~\cite{Marder84,Carlson87,Goldstein88,McCullough90,Lubensky93,Misbah98,Heimburg00,Kubica02,Bannerjee02}
46 xsun 3354 (and some heroic
47     simulations~\cite{Ayton02,Jiang04,Brannigan04a,deVries05,deJoannis06})
48     undertaken to try to explain this phase, but to date, none have looked
49     specifically at the contribution of the dipolar character of the lipid
50     head groups towards this corrugation. Lipid chain interdigitation
51     certainly plays a major role, and the structures of the ripple phase
52     are highly ordered. The model we investigate here lacks chain
53     interdigitation (as well as the chains themselves!) and will not be
54     detailed enough to rule in favor of (or against) any of these
55     explanations for the $P_{\beta'}$ phase.
56    
57     Membranes containing electrostatic dipoles can also exhibit the
58     flexoelectric effect,\cite{Todorova2004,Harden2006,Petrov2006} which
59     is the ability of mechanical deformations to result in electrostatic
60     organization of the membrane. This phenomenon is a curvature-induced
61     membrane polarization which can lead to potential differences across a
62     membrane. Reverse flexoelectric behavior (in which applied currents
63     effect membrane curvature) has also been observed. Explanations of
64     the details of these effects have typically utilized membrane
65     polarization perpendicular to the face of the
66     membrane,\cite{Petrov2006} and the effect has been observed in both
67     biological,\cite{Raphael2000} bent-core liquid
68     crystalline,\cite{Harden2006} and polymer-dispersed liquid crystalline
69     membranes.\cite{Todorova2004}
70    
71     The problem with using atomistic and even coarse-grained approaches to
72     study membrane buckling phenomena is that only a relatively small
73     number of periods of the corrugation (i.e. one or two) can be
74     realistically simulated given current technology. Also, simulations
75     of lipid bilayers are traditionally carried out with periodic boundary
76     conditions in two or three dimensions and these have the potential to
77     enhance the periodicity of the system at that wavelength. To avoid
78     this pitfall, we are using a model which allows us to have
79     sufficiently large systems so that we are not causing artificial
80     corrugation through the use of periodic boundary conditions.
81    
82     The simplest dipolar membrane is one in which the dipoles are located
83     on fixed lattice sites. Ferroelectric states (with long-range dipolar
84     order) can be observed in dipolar systems with non-triangular
85     packings. However, {\em triangularly}-packed 2-D dipolar systems are
86     inherently frustrated and one would expect a dipolar-disordered phase
87     to be the lowest free energy
88     configuration.\cite{Toulouse1977,Marland1979} Dipolar lattices already
89     have rich phase behavior, but in order to allow the membrane to
90     buckle, a single degree of freedom (translation normal to the membrane
91     face) must be added to each of the dipoles. It would also be possible
92     to allow complete translational freedom. This approach
93     is similar in character to a number of elastic Ising models that have
94     been developed to explain interesting mechanical properties in
95     magnetic alloys.\cite{Renard1966,Zhu2005,Zhu2006,Jiang2006}
96    
97     What we present here is an attempt to find the simplest dipolar model
98     which will exhibit buckling behavior. We are using a modified XYZ
99     lattice model; details of the model can be found in section
100     \ref{mc:sec:model}, results of Monte Carlo simulations using this model
101     are presented in section
102     \ref{mc:sec:results}, and section \ref{mc:sec:discussion} contains our conclusions.
103    
104     \section{2-D Dipolar Membrane}
105     \label{mc:sec:model}
106    
107     The point of developing this model was to arrive at the simplest
108     possible theoretical model which could exhibit spontaneous corrugation
109     of a two-dimensional dipolar medium. Since molecules in polymerized
110     membranes and in the $P_{\beta'}$ ripple phase have limited
111     translational freedom, we have chosen a lattice to support the dipoles
112     in the x-y plane. The lattice may be either triangular (lattice
113     constants $a/b =
114     \sqrt{3}$) or distorted. However, each dipole has 3 degrees of
115     freedom. They may move freely {\em out} of the x-y plane (along the
116     $z$ axis), and they have complete orientational freedom ($0 <= \theta
117     <= \pi$, $0 <= \phi < 2
118     \pi$). This is essentially a modified X-Y-Z model with translational
119     freedom along the z-axis.
120    
121     The potential energy of the system,
122 xsun 3361 \begin{equation}
123     \begin{split}
124     V = \sum_i &\left( \sum_{j>i} \frac{|\mu|^2}{4\pi \epsilon_0 r_{ij}^3} \left[
125 xsun 3354 {\mathbf{\hat u}_i} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat u}_j} -
126     3({\mathbf{\hat u}_i} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat
127 xsun 3361 r}_{ij}})({\mathbf{\hat u}_j} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}})\right] \right. \\
128     & \left. + \sum_{j \in NN_i}^6 \frac{k_r}{2}\left(
129 xsun 3354 r_{ij}-\sigma \right)^2 \right)
130 xsun 3361 \end{split}
131 xsun 3354 \label{mceq:pot}
132 xsun 3361 \end{equation}
133 xsun 3354
134     In this potential, $\mathbf{\hat u}_i$ is the unit vector pointing
135     along dipole $i$ and $\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}$ is the unit vector
136     pointing along the inter-dipole vector $\mathbf{r}_{ij}$. The entire
137     potential is governed by three parameters, the dipolar strength
138     ($\mu$), the harmonic spring constant ($k_r$) and the preferred
139     intermolecular spacing ($\sigma$). In practice, we set the value of
140     $\sigma$ to the average inter-molecular spacing from the planar
141     lattice, yielding a potential model that has only two parameters for a
142     particular choice of lattice constants $a$ (along the $x$-axis) and
143     $b$ (along the $y$-axis). We also define a set of reduced parameters
144     based on the length scale ($\sigma$) and the energy of the harmonic
145     potential at a deformation of 2 $\sigma$ ($\epsilon = k_r \sigma^2 /
146     2$). Using these two constants, we perform our calculations using
147     reduced distances, ($r^{*} = r / \sigma$), temperatures ($T^{*} = 2
148     k_B T / k_r \sigma^2$), densities ($\rho^{*} = N \sigma^2 / L_x L_y$),
149     and dipole moments ($\mu^{*} = \mu / \sqrt{4 \pi \epsilon_0 \sigma^5
150     k_r / 2}$). It should be noted that the density ($\rho^{*}$) depends
151     only on the mean particle spacing in the $x-y$ plane; the lattice is
152     fully populated.
153    
154     To investigate the phase behavior of this model, we have performed a
155     series of Metropolis Monte Carlo simulations of moderately-sized (34.3
156     $\sigma$ on a side) patches of membrane hosted on both triangular
157     ($\gamma = a/b = \sqrt{3}$) and distorted ($\gamma \neq \sqrt{3}$)
158     lattices. The linear extent of one edge of the monolayer was $20 a$
159     and the system was kept roughly square. The average distance that
160     coplanar dipoles were positioned from their six nearest neighbors was
161     1 $\sigma$ (on both triangular and distorted lattices). Typical
162     system sizes were 1360 dipoles for the triangular lattices and
163     840-2800 dipoles for the distorted lattices. Two-dimensional periodic
164     boundary conditions were used, and the cutoff for the dipole-dipole
165     interaction was set to 4.3 $\sigma$. This cutoff is roughly 2.5 times
166     the typical real-space electrostatic cutoff for molecular systems.
167     Since dipole-dipole interactions decay rapidly with distance, and
168     since the intrinsic three-dimensional periodicity of the Ewald sum can
169     give artifacts in 2-d systems, we have chosen not to use it in these
170     calculations. Although the Ewald sum has been reformulated to handle
171     2-D systems,\cite{Parry75,Parry76,Heyes77,deLeeuw79,Rhee89} these
172     methods are computationally expensive,\cite{Spohr97,Yeh99} and are not
173     necessary in this case. All parameters ($T^{*}$, $\mu^{*}$, and
174     $\gamma$) were varied systematically to study the effects of these
175     parameters on the formation of ripple-like phases.
176    
177     \section{Results and Analysis}
178     \label{mc:sec:results}
179    
180     \subsection{Dipolar Ordering and Coexistence Temperatures}
181     The principal method for observing the orientational ordering
182 xsun 3362 transition in dipolar or liquid crystalline systems is the $P_2$ order
183     parameter (defined as $1.5 \times \lambda_{max}$, where
184     $\lambda_{max}$ is the largest eigenvalue of the matrix,
185 xsun 3354 \begin{equation}
186     {\mathsf{S}} = \frac{1}{N} \sum_i \left(
187     \begin{array}{ccc}
188     u^{x}_i u^{x}_i-\frac{1}{3} & u^{x}_i u^{y}_i & u^{x}_i u^{z}_i \\
189     u^{y}_i u^{x}_i & u^{y}_i u^{y}_i -\frac{1}{3} & u^{y}_i u^{z}_i \\
190     u^{z}_i u^{x}_i & u^{z}_i u^{y}_i & u^{z}_i u^{z}_i -\frac{1}{3}
191     \end{array} \right).
192     \label{mceq:opmatrix}
193     \end{equation}
194     Here $u^{\alpha}_i$ is the $\alpha=x,y,z$ component of the unit vector
195     for dipole $i$. $P_2$ will be $1.0$ for a perfectly-ordered system
196     and near $0$ for a randomized system. Note that this order parameter
197     is {\em not} equal to the polarization of the system. For example,
198     the polarization of the perfect anti-ferroelectric system is $0$, but
199     $P_2$ for an anti-ferroelectric system is $1$. The eigenvector of
200     $\mathsf{S}$ corresponding to the largest eigenvalue is familiar as
201     the director axis, which can be used to determine a privileged dipolar
202     axis for dipole-ordered systems. The top panel in Fig. \ref{mcfig:phase}
203     shows the values of $P_2$ as a function of temperature for both
204     triangular ($\gamma = 1.732$) and distorted ($\gamma=1.875$)
205     lattices.
206    
207     \begin{figure}
208     \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcPhase.pdf}
209     \caption{\label{mcfig:phase} Top panel: The $P_2$ dipolar order parameter as
210     a function of temperature for both triangular ($\gamma = 1.732$) and
211     distorted ($\gamma = 1.875$) lattices. Bottom Panel: The phase
212     diagram for the dipolar membrane model. The line denotes the division
213     between the dipolar ordered (anti-ferroelectric) and disordered phases.
214     An enlarged view near the triangular lattice is shown inset.}
215     \end{figure}
216    
217     There is a clear order-disorder transition in evidence from this data.
218     Both the triangular and distorted lattices have dipolar-ordered
219     low-temperature phases, and orientationally-disordered high
220     temperature phases. The coexistence temperature for the triangular
221     lattice is significantly lower than for the distorted lattices, and
222     the bulk polarization is approximately $0$ for both dipolar ordered
223     and disordered phases. This gives strong evidence that the dipolar
224     ordered phase is anti-ferroelectric. We have verified that this
225     dipolar ordering transition is not a function of system size by
226     performing identical calculations with systems twice as large. The
227     transition is equally smooth at all system sizes that were studied.
228     Additionally, we have repeated the Monte Carlo simulations over a wide
229     range of lattice ratios ($\gamma$) to generate a dipolar
230     order/disorder phase diagram. The bottom panel in Fig. \ref{mcfig:phase}
231     shows that the triangular lattice is a low-temperature cusp in the
232     $T^{*}-\gamma$ phase diagram.
233    
234     This phase diagram is remarkable in that it shows an
235     anti-ferroelectric phase near $\gamma=1.732$ where one would expect
236     lattice frustration to result in disordered phases at all
237     temperatures. Observations of the configurations in this phase show
238     clearly that the system has accomplished dipolar ordering by forming
239     large ripple-like structures. We have observed anti-ferroelectric
240     ordering in all three of the equivalent directions on the triangular
241     lattice, and the dipoles have been observed to organize perpendicular
242     to the membrane normal (in the plane of the membrane). It is
243     particularly interesting to note that the ripple-like structures have
244     also been observed to propagate in the three equivalent directions on
245     the lattice, but the {\em direction of ripple propagation is always
246     perpendicular to the dipole director axis}. A snapshot of a typical
247     anti-ferroelectric rippled structure is shown in
248     Fig. \ref{mcfig:snapshot}.
249    
250     \begin{figure}
251     \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcSnapshot.pdf}
252     \caption{\label{mcfig:snapshot} Top and Side views of a representative
253     configuration for the dipolar ordered phase supported on the
254     triangular lattice. Note the anti-ferroelectric ordering and the long
255     wavelength buckling of the membrane. Dipolar ordering has been
256     observed in all three equivalent directions on the triangular lattice,
257     and the ripple direction is always perpendicular to the director axis
258     for the dipoles.}
259     \end{figure}
260    
261     Although the snapshot in Fig. \ref{mcfig:snapshot} gives the appearance
262     of three-row stair-like structures, these appear to be transient. On
263     average, the corrugation of the membrane is a relatively smooth,
264     long-wavelength phenomenon, with occasional steep drops between
265     adjacent lines of anti-aligned dipoles.
266    
267     The height-dipole correlation function ($C_{\textrm{hd}}(r, \cos
268     \theta)$) makes the connection between dipolar ordering and the wave
269     vector of the ripple even more explicit. $C_{\textrm{hd}}(r, \cos
270     \theta)$ is an angle-dependent pair distribution function. The angle
271     ($\theta$) is the angle between the intermolecular vector
272     $\vec{r}_{ij}$ and direction of dipole $i$,
273     \begin{equation}
274     C_{\textrm{hd}} = \frac{\langle \frac{1}{n(r)} \sum_{i}\sum_{j>i}
275     h_i \cdot h_j \delta(r - r_{ij}) \delta(\cos \theta_{ij} -
276     \cos \theta)\rangle} {\langle h^2 \rangle}
277     \end{equation}
278     where $\cos \theta_{ij} = \hat{\mu}_{i} \cdot \hat{r}_{ij}$ and
279     $\hat{r}_{ij} = \vec{r}_{ij} / r_{ij}$. $n(r)$ is the number of
280     dipoles found in a cylindrical shell between $r$ and $r+\delta r$ of
281     the central particle. Fig. \ref{mcfig:CrossCorrelation} shows contours
282     of this correlation function for both anti-ferroelectric, rippled
283     membranes as well as for the dipole-disordered portion of the phase
284     diagram.
285    
286     \begin{figure}
287     \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcHdc.pdf}
288     \caption{\label{mcfig:CrossCorrelation} Contours of the height-dipole
289     correlation function as a function of the dot product between the
290     dipole ($\hat{\mu}$) and inter-dipole separation vector ($\hat{r}$)
291     and the distance ($r$) between the dipoles. Perfect height
292     correlation (contours approaching 1) are present in the ordered phase
293     when the two dipoles are in the same head-to-tail line.
294     Anti-correlation (contours below 0) is only seen when the inter-dipole
295     vector is perpendicular to the dipoles. In the dipole-disordered
296     portion of the phase diagram, there is only weak correlation in the
297     dipole direction and this correlation decays rapidly to zero for
298     intermolecular vectors that are not dipole-aligned.}
299     \end{figure}
300    
301     The height-dipole correlation function gives a map of how the topology
302     of the membrane surface varies with angular deviation around a given
303     dipole. The upper panel of Fig. \ref{mcfig:CrossCorrelation} shows that
304     in the anti-ferroelectric phase, the dipole heights are strongly
305     correlated for dipoles in head-to-tail arrangements, and this
306     correlation persists for very long distances (up to 15 $\sigma$). For
307     portions of the membrane located perpendicular to a given dipole, the
308     membrane height becomes anti-correlated at distances of 10 $\sigma$.
309     The correlation function is relatively smooth; there are no steep
310     jumps or steps, so the stair-like structures in
311     Fig. \ref{mcfig:snapshot} are indeed transient and disappear when
312     averaged over many configurations. In the dipole-disordered phase,
313     the height-dipole correlation function is relatively flat (and hovers
314     near zero). The only significant height correlations are for axial
315     dipoles at very short distances ($r \approx
316     \sigma$).
317    
318     \subsection{Discriminating Ripples from Thermal Undulations}
319    
320     In order to be sure that the structures we have observed are actually
321     a rippled phase and not simply thermal undulations, we have computed
322     the undulation spectrum,
323     \begin{equation}
324     h(\vec{q}) = A^{-1/2} \int d\vec{r}
325     h(\vec{r}) e^{-i \vec{q}\cdot\vec{r}}
326     \end{equation}
327     where $h(\vec{r})$ is the height of the membrane at location $\vec{r}
328     = (x,y)$.~\cite{Safran94,Seifert97} In simple (and more complicated)
329     elastic continuum models, it can shown that in the $NVT$ ensemble, the
330     absolute value of the undulation spectrum can be written,
331     \begin{equation}
332     \langle | h(q) |^2 \rangle_{NVT} = \frac{k_B T}{k_c q^4 +
333     \gamma q^2},
334     \label{mceq:fit}
335     \end{equation}
336     where $k_c$ is the bending modulus for the membrane, and $\gamma$ is
337     the mechanical surface tension.~\cite{Safran94} The systems studied in
338     this paper have essentially zero bending moduli ($k_c$) and relatively
339     large mechanical surface tensions ($\gamma$), so a much simpler form
340     can be written,
341     \begin{equation}
342 xsun 3361 \langle | h(q) |^2 \rangle_{NVT} = \frac{k_B T}{\gamma q^2}.
343 xsun 3354 \label{mceq:fit2}
344     \end{equation}
345    
346     The undulation spectrum is computed by superimposing a rectangular
347     grid on top of the membrane, and by assigning height ($h(\vec{r})$)
348     values to the grid from the average of all dipoles that fall within a
349     given $\vec{r}+d\vec{r}$ grid area. Empty grid pixels are assigned
350     height values by interpolation from the nearest neighbor pixels. A
351     standard 2-d Fourier transform is then used to obtain $\langle |
352     h(q)|^2 \rangle$. Alternatively, since the dipoles sit on a Bravais
353     lattice, one could use the heights of the lattice points themselves as
354     the grid for the Fourier transform (without interpolating to a square
355     grid). However, if lateral translational freedom is added to this
356     model (a likely extension), an interpolated grid method for computing
357     undulation spectra will be required.
358    
359     As mentioned above, the best fits to our undulation spectra are
360     obtained by setting the value of $k_c$ to 0. In Fig. \ref{mcfig:fit} we
361     show typical undulation spectra for two different regions of the phase
362     diagram along with their fits from the Landau free energy approach
363     (Eq. \ref{mceq:fit2}). In the high-temperature disordered phase, the
364     Landau fits can be nearly perfect, and from these fits we can estimate
365     the tension in the surface. In reduced units, typical values of
366     $\gamma^{*} = \gamma / \epsilon = 2500$ are obtained for the
367     disordered phase ($\gamma^{*} = 2551.7$ in the top panel of
368     Fig. \ref{mcfig:fit}).
369    
370     Typical values of $\gamma^{*}$ in the dipolar-ordered phase are much
371     higher than in the dipolar-disordered phase ($\gamma^{*} = 73,538$ in
372     the lower panel of Fig. \ref{mcfig:fit}). For the dipolar-ordered
373     triangular lattice near the coexistence temperature, we also observe
374     long wavelength undulations that are far outliers to the fits. That
375     is, the Landau free energy fits are well within error bars for most of
376     the other points, but can be off by {\em orders of magnitude} for a
377     few low frequency components.
378    
379     We interpret these outliers as evidence that these low frequency modes
380     are {\em non-thermal undulations}. We take this as evidence that we
381     are actually seeing a rippled phase developing in this model system.
382    
383     \begin{figure}
384     \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcLogFit.pdf}
385     \caption{\label{mcfig:fit} Evidence that the observed ripples are {\em
386     not} thermal undulations is obtained from the 2-d Fourier transform
387     $\langle |h^{*}(\vec{q})|^2 \rangle$ of the height profile ($\langle
388     h^{*}(x,y) \rangle$). Rippled samples show low-wavelength peaks that
389     are outliers on the Landau free energy fits by an order of magnitude.
390     Samples exhibiting only thermal undulations fit Eq. \ref{mceq:fit}
391     remarkably well.}
392     \end{figure}
393    
394     \subsection{Effects of Potential Parameters on Amplitude and Wavelength}
395    
396     We have used two different methods to estimate the amplitude and
397     periodicity of the ripples. The first method requires projection of
398     the ripples onto a one dimensional rippling axis. Since the rippling
399     is always perpendicular to the dipole director axis, we can define a
400     ripple vector as follows. The largest eigenvector, $s_1$, of the
401     $\mathsf{S}$ matrix in Eq. \ref{mceq:opmatrix} is projected onto a
402     planar director axis,
403     \begin{equation}
404     \vec{d} = \left(\begin{array}{c}
405     \vec{s}_1 \cdot \hat{i} \\
406     \vec{s}_1 \cdot \hat{j} \\
407     0
408     \end{array} \right).
409     \end{equation}
410     ($\hat{i}$, $\hat{j}$ and $\hat{k}$ are unit vectors along the $x$,
411     $y$, and $z$ axes, respectively.) The rippling axis is in the plane of
412     the membrane and is perpendicular to the planar director axis,
413     \begin{equation}
414     \vec{q}_{\mathrm{rip}} = \vec{d} \times \hat{k}
415     \end{equation}
416     We can then find the height profile of the membrane along the ripple
417     axis by projecting heights of the dipoles to obtain a one-dimensional
418     height profile, $h(q_{\mathrm{rip}})$. Ripple wavelengths can be
419     estimated from the largest non-thermal low-frequency component in the
420     Fourier transform of $h(q_{\mathrm{rip}})$. Amplitudes can be
421     estimated by measuring peak-to-trough distances in
422     $h(q_{\mathrm{rip}})$ itself.
423    
424     A second, more accurate, and simpler method for estimating ripple
425     shape is to extract the wavelength and height information directly
426     from the largest non-thermal peak in the undulation spectrum. For
427     large-amplitude ripples, the two methods give similar results. The
428     one-dimensional projection method is more prone to noise (particularly
429     in the amplitude estimates for the distorted lattices). We report
430     amplitudes and wavelengths taken directly from the undulation spectrum
431     below.
432    
433     In the triangular lattice ($\gamma = \sqrt{3}$), the rippling is
434     observed for temperatures ($T^{*}$) from $61-122$. The wavelength of
435     the ripples is remarkably stable at 21.4~$\sigma$ for all but the
436     temperatures closest to the order-disorder transition. At $T^{*} =
437     122$, the wavelength drops to 17.1~$\sigma$.
438    
439     The dependence of the amplitude on temperature is shown in the top
440     panel of Fig. \ref{mcfig:Amplitude}. The rippled structures shrink
441     smoothly as the temperature rises towards the order-disorder
442     transition. The wavelengths and amplitudes we observe are
443     surprisingly close to the $\Lambda / 2$ phase observed by Kaasgaard
444     {\it et al.} in their work on PC-based lipids.\cite{Kaasgaard03}
445     However, this is coincidental agreement based on a choice of 7~\AA~as
446     the mean spacing between lipids.
447    
448     \begin{figure}
449     \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcProperties_sq.pdf}
450     \caption{\label{mcfig:Amplitude} a) The amplitude $A^{*}$ of the ripples
451     vs. temperature for a triangular lattice. b) The amplitude $A^{*}$ of
452     the ripples vs. dipole strength ($\mu^{*}$) for both the triangular
453     lattice (circles) and distorted lattice (squares). The reduced
454     temperatures were kept fixed at $T^{*} = 94$ for the triangular
455     lattice and $T^{*} = 106$ for the distorted lattice (approximately 2/3
456     of the order-disorder transition temperature for each lattice).}
457     \end{figure}
458    
459     The ripples can be made to disappear by increasing the internal
460     elastic tension (i.e. by increasing $k_r$ or equivalently, reducing
461     the dipole moment). The amplitude of the ripples depends critically
462     on the strength of the dipole moments ($\mu^{*}$) in Eq. \ref{mceq:pot}.
463     If the dipoles are weakened substantially (below $\mu^{*}$ = 20) at a
464     fixed temperature of 94, the membrane loses dipolar ordering
465     and the ripple structures. The ripples reach a peak amplitude of
466     3.7~$\sigma$ at a dipolar strength of 25. We show the dependence
467     of ripple amplitude on the dipolar strength in
468     Fig. \ref{mcfig:Amplitude}.
469    
470     \subsection{Distorted lattices}
471    
472     We have also investigated the effect of the lattice geometry by
473     changing the ratio of lattice constants ($\gamma$) while keeping the
474     average nearest-neighbor spacing constant. The anti-ferroelectric state
475     is accessible for all $\gamma$ values we have used, although the
476     distorted triangular lattices prefer a particular director axis due to
477     the anisotropy of the lattice.
478    
479     Our observation of rippling behavior was not limited to the triangular
480     lattices. In distorted lattices the anti-ferroelectric phase can
481     develop nearly instantaneously in the Monte Carlo simulations, and
482     these dipolar-ordered phases tend to be remarkably flat. Whenever
483     rippling has been observed in these distorted lattices
484     (e.g. $\gamma = 1.875$), we see relatively short ripple wavelengths
485     (14 $\sigma$) and amplitudes of 2.4~$\sigma$. These ripples are
486     weakly dependent on dipolar strength (see Fig. \ref{mcfig:Amplitude}),
487     although below a dipolar strength of $\mu^{*} = 20$, the membrane
488     loses dipolar ordering and displays only thermal undulations.
489    
490     The ripple phase does {\em not} appear at all values of $\gamma$. We
491     have only observed non-thermal undulations in the range $1.625 <
492     \gamma < 1.875$. Outside this range, the order-disorder transition in
493     the dipoles remains, but the ordered dipolar phase has only thermal
494     undulations. This is one of our strongest pieces of evidence that
495     rippling is a symmetry-breaking phenomenon for triangular and
496     nearly-triangular lattices.
497    
498     \subsection{Effects of System Size}
499     To evaluate the effect of finite system size, we have performed a
500     series of simulations on the triangular lattice at a reduced
501     temperature of 122, which is just below the order-disorder transition
502     temperature ($T^{*} = 139$). These conditions are in the
503     dipole-ordered and rippled portion of the phase diagram. These are
504     also the conditions that should be most susceptible to system size
505     effects.
506    
507     \begin{figure}
508     \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcSystemSize.pdf}
509     \caption{\label{mcfig:systemsize} The ripple wavelength (top) and
510     amplitude (bottom) as a function of system size for a triangular
511     lattice ($\gamma=1.732$) at $T^{*} = 122$.}
512     \end{figure}
513    
514     There is substantial dependence on system size for small (less than
515     29~$\sigma$) periodic boxes. Notably, there are resonances apparent
516     in the ripple amplitudes at box lengths of 17.3 and 29.5 $\sigma$.
517     For larger systems, the behavior of the ripples appears to have
518     stabilized and is on a trend to slightly smaller amplitudes (and
519     slightly longer wavelengths) than were observed from the 34.3 $\sigma$
520     box sizes that were used for most of the calculations.
521    
522     It is interesting to note that system sizes which are multiples of the
523     default ripple wavelength can enhance the amplitude of the observed
524     ripples, but appears to have only a minor effect on the observed
525     wavelength. It would, of course, be better to use system sizes that
526     were many multiples of the ripple wavelength to be sure that the
527     periodic box is not driving the phenomenon, but at the largest system
528     size studied (70 $\sigma$ $\times$ 70 $\sigma$), the number of dipoles
529     (5440) made long Monte Carlo simulations prohibitively expensive.
530    
531     \section{Discussion}
532     \label{mc:sec:discussion}
533    
534     We have been able to show that a simple dipolar lattice model which
535     contains only molecular packing (from the lattice), anisotropy (in the
536     form of electrostatic dipoles) and a weak elastic tension (in the form
537     of a nearest-neighbor harmonic potential) is capable of exhibiting
538     stable long-wavelength non-thermal surface corrugations. The best
539     explanation for this behavior is that the ability of the dipoles to
540     translate out of the plane of the membrane is enough to break the
541     symmetry of the triangular lattice and allow the energetic benefit
542     from the formation of a bulk anti-ferroelectric phase. Were the weak
543     elastic tension absent from our model, it would be possible for the
544     entire lattice to ``tilt'' using $z$-translation. Tilting the lattice
545     in this way would yield an effectively non-triangular lattice which
546     would avoid dipolar frustration altogether. With the elastic tension
547     in place, bulk tilt causes a large strain, and the least costly way to
548     release this strain is between two rows of anti-aligned dipoles.
549     These ``breaks'' will result in rippled or sawtooth patterns in the
550     membrane, and allow small stripes of membrane to form
551     anti-ferroelectric regions that are tilted relative to the averaged
552     membrane normal.
553    
554     Although the dipole-dipole interaction is the major driving force for
555     the long range orientational ordered state, the formation of the
556     stable, smooth ripples is a result of the competition between the
557     elastic tension and the dipole-dipole interactions. This statement is
558     supported by the variation in $\mu^{*}$. Substantially weaker dipoles
559     relative to the surface tension can cause the corrugated phase to
560     disappear.
561    
562     The packing of the dipoles into a nearly-triangular lattice is clearly
563     an important piece of the puzzle. The dipolar head groups of lipid
564     molecules are sterically (as well as electrostatically) anisotropic,
565     and would not pack in triangular arrangements without the steric
566     interference of adjacent molecular bodies. Since we only see rippled
567     phases in the neighborhood of $\gamma=\sqrt{3}$, this implies that
568     even if this dipolar mechanism is the correct explanation for the
569     ripple phase in realistic bilayers, there would still be a role played
570     by the lipid chains in the in-plane organization of the triangularly
571     ordered phases which could support ripples. The present model is
572     certainly not detailed enough to answer exactly what drives the
573     formation of the $P_{\beta'}$ phase in real lipids, but suggests some
574     avenues for further experiments.
575    
576     The most important prediction we can make using the results from this
577     simple model is that if dipolar ordering is driving the surface
578     corrugation, the wave vectors for the ripples should always found to
579     be {\it perpendicular} to the dipole director axis. This prediction
580     should suggest experimental designs which test whether this is really
581     true in the phosphatidylcholine $P_{\beta'}$ phases. The dipole
582     director axis should also be easily computable for the all-atom and
583     coarse-grained simulations that have been published in the literature.
584    
585     Our other observation about the ripple and dipolar directionality is
586     that the dipole director axis can be found to be parallel to any of
587     the three equivalent lattice vectors in the triangular lattice.
588     Defects in the ordering of the dipoles can cause the dipole director
589     (and consequently the surface corrugation) of small regions to be
590     rotated relative to each other by 120$^{\circ}$. This is a similar
591     behavior to the domain rotation seen in the AFM studies of Kaasgaard
592     {\it et al.}\cite{Kaasgaard03}
593    
594     Although our model is simple, it exhibits some rich and unexpected
595     behaviors. It would clearly be a closer approximation to the reality
596     if we allowed greater translational freedom to the dipoles and
597     replaced the somewhat artificial lattice packing and the harmonic
598     elastic tension with more realistic molecular modeling potentials.
599     What we have done is to present a simple model which exhibits bulk
600     non-thermal corrugation, and our explanation of this rippling
601     phenomenon will help us design more accurate molecular models for
602     corrugated membranes and experiments to test whether rippling is
603     dipole-driven or not.