ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/xDissertation/mc.tex
Revision: 3383
Committed: Wed Apr 16 21:56:34 2008 UTC (17 years ago) by xsun
Content type: application/x-tex
File size: 32364 byte(s)
Log Message:
formatting check

File Contents

# Content
1 \chapter{\label{chap:mc}SPONTANEOUS CORRUGATION OF DIPOLAR MEMBRANES}
2
3 \section{Introduction}
4 \label{mc:sec:Int}
5
6 The properties of polymeric membranes are known to depend sensitively
7 on the details of the internal interactions between the constituent
8 monomers. A flexible membrane will always have a competition between
9 the energy of curvature and the in-plane stretching energy and will be
10 able to buckle in certain limits of surface tension and
11 temperature.\cite{Safran94} The buckling can be non-specific and
12 centered at dislocation~\cite{Seung1988} or grain-boundary
13 defects,\cite{Carraro1993} or it can be directional and cause long
14 ``roof-tile'' or tube-like structures to appear in
15 partially-polymerized phospholipid vesicles.\cite{Mutz1991}
16
17 One would expect that anisotropic local interactions could lead to
18 interesting properties of the buckled membrane. We report here on the
19 buckling behavior of a membrane composed of harmonically-bound, but
20 freely-rotating electrostatic dipoles. The dipoles have strongly
21 anisotropic local interactions and the membrane exhibits coupling
22 between the buckling and the long-range ordering of the dipoles.
23
24 Buckling behavior in liquid crystalline and biological membranes is a
25 well-known phenomenon. Relatively pure phosphatidylcholine (PC)
26 bilayers form a corrugated or ``rippled'' phase ($P_{\beta'}$) which
27 appears as an intermediate phase between the gel ($L_\beta$) and fluid
28 ($L_{\alpha}$) phases. The $P_{\beta'}$ phase has attracted
29 substantial experimental interest over the past 30
30 years,~\cite{Sun96,Katsaras00,Copeland80,Meyer96,Kaasgaard03} and
31 there have been a number of theoretical
32 approaches~\cite{Marder84,Carlson87,Goldstein88,McCullough90,Lubensky93,Misbah98,Heimburg00,Kubica02,Bannerjee02}
33 (and some heroic
34 simulations~\cite{Ayton02,Jiang04,Brannigan04a,deVries05,deJoannis06})
35 undertaken to try to explain this phase, but to date, none have looked
36 specifically at the contribution of the dipolar character of the lipid
37 head groups towards this corrugation. Lipid chain interdigitation
38 certainly plays a major role, and the structures of the ripple phase
39 are highly ordered. The model we investigate here lacks chain
40 interdigitation (as well as the chains themselves!) and will not be
41 detailed enough to rule in favor of (or against) any of these
42 explanations for the $P_{\beta'}$ phase.
43
44 Membranes containing electrostatic dipoles can also exhibit the
45 flexoelectric effect,\cite{Todorova2004,Harden2006,Petrov2006} which
46 is the ability of mechanical deformations to result in electrostatic
47 organization of the membrane. This phenomenon is a curvature-induced
48 membrane polarization which can lead to potential differences across a
49 membrane. Reverse flexoelectric behavior (in which applied currents
50 effect membrane curvature) has also been observed. Explanations of
51 the details of these effects have typically utilized membrane
52 polarization perpendicular to the face of the
53 membrane,\cite{Petrov2006} and the effect has been observed in both
54 biological,\cite{Raphael2000} bent-core liquid
55 crystalline,\cite{Harden2006} and polymer-dispersed liquid crystalline
56 membranes.\cite{Todorova2004}
57
58 The problem with using atomistic and even coarse-grained approaches to
59 study membrane buckling phenomena is that only a relatively small
60 number of periods of the corrugation (i.e. one or two) can be
61 realistically simulated given current technology. Also, simulations
62 of lipid bilayers are traditionally carried out with periodic boundary
63 conditions in two or three dimensions and these have the potential to
64 enhance the periodicity of the system at that wavelength. To avoid
65 this pitfall, we are using a model which allows us to have
66 sufficiently large systems so that we are not causing artificial
67 corrugation through the use of periodic boundary conditions.
68
69 The simplest dipolar membrane is one in which the dipoles are located
70 on fixed lattice sites. Ferroelectric states (with long-range dipolar
71 order) can be observed in dipolar systems with non-triangular
72 packings. However, {\em triangularly}-packed 2-D dipolar systems are
73 inherently frustrated and one would expect a dipolar-disordered phase
74 to be the lowest free energy
75 configuration.\cite{Toulouse1977,Marland1979} Dipolar lattices already
76 have rich phase behavior, but in order to allow the membrane to
77 buckle, a single degree of freedom (translation normal to the membrane
78 face) must be added to each of the dipoles. It would also be possible
79 to allow complete translational freedom. This approach
80 is similar in character to a number of elastic Ising models that have
81 been developed to explain interesting mechanical properties in
82 magnetic alloys.\cite{Renard1966,Zhu2005,Zhu2006,Jiang2006}
83
84 What we present here is an attempt to find the simplest dipolar model
85 which will exhibit buckling behavior. We are using a modified XYZ
86 lattice model; details of the model can be found in section
87 \ref{mc:sec:model}, results of Monte Carlo simulations using this model
88 are presented in section
89 \ref{mc:sec:results}, and section \ref{mc:sec:discussion} contains our conclusions.
90
91 \section{2-D Dipolar Membrane}
92 \label{mc:sec:model}
93
94 The point of developing this model was to arrive at the simplest
95 possible theoretical model which could exhibit spontaneous corrugation
96 of a two-dimensional dipolar medium. Since molecules in polymerized
97 membranes and in the $P_{\beta'}$ ripple phase have limited
98 translational freedom, we have chosen a lattice to support the dipoles
99 in the x-y plane. The lattice may be either triangular (lattice
100 constants $a/b =
101 \sqrt{3}$) or distorted. However, each dipole has 3 degrees of
102 freedom. They may move freely {\em out} of the x-y plane (along the
103 $z$ axis), and they have complete orientational freedom ($0 <= \theta
104 <= \pi$, $0 <= \phi < 2
105 \pi$). This is essentially a modified X-Y-Z model with translational
106 freedom along the z-axis.
107
108 The potential energy of the system,
109 \begin{equation}
110 \begin{split}
111 V = \sum_i &\left( \sum_{j>i} \frac{|\mu|^2}{4\pi \epsilon_0 r_{ij}^3} \left[
112 {\mathbf{\hat u}_i} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat u}_j} -
113 3({\mathbf{\hat u}_i} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat
114 r}_{ij}})({\mathbf{\hat u}_j} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}})\right] \right. \\
115 & \left. + \sum_{j \in NN_i}^6 \frac{k_r}{2}\left(
116 r_{ij}-\sigma \right)^2 \right)
117 \end{split}
118 \label{mceq:pot}
119 \end{equation}
120
121 In this potential, $\mathbf{\hat u}_i$ is the unit vector pointing
122 along dipole $i$ and $\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}$ is the unit vector
123 pointing along the inter-dipole vector $\mathbf{r}_{ij}$. The entire
124 potential is governed by three parameters, the dipolar strength
125 ($\mu$), the harmonic spring constant ($k_r$) and the preferred
126 intermolecular spacing ($\sigma$). In practice, we set the value of
127 $\sigma$ to the average inter-molecular spacing from the planar
128 lattice, yielding a potential model that has only two parameters for a
129 particular choice of lattice constants $a$ (along the $x$-axis) and
130 $b$ (along the $y$-axis). We also define a set of reduced parameters
131 based on the length scale ($\sigma$) and the energy of the harmonic
132 potential at a deformation of 2 $\sigma$ ($\epsilon = k_r \sigma^2 /
133 2$). Using these two constants, we perform our calculations using
134 reduced distances, ($r^{*} = r / \sigma$), temperatures ($T^{*} = 2
135 k_B T / k_r \sigma^2$), densities ($\rho^{*} = N \sigma^2 / L_x L_y$),
136 and dipole moments ($\mu^{*} = \mu / \sqrt{4 \pi \epsilon_0 \sigma^5
137 k_r / 2}$). It should be noted that the density ($\rho^{*}$) depends
138 only on the mean particle spacing in the $x-y$ plane; the lattice is
139 fully populated.
140
141 To investigate the phase behavior of this model, we have performed a
142 series of Me\-trop\-o\-lis Monte Carlo simulations of moderately-sized
143 (34.3 $\sigma$ on a side) patches of membrane hosted on both
144 triangular ($\gamma = a/b = \sqrt{3}$) and distorted ($\gamma \neq
145 \sqrt{3}$) lattices. The linear extent of one edge of the monolayer
146 was $20 a$ and the system was kept roughly square. The average
147 distance that coplanar dipoles were positioned from their six nearest
148 neighbors was 1 $\sigma$ (on both triangular and distorted lattices).
149 Typical system sizes were 1360 dipoles for the triangular lattices and
150 840-2800 dipoles for the distorted lattices. Two-dimensional periodic
151 boundary conditions were used, and the cutoff for the dipole-dipole
152 interaction was set to 4.3 $\sigma$. This cutoff is roughly 2.5 times
153 the typical real-space electrostatic cutoff for molecular systems.
154 Since dipole-dipole interactions decay rapidly with distance, and
155 since the intrinsic three-dimensional periodicity of the Ewald sum can
156 give artifacts in 2-d systems, we have chosen not to use it in these
157 calculations. Although the Ewald sum has been reformulated to handle
158 2-D systems,\cite{Parry75,Parry76,Heyes77,deLeeuw79,Rhee89} these
159 methods are computationally expensive,\cite{Spohr97,Yeh99} and are not
160 necessary in this case. All parameters ($T^{*}$, $\mu^{*}$, and
161 $\gamma$) were varied systematically to study the effects of these
162 parameters on the formation of ripple-like phases. The error bars in
163 our results are one $\sigma$ on each side of the average values, where
164 $\sigma$ is the standard deviation obtained from repeated observations
165 of many configurations.
166
167 \section{Results and Analysis}
168 \label{mc:sec:results}
169
170 \subsection{Dipolar Ordering and Coexistence Temperatures}
171 The principal method for observing the orientational ordering
172 transition in dipolar or liquid crystalline systems is the $P_2$ order
173 parameter (defined as $1.5 \times \lambda_{max}$, where
174 $\lambda_{max}$ is the largest eigenvalue of the matrix,
175 \begin{equation}
176 {\mathsf{S}} = \frac{1}{N} \sum_i \left(
177 \begin{array}{ccc}
178 u^{x}_i u^{x}_i-\frac{1}{3} & u^{x}_i u^{y}_i & u^{x}_i u^{z}_i \\
179 u^{y}_i u^{x}_i & u^{y}_i u^{y}_i -\frac{1}{3} & u^{y}_i u^{z}_i \\
180 u^{z}_i u^{x}_i & u^{z}_i u^{y}_i & u^{z}_i u^{z}_i -\frac{1}{3}
181 \end{array} \right).
182 \label{mceq:opmatrix}
183 \end{equation}
184 Here $u^{\alpha}_i$ is the $\alpha=x,y,z$ component of the unit vector
185 for dipole $i$. $P_2$ will be $1.0$ for a perfectly-ordered system
186 and near $0$ for a randomized system. Note that this order parameter
187 is {\em not} equal to the polarization of the system. For example,
188 the polarization of the perfect anti-ferroelectric system is $0$, but
189 $P_2$ for an anti-ferroelectric system is $1$. The eigenvector of
190 $\mathsf{S}$ corresponding to the largest eigenvalue is familiar as
191 the director axis, which can be used to determine a privileged dipolar
192 axis for dipole-ordered systems. The top panel in Fig. \ref{mcfig:phase}
193 shows the values of $P_2$ as a function of temperature for both
194 triangular ($\gamma = 1.732$) and distorted ($\gamma=1.875$)
195 lattices.
196
197 \begin{figure}
198 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcPhase.pdf}
199 \caption[ The $P_2$ dipolar order parameter as
200 a function of temperature and the phase diagram for the dipolar
201 membrane model]{\label{mcfig:phase} Top panel: The $P_2$ dipolar order
202 parameter as a function of temperature for both triangular ($\gamma =
203 1.732$) and distorted ($\gamma = 1.875$) lattices. Bottom Panel: The
204 phase diagram for the dipolar membrane model. The line denotes the
205 division between the dipolar ordered (anti-ferroelectric) and
206 disordered phases. An enlarged view near the triangular lattice is
207 shown inset.}
208 \end{figure}
209
210 There is a clear order-disorder transition in evidence from this data.
211 Both the triangular and distorted lattices have dipolar-ordered
212 low-temperature phases, and ori\-en\-ta\-tion\-al\-ly-disordered high
213 temperature phases. The coexistence temperature for the triangular
214 lattice is significantly lower than for the distorted lattices, and
215 the bulk polarization is approximately $0$ for both dipolar ordered
216 and disordered phases. This gives strong evidence that the dipolar
217 ordered phase is anti-ferroelectric. We have verified that this
218 dipolar ordering transition is not a function of system size by
219 performing identical calculations with systems twice as large. The
220 transition is equally smooth at all system sizes that were studied.
221 Additionally, we have repeated the Monte Carlo simulations over a wide
222 range of lattice ratios ($\gamma$) to generate a dipolar
223 order/disorder phase diagram. The bottom panel in
224 Fig. \ref{mcfig:phase} shows that the triangular lattice is a
225 low-temperature cusp in the $T^{*}-\gamma$ phase diagram.
226
227 This phase diagram is remarkable in that it shows an
228 anti-ferroelectric phase near $\gamma=1.732$ where one would expect
229 lattice frustration to result in disordered phases at all
230 temperatures. Observations of the configurations in this phase show
231 clearly that the system has accomplished dipolar ordering by forming
232 large ripple-like structures. We have observed anti-ferroelectric
233 ordering in all three of the equivalent directions on the triangular
234 lattice, and the dipoles have been observed to organize perpendicular
235 to the membrane normal (in the plane of the membrane). It is
236 particularly interesting to note that the ripple-like structures have
237 also been observed to propagate in the three equivalent directions on
238 the lattice, but the {\em direction of ripple propagation is always
239 perpendicular to the dipole director axis}. A snapshot of a typical
240 anti-ferroelectric rippled structure is shown in
241 Fig. \ref{mcfig:snapshot}.
242
243 \begin{figure}
244 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcSnapshot.pdf}
245 \caption[ Top and Side views of a representative
246 configuration for the dipolar ordered phase supported on the
247 triangular lattice]{\label{mcfig:snapshot} Top and Side views of a
248 representative configuration for the dipolar ordered phase supported
249 on the triangular lattice. Note the anti-ferroelectric ordering and
250 the long wavelength buckling of the membrane. Dipolar ordering has
251 been observed in all three equivalent directions on the triangular
252 lattice, and the ripple direction is always perpendicular to the
253 director axis for the dipoles.}
254 \end{figure}
255
256 Although the snapshot in Fig. \ref{mcfig:snapshot} gives the appearance
257 of three-row stair-like structures, these appear to be transient. On
258 average, the corrugation of the membrane is a relatively smooth,
259 long-wavelength phenomenon, with occasional steep drops between
260 adjacent lines of anti-aligned dipoles.
261
262 The height-dipole correlation function ($C_{\textrm{hd}}(r, \cos
263 \theta)$) makes the connection between dipolar ordering and the wave
264 vector of the ripple even more explicit. $C_{\textrm{hd}}(r, \cos
265 \theta)$ is an angle-dependent pair distribution function. The angle
266 ($\theta$) is the angle between the intermolecular vector
267 $\vec{r}_{ij}$ and direction of dipole $i$,
268 \begin{equation}
269 C_{\textrm{hd}} = \frac{\langle \frac{1}{n(r)} \sum_{i}\sum_{j>i}
270 h_i \cdot h_j \delta(r - r_{ij}) \delta(\cos \theta_{ij} -
271 \cos \theta)\rangle} {\langle h^2 \rangle}
272 \end{equation}
273 where $\cos \theta_{ij} = \hat{\mu}_{i} \cdot \hat{r}_{ij}$ and
274 $\hat{r}_{ij} = \vec{r}_{ij} / r_{ij}$. $n(r)$ is the number of
275 dipoles found in a cylindrical shell between $r$ and $r+\delta r$ of
276 the central particle. Fig. \ref{mcfig:CrossCorrelation} shows contours
277 of this correlation function for both anti-ferroelectric, rippled
278 membranes as well as for the dipole-disordered portion of the phase
279 diagram.
280
281 \begin{figure}
282 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcHdc.pdf}
283 \caption[Contours of the height-dipole
284 correlation function]{\label{mcfig:CrossCorrelation} Contours of the
285 height-dipole correlation function as a function of the dot product
286 between the dipole ($\hat{\mu}$) and inter-dipole separation vector
287 ($\hat{r}$) and the distance ($r$) between the dipoles. Perfect
288 height correlation (contours approaching 1) are present in the ordered
289 phase when the two dipoles are in the same head-to-tail line.
290 Anti-correlation (contours below 0) is only seen when the inter-dipole
291 vector is perpendicular to the dipoles. In the dipole-disordered
292 portion of the phase diagram, there is only weak correlation in the
293 dipole direction and this correlation decays rapidly to zero for
294 intermolecular vectors that are not dipole-aligned.}
295 \end{figure}
296
297 The height-dipole correlation function gives a map of how the topology
298 of the membrane surface varies with angular deviation around a given
299 dipole. The upper panel of Fig. \ref{mcfig:CrossCorrelation} shows that
300 in the anti-ferroelectric phase, the dipole heights are strongly
301 correlated for dipoles in head-to-tail arrangements, and this
302 correlation persists for very long distances (up to 15 $\sigma$). For
303 portions of the membrane located perpendicular to a given dipole, the
304 membrane height becomes anti-correlated at distances of 10 $\sigma$.
305 The correlation function is relatively smooth; there are no steep
306 jumps or steps, so the stair-like structures in
307 Fig. \ref{mcfig:snapshot} are indeed transient and disappear when
308 averaged over many configurations. In the dipole-disordered phase,
309 the height-dipole correlation function is relatively flat (and hovers
310 near zero). The only significant height correlations are for axial
311 dipoles at very short distances ($r \approx
312 \sigma$).
313
314 \subsection{Discriminating Ripples from Thermal Undulations}
315
316 In order to be sure that the structures we have observed are actually
317 a rippled phase and not simply thermal undulations, we have computed
318 the undulation spectrum,
319 \begin{equation}
320 h(\vec{q}) = A^{-1/2} \int d\vec{r}
321 h(\vec{r}) e^{-i \vec{q}\cdot\vec{r}}
322 \end{equation}
323 where $h(\vec{r})$ is the height of the membrane at location $\vec{r}
324 = (x,y)$.~\cite{Safran94,Seifert97} In simple (and more complicated)
325 elastic continuum models, it can shown that in the $NVT$ ensemble, the
326 absolute value of the undulation spectrum can be written,
327 \begin{equation}
328 \langle | h(q) |^2 \rangle_{NVT} = \frac{k_B T}{k_c q^4 +
329 \gamma q^2},
330 \label{mceq:fit}
331 \end{equation}
332 where $k_c$ is the bending modulus for the membrane, and $\gamma$ is
333 the mechanical surface tension.~\cite{Safran94} The systems studied in
334 this paper have essentially zero bending moduli ($k_c$) and relatively
335 large mechanical surface tensions ($\gamma$), so a much simpler form
336 can be written,
337 \begin{equation}
338 \langle | h(q) |^2 \rangle_{NVT} = \frac{k_B T}{\gamma q^2}.
339 \label{mceq:fit2}
340 \end{equation}
341
342 The undulation spectrum is computed by superimposing a rectangular
343 grid on top of the membrane, and by assigning height ($h(\vec{r})$)
344 values to the grid from the average of all dipoles that fall within a
345 given $\vec{r}+d\vec{r}$ grid area. Empty grid pixels are assigned
346 height values by interpolation from the nearest neighbor pixels. A
347 standard 2-d Fourier transform is then used to obtain $\langle |
348 h(q)|^2 \rangle$. Alternatively, since the dipoles sit on a Bravais
349 lattice, one could use the heights of the lattice points themselves as
350 the grid for the Fourier transform (without interpolating to a square
351 grid). However, if lateral translational freedom is added to this
352 model (a likely extension), an interpolated grid method for computing
353 undulation spectra will be required.
354
355 As mentioned above, the best fits to our undulation spectra are
356 obtained by setting the value of $k_c$ to 0. In Fig. \ref{mcfig:fit} we
357 show typical undulation spectra for two different regions of the phase
358 diagram along with their fits from the Landau free energy approach
359 (Eq. \ref{mceq:fit2}). In the high-temperature disordered phase, the
360 Landau fits can be nearly perfect, and from these fits we can estimate
361 the tension in the surface. In reduced units, typical values of
362 $\gamma^{*} = \gamma / \epsilon = 2500$ are obtained for the
363 disordered phase ($\gamma^{*} = 2551.7$ in the top panel of
364 Fig. \ref{mcfig:fit}).
365
366 Typical values of $\gamma^{*}$ in the dipolar-ordered phase are much
367 higher than in the dipolar-disordered phase ($\gamma^{*} = 73,538$ in
368 the lower panel of Fig. \ref{mcfig:fit}). For the dipolar-ordered
369 triangular lattice near the coexistence temperature, we also observe
370 long wavelength undulations that are far outliers to the fits. That
371 is, the Landau free energy fits are well within error bars for most of
372 the other points, but can be off by {\em orders of magnitude} for a
373 few low frequency components.
374
375 We interpret these outliers as evidence that these low frequency modes
376 are {\em non-thermal undulations}. We take this as evidence that we
377 are actually seeing a rippled phase developing in this model system.
378
379 \begin{figure}
380 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcLogFit.pdf}
381 \caption[Evidence that the observed ripples are {\em not} thermal
382 undulations]{\label{mcfig:fit} Evidence that the observed ripples are
383 {\em not} thermal undulations is obtained from the 2-d Fourier
384 transform $\langle |h^{*}(\vec{q})|^2 \rangle$ of the height profile
385 ($\langle h^{*}(x,y) \rangle$). Rippled samples show low-wavelength
386 peaks that are outliers on the Landau free energy fits by an order of
387 magnitude. Samples exhibiting only thermal undulations fit
388 Eq. \ref{mceq:fit} remarkably well.}
389 \end{figure}
390
391 \subsection{Effects of Potential Parameters on Amplitude and Wavelength}
392
393 We have used two different methods to estimate the amplitude and
394 periodicity of the ripples. The first method requires projection of
395 the ripples onto a one dimensional rippling axis. Since the rippling
396 is always perpendicular to the dipole director axis, we can define a
397 ripple vector as follows. The largest eigenvector, $s_1$, of the
398 $\mathsf{S}$ matrix in Eq. \ref{mceq:opmatrix} is projected onto a
399 planar director axis,
400 \begin{equation}
401 \vec{d} = \left(\begin{array}{c}
402 \vec{s}_1 \cdot \hat{i} \\
403 \vec{s}_1 \cdot \hat{j} \\
404 0
405 \end{array} \right).
406 \end{equation}
407 ($\hat{i}$, $\hat{j}$ and $\hat{k}$ are unit vectors along the $x$,
408 $y$, and $z$ axes, respectively.) The rippling axis is in the plane of
409 the membrane and is perpendicular to the planar director axis,
410 \begin{equation}
411 \vec{q}_{\mathrm{rip}} = \vec{d} \times \hat{k}
412 \end{equation}
413 We can then find the height profile of the membrane along the ripple
414 axis by projecting heights of the dipoles to obtain a one-dimensional
415 height profile, $h(q_{\mathrm{rip}})$. Ripple wavelengths can be
416 estimated from the largest non-thermal low-frequency component in the
417 Fourier transform of $h(q_{\mathrm{rip}})$. Amplitudes can be
418 estimated by measuring peak-to-trough distances in
419 $h(q_{\mathrm{rip}})$ itself.
420
421 A second, more accurate, and simpler method for estimating ripple
422 shape is to extract the wavelength and height information directly
423 from the largest non-thermal peak in the undulation spectrum. For
424 large-amplitude ripples, the two methods give similar results. The
425 one-dimensional projection method is more prone to noise (particularly
426 in the amplitude estimates for the distorted lattices). We report
427 amplitudes and wavelengths taken directly from the undulation spectrum
428 below.
429
430 In the triangular lattice ($\gamma = \sqrt{3}$), the rippling is
431 observed for temperatures ($T^{*}$) from $61-122$. The wavelength of
432 the ripples is remarkably stable at 21.4~$\sigma$ for all but the
433 temperatures closest to the order-disorder transition. At $T^{*} =
434 122$, the wavelength drops to 17.1~$\sigma$.
435
436 The dependence of the amplitude on temperature is shown in the top
437 panel of Fig. \ref{mcfig:Amplitude}. The rippled structures shrink
438 smoothly as the temperature rises towards the order-disorder
439 transition. The wavelengths and amplitudes we observe are
440 surprisingly close to the $\Lambda / 2$ phase observed by Kaasgaard
441 {\it et al.} in their work on PC-based lipids.\cite{Kaasgaard03}
442 However, this is coincidental agreement based on a choice of 7~\AA~as
443 the mean spacing between lipids.
444
445 \begin{figure}
446 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcProperties_sq.pdf}
447 \caption[ The amplitude $A^{*}$ of the ripples
448 vs. temperature and dipole strength
449 ($\mu^{*}$)]{\label{mcfig:Amplitude} a) The amplitude $A^{*}$ of the
450 ripples vs. temperature for a triangular lattice. b) The amplitude
451 $A^{*}$ of the ripples vs. dipole strength ($\mu^{*}$) for both the
452 triangular lattice (circles) and distorted lattice (squares). The
453 reduced temperatures were kept fixed at $T^{*} = 94$ for the
454 triangular lattice and $T^{*} = 106$ for the distorted lattice
455 (approximately 2/3 of the order-disorder transition temperature for
456 each lattice).}
457 \end{figure}
458
459 The ripples can be made to disappear by increasing the internal
460 elastic tension (i.e. by increasing $k_r$ or equivalently, reducing
461 the dipole moment). The amplitude of the ripples depends critically
462 on the strength of the dipole moments ($\mu^{*}$) in Eq. \ref{mceq:pot}.
463 If the dipoles are weakened substantially (below $\mu^{*}$ = 20) at a
464 fixed temperature of 94, the membrane loses dipolar ordering
465 and the ripple structures. The ripples reach a peak amplitude of
466 3.7~$\sigma$ at a dipolar strength of 25. We show the dependence
467 of ripple amplitude on the dipolar strength in
468 Fig. \ref{mcfig:Amplitude}.
469
470 \subsection{Distorted lattices}
471
472 We have also investigated the effect of the lattice geometry by
473 changing the ratio of lattice constants ($\gamma$) while keeping the
474 average nearest-neighbor spacing constant. The anti-ferroelectric state
475 is accessible for all $\gamma$ values we have used, although the
476 distorted triangular lattices prefer a particular director axis due to
477 the anisotropy of the lattice.
478
479 Our observation of rippling behavior was not limited to the triangular
480 lattices. In distorted lattices the anti-ferroelectric phase can
481 develop nearly instantaneously in the Monte Carlo simulations, and
482 these dipolar-ordered phases tend to be remarkably flat. Whenever
483 rippling has been observed in these distorted lattices
484 (e.g. $\gamma = 1.875$), we see relatively short ripple wavelengths
485 (14 $\sigma$) and amplitudes of 2.4~$\sigma$. These ripples are
486 weakly dependent on dipolar strength (see Fig. \ref{mcfig:Amplitude}),
487 although below a dipolar strength of $\mu^{*} = 20$, the membrane
488 loses dipolar ordering and displays only thermal undulations.
489
490 The ripple phase does {\em not} appear at all values of $\gamma$. We
491 have only observed non-thermal undulations in the range $1.625 <
492 \gamma < 1.875$. Outside this range, the order-disorder transition in
493 the dipoles remains, but the ordered dipolar phase has only thermal
494 undulations. This is one of our strongest pieces of evidence that
495 rippling is a symmetry-breaking phenomenon for triangular and
496 nearly-triangular lattices.
497
498 \subsection{Effects of System Size}
499 To evaluate the effect of finite system size, we have performed a
500 series of simulations on the triangular lattice at a reduced
501 temperature of 122, which is just below the order-disorder transition
502 temperature ($T^{*} = 139$). These conditions are in the
503 dipole-ordered and rippled portion of the phase diagram. These are
504 also the conditions that should be most susceptible to system size
505 effects.
506
507 \begin{figure}
508 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcSystemSize.pdf}
509 \caption[The ripple wavelength and amplitude as a function of system
510 size]{\label{mcfig:systemsize} The ripple wavelength (top) and
511 amplitude (bottom) as a function of system size for a triangular
512 lattice ($\gamma=1.732$) at $T^{*} = 122$.}
513 \end{figure}
514
515 There is substantial dependence on system size for small (less than
516 29~$\sigma$) periodic boxes. Notably, there are resonances apparent
517 in the ripple amplitudes at box lengths of 17.3 and 29.5 $\sigma$.
518 For larger systems, the behavior of the ripples appears to have
519 stabilized and is on a trend to slightly smaller amplitudes (and
520 slightly longer wavelengths) than were observed from the 34.3 $\sigma$
521 box sizes that were used for most of the calculations.
522
523 It is interesting to note that system sizes which are multiples of the
524 default ripple wavelength can enhance the amplitude of the observed
525 ripples, but appears to have only a minor effect on the observed
526 wavelength. It would, of course, be better to use system sizes that
527 were many multiples of the ripple wavelength to be sure that the
528 periodic box is not driving the phenomenon, but at the largest system
529 size studied (70 $\sigma$ $\times$ 70 $\sigma$), the number of dipoles
530 (5440) made long Monte Carlo simulations prohibitively expensive.
531
532 \section{Discussion}
533 \label{mc:sec:discussion}
534
535 We have been able to show that a simple dipolar lattice model which
536 contains only molecular packing (from the lattice), anisotropy (in the
537 form of electrostatic dipoles) and a weak elastic tension (in the form
538 of a nearest-neighbor harmonic potential) is capable of exhibiting
539 stable long-wavelength non-thermal surface corrugations. The best
540 explanation for this behavior is that the ability of the dipoles to
541 translate out of the plane of the membrane is enough to break the
542 symmetry of the triangular lattice and allow the energetic benefit
543 from the formation of a bulk anti-ferroelectric phase. Were the weak
544 elastic tension absent from our model, it would be possible for the
545 entire lattice to ``tilt'' using $z$-translation. Tilting the lattice
546 in this way would yield an effectively non-triangular lattice which
547 would avoid dipolar frustration altogether. With the elastic tension
548 in place, bulk tilt causes a large strain, and the least costly way to
549 release this strain is between two rows of anti-aligned dipoles.
550 These ``breaks'' will result in rippled or sawtooth patterns in the
551 membrane, and allow small stripes of membrane to form
552 anti-ferroelectric regions that are tilted relative to the averaged
553 membrane normal.
554
555 Although the dipole-dipole interaction is the major driving force for
556 the long range orientational ordered state, the formation of the
557 stable, smooth ripples is a result of the competition between the
558 elastic tension and the dipole-dipole interactions. This statement is
559 supported by the variation in $\mu^{*}$. Substantially weaker dipoles
560 relative to the surface tension can cause the corrugated phase to
561 disappear.
562
563 The packing of the dipoles into a nearly-triangular lattice is clearly
564 an important piece of the puzzle. The dipolar head groups of lipid
565 molecules are sterically (as well as electrostatically) anisotropic,
566 and would not pack in triangular arrangements without the steric
567 interference of adjacent molecular bodies. Since we only see rippled
568 phases in the neighborhood of $\gamma=\sqrt{3}$, this implies that
569 even if this dipolar mechanism is the correct explanation for the
570 ripple phase in realistic bilayers, there would still be a role played
571 by the lipid chains in the in-plane organization of the triangularly
572 ordered phases which could support ripples. The present model is
573 certainly not detailed enough to answer exactly what drives the
574 formation of the $P_{\beta'}$ phase in real lipids, but suggests some
575 avenues for further experiments.
576
577 The most important prediction we can make using the results from this
578 simple model is that if dipolar ordering is driving the surface
579 corrugation, the wave vectors for the ripples should always found to
580 be {\it perpendicular} to the dipole director axis. This prediction
581 should suggest experimental designs which test whether this is really
582 true in the phosphatidylcholine $P_{\beta'}$ phases. The dipole
583 director axis should also be easily computable for the all-atom and
584 coarse-grained simulations that have been published in the literature.
585
586 Our other observation about the ripple and dipolar directionality is
587 that the dipole director axis can be found to be parallel to any of
588 the three equivalent lattice vectors in the triangular lattice.
589 Defects in the ordering of the dipoles can cause the dipole director
590 (and consequently the surface corrugation) of small regions to be
591 rotated relative to each other by 120$^{\circ}$. This is a similar
592 behavior to the domain rotation seen in the AFM studies of Kaasgaard
593 {\it et al.}\cite{Kaasgaard03}
594
595 Although our model is simple, it exhibits some rich and unexpected
596 behaviors. It would clearly be a closer approximation to the reality
597 if we allowed greater translational freedom to the dipoles and
598 replaced the somewhat artificial lattice packing and the harmonic
599 elastic tension with more realistic molecular modeling potentials.
600 What we have done is to present a simple model which exhibits bulk
601 non-thermal corrugation, and our explanation of this rippling
602 phenomenon will help us design more accurate molecular models for
603 corrugated membranes and experiments to test whether rippling is
604 dipole-driven or not.