ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/xDissertation/mc.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/xDissertation/mc.tex (file contents):
Revision 3374 by xsun, Thu Mar 20 22:21:43 2008 UTC vs.
Revision 3383 by xsun, Wed Apr 16 21:56:34 2008 UTC

# Line 139 | Line 139 | series of Metropolis Monte Carlo simulations of modera
139   fully populated.
140  
141   To investigate the phase behavior of this model, we have performed a
142 < series of Metropolis Monte Carlo simulations of moderately-sized (34.3
143 < $\sigma$ on a side) patches of membrane hosted on both triangular
144 < ($\gamma = a/b = \sqrt{3}$) and distorted ($\gamma \neq \sqrt{3}$)
145 < lattices.  The linear extent of one edge of the monolayer was $20 a$
146 < and the system was kept roughly square. The average distance that
147 < coplanar dipoles were positioned from their six nearest neighbors was
148 < 1 $\sigma$ (on both triangular and distorted lattices).  Typical
149 < system sizes were 1360 dipoles for the triangular lattices and
142 > series of Me\-trop\-o\-lis Monte Carlo simulations of moderately-sized
143 > (34.3 $\sigma$ on a side) patches of membrane hosted on both
144 > triangular ($\gamma = a/b = \sqrt{3}$) and distorted ($\gamma \neq
145 > \sqrt{3}$) lattices.  The linear extent of one edge of the monolayer
146 > was $20 a$ and the system was kept roughly square. The average
147 > distance that coplanar dipoles were positioned from their six nearest
148 > neighbors was 1 $\sigma$ (on both triangular and distorted lattices).
149 > Typical system sizes were 1360 dipoles for the triangular lattices and
150   840-2800 dipoles for the distorted lattices.  Two-dimensional periodic
151   boundary conditions were used, and the cutoff for the dipole-dipole
152   interaction was set to 4.3 $\sigma$.  This cutoff is roughly 2.5 times
# Line 159 | Line 159 | parameters on the formation of ripple-like phases.
159   methods are computationally expensive,\cite{Spohr97,Yeh99} and are not
160   necessary in this case.  All parameters ($T^{*}$, $\mu^{*}$, and
161   $\gamma$) were varied systematically to study the effects of these
162 < parameters on the formation of ripple-like phases.
162 > parameters on the formation of ripple-like phases. The error bars in
163 > our results are one $\sigma$ on each side of the average values, where
164 > $\sigma$ is the standard deviation obtained from repeated observations
165 > of many configurations.
166  
167   \section{Results and Analysis}
168   \label{mc:sec:results}
# Line 193 | Line 196 | lattices.
196  
197   \begin{figure}
198   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcPhase.pdf}
199 < \caption{\label{mcfig:phase} Top panel: The $P_2$ dipolar order parameter as
200 < a function of temperature for both triangular ($\gamma = 1.732$) and
201 < distorted ($\gamma = 1.875$) lattices.  Bottom Panel: The phase
202 < diagram for the dipolar membrane model.  The line denotes the division
203 < between the dipolar ordered (anti-ferroelectric) and disordered phases.
204 < An enlarged view near the triangular lattice is shown inset.}
199 > \caption[ The $P_2$ dipolar order parameter as
200 > a function of temperature and the phase diagram for the dipolar
201 > membrane model]{\label{mcfig:phase} Top panel: The $P_2$ dipolar order
202 > parameter as a function of temperature for both triangular ($\gamma =
203 > 1.732$) and distorted ($\gamma = 1.875$) lattices.  Bottom Panel: The
204 > phase diagram for the dipolar membrane model.  The line denotes the
205 > division between the dipolar ordered (anti-ferroelectric) and
206 > disordered phases.  An enlarged view near the triangular lattice is
207 > shown inset.}
208   \end{figure}
209  
210   There is a clear order-disorder transition in evidence from this data.
211   Both the triangular and distorted lattices have dipolar-ordered
212 < low-temperature phases, and orientationally-disordered high
212 > low-temperature phases, and ori\-en\-ta\-tion\-al\-ly-disordered high
213   temperature phases.  The coexistence temperature for the triangular
214   lattice is significantly lower than for the distorted lattices, and
215   the bulk polarization is approximately $0$ for both dipolar ordered
# Line 214 | Line 220 | order/disorder phase diagram.  The bottom panel in Fig
220   transition is equally smooth at all system sizes that were studied.
221   Additionally, we have repeated the Monte Carlo simulations over a wide
222   range of lattice ratios ($\gamma$) to generate a dipolar
223 < order/disorder phase diagram.  The bottom panel in Fig. \ref{mcfig:phase}
224 < shows that the triangular lattice is a low-temperature cusp in the
225 < $T^{*}-\gamma$ phase diagram.
223 > order/disorder phase diagram.  The bottom panel in
224 > Fig. \ref{mcfig:phase} shows that the triangular lattice is a
225 > low-temperature cusp in the $T^{*}-\gamma$ phase diagram.
226  
227   This phase diagram is remarkable in that it shows an
228   anti-ferroelectric phase near $\gamma=1.732$ where one would expect
# Line 236 | Line 242 | Fig. \ref{mcfig:snapshot}.
242  
243   \begin{figure}
244   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcSnapshot.pdf}
245 < \caption{\label{mcfig:snapshot} Top and Side views of a representative
245 > \caption[ Top and Side views of a representative
246   configuration for the dipolar ordered phase supported on the
247 < triangular lattice. Note the anti-ferroelectric ordering and the long
248 < wavelength buckling of the membrane.  Dipolar ordering has been
249 < observed in all three equivalent directions on the triangular lattice,
250 < and the ripple direction is always perpendicular to the director axis
251 < for the dipoles.}
247 > triangular lattice]{\label{mcfig:snapshot} Top and Side views of a
248 > representative configuration for the dipolar ordered phase supported
249 > on the triangular lattice. Note the anti-ferroelectric ordering and
250 > the long wavelength buckling of the membrane.  Dipolar ordering has
251 > been observed in all three equivalent directions on the triangular
252 > lattice, and the ripple direction is always perpendicular to the
253 > director axis for the dipoles.}
254   \end{figure}
255  
256   Although the snapshot in Fig. \ref{mcfig:snapshot} gives the appearance
# Line 272 | Line 280 | diagram.
280  
281   \begin{figure}
282   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcHdc.pdf}
283 < \caption{\label{mcfig:CrossCorrelation} Contours of the height-dipole
284 < correlation function as a function of the dot product between the
285 < dipole ($\hat{\mu}$) and inter-dipole separation vector ($\hat{r}$)
286 < and the distance ($r$) between the dipoles.  Perfect height
287 < correlation (contours approaching 1) are present in the ordered phase
288 < when the two dipoles are in the same head-to-tail line.
283 > \caption[Contours of the height-dipole
284 > correlation function]{\label{mcfig:CrossCorrelation} Contours of the
285 > height-dipole correlation function as a function of the dot product
286 > between the dipole ($\hat{\mu}$) and inter-dipole separation vector
287 > ($\hat{r}$) and the distance ($r$) between the dipoles.  Perfect
288 > height correlation (contours approaching 1) are present in the ordered
289 > phase when the two dipoles are in the same head-to-tail line.
290   Anti-correlation (contours below 0) is only seen when the inter-dipole
291   vector is perpendicular to the dipoles.  In the dipole-disordered
292   portion of the phase diagram, there is only weak correlation in the
# Line 369 | Line 378 | are actually seeing a rippled phase developing in this
378  
379   \begin{figure}
380   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcLogFit.pdf}
381 < \caption{\label{mcfig:fit} Evidence that the observed ripples are {\em
382 < not} thermal undulations is obtained from the 2-d Fourier transform
383 < $\langle |h^{*}(\vec{q})|^2 \rangle$ of the height profile ($\langle
384 < h^{*}(x,y) \rangle$). Rippled samples show low-wavelength peaks that
385 < are outliers on the Landau free energy fits by an order of magnitude.
386 < Samples exhibiting only thermal undulations fit Eq. \ref{mceq:fit}
387 < remarkably well.}
381 > \caption[Evidence that the observed ripples are {\em not} thermal
382 > undulations]{\label{mcfig:fit} Evidence that the observed ripples are
383 > {\em not} thermal undulations is obtained from the 2-d Fourier
384 > transform $\langle |h^{*}(\vec{q})|^2 \rangle$ of the height profile
385 > ($\langle h^{*}(x,y) \rangle$). Rippled samples show low-wavelength
386 > peaks that are outliers on the Landau free energy fits by an order of
387 > magnitude.  Samples exhibiting only thermal undulations fit
388 > Eq. \ref{mceq:fit} remarkably well.}
389   \end{figure}
390  
391   \subsection{Effects of Potential Parameters on Amplitude and Wavelength}
# Line 434 | Line 444 | the mean spacing between lipids.
444  
445   \begin{figure}
446   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcProperties_sq.pdf}
447 < \caption{\label{mcfig:Amplitude} a) The amplitude $A^{*}$ of the ripples
448 < vs. temperature for a triangular lattice. b) The amplitude $A^{*}$ of
449 < the ripples vs. dipole strength ($\mu^{*}$) for both the triangular
450 < lattice (circles) and distorted lattice (squares).  The reduced
451 < temperatures were kept fixed at $T^{*} = 94$ for the triangular
452 < lattice and $T^{*} = 106$ for the distorted lattice (approximately 2/3
453 < of the order-disorder transition temperature for each lattice).}
447 > \caption[ The amplitude $A^{*}$ of the ripples
448 > vs. temperature and dipole strength
449 > ($\mu^{*}$)]{\label{mcfig:Amplitude} a) The amplitude $A^{*}$ of the
450 > ripples vs. temperature for a triangular lattice. b) The amplitude
451 > $A^{*}$ of the ripples vs. dipole strength ($\mu^{*}$) for both the
452 > triangular lattice (circles) and distorted lattice (squares).  The
453 > reduced temperatures were kept fixed at $T^{*} = 94$ for the
454 > triangular lattice and $T^{*} = 106$ for the distorted lattice
455 > (approximately 2/3 of the order-disorder transition temperature for
456 > each lattice).}
457   \end{figure}
458  
459   The ripples can be made to disappear by increasing the internal
# Line 493 | Line 506 | effects.
506  
507   \begin{figure}
508   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcSystemSize.pdf}
509 < \caption{\label{mcfig:systemsize} The ripple wavelength (top) and
509 > \caption[The ripple wavelength and amplitude as a function of system
510 > size]{\label{mcfig:systemsize} The ripple wavelength (top) and
511   amplitude (bottom) as a function of system size for a triangular
512   lattice ($\gamma=1.732$) at $T^{*} = 122$.}
513   \end{figure}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines