ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/xDissertation/mc.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/xDissertation/mc.tex (file contents):
Revision 3336 by xsun, Wed Jan 30 16:01:02 2008 UTC vs.
Revision 3362 by xsun, Fri Mar 7 01:53:18 2008 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1 < \chapter{\label{chap:mc}MONTE CARLO}
1 > \chapter{\label{chap:mc}SPONTANEOUS CORRUGATION OF DIPOLAR MEMBRANES}
2 >
3 > \section{Introduction}
4 > \label{mc:sec:Int}
5 >
6 > The properties of polymeric membranes are known to depend sensitively
7 > on the details of the internal interactions between the constituent
8 > monomers.  A flexible membrane will always have a competition between
9 > the energy of curvature and the in-plane stretching energy and will be
10 > able to buckle in certain limits of surface tension and
11 > temperature.\cite{Safran94} The buckling can be non-specific and
12 > centered at dislocation~\cite{Seung1988} or grain-boundary
13 > defects,\cite{Carraro1993} or it can be directional and cause long
14 > ``roof-tile'' or tube-like structures to appear in
15 > partially-polymerized phospholipid vesicles.\cite{Mutz1991}
16 >
17 > One would expect that anisotropic local interactions could lead to
18 > interesting properties of the buckled membrane.  We report here on the
19 > buckling behavior of a membrane composed of harmonically-bound, but
20 > freely-rotating electrostatic dipoles.  The dipoles have strongly
21 > anisotropic local interactions and the membrane exhibits coupling
22 > between the buckling and the long-range ordering of the dipoles.
23 >
24 > Buckling behavior in liquid crystalline and biological membranes is a
25 > well-known phenomenon.  Relatively pure phosphatidylcholine (PC)
26 > bilayers form a corrugated or ``rippled'' phase ($P_{\beta'}$) which
27 > appears as an intermediate phase between the gel ($L_\beta$) and fluid
28 > ($L_{\alpha}$) phases.  The $P_{\beta'}$ phase has attracted
29 > substantial experimental interest over the past 30 years. Most
30 > structural information of the ripple phase has been obtained by the
31 > X-ray diffraction~\cite{Sun96,Katsaras00} and freeze-fracture electron
32 > microscopy (FFEM).~\cite{Copeland80,Meyer96} The X-ray diffraction
33 > work by Katsaras {\it et al.} showed that a rich phase diagram
34 > exhibiting both {\it asymmetric} and {\it symmetric} ripples is
35 > possible for lecithin bilayers.\cite{Katsaras00} Recently, Kaasgaard
36 > {\it et al.} used atomic force microscopy (AFM) to observe ripple
37 > phase morphology in bilayers supported on mica.~\cite{Kaasgaard03} The
38 > experimental results provide strong support for a 2-dimensional
39 > triangular packing lattice of the lipid molecules within the ripple
40 > phase.  This is a notable change from the observed lipid packing
41 > within the gel phase,~\cite{Cevc87} although Tenchov {\it et al.} have
42 > recently observed near-hexagonal packing in some phosphatidylcholine
43 > (PC) gel phases.~\cite{Tenchov2001} There have been a number of
44 > theoretical
45 > approaches~\cite{Marder84,Carlson87,Goldstein88,McCullough90,Lubensky93,Misbah98,Heimburg00,Kubica02,Bannerjee02}
46 > (and some heroic
47 > simulations~\cite{Ayton02,Jiang04,Brannigan04a,deVries05,deJoannis06})
48 > undertaken to try to explain this phase, but to date, none have looked
49 > specifically at the contribution of the dipolar character of the lipid
50 > head groups towards this corrugation.  Lipid chain interdigitation
51 > certainly plays a major role, and the structures of the ripple phase
52 > are highly ordered.  The model we investigate here lacks chain
53 > interdigitation (as well as the chains themselves!) and will not be
54 > detailed enough to rule in favor of (or against) any of these
55 > explanations for the $P_{\beta'}$ phase.
56 >
57 > Membranes containing electrostatic dipoles can also exhibit the
58 > flexoelectric effect,\cite{Todorova2004,Harden2006,Petrov2006} which
59 > is the ability of mechanical deformations to result in electrostatic
60 > organization of the membrane.  This phenomenon is a curvature-induced
61 > membrane polarization which can lead to potential differences across a
62 > membrane.  Reverse flexoelectric behavior (in which applied currents
63 > effect membrane curvature) has also been observed.  Explanations of
64 > the details of these effects have typically utilized membrane
65 > polarization perpendicular to the face of the
66 > membrane,\cite{Petrov2006} and the effect has been observed in both
67 > biological,\cite{Raphael2000} bent-core liquid
68 > crystalline,\cite{Harden2006} and polymer-dispersed liquid crystalline
69 > membranes.\cite{Todorova2004}
70 >
71 > The problem with using atomistic and even coarse-grained approaches to
72 > study membrane buckling phenomena is that only a relatively small
73 > number of periods of the corrugation (i.e. one or two) can be
74 > realistically simulated given current technology.  Also, simulations
75 > of lipid bilayers are traditionally carried out with periodic boundary
76 > conditions in two or three dimensions and these have the potential to
77 > enhance the periodicity of the system at that wavelength.  To avoid
78 > this pitfall, we are using a model which allows us to have
79 > sufficiently large systems so that we are not causing artificial
80 > corrugation through the use of periodic boundary conditions.
81 >
82 > The simplest dipolar membrane is one in which the dipoles are located
83 > on fixed lattice sites. Ferroelectric states (with long-range dipolar
84 > order) can be observed in dipolar systems with non-triangular
85 > packings.  However, {\em triangularly}-packed 2-D dipolar systems are
86 > inherently frustrated and one would expect a dipolar-disordered phase
87 > to be the lowest free energy
88 > configuration.\cite{Toulouse1977,Marland1979} Dipolar lattices already
89 > have rich phase behavior, but in order to allow the membrane to
90 > buckle, a single degree of freedom (translation normal to the membrane
91 > face) must be added to each of the dipoles.  It would also be possible
92 > to allow complete translational freedom.  This approach
93 > is similar in character to a number of elastic Ising models that have
94 > been developed to explain interesting mechanical properties in
95 > magnetic alloys.\cite{Renard1966,Zhu2005,Zhu2006,Jiang2006}
96 >
97 > What we present here is an attempt to find the simplest dipolar model
98 > which will exhibit buckling behavior.  We are using a modified XYZ
99 > lattice model; details of the model can be found in section
100 > \ref{mc:sec:model}, results of Monte Carlo simulations using this model
101 > are presented in section
102 > \ref{mc:sec:results}, and section \ref{mc:sec:discussion} contains our conclusions.
103 >
104 > \section{2-D Dipolar Membrane}
105 > \label{mc:sec:model}
106 >
107 > The point of developing this model was to arrive at the simplest
108 > possible theoretical model which could exhibit spontaneous corrugation
109 > of a two-dimensional dipolar medium.  Since molecules in polymerized
110 > membranes and in the $P_{\beta'}$ ripple phase have limited
111 > translational freedom, we have chosen a lattice to support the dipoles
112 > in the x-y plane.  The lattice may be either triangular (lattice
113 > constants $a/b =
114 > \sqrt{3}$) or distorted.  However, each dipole has 3 degrees of
115 > freedom.  They may move freely {\em out} of the x-y plane (along the
116 > $z$ axis), and they have complete orientational freedom ($0 <= \theta
117 > <= \pi$, $0 <= \phi < 2
118 > \pi$).  This is essentially a modified X-Y-Z model with translational
119 > freedom along the z-axis.
120 >
121 > The potential energy of the system,
122 > \begin{equation}
123 > \begin{split}
124 > V = \sum_i  &\left( \sum_{j>i} \frac{|\mu|^2}{4\pi \epsilon_0 r_{ij}^3} \left[
125 > {\mathbf{\hat u}_i} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat u}_j} -
126 > 3({\mathbf{\hat u}_i} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat
127 > r}_{ij}})({\mathbf{\hat u}_j} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}})\right] \right. \\
128 >  & \left. + \sum_{j \in NN_i}^6 \frac{k_r}{2}\left(
129 > r_{ij}-\sigma \right)^2 \right)
130 > \end{split}
131 > \label{mceq:pot}
132 > \end{equation}
133 >
134 > In this potential, $\mathbf{\hat u}_i$ is the unit vector pointing
135 > along dipole $i$ and $\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}$ is the unit vector
136 > pointing along the inter-dipole vector $\mathbf{r}_{ij}$.  The entire
137 > potential is governed by three parameters, the dipolar strength
138 > ($\mu$), the harmonic spring constant ($k_r$) and the preferred
139 > intermolecular spacing ($\sigma$).  In practice, we set the value of
140 > $\sigma$ to the average inter-molecular spacing from the planar
141 > lattice, yielding a potential model that has only two parameters for a
142 > particular choice of lattice constants $a$ (along the $x$-axis) and
143 > $b$ (along the $y$-axis).  We also define a set of reduced parameters
144 > based on the length scale ($\sigma$) and the energy of the harmonic
145 > potential at a deformation of 2 $\sigma$ ($\epsilon = k_r \sigma^2 /
146 > 2$).  Using these two constants, we perform our calculations using
147 > reduced distances, ($r^{*} = r / \sigma$), temperatures ($T^{*} = 2
148 > k_B T / k_r \sigma^2$), densities ($\rho^{*} = N \sigma^2 / L_x L_y$),
149 > and dipole moments ($\mu^{*} = \mu / \sqrt{4 \pi \epsilon_0 \sigma^5
150 > k_r / 2}$).  It should be noted that the density ($\rho^{*}$) depends
151 > only on the mean particle spacing in the $x-y$ plane; the lattice is
152 > fully populated.
153 >
154 > To investigate the phase behavior of this model, we have performed a
155 > series of Metropolis Monte Carlo simulations of moderately-sized (34.3
156 > $\sigma$ on a side) patches of membrane hosted on both triangular
157 > ($\gamma = a/b = \sqrt{3}$) and distorted ($\gamma \neq \sqrt{3}$)
158 > lattices.  The linear extent of one edge of the monolayer was $20 a$
159 > and the system was kept roughly square. The average distance that
160 > coplanar dipoles were positioned from their six nearest neighbors was
161 > 1 $\sigma$ (on both triangular and distorted lattices).  Typical
162 > system sizes were 1360 dipoles for the triangular lattices and
163 > 840-2800 dipoles for the distorted lattices.  Two-dimensional periodic
164 > boundary conditions were used, and the cutoff for the dipole-dipole
165 > interaction was set to 4.3 $\sigma$.  This cutoff is roughly 2.5 times
166 > the typical real-space electrostatic cutoff for molecular systems.
167 > Since dipole-dipole interactions decay rapidly with distance, and
168 > since the intrinsic three-dimensional periodicity of the Ewald sum can
169 > give artifacts in 2-d systems, we have chosen not to use it in these
170 > calculations.  Although the Ewald sum has been reformulated to handle
171 > 2-D systems,\cite{Parry75,Parry76,Heyes77,deLeeuw79,Rhee89} these
172 > methods are computationally expensive,\cite{Spohr97,Yeh99} and are not
173 > necessary in this case.  All parameters ($T^{*}$, $\mu^{*}$, and
174 > $\gamma$) were varied systematically to study the effects of these
175 > parameters on the formation of ripple-like phases.
176 >
177 > \section{Results and Analysis}
178 > \label{mc:sec:results}
179 >
180 > \subsection{Dipolar Ordering and Coexistence Temperatures}
181 > The principal method for observing the orientational ordering
182 > transition in dipolar or liquid crystalline systems is the $P_2$ order
183 > parameter (defined as $1.5 \times \lambda_{max}$, where
184 > $\lambda_{max}$ is the largest eigenvalue of the matrix,
185 > \begin{equation}
186 > {\mathsf{S}} = \frac{1}{N} \sum_i \left(
187 > \begin{array}{ccc}
188 >        u^{x}_i u^{x}_i-\frac{1}{3} & u^{x}_i u^{y}_i & u^{x}_i u^{z}_i \\
189 >        u^{y}_i u^{x}_i  & u^{y}_i u^{y}_i -\frac{1}{3} & u^{y}_i u^{z}_i \\
190 >        u^{z}_i u^{x}_i & u^{z}_i u^{y}_i  & u^{z}_i u^{z}_i -\frac{1}{3}
191 > \end{array} \right).
192 > \label{mceq:opmatrix}
193 > \end{equation}
194 > Here $u^{\alpha}_i$ is the $\alpha=x,y,z$ component of the unit vector
195 > for dipole $i$.  $P_2$ will be $1.0$ for a perfectly-ordered system
196 > and near $0$ for a randomized system.  Note that this order parameter
197 > is {\em not} equal to the polarization of the system.  For example,
198 > the polarization of the perfect anti-ferroelectric system is $0$, but
199 > $P_2$ for an anti-ferroelectric system is $1$.  The eigenvector of
200 > $\mathsf{S}$ corresponding to the largest eigenvalue is familiar as
201 > the director axis, which can be used to determine a privileged dipolar
202 > axis for dipole-ordered systems.  The top panel in Fig. \ref{mcfig:phase}
203 > shows the values of $P_2$ as a function of temperature for both
204 > triangular ($\gamma = 1.732$) and distorted ($\gamma=1.875$)
205 > lattices.
206 >
207 > \begin{figure}
208 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcPhase.pdf}
209 > \caption{\label{mcfig:phase} Top panel: The $P_2$ dipolar order parameter as
210 > a function of temperature for both triangular ($\gamma = 1.732$) and
211 > distorted ($\gamma = 1.875$) lattices.  Bottom Panel: The phase
212 > diagram for the dipolar membrane model.  The line denotes the division
213 > between the dipolar ordered (anti-ferroelectric) and disordered phases.
214 > An enlarged view near the triangular lattice is shown inset.}
215 > \end{figure}
216 >
217 > There is a clear order-disorder transition in evidence from this data.
218 > Both the triangular and distorted lattices have dipolar-ordered
219 > low-temperature phases, and orientationally-disordered high
220 > temperature phases.  The coexistence temperature for the triangular
221 > lattice is significantly lower than for the distorted lattices, and
222 > the bulk polarization is approximately $0$ for both dipolar ordered
223 > and disordered phases.  This gives strong evidence that the dipolar
224 > ordered phase is anti-ferroelectric.  We have verified that this
225 > dipolar ordering transition is not a function of system size by
226 > performing identical calculations with systems twice as large.  The
227 > transition is equally smooth at all system sizes that were studied.
228 > Additionally, we have repeated the Monte Carlo simulations over a wide
229 > range of lattice ratios ($\gamma$) to generate a dipolar
230 > order/disorder phase diagram.  The bottom panel in Fig. \ref{mcfig:phase}
231 > shows that the triangular lattice is a low-temperature cusp in the
232 > $T^{*}-\gamma$ phase diagram.
233 >
234 > This phase diagram is remarkable in that it shows an
235 > anti-ferroelectric phase near $\gamma=1.732$ where one would expect
236 > lattice frustration to result in disordered phases at all
237 > temperatures.  Observations of the configurations in this phase show
238 > clearly that the system has accomplished dipolar ordering by forming
239 > large ripple-like structures.  We have observed anti-ferroelectric
240 > ordering in all three of the equivalent directions on the triangular
241 > lattice, and the dipoles have been observed to organize perpendicular
242 > to the membrane normal (in the plane of the membrane).  It is
243 > particularly interesting to note that the ripple-like structures have
244 > also been observed to propagate in the three equivalent directions on
245 > the lattice, but the {\em direction of ripple propagation is always
246 > perpendicular to the dipole director axis}.  A snapshot of a typical
247 > anti-ferroelectric rippled structure is shown in
248 > Fig. \ref{mcfig:snapshot}.
249 >
250 > \begin{figure}
251 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcSnapshot.pdf}
252 > \caption{\label{mcfig:snapshot} Top and Side views of a representative
253 > configuration for the dipolar ordered phase supported on the
254 > triangular lattice. Note the anti-ferroelectric ordering and the long
255 > wavelength buckling of the membrane.  Dipolar ordering has been
256 > observed in all three equivalent directions on the triangular lattice,
257 > and the ripple direction is always perpendicular to the director axis
258 > for the dipoles.}
259 > \end{figure}
260 >
261 > Although the snapshot in Fig. \ref{mcfig:snapshot} gives the appearance
262 > of three-row stair-like structures, these appear to be transient.  On
263 > average, the corrugation of the membrane is a relatively smooth,
264 > long-wavelength phenomenon, with occasional steep drops between
265 > adjacent lines of anti-aligned dipoles.
266 >
267 > The height-dipole correlation function ($C_{\textrm{hd}}(r, \cos
268 > \theta)$) makes the connection between dipolar ordering and the wave
269 > vector of the ripple even more explicit.  $C_{\textrm{hd}}(r, \cos
270 > \theta)$ is an angle-dependent pair distribution function. The angle
271 > ($\theta$) is the angle between the intermolecular vector
272 > $\vec{r}_{ij}$ and direction of dipole $i$,
273 > \begin{equation}
274 > C_{\textrm{hd}} = \frac{\langle \frac{1}{n(r)} \sum_{i}\sum_{j>i}
275 > h_i \cdot h_j \delta(r - r_{ij}) \delta(\cos \theta_{ij} -
276 > \cos \theta)\rangle} {\langle h^2 \rangle}
277 > \end{equation}
278 > where $\cos \theta_{ij} = \hat{\mu}_{i} \cdot \hat{r}_{ij}$ and
279 > $\hat{r}_{ij} = \vec{r}_{ij} / r_{ij}$.  $n(r)$ is the number of
280 > dipoles found in a cylindrical shell between $r$ and $r+\delta r$ of
281 > the central particle. Fig. \ref{mcfig:CrossCorrelation} shows contours
282 > of this correlation function for both anti-ferroelectric, rippled
283 > membranes as well as for the dipole-disordered portion of the phase
284 > diagram.
285 >
286 > \begin{figure}
287 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcHdc.pdf}
288 > \caption{\label{mcfig:CrossCorrelation} Contours of the height-dipole
289 > correlation function as a function of the dot product between the
290 > dipole ($\hat{\mu}$) and inter-dipole separation vector ($\hat{r}$)
291 > and the distance ($r$) between the dipoles.  Perfect height
292 > correlation (contours approaching 1) are present in the ordered phase
293 > when the two dipoles are in the same head-to-tail line.
294 > Anti-correlation (contours below 0) is only seen when the inter-dipole
295 > vector is perpendicular to the dipoles.  In the dipole-disordered
296 > portion of the phase diagram, there is only weak correlation in the
297 > dipole direction and this correlation decays rapidly to zero for
298 > intermolecular vectors that are not dipole-aligned.}
299 > \end{figure}
300 >
301 > The height-dipole correlation function gives a map of how the topology
302 > of the membrane surface varies with angular deviation around a given
303 > dipole.  The upper panel of Fig. \ref{mcfig:CrossCorrelation} shows that
304 > in the anti-ferroelectric phase, the dipole heights are strongly
305 > correlated for dipoles in head-to-tail arrangements, and this
306 > correlation persists for very long distances (up to 15 $\sigma$).  For
307 > portions of the membrane located perpendicular to a given dipole, the
308 > membrane height becomes anti-correlated at distances of 10 $\sigma$.
309 > The correlation function is relatively smooth; there are no steep
310 > jumps or steps, so the stair-like structures in
311 > Fig. \ref{mcfig:snapshot} are indeed transient and disappear when
312 > averaged over many configurations.  In the dipole-disordered phase,
313 > the height-dipole correlation function is relatively flat (and hovers
314 > near zero).  The only significant height correlations are for axial
315 > dipoles at very short distances ($r \approx
316 > \sigma$).
317 >
318 > \subsection{Discriminating Ripples from Thermal Undulations}
319 >
320 > In order to be sure that the structures we have observed are actually
321 > a rippled phase and not simply thermal undulations, we have computed
322 > the undulation spectrum,
323 > \begin{equation}
324 > h(\vec{q}) = A^{-1/2} \int d\vec{r}
325 > h(\vec{r}) e^{-i \vec{q}\cdot\vec{r}}
326 > \end{equation}
327 > where $h(\vec{r})$ is the height of the membrane at location $\vec{r}
328 > = (x,y)$.~\cite{Safran94,Seifert97} In simple (and more complicated)
329 > elastic continuum models, it can shown that in the $NVT$ ensemble, the
330 > absolute value of the undulation spectrum can be written,
331 > \begin{equation}
332 > \langle | h(q) |^2 \rangle_{NVT} = \frac{k_B T}{k_c q^4 +
333 > \gamma q^2},
334 > \label{mceq:fit}
335 > \end{equation}
336 > where $k_c$ is the bending modulus for the membrane, and $\gamma$ is
337 > the mechanical surface tension.~\cite{Safran94} The systems studied in
338 > this paper have essentially zero bending moduli ($k_c$) and relatively
339 > large mechanical surface tensions ($\gamma$), so a much simpler form
340 > can be written,
341 > \begin{equation}
342 > \langle | h(q) |^2 \rangle_{NVT} = \frac{k_B T}{\gamma q^2}.
343 > \label{mceq:fit2}
344 > \end{equation}
345 >
346 > The undulation spectrum is computed by superimposing a rectangular
347 > grid on top of the membrane, and by assigning height ($h(\vec{r})$)
348 > values to the grid from the average of all dipoles that fall within a
349 > given $\vec{r}+d\vec{r}$ grid area.  Empty grid pixels are assigned
350 > height values by interpolation from the nearest neighbor pixels.  A
351 > standard 2-d Fourier transform is then used to obtain $\langle |
352 > h(q)|^2 \rangle$.  Alternatively, since the dipoles sit on a Bravais
353 > lattice, one could use the heights of the lattice points themselves as
354 > the grid for the Fourier transform (without interpolating to a square
355 > grid).  However, if lateral translational freedom is added to this
356 > model (a likely extension), an interpolated grid method for computing
357 > undulation spectra will be required.
358 >
359 > As mentioned above, the best fits to our undulation spectra are
360 > obtained by setting the value of $k_c$ to 0.  In Fig. \ref{mcfig:fit} we
361 > show typical undulation spectra for two different regions of the phase
362 > diagram along with their fits from the Landau free energy approach
363 > (Eq. \ref{mceq:fit2}).  In the high-temperature disordered phase, the
364 > Landau fits can be nearly perfect, and from these fits we can estimate
365 > the tension in the surface.  In reduced units, typical values of
366 > $\gamma^{*} = \gamma / \epsilon = 2500$ are obtained for the
367 > disordered phase ($\gamma^{*} = 2551.7$ in the top panel of
368 > Fig. \ref{mcfig:fit}).
369 >
370 > Typical values of $\gamma^{*}$ in the dipolar-ordered phase are much
371 > higher than in the dipolar-disordered phase ($\gamma^{*} = 73,538$ in
372 > the lower panel of Fig. \ref{mcfig:fit}).  For the dipolar-ordered
373 > triangular lattice near the coexistence temperature, we also observe
374 > long wavelength undulations that are far outliers to the fits.  That
375 > is, the Landau free energy fits are well within error bars for most of
376 > the other points, but can be off by {\em orders of magnitude} for a
377 > few low frequency components.
378 >
379 > We interpret these outliers as evidence that these low frequency modes
380 > are {\em non-thermal undulations}.  We take this as evidence that we
381 > are actually seeing a rippled phase developing in this model system.
382 >
383 > \begin{figure}
384 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcLogFit.pdf}
385 > \caption{\label{mcfig:fit} Evidence that the observed ripples are {\em
386 > not} thermal undulations is obtained from the 2-d Fourier transform
387 > $\langle |h^{*}(\vec{q})|^2 \rangle$ of the height profile ($\langle
388 > h^{*}(x,y) \rangle$). Rippled samples show low-wavelength peaks that
389 > are outliers on the Landau free energy fits by an order of magnitude.
390 > Samples exhibiting only thermal undulations fit Eq. \ref{mceq:fit}
391 > remarkably well.}
392 > \end{figure}
393 >
394 > \subsection{Effects of Potential Parameters on Amplitude and Wavelength}
395 >
396 > We have used two different methods to estimate the amplitude and
397 > periodicity of the ripples.  The first method requires projection of
398 > the ripples onto a one dimensional rippling axis. Since the rippling
399 > is always perpendicular to the dipole director axis, we can define a
400 > ripple vector as follows.  The largest eigenvector, $s_1$, of the
401 > $\mathsf{S}$ matrix in Eq. \ref{mceq:opmatrix} is projected onto a
402 > planar director axis,
403 > \begin{equation}
404 > \vec{d} = \left(\begin{array}{c}
405 > \vec{s}_1 \cdot \hat{i} \\
406 > \vec{s}_1 \cdot \hat{j} \\
407 > 0
408 > \end{array} \right).
409 > \end{equation}
410 > ($\hat{i}$, $\hat{j}$ and $\hat{k}$ are unit vectors along the $x$,
411 > $y$, and $z$ axes, respectively.)  The rippling axis is in the plane of
412 > the membrane and is perpendicular to the planar director axis,
413 > \begin{equation}
414 > \vec{q}_{\mathrm{rip}} = \vec{d} \times \hat{k}
415 > \end{equation}
416 > We can then find the height profile of the membrane along the ripple
417 > axis by projecting heights of the dipoles to obtain a one-dimensional
418 > height profile, $h(q_{\mathrm{rip}})$. Ripple wavelengths can be
419 > estimated from the largest non-thermal low-frequency component in the
420 > Fourier transform of $h(q_{\mathrm{rip}})$.  Amplitudes can be
421 > estimated by measuring peak-to-trough distances in
422 > $h(q_{\mathrm{rip}})$ itself.
423 >
424 > A second, more accurate, and simpler method for estimating ripple
425 > shape is to extract the wavelength and height information directly
426 > from the largest non-thermal peak in the undulation spectrum.  For
427 > large-amplitude ripples, the two methods give similar results.  The
428 > one-dimensional projection method is more prone to noise (particularly
429 > in the amplitude estimates for the distorted lattices).  We report
430 > amplitudes and wavelengths taken directly from the undulation spectrum
431 > below.
432 >
433 > In the triangular lattice ($\gamma = \sqrt{3}$), the rippling is
434 > observed for temperatures ($T^{*}$) from $61-122$.  The wavelength of
435 > the ripples is remarkably stable at 21.4~$\sigma$ for all but the
436 > temperatures closest to the order-disorder transition.  At $T^{*} =
437 > 122$, the wavelength drops to 17.1~$\sigma$.
438 >
439 > The dependence of the amplitude on temperature is shown in the top
440 > panel of Fig. \ref{mcfig:Amplitude}.  The rippled structures shrink
441 > smoothly as the temperature rises towards the order-disorder
442 > transition.  The wavelengths and amplitudes we observe are
443 > surprisingly close to the $\Lambda / 2$ phase observed by Kaasgaard
444 > {\it et al.} in their work on PC-based lipids.\cite{Kaasgaard03}
445 > However, this is coincidental agreement based on a choice of 7~\AA~as
446 > the mean spacing between lipids.
447 >
448 > \begin{figure}
449 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcProperties_sq.pdf}
450 > \caption{\label{mcfig:Amplitude} a) The amplitude $A^{*}$ of the ripples
451 > vs. temperature for a triangular lattice. b) The amplitude $A^{*}$ of
452 > the ripples vs. dipole strength ($\mu^{*}$) for both the triangular
453 > lattice (circles) and distorted lattice (squares).  The reduced
454 > temperatures were kept fixed at $T^{*} = 94$ for the triangular
455 > lattice and $T^{*} = 106$ for the distorted lattice (approximately 2/3
456 > of the order-disorder transition temperature for each lattice).}
457 > \end{figure}
458 >
459 > The ripples can be made to disappear by increasing the internal
460 > elastic tension (i.e. by increasing $k_r$ or equivalently, reducing
461 > the dipole moment).  The amplitude of the ripples depends critically
462 > on the strength of the dipole moments ($\mu^{*}$) in Eq. \ref{mceq:pot}.
463 > If the dipoles are weakened substantially (below $\mu^{*}$ = 20) at a
464 > fixed temperature of 94, the membrane loses dipolar ordering
465 > and the ripple structures. The ripples reach a peak amplitude of
466 > 3.7~$\sigma$ at a dipolar strength of 25.  We show the dependence
467 > of ripple amplitude on the dipolar strength in
468 > Fig. \ref{mcfig:Amplitude}.
469 >
470 > \subsection{Distorted lattices}
471 >
472 > We have also investigated the effect of the lattice geometry by
473 > changing the ratio of lattice constants ($\gamma$) while keeping the
474 > average nearest-neighbor spacing constant. The anti-ferroelectric state
475 > is accessible for all $\gamma$ values we have used, although the
476 > distorted triangular lattices prefer a particular director axis due to
477 > the anisotropy of the lattice.
478 >
479 > Our observation of rippling behavior was not limited to the triangular
480 > lattices.  In distorted lattices the anti-ferroelectric phase can
481 > develop nearly instantaneously in the Monte Carlo simulations, and
482 > these dipolar-ordered phases tend to be remarkably flat.  Whenever
483 > rippling has been observed in these distorted lattices
484 > (e.g. $\gamma = 1.875$), we see relatively short ripple wavelengths
485 > (14 $\sigma$) and amplitudes of 2.4~$\sigma$.  These ripples are
486 > weakly dependent on dipolar strength (see Fig. \ref{mcfig:Amplitude}),
487 > although below a dipolar strength of $\mu^{*} = 20$, the membrane
488 > loses dipolar ordering and displays only thermal undulations.
489 >
490 > The ripple phase does {\em not} appear at all values of $\gamma$.  We
491 > have only observed non-thermal undulations in the range $1.625 <
492 > \gamma < 1.875$.  Outside this range, the order-disorder transition in
493 > the dipoles remains, but the ordered dipolar phase has only thermal
494 > undulations.  This is one of our strongest pieces of evidence that
495 > rippling is a symmetry-breaking phenomenon for triangular and
496 > nearly-triangular lattices.
497 >
498 > \subsection{Effects of System Size}
499 > To evaluate the effect of finite system size, we have performed a
500 > series of simulations on the triangular lattice at a reduced
501 > temperature of 122, which is just below the order-disorder transition
502 > temperature ($T^{*} = 139$).  These conditions are in the
503 > dipole-ordered and rippled portion of the phase diagram.  These are
504 > also the conditions that should be most susceptible to system size
505 > effects.
506 >
507 > \begin{figure}
508 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcSystemSize.pdf}
509 > \caption{\label{mcfig:systemsize} The ripple wavelength (top) and
510 > amplitude (bottom) as a function of system size for a triangular
511 > lattice ($\gamma=1.732$) at $T^{*} = 122$.}
512 > \end{figure}
513 >
514 > There is substantial dependence on system size for small (less than
515 > 29~$\sigma$) periodic boxes.  Notably, there are resonances apparent
516 > in the ripple amplitudes at box lengths of 17.3 and 29.5 $\sigma$.
517 > For larger systems, the behavior of the ripples appears to have
518 > stabilized and is on a trend to slightly smaller amplitudes (and
519 > slightly longer wavelengths) than were observed from the 34.3 $\sigma$
520 > box sizes that were used for most of the calculations.
521 >
522 > It is interesting to note that system sizes which are multiples of the
523 > default ripple wavelength can enhance the amplitude of the observed
524 > ripples, but appears to have only a minor effect on the observed
525 > wavelength.  It would, of course, be better to use system sizes that
526 > were many multiples of the ripple wavelength to be sure that the
527 > periodic box is not driving the phenomenon, but at the largest system
528 > size studied (70 $\sigma$ $\times$ 70 $\sigma$), the number of dipoles
529 > (5440) made long Monte Carlo simulations prohibitively expensive.
530 >
531 > \section{Discussion}
532 > \label{mc:sec:discussion}
533 >
534 > We have been able to show that a simple dipolar lattice model which
535 > contains only molecular packing (from the lattice), anisotropy (in the
536 > form of electrostatic dipoles) and a weak elastic tension (in the form
537 > of a nearest-neighbor harmonic potential) is capable of exhibiting
538 > stable long-wavelength non-thermal surface corrugations.  The best
539 > explanation for this behavior is that the ability of the dipoles to
540 > translate out of the plane of the membrane is enough to break the
541 > symmetry of the triangular lattice and allow the energetic benefit
542 > from the formation of a bulk anti-ferroelectric phase.  Were the weak
543 > elastic tension absent from our model, it would be possible for the
544 > entire lattice to ``tilt'' using $z$-translation.  Tilting the lattice
545 > in this way would yield an effectively non-triangular lattice which
546 > would avoid dipolar frustration altogether.  With the elastic tension
547 > in place, bulk tilt causes a large strain, and the least costly way to
548 > release this strain is between two rows of anti-aligned dipoles.
549 > These ``breaks'' will result in rippled or sawtooth patterns in the
550 > membrane, and allow small stripes of membrane to form
551 > anti-ferroelectric regions that are tilted relative to the averaged
552 > membrane normal.
553 >
554 > Although the dipole-dipole interaction is the major driving force for
555 > the long range orientational ordered state, the formation of the
556 > stable, smooth ripples is a result of the competition between the
557 > elastic tension and the dipole-dipole interactions.  This statement is
558 > supported by the variation in $\mu^{*}$.  Substantially weaker dipoles
559 > relative to the surface tension can cause the corrugated phase to
560 > disappear.
561 >
562 > The packing of the dipoles into a nearly-triangular lattice is clearly
563 > an important piece of the puzzle.  The dipolar head groups of lipid
564 > molecules are sterically (as well as electrostatically) anisotropic,
565 > and would not pack in triangular arrangements without the steric
566 > interference of adjacent molecular bodies.  Since we only see rippled
567 > phases in the neighborhood of $\gamma=\sqrt{3}$, this implies that
568 > even if this dipolar mechanism is the correct explanation for the
569 > ripple phase in realistic bilayers, there would still be a role played
570 > by the lipid chains in the in-plane organization of the triangularly
571 > ordered phases which could support ripples.  The present model is
572 > certainly not detailed enough to answer exactly what drives the
573 > formation of the $P_{\beta'}$ phase in real lipids, but suggests some
574 > avenues for further experiments.
575 >
576 > The most important prediction we can make using the results from this
577 > simple model is that if dipolar ordering is driving the surface
578 > corrugation, the wave vectors for the ripples should always found to
579 > be {\it perpendicular} to the dipole director axis.  This prediction
580 > should suggest experimental designs which test whether this is really
581 > true in the phosphatidylcholine $P_{\beta'}$ phases.  The dipole
582 > director axis should also be easily computable for the all-atom and
583 > coarse-grained simulations that have been published in the literature.
584 >
585 > Our other observation about the ripple and dipolar directionality is
586 > that the dipole director axis can be found to be parallel to any of
587 > the three equivalent lattice vectors in the triangular lattice.
588 > Defects in the ordering of the dipoles can cause the dipole director
589 > (and consequently the surface corrugation) of small regions to be
590 > rotated relative to each other by 120$^{\circ}$.  This is a similar
591 > behavior to the domain rotation seen in the AFM studies of Kaasgaard
592 > {\it et al.}\cite{Kaasgaard03}  
593 >
594 > Although our model is simple, it exhibits some rich and unexpected
595 > behaviors.  It would clearly be a closer approximation to the reality
596 > if we allowed greater translational freedom to the dipoles and
597 > replaced the somewhat artificial lattice packing and the harmonic
598 > elastic tension with more realistic molecular modeling potentials.
599 > What we have done is to present a simple model which exhibits bulk
600 > non-thermal corrugation, and our explanation of this rippling
601 > phenomenon will help us design more accurate molecular models for
602 > corrugated membranes and experiments to test whether rippling is
603 > dipole-driven or not.

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines